Quran's STUNNING Divine Miracles: [1] Allah Almighty also promised in several Divine Prophecies that He will show the Glorious Quran's Miracles to mankind: 1- The root letters for "message" and all of its derivatives occur 513 times throughout the Glorious Quran. Yet, all Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty Alone, the Prophets' and Messengers' actual names (Muhammad, Moses, Noah, Abraham, Lot etc....) were also all mentioned 513 times in the Glorious Quran. The detailed breakdown of all of this is thoroughly listed here. This Miracle is covered in 100s (hundreds) of Noble Verses.2- Allah Almighty said that Prophet Noah lived for 950 years. Yet, all Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty Alone, the entire Noble Surah (chapter Noah) is exactly written in 950 Letters. You can thoroughly see the accurate count in the scanned images.Coincidence? See 1,000s of examples [1]. Quran's Stunning Numerical & Scientific Miracles. |
What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube
Quennel
Gale: A typical desperate Christian tries to
respond but he fails
By Ahmed Eldin
Gale, the
desperate
Christian attempted to respond me on the topic “Does being called
"Kyrios" really imply Deity?” you can find his
refutation here:
The
type
that I am going to refute and make him more desperate is that I will
respond to
his responses in order not to full the text and make it hard for the
reader to
understand. So I advice first to read his pathetic response to me and
then read
my response.
Answering
his first response:
This
desperate Christian fails to realize that I am talking about the word
“Lord” in
the context of what Jesus said about himself, not in an Islamic
context. It is
obvious that this Christian kid cannot defend the issue of the
“Lord” and he is
attacking to me describing me an ignorant Muslim that I do not know
about the
context of the word “Lord” in the Quran, indeed
very funny. If Gale accepts
Jesus as Lord and from that concludes that he is his god then he must
accept as
his gods other biblical prophets because they are described also as
lords. Gale
continues barking by saying that these prophets are called lords in a
different
context not in a deity like Jesus. I am asking “so
what”? Are they not called
Lords?. The context of Jesus lordship must be analyzed from his own
words not
by others, especially not from the antichrist Paul who corrupted the
true
teachings of Jesus. I wonder why this kid Gale did not refute the links
that I
posted about this false Apostle. Read:
http://islamic-answers.com/jesus__words_only
http://l.b5z.net/i/u/6053592/i/Pauline_Corruption_of_Biblical_Analysis.pdf (a must read)
http://l.b5z.net/i/u/6053592/i/Jude_s_Epistle__More_Evidence_of_Rift_Between_
Jerusalem_and_Paul__.pdf
http://l.b5z.net/i/u/6053592/i/Was_Paul_or_James__Church_the_more_succesfull_Evangelist.pdf
http://islamic-answers.com/jesus_or_paul_____audio_lecture_
http://islamic-answers.com/christianity
But
also
we must not forget what Paul himself said about himself.
But
be it
so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I
caught you with
guile.( 2 Corinthians
This
antichrist also said:
For
if the
truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto
his glory; why yet
am I also judged as a sinner? (Romans 3:7)
Yes,
you
are a sinner and a liar.
So
how can
we trust this man? Gale uses the words of Sam Shamoun by saying:
It isn’t merely the fact that Jesus is addressed as Kurios that leads Christians to believe he is Yahweh, BUT IN THE MANNER in which the NT writers use this Greek word for Christ that leads them to this conclusion. (http://www../Shamoun/q_jesus_kurios.htm)
As
I said I
do not care how Paul described Jesus, but I care what Jesus said about
himself.
Jesus never presented himself as God. In addition, I challenge this kid
Gale to
present me words from Jesus that says that he is God. Only Paul
describes Jesus
as God. And again he only tries to describes him as god, he never said,
“Jesus
is God Almighty”
Answering his second response:
Again,
please read his response and then mine.
The
desperate Christian presents the quote “Acts 9:3-20” as the word of Jesus indeed
very funny. This ignorant or
more correctly uneducated on Christianity does not know that this quote
describes the so-called vision that Paul had. This is a story that Paul
said
which also we could find in it many contradictions:
Please
read the following article concerning the contradiction and the
confusion that
Paul committed with his “vision”
http://muslim-responses.com/Did_he_really_meet_Jesus/Did_he_really_meet_Jesus_
Gale
continuous by saying or at least try to give a picture that Paul was
with disciples
and that results that he was approved by the disciples and he was in
peace with
them. Unfortunately, I will disappoint the desperate Christian and
inform him
that Paul fought the disciples. Please read the detail article
concerning the
relationship of Paul with the disciples:
http://muslim-responses.com/Paul_VS_the_Disciples/Paul_VS_the_Disciples_
This
amateur
missionary says that the disciples are Muslims. Moreover, according to
the
Quran as Muslims were believers and they chosen Paul. I wonder where
this kid
saw the name of Paul in the Quran or where he saw that the disciples
choose
Paul. At least hilarious. This ignorant fail to realize that if he
accepts that
disciples are Muslims then in any case could not choose this antichrist
Paul
because he insulted the religion of Jesus (see the link above) or they
could
not believe that Jesus is God as the Christians claim. This kid just
does not
understand the basic things.
Then
he
quotes an Islamic source and claims that they speak good about Paul. He
qutotes
a strange “ Islamic Source”
“Ibid. p.
653; bold and capital emphasis ours). Personally I don’t know
this Islamic
Source but even if it is a valid one then nowhere in the text present
Paul as
the truthful Apostle. The strange thing is that it claims this quote
that Paul
was NOT one of the disciples of Jesus. In addition, this quote is not
an
authentic hadeedth from our Prophet Muhammad or a verse from the Holy
Quran.
Despite the fact that the most important to say about these Islamic
sources are
not ALL of them Valid in a Islamic Theological concept, is just
expressing a
personal opinion of the Muslim writer. The same apply for the quote
“[State
University of New York Press,
Concerning
now the Quranic verses that this uneducated Christian posted:
Behold!
Allah said: “O Jesus! I will take thee and raise thee to
Myself and clear thee
(of the falsehoods) of those who blaspheme; I will make those
who follow
thee
O ye who
believe! Be ye helpers of Allah: as said Jesus the son of Mary to the
Disciples,
“Who will be my helpers to (the work of) Allah?”
Said the Disciples, “We are
Allah's helpers!” then a portion of the Children of Israel
believed, and a
portion disbelieved: But We gave power to those who believed
against their
enemies, AND THEY BECAME THE ONES THAT PREVAILED. S.
61:14
Of
course
the followers (those who followed the original teachings of Jesus) of
Jesus
prevailed not military not in power but in the sight of Allah and
wining His
pleasure. Most important the Quranic verses never say that the
followers of
Paul will be the successful. Yet this missionary posted the tafsir of
ibn
kathir and he was exposed in his own!
THROUGHOUT
THIS TIME, the Christians had the upper hand and dominated the Jews.
ALLAH
AIDED THEM AGAINST THE JEWS BECAUSE THEY USED TO BE CLOSER TO THE TRUTH
THAN
THE JEWS, even though both groups were and still are disbelievers, may
Allah’s
curse descend on them.” (Tafsir Ibn
Kathir (Abridged), Volume 2, Parts 3, 4, & 5
(Surat Al-Baqarah, Verse 253, to Surat An-Nisa, Verse 147),
abridged by a
group of scholars under the supervision of Shaykh Safiur-Rahman
Al-Mubarakpuri
[Darussalam Publishers & Distributors Riyadh, Houston, New
York, Lahore;
First Edition: March 2000], p. 171; bold and capital emphasis
ours)
Yet
he realized
that he exposed by this quote and claims :
“Ibn Kathir’s
explanation doesn’t solve the problem since the Quran claims
that the true
followers of Christ would prevail and yet the Christianity that
prevailed is
the one that Ibn Kathir
attacks as false. At the same time Ibn
Kathir admits that this
aberration is that which God caused
to prevail!”
What can you say ? this man is so
desperate. He is answering to himself by the quotation of ibn kathir.
Again the
true followers not Paul prevailed in a manner not military not in power
but in
the sight of Allah and wining His pleasure.
Please read the following article
that deals in detail concerning the issue “ Quran affirms
Paul”
http://muslim-responses.com/The_Quran_and_Paul/The_Quran_and_Paul_
The desperate Christian continuous
by saying that Allah quoted Paul.
The Prophet said,
"ALLAH SAID, 'I have prepared for My righteous
slaves (such
excellent things) as no eye has ever seen, nor an ear has
ever heard nor a
human heart can ever think of.'" (Sahih Bukhari, Volume 9,
Book 93,
Number 589)
This was prepared by God NOT by
Paul I wonder if these ignorant missionary knows how to read:
"However, as it
is written: 'No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no
mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him.'"
1
Corinthians 2:9
He exposed by himself
Answering Third response
Well I do not accuse here Gale because it seems that he did not understand my point or maybe I was not clear enough. Gale didn’t understand, that I refer to the word “Lord” to the quote Acts 22:14-16 and Romans 10:9-13 not the quote of the Old testament because the Old testament refer Lord as God but this is not the case with Jesus because never Jesus himself supported his lordship to be a deity. So simple, but Gale likes to play around or honestly this kid didn’t understand, actually he exposes once again his amateur character. Once again, to make it clear for this fool, Lord in the Old Testament clearly describes God as well as some biblical prophets. For example as Gale quotes:
For I am the LORD your God, The
Holy One of
Here God indentifies himself as the Lord God not the Lord Prophet as some biblical Prophets are called. Jesus is the Lord prophet according to his own words not the Lord God. Ok Mr. Gale, did you get it now?
Also Gale presents some translations of the Bible that use the word “Jehovah” as Lord. But when Jesus is called Lord in the New Testament why the English translations don’t use the word Jehovah for Lord if he was Jehovah. Simple because Jesus is not the lord Jehovah. Even if the name of God was Jehovah then why Jesus called God in Aramaic “Allah”? For more proofs read:
https://www.answering-christianity.com/allah.htm
About
Jesus saving his people from for
their sins this not something unique for a prophet. All the prophets of
God
with their messages saved their people for their sin. Every message of
a
Prophet had a purpose of salvation otherwise, their mission was
useless. Is
this so hard to understand kiddy Gale? Again the context of lordship of
Jesus(by his own words not Paul the antichrist) is total different from
the
context of the Old Testament for it uses Lord for God AND for the
Prophets.
Again another missionary like Gale fails to quote Jesus and says the
same words
as the antichrist Paul said. I challenge this kid to show me where the
context
of Jesus of lordship(Jesus words) agrees with the context of Paul about
the
lordship of Jesus. Good luck kid J !!
If
you notice his 3rd response the
only quotes that HARDLY supports him are the quotes of Paul not Jesus.
This kid
also challenges me to show him where the Quran claims that Paul was
wrong, this
challenge has already answered here: http://muslim-responses.com/The_Quran_and_Paul/The_Quran_and_Paul_
This ignorant and uneducated
Christian missionary insists that Jehovah is true God and quotes many
passages
from the bible to prove his point. But unfortunately for him this not
the case
at all. The word “Jehovah is an invention word in order not
to pronounce the
word God in Hebrew. I dedicate to Gale this quote in order to learn who
and
what this “Jehovah” is and to see that ALLAH is the
true name of God:
“WHO IS JEHOVAH?
Astonishing
as it may sound, it is an admitted fact that prior to the sixteenth
century,
the word "Jehovah,"
was unheard of. Whenever the origin of this word appeared in its true
Hebrew
form in Jewish Scriptures (read from right to left as in Arabic) Yet,
Huh, Wav,
Huh; or Y.H.W.H. these four letters were preceded by a substitute word "Adonai,"
to warn the
reader that the following word was not to be articulated. The Jews took
meticulous care in repeating this exercise in their "Book
of God"
six thousand, eight hundred and twenty-three times - interpolating the
words "Adonai"
or "Elohim." They sincerely believed that this awesome name of God
was never to be pronounced. This prohibition was no ordinary affair: it
called
for a penalty of death on one who dared to utter it, and this taboo has
been more
successful than all the "DO's" and "DON'T's" of the Ten
Commandments put together.
If
Jehovah is the name of God Almighty, and if the 27 Books of the New
Testament
were inspired by Him, then it is an anomaly of the highest order, that
He
(Jehovah) signally failed to have His Own Name recorded in "His
Word"
(N.T.) the
Christian addition to the Jewish Bible. The Christians claim that they
have in
their possession over twenty-four thousand so-called "originals" of
their Holy Writ in the Greek language, and yet not a single parchment
has
"Jehovah" written in it. Curiously this "name of God" (?)
has been sacrilegiously replaced by the Greek words ky'ri.os
and the.os',
which mean 'Lord' and
'God.' Yet, miracle of miracles - Alleluya! - no devil or
saint has been
able to eliminate the word "ALLAH" from the so-called New Testament
of the Christians.
NEW
FANGLED DOCTRINES
A
hundred years ago, all of a sudden, more than a hundred new cults and
denominations of Christiandom mushroomed in the
Judge
Rutherford, followed by Charles T. Russell created a new "church,"
which in its system of organisation and administration is second to
none in the
world. There is very much we Muslims can learn from their enthusiasm
and
methodology. Read, "Thirty
Years a Watchtower Slave"
by Schelin. It is not
their theology I am enamoured with but their modus
operandi
(the way they operate). Read, how this
incorrigible sect came very close to conquering
VIRILE
SECT
The
"Jehovah's Witnesses," have made the most phenominal progress of all
the religious sects of the past hundred years, on a percentage basis.
The
Bahaies are moving at a snails-pace in comparison, actually receding in
ratio
with the other Christian off-shoots. These "Witnesses" are the
fittest in their fight against the other Christians as well as against
the
Muslims. Simply because they programme themselves five times a week in
their
"Kingdom Halls," and what they learn they implement during the
week-ends. We Muslims are supposed to be "programmed" five times a
day in our daily Salaat,
but we have lost the true purpose of this Pillar of Islam. Our Salaat
is for earning Sawaab
(spiritual blessings)
only.
They
have made the word JEHOVAH famous. They knock at people's doors, asking
the
question - "What
is His
Name?"
The orthodox Christian replies -
"God." They say, "God is not a name, it is an object of worship.
What's His Name?" "Father," says the orthodox as a second try.
"Is your father God?" Of course not! So what is His Name?
"JEHOVAH! is His Name," says the "Witness" to both Muslims
and non-Muslims alike. He has become a professor of this one word. He
has made
it into a religion.
THE
"TETRAGRAMMATON"
Why
not for a change ask him, a question or two. Ask him where he got the
word
Jehovah from? He will surely reply - "From the Holy Bible." What does
it say? Does it spell out the word J-e-h-o-v-a-h?
"No," he will reply. "There is a 'tetragrammaton'
in the Bible from
which the word Jehovah is derived." What is a tetragrammaton? No one
seems
to have heard this highly mystical term. In the
What
then is a "tetragrammaton!" The Jehovah's Witness replies, "Y H
W Hi!"
"No!" "What I want to know from you is, what does the word
tetragrammaton mean?" You will find him most reluctant in explaining.
Either he does not really know, or he is feeling embarrassed in
replying. "Tetra,"
in Greek means
FOUR, and "grammaton,"
means LETTERS. It simply means "a four letter word."
Can
you read into Y H W H the word Jehovah? I cannot. "No!", says the
Jehovah's Witness, "we ought to add vowels to these four consonents to
produce the sound. Originally, both Hebrew and Arabic were written
without the
vowel signs The native of each language was able to read if even
without those
vowels. Not so the outsider, for whose benefit the vowels were
invented.
THE
"J" SICKNESS
Let
us add the vowels as the "Witness" suggests. YHWH becomes YeHoWaH.
Juggle as you like but you can never materialise Jehovah! Ask him, from
which
hat he drew his "J".
He will tell you that "this is the 'popular'
pronunciation from the 16th century." The exact sound of the four
letters
YHWH is known neither to the Jews nor to the Gentiles, yet he is
ramming
JEHOVAH down everyones throats. The European Christians have developed
a
fondness (sickness) for the letter "J" They add J's where there are
no Jays. Look!
Yael |
he
converts to |
Joel |
Yehuda |
to |
Juda |
Yeheshua |
to |
Joshua |
Yusuf |
to |
Joseph |
Yunus |
to |
Jonah |
Yesus |
to |
Jesus |
Yehowa |
to |
Jehovah |
There
is no end to the Westerner's infatuation for the letter "J." Now in
the busy streets of
The
letters Y H W H occur in the Hebrew (Jewish) Scriptures 6 823 times,
boasts the
Jehovah's Witness, and it occurs in combination with the word "Elohim;"
156 times in the
booklet called Genesis alone. This combination YHWH/ELOHIM has been
consistently translated in the English Bible as "Lord God,"
"Lord God," Lord God," ad
infinitum.
COMMON
ORIGIN
What
is YHWH;
and what is ELOHIM?
Since the lews did not articulate the word YHWH for centuries, and
since even
the Chief Rabbis would not allow the ineffable to be heard, they have
forfeited
the right to claim dogmatically how the word is to be sounded. We have
to seek
the aid of the Arab to revive Hebrew, a language which had once died
out. In
every linguistic difficulty recourse has to be made to Arabic, a sister
language, which has remained alive and viable. Racially and
linguistically, the
Arabs and the Jews have a common origin, going back to Father Abraham.1
Note
the startling resemblance between the languages, very often the same
sounding
words carry identical meaning in both.
HEBREW |
ARABIC |
ENGLISH |
Elah |
Ilah |
god |
Ikhud |
Ahud |
one |
Yaum
|
Yaum |
day |
Shaloam |
Salaam |
peace |
Yahuwa |
Ya
Huwa |
oh
he |
YHWH
or Yehova or Yahuwa all mean the very same thing. "Ya" is a vocative
and an exclamatory particle in both Hebrew and Arabic, meaning Oh!
And
"Huwa" or
"Hu" means He,
again in both Hebrew and Arabic. Together they mean Oh He! So instead
of YHWH
ELOHIM, we now have Oh He! ELOHIM.
CHAPTER FOUR
ALLAH IN THE
BIBLE
The
suffix "IM"
of the word
"ELOHIM" is a plural of respect in Hebrew.
(Remember
that in Arabic
and Hebrew there are two types of plurals. One of numbers and the other
of
honour as in Royal proclamations. Since the plural of honour is
uncommon in the
language of the European, he has confused these plurals to connote a
plurality
in the "godhead," hence his justification for his Doctrine of the
Holy Trinity - the Father, Son and Holy Ghost).
Hence
ELOHIM = ELOH + IM.
Now I want you to perform an exercise. Do you see the words: YA-HUWA
ELOH-IM?
Place your left hand index finger
on the first two letters "YA" meaning oh! and the other index finger
on the "IM" a plural of respect. What you now have remaining in Huwa
Eloh or Huwa Elah. El in Hebrew means god, and Elah or Eloh also stands
for the
same name - god. Therefore, "Huwa el Elah" or HUWA 'L LAH, which is
identical to the Quranic expression - Huwal lah hu (meaning: HE IS
ALLAH) of
the verse QUL
HUWAL LAH HU AHUD
SAY: |
|
HE IS ALLAH |
|
HE IS ONE |
|
Holy Qur'an
112:1
The
above exercise proves
that El, Elah and Elohim are not three distinctly different words. They
all represent
the single Arabic word Allah. This is not my wishful thinking. Please
see
below. It is a photostatic reproduction of a page from the English
Bible,
edited by Rev. C. I. Scofield,D.D., with his Bible
Commentary· This Doctor of
Divinity is well respected among the Bible Scholars of the Christian
world. He
is backed in his "NEW
AND IMPROVED
EDITION" of this translation by a galaxy
of eight other
D.D.'s:
Rev.
Henry G. Weston, D.D.,
LL.D., President
Crozer Theological
jeminary.
Rev. W. G. Moorehead, D.D., President
Xenia (U.I,) Theological Seminary.
Rev. lames M. Gray, D.D., President
Moody Bible Institute.
Rev. Elmore Harris, D.D., President
Toronto Bible Institute.
Rev. William !. Erdman, D.D., Author
"The Gospel of John," etc.
Rev. Arthur T. Pierson, D.D., Author,
Editor, Teacher, etc.
Rev. William L. Pettingill, D.D., Author,
Editor, Teacher.
Arno C. Gaebelein, Author
"Harmoney of Prophetic Word," etc.
I
have not listed the above
luminaries to awe you. They have been unanimous in supporting Rev.
Scofield in
his "New and Improved" commentary.
Please
note that in their
comment No. 1 below left, they concur that - "Elohim,
(sometimes El
or Elah
meaning God)" and alternatively spelled "Alah"
(line three, third word). All the eight
D.D.'s above could not have been blind in dittoing the spelling
"Alah" for God. How far were they from the Arabic word spelled -
ALLAH - in English, I ask you dear reader? This is Allah's handiwork,
but the
Devil (I must give him a capital "D," he deserves it) was not slow in
making a quick come-back through his agents. He succeeded in firing all
the
D.D.'s responsible for that debacle, and had them replaced by nine
others with
more impressive degrees than the previous lot. You will find them in
the recent
reproduction of "The
New Scofield
Reference Bible." You will not be able to
lay your hands
anymore on the Bible with "Alah"
in it. The Devil has seen to that.
|
|
MY ONLY PLEA
I
had made some public
statements regarding my discovery of the word "Alah" as alternatively
spelled from the usual Christian spelling "Elah." My plea to the
Christians was this that spell the word as you like, with an "A" or
an "E", with a single "L" or double "LL's", but
for goodness sake pronounce the word correctly, as we Muslims do.
Because even
with its proper Anglicised spelling -
A L L A H:
"IT IS
SO FAR FROM ITS ARABIC ORIGINAL, WHEN PRONOUNCED WITH A THIN ENGLISH
CONSONANT
AND FEEBLE VOWELS, THAT MANY AN ARAB MUSLIM WOULD FIND IT
UNRECOGNIZABLE."
Says Rev. Kenneth Cragg, the Anglican Bishop of
As
much as the Englishman
has the right to dictate to us as to how his language is to be sounded,
surely
we Muslims have as much right to demand a common courtesy when taking
the name
of God. We do not wish the word Allah to go into limbo like the
"Yahuwa" of the ]ews. More than 6000 times the formula "YAHUWA
ELAH," or ya"HUWA ALAH," or "HUWALLAH," (He is Allah!)
occur in the Hebrew manuscripts of the Jewish Bible, commonly called
the
"Old Testament," by the Christians. If this fact is openly acknowledged
by the learned men of Christianity and broadcasted as Rev. Scofield had
done
then the day for Muslims and Christians to worship God together would
not be
far distant. But the Devil will not have it. Vested interests are
involved.
Instead of prenouncing the word ALAH correctly, they would rather have
the
whole word omitted.
QUICK ABROGATION
"Now
You See It"
- "Now You Don't" is an old, old gimmick in the West. Compare the
above and see how cleverly, how deftly the new band of missionaries
expunged
the word "Alah"
from the "Authorised
King James
Version" of the Scofield translation of the
Bible1.
As
a guide to one of the
largest Mosques in the Southern Hemisphere, the JUMA MUSJID,
1. For further
examples of the
Christian gymnastics in the Bible, see Chapter 4 in my book - "Is the
Bible God's
Word?".
UNIQUE NAME FOR
UNIQUE GOD
"We
Muslims prefer the
Arabic word Allah to the English word God, because this English word
God is
often misused or misapplied," I explain to my non-Muslim visitors to
the
mosque, on their so-called "Oriental
Tour" as arranged by the Durban Publicity
Bureau, I continue,
"On your last port of call, you will be ending off at a Hindu house of
Prayer, called a Temple, and there, you might rightfully point out to
your
children the idols and the images found, as 'the gods of the Hindus',
and if a Hindu overhears you;
he will not mind, he will not be offended, because what you said to
your child
is actually what he believes. Then, again, we speak of the gods of
ancient
"Further,
in English,
if some gentleman was to look after somebody's child as a guardian, we
would
say that he is a "godfather" to the child, and the woman - a
"god- mother" to the child. And if one tried to be a bit too funny, a
bit too clever, one would say -'What do you think of yourself, are you a tin god!'
We spell god with
a capital "G" (God), and we spell god with a small "g"
(god), which creates in your minds grades and grades of divinities."
This
Arabic word, Allah, is
never used in any other sense. There is no such thing as an
"Allah-father" or an "Allah-mother" or a
"Tin-Allah." ALLAH is a unique word for the only God. Arabic, like
every other language, also has its rules of grammar, but in Arabic you
cannot
make a plural form for Allah, nor can you make a feminine of Allah. All
this is
very unlike the English word, God. If you want to make a plural, just
add an
"s" (Gods); You can make God feminine by adding "dess"
(goddess); and you can make God diminutive by adding "ling"
(godling). Look at the sheer mockery the Westerner has made of the word
"GOD," and how his fertile imagination has run riot and havoc in
denigrating the Glory and Majesty of the Incomparable Creator,
sustainer and
Cherisher of all the worlds as recorded in the Oxford Dictionary:
You
have a variety of
choices in the list above. Take your pick like that old woman who lit
one
candle to St. Michael and another to the Devil. So that whether she
went to
Heaven or to Hell she would have a friend.
Jupiter
the god
of Heaven
Pluto the god
of Hell
Mars the god
of War
Neptune the god
of the
Sea and
Zeus the god-father
of
them all
with
his many wives and
many children. His Hercules, his Appolo, his Horus, his Isis and
Osiris.
Sheer
mythology and rank
blasphemy, but to a people who believed in mythology, mythology was no
mythology; it was empirical truths. And this terminology of the West
lended
itself well to paganistic theology, with their "gods" and
"goddesses." BUT ALLAH IS FREE FROM ALL CORRUPTIONS. YOU CAN DO
NOTHING WITH THIS WORD IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE ARAB. YOU CANNOT
MANIPULATE IT IN
ANY WAY!
PEARLS OF FAITH
Here
is a passage of great
sublimity, summing up in marvellous terse verses the Asma-ul-Husna,
the Most Beautiful
names of Allah.
HE IS ALLAH, BESIDES WHOM THERE
IS NO OTHER GODS; |
|
WHO KNOWS (ALL THINGS) BOTH
SECRET AND OPEN; |
|
HE IS MOST GRACIOUS, MOST
MERCIFUL |
|
HE IS ALLAH, BESIDES WHOM THERE
IS NO OTHER GOD; |
|
THE SOVEREIGN, |
|
THE HOLY ONE, |
|
THE SOURCE OF PEACE (AND
PERFECTION), |
|
THE GUARDIAN OF
FAITH, |
|
THE PRESERVER
OF SAFETY, |
|
THE EXALTED IN
MIGHT, |
|
THE
IRRESISTIBLE, |
|
THE SUPREME: |
|
GLORY TO ALLAH: (HIGH IS HE) |
|
ABOVE THE PARTNERS THEY ASCRIBE
TO HIM |
|
HE IS ALLAH, |
|
THE CREATOR |
|
THE EVOLVER, |
|
THE BESTOWER OF FORMS (OR
COLOURS) |
|
TO HIM BELONG THE MOST BEAUTIFUL
NAMES: |
|
ALL THAT IS IN THE HEAVENS AND
THE EARTH, DOTH DECLARE HIS PRAISES AND GLORY. |
|
AND HE IS THE EXALTED IN MIGHT |
|
THE WISE. |
|
Holy Qur'an
59:22-24
Where
is there in the
religious literature of the world anything to compare with this!
"ALLAH"
IN EVERY BIBLE AND IN EVERY LANGUAGE
There
is no difficulty in
our agreeing that in the languages of the world, every nation has given
a
distinctive name to God. Most of these names are attributive names,
describing
some aspect of God. But the proper name for God Almighty in the Semitic
languages, i.e. in the mother-tongues of Moses, Jesus and Muhummed
(Peace be
upon them all) is ALLAH! This name is still extant in the Christian
Bible in
every language of the world. The Christians are boasting that they have
translated their Bible into over fifteen hundred languages, more
specially the
translation of the New Testament. In every Gospel
that I have scrutnised in the various languages I
find the word "Allah"
preserved - English or Afrikaanz, Zulu or Swahili. Why not check up in
your own
dialect to prove me wrong. I would love to hear from you.
If
what I claim is Gospel
Truth, then how is it that the whole Christian world of over 1 200 000
000
people have not been aware of it. This is what effective programming or
brain-washing can do. They have been trained NOT to see the obvious.
Did not
Jesus bewail:
"Seeing,
they see not, and hearing
they hear not, neither do they understand."
(Matthew
13:13).
FROM THE LIPS
OF
JESUS
I
ask my Christian
visitors, "Do you remember your Gospel narrative, that when Christ was
supposed to have been on the cross, he cried out with a loud voice:
"ELOI, ELOI,
LAMA SABACHTHANI? which is,
being interpreted, My
God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?" (Mark
15:34).
The
above is a translation
from the Greek manuscripts "ACCORDING TO ST. MARK." Obviously his
Hebrew has a Greek accent. Because, his so-called originals were
written in
Greek. But listen to Matthew, who is supposed to have written his
Gospel
originally in Hebrew, which was aimed at the Jews.
"MATTHEW,
WHO IS ALSO
LEVI, AND WHO FROM A PUBLICAN CAME TO BE AN APOSTLE, FIRST OF ALL THE
EVANGELISTS,
COMPOSED A GOSPEL OF CHRIST IN
Naturally,
Matthew's accent
would be more Semitic (Hebrew and Arabic) than that of Mark. Matthew
records the
same scene as Mark 15:34, but note the variation of the dialect:
Jesus cried
with a
loud voice, saying ELI, ELI, LAMA SABACHTHANI? that is to say, My God,
My God,
why hast thou forsaken me'? (Matthew
27:46).
Please
memorise the words -
"Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani." (Eli - pronounced like L and I in
English) Utter the words - ELI, ELI, LAMA SABACHTHANI; ELI, ELI, LAMA
SABACHTHANI, to your Christian friends and neighbours and ask them
whether
these words - "Eli, Eli," sounds like "Jehovah, Jehovah!"
to them? No! is the answer if they are not deaf. Ask further, whether
"Eli, Eli," sounds like "Abba, Abba!" (meaning father,
father! in Hebrew) to them! Again the reply will be "No!" if they are
not deaf. Can't they see that the cry is to Allah? "Eli, Eli - Elah,
Elah,
Allah, Allah!" Let them hear these words from your lips and watch their
reactions. No honest per- son can help agreeing with you.
1. Of
the circumcision:
means those who had been
circumcised. Referring to the Jewish converts to Christianity.
ALLELUYA!
Now
ask your Christian
friend, if he had heard the word - "ALLELUYA." No Christian worth the
name will fail to recognise it. Whenever the Christian goes into
ecstasy, he
exclaims - "Alleluya! Alleluya!", just as we Muslims might exclaim
the Takbir - "Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar!" Ask him, what is Alleluya?
Take him to the Book of Revelation, the last book of the New Testament,
Chapter
19; we are informed there that John the disciple of Jesus, saw a
vision, in
which he heard the angels in heaven singing, Alleluya, Alleluya. Ask
him again,
what is Alleluya! Is it "hip, hip, hooray; hip, hip, hooray!" Are
angels in heaven singing - hip, hip, hoorays to God? Every time when
God
creates a new galaxy, do the angels exclaim - "hip, hip, hooray!"
When He explodes a super-nova, do the angels say, "hip, hip,
hooray!"? How absurd!
Then
what is Alleluya! The
last syllable "YA" is a vocative and an exclamatory particle in both
Arabic and Hebrew meaning "OH!" In other words YA = OH, (the
vocative); and YA = (!), a note of exclamation, or an exclamatory
particle, or
as is more commonly known an exclamation mark.
The
Semite, both Arab and
Jew, begins with the exclamatory particle or exclamation mark. The
Westerner,
in his language ends with the exclamatory particle or exclamation mark,
eg.
Stop! Go! Fire! Bang!
Let
us repeat the above
Tasbih (words of praise) as an Arab or a Jew: ALLE-LU-YA will be
YA-ALLE-LU
because, as explained above, YA is always at the beginning in both
Arabic and
Hebrew.
YA
ALLE LU would be YA ALLA
HU: Meaning, "OH ALLAH!" (You are the Only Being Who deserves worship
and Praise) "OH ALLAH!" (You are the Only Being Who deserves worship
and Praise).
Unbiased
Christians will
not fail to recognise Allah as none other than his - El, Eli, Alle,
Elah, Alah,
Allah. Call upon Him by any name, for His are the Most Beautiful names,
as long
as those names are not contaminated and as long as they do not conjure
up in
our minds the images of men or monkeys howsoever glorified they might
have
been.
THE CONCEPT OF
"GOD THE FATHER"
There
are many beautiful
attributes of God, which are common to both the Holy Qur'an and the
Holy Bible.
A lengthy thesis can be written on this. But a very interesting facet I
have
discovered in this that among the 99 attributes of God given to us in
the Holy
Qur'an the word "Father" is not one of them. If the Holy Prophet was
the author of the Holy Qur'an as his adversaries allege, then how could
he have
avoided the term - Father - for God, for twenty-three years of his
prophetic life!
Abb,
meaning father in
Arabic (Abba in Hebrew), is an easier word than Rabb, meaning Lord and
Cherisher; yet the attribute Rabb abounds in the Last and Final
Revelation of
God. The reason for the omission of the word Abb (father) for
describing God Almighty
is obvious: MANKIND HAD DENIGRATED THAT BEAUTIFUL CONCEPT OF THE LOVING
Father
in Heaven to being the Father of the "only begotten
son"1 - to being
physically like a human being, because begetting is an animal
act, belonging to the lower animal functions of sex.
1. John 3:16
UNIQUE TO THE
QUR'AN AND CONCLUSION
SAY: "SHALL I TAKE FOR
MY PROTECTOR ANY BUT ALLAH THE ORIGINATOR OF THE
HEAVENS AND THE EARTH? WHEN IT IS HE WHO FEEDS
BUT HAS NO NEED TO BE FED." |
|
Sura An-am
6:14
No
creature who is ever in
need of earthly food can be "ATNATU!"
If you can make the worshippers of the "man-gods" to apply this
touchstone to their heroes, you can retrieve millions from the
impending Hell-fire.
Learn a lesson from the Australoid (give him one last look on the
frontispiece), who despite his abject primitiveness still stands high
above the
millions of the civilised men and women of both East and West who strut
the
world today.
GLORY BE TO
ALLAH!
Source: ( Ahmed Deedat from his
Book “ What is His Name?” page 21-39)
Answering his fourth response:
Gale presents 3 quotations in order
as he claims to prove that Jesus answer to prayers and we must ask from
him
like we ask from God. Let us expose him from his own quotations: He
posts the
following
“And whatsoever ye
shall ask in my name, that will I do,
that the Father may be
glorified in the Son. If ye shall ask any thing in my name,
I will do
it.” John 14:13-14
“Ye have not chosen me,
but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring
forth
fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye
shall ask of
the Father in my name, he may give it you.” John
15:16
“And in that day ye
shall ask me nothing. Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatsoever
ye
shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you. Hitherto have ye
asked
nothing in my name: ask, and ye shall receive, that
your joy may be
full… At that day ye shall ask in my name:
and I say not unto you, that
I will pray the Father for you.” John 16:23-24, 26
We must note from John 14:13-14
That Jesus will do, ONLY that the Father may be glorified in the son.
To
Glorify the Father through the son, what that means? It means that the
Father
is the source of glorification and the Father will respond through
Jesus. That
does not make Jesus God. The Father again is the source of everything,
clearly,
Jesus has a role of a Prophet according to this verse and he is not
presented
like the Father. For example when Moses split the sea was not Moses who
splited
but Allah, Jews glorified Allah through Moses, through his miracle.
In John 15:16 things are more clear
but this kid Gale cannot comprehended. This verse says that we must ask
FROM
THE FATHER not from Jesus. The phrase “ask the Father in my name” means that we
must ask from the father
through the way of Jesus learned his people to ask” Jesus
never say ‘ASK ONLY
FROM ME” he always elevates the Father as the only God that
you must ask.
In
John 16:23-24 Jesus goes further by praying
to the Father in order to satisfy what the people asked from his name.
In other
words Jesus tells them to ask from him and he then ask the father by
praying,
so who is responding? The Father not Jesus. Amazingly, this fool
missionary
expose himself through his quotations like Sam Shamoun. Good work Gale
!
Actaully
Gale admits from his own words:
“Moreover, performing
something in someone else's name has two implications. First, it is the
authority of another person that allows someone to perform the work. In
other
words, it is because someone else authorized you to take these actions
that you
are able to perform them; a person is not doing them in his own
authority. For
example, when David fought Goliath he came unto him "in the name of the
LORD of hosts, the God of the armies of
Second, when you come in
someone’s name, you come in his stead. The person to whom you
come is expected
to respond to you, not on the basis of who you are, but on behalf of
the one
you represent, in whose authority you have come. They are to treat you
as they
would treat the one who authorized you to come. For instance, when
David sent
servants to Nabal to
ask for food, “they spake
to Nabal according to
all
those words in the name of David” (1 Samuel 25:9). Therefore,
when Nabal insulted
David's servants (who came in David's name)
he insulted David just as if he had spoken directly to his
face.”
Excatly, Jesus was like
David, like a Prophet of God. Because All authority and power was given to him by God:
And Jesus came and spake
unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in
heaven and in earth.(
Matthew 28:18)
The same power to
forgive sins.
But that ye may know
that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he
to the
sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house.
(Matthew
9:6)
So all the power of
Jesus is not his own, belongs to God therefore I take as God the one
that gave
power to Jesus.
He continues his
desperate attempts by posting the following quote:
"After Jesus said this, he
looked toward heaven and prayed: 'Father, the time has come. Glorify
your Son,
that your Son may glorify you. For you granted him authority
over all people
that he might give eternal life to all those you have given him. Now
this
is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus
Christ,
whom you have sent. I have brought you glory on earth by completing the
work
you gave me to do. And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with
the
glory I had with you before the world began." John 17:1-5
Again, this
missionary continues to expose his self through his own unholy book. He
tries
to give some meanings with has nothing to do with the verse, and he
claims that
I do not know the true meaning.
The phrase: “"And now, Father, glorify me in your
presence with
the glory I had WITH YOU before the world began."
So what is
the “ great” thing about this verse Gale? All the
prophets had glory with God
before the world began.
70. As
he spake by
the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world
began: (Luke 1:70)
Also John
the Baptist
gave salvation. To give knowledge of salvation unto his people
by the
remission of their sins, (Luke 1:77)
He then
tries to give us understand that Jesus “Commanded
God” to glorify him. Well I
am asking Gale if he prays to God as Jesus taught him. If yes then for
sure he
says the following words:
9. After this manner
therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.
10. Thy kingdom come.
Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.
11. Give us this day our
daily bread.
12. And forgive us our
debts, as we forgive our debtors.
13. And lead us not into
temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the
power,
and the glory, for ever. Amen.( Matthew 6:9-13)
In other words Gale and
all Christians alike COMMAND God to do the follows:
1) To give them their
daily bread
2) To forgive them
3) And to lead them not
into temptation.
Like Jesus commanded God
to glorify him. So also according to the Gales argument, all the
Christians
that Command God to do these actions are also Gods.
But let us analyze the
verse again:
1. These words spake
Jesus, and lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour is
come;
glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee:
2. As thou hast given
him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many
as thou
hast given him.
3. And this is life
eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ,
whom
thou hast sent.
4. I have glorified thee
on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.
5. And now, O Father,
glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with
thee before
the world was.
6. I have manifested thy
name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they
were, and
thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word.
7. Now they have known
that all things whatsoever thou hast given me are of thee.
8. For I have given unto
them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them , and
have
known surely that I came out from thee, and they have believed that
thou didst
send me. John 17:1-8
From this verse again we
can see how Jesus is NOT equal with God. He is a Prophet of God. Jesus
clearly
says that the only true God is the Father and he (Jesus) is the Apostle
His
messenger:
3. And this is life
eternal, that they might know thee the ONLY true God,
and Jesus Christ,
whom thou hast sent. Gale forgets to mention the last phrase
“ whom thou hast
sent” obviously because describes Jesus as a person that God
sent. Amazingly,
Jesus admits that the Father sent him
“and have known surely
that I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send
me”
this according to Jesus
immediately makes him inferior comparing with the Father.
Verily, verily, I say
unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord; neither
he that is sent
greater than he that sent him. John 13:16
Therefore Jesus is not
greater than the Father because the Father sent Jesus. So how Jesus is
equal
with God? Or worst how Jesus is God? I would love Gale to give me an
answer
here. Good Luck Buddy!! J
Answering his fifth
response:
Gale by posting John
5:19-23 in the supposed context illustrates how Jesus is inferior again
comparing with the Father. But the quote that Gale gives is not the
context
actually he do not mention the verse John 5:30 simply because do not
suit him.
But let us paste the whole context to expose him once again:
19. Then answered Jesus
and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do
nothing of
himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he
doeth,
these also doeth the Son likewise.
20. For the Father
loveth the Son, and sheweth him all things that himself doeth: and he
will shew
him greater works than these, that ye may marvel.
21. For as the Father
raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them ; even so the Son quickeneth
whom he
will.
22. For the Father
judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:
23. That all men should
honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not
the Son
honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.
24. Verily, verily, I
say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent
me, hath
everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed
from
death unto life.
25. Verily, verily, I
say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear
the
voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live.
26. For as the Father
hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in
himself;
27. And hath given him
authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.
28. Marvel not at this:
for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall
hear his
voice,
29. And shall come
forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and
they that
have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
30. I can of mine own
self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I
seek
not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me. (John
5:19-30)
From the above verses,
we can conclude that Jesus is indeed inferior comparing with the
Father. Is
clearly that we read that Jesus “can do nothing from
himself”, “that the
father committed all judgment unto the
son”, committing the judgment
to the son does not mean that Jesus is God; God gave to the other
Prophets the
ability to Judge. Again, The Father sent Jesus as the verse 23 say.
Verse 26
mentions that the father gave life to Jesus. Verse 27 silences
completely the
kiddy missionary by clearly stating my point “Father GAVE
authority to Jesus to
execute Judgment, because Jesus as he mentioned “can not do
nothing from
himself”. Therefore, the real source is Father and without
the Father Jesus
cannot do nothing. The verse 30 support the whole context, that is that
Jesus
indeed cannot do nothing he needs the help of God as a true Prophet. I really enjoy when their
own “holy” book
testify against the Christians.
Gale continues by saying
that I posting verses from the New Testament that disproves Islam. When
I
posted the verse
“Ye men of Israel, hear
these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by
miracles and
wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye
yourselves
also know” Acts 2:22
Gale argues that the
next verses disprove Islam. Indeed childish remarks. Even he admit why
I did
that, he said: “Now
Mr. Eldin is trying to use Acts
2:22 to disprove the divinity of Jesus;”
Actually
this missionary is totally confused. The verse that posted is obviously
refutes
the divinity of Jesus, check the verse again:
“Ye men of Israel, hear
these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among
you by miracles
and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of
you, as ye
yourselves also know” Acts 2:22
Gale never answered
simply because he cannot, he knows that the above verse disprove the
divinity
of Jesus and continuous to argue about crucifixion, a total different
topic.
The reason that I posted the verse is to show you that the book of acts
consider him as a man not as a God. This missionary out of his panic don’t understand
that also in all kind of
debates or arguments also Christians use verses from the Quran to
“prove” their
point. Check the whole Quranic verses that Gale used in his article.
How fool
can a missionary be?
He posts the verses:
“For David did not ascend to heaven, and yet he
said, ‘The Lord said to my
Lord: “Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a
footstool for your
feet.”’ Therefore let all
Then argues that the
issue of the word Kyrios support his point. This missionary cannot
understand
that the phrase “The Lord said to my Lord” simply
means “ Lord God said to my
Lord Prophet”(because as I proved to my first article many
prophets are called
Lords) otherwise we have the funny meaning of Gale which is “
The Lord God said
to my Lord God” ???????? indeed stupidity of the high order
!!
Answering his sixth
response:
Then this English
speaking missionary tries to correct me (a Greek citizen) in the Greek
language. He says
“Here
is what the word for worshipers is:
Proskunetes
Definition
a
worshipper (http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4353&version=kjv)
Now
look at the definition for worship:
Proskuneo
Definition
1.
to
kiss the hand to (towards) one, in token of reverence
2.
among
the Orientals, esp. the Persians, to fall upon the knees and touch
the ground with the forehead as an expression of profound reverence
3.
in
the NT by kneeling or prostration to do homage (to one) or make
obeisance, whether in order to express respect or to make supplication
a.
used
of homage shown to men and beings of superior rank
1.
to
the Jewish high priests
Word
Usage - Total:
60
worship 60
(http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4352&version=kjv)”
This
foolish Christian actually support my claim, he says that the word
“proskinites” is a worshiper now look what
definition gives about what is
worship.
. “
in
the NT by kneeling or prostration to do homage (to
one) or
make obeisance, whether in order to express respect or to make
supplication
a.
used
of homage shown to men and beings of superior rank”
Exactly
what I said. This kiddy did not understand that I emphasized the point
that to
prostrate does not always mean to worship in theological way. You can,
sometimes, prostrate as respect to someone not to worship him as God.
This
ignorant again tries to back up his claim by quoting passages from the
Holy
Quran indicating that prostrate means worship. Yes, but this fool does
not
realize that I am talking about his unholy book. He then argues that
“Jesus accepted
worship and even commanded the
people to worship him as God” and he support his argument by
quoting:
And they departed quickly from the
sepulchre with fear and great joy; and did run to bring his disciples
word. And
as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, All
hail. And they came and held him by the feet, AND WORSHIPPED HIM.
Then said
Jesus unto them, Be not afraid: go tell my brethren that they go into
Therefore,
Gale supports that Jesus is God.
Well I am going to disappoint Gale by telling him that Prophet Daniel
also
received worship (as Gale means with Jesus):
Then
the king Nebuchadnezzar fell upon his
face, and worshipped Daniel, and
commanded that they should offer an
oblation and sweet odours unto him.(2:46)
According
to Gale Prophet Daniel, is also God?
This is actually the reason why I said that prostrating to someone does
not
always mean that you prostrate to him in a manner to worship him like
you worship
God. In addition,
“The
word “worship” in Mark 5:6 (But when he
saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him,) and many other places
means to
adore, to adulate, to respect, to revere. Compare the same verse with
Luke
8:28(When he saw Jesus, he cried out, and fell down before him,
and with
a loud voice said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God
most
high? I beseech thee, torment me not.) where the word
“worship” alternatively
recorded as “ fell down before him” ( Ahmed Deedat,
Compat Kit)
He
further makes some desperate attempts
to say that Jesus is God because the disciples saluted Jesus by the
word “Hail”
which in Greek is “Chairo”. Indeed very funny. As a
Greek Citizen that I am,
every day they salute me and I salute my friends by the word
“Chairo” well
according to Gale, he must take me also as his God because they salute
me and
salute them in the Greek word “Chairo”These
missionaries getting more and more
desperate. See below the definition of the Greek word
“Chairo”
χαίρω
πάρα πολύ |
= |
exult |
|||
chairo para poly |
|
|
|||
χαίρω |
= |
rejoice |
|||
chairo |
|
|
|||
(http://kypros.org/cgi-bin/lexicon)
Answering
his seventh response:
In that, point the desperate
Christian goes mad. He said that the revelation of John is the words of
Jesus
and Jesus said that he is alpha and omega therefore Jesus is God. This
argument
has already dealt in detail here:
“Jesus
said I AM THE ALPHA AND OMEGA THE FIRST AND LAST
Did he really
say that? Let us quote each alpha omega verse and you will
see for yourself and not a single one of them is Jesus speaking:
1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ,
which God gave unto him, to shew unto
his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and
signified
it by his angel unto his servant John: 2 Who bare
record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of
all
things that he saw.
3
Blessed is
he that readeth, and they that hear
the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written
therein:
for the time is at hand. 4 John to the seven
churches which are in Asia: Grace be unto you, and peace, from him
which is,
and which was, and which is to come; and from the seven Spirits which
are
before his throne; 5 And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful
witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the
kings of the
earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own
blood, 6 And hath made us kings and priests unto God and
his Father; to him be
glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen. 7 Behold, he
cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which
pierced
him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so,
Amen. 8
I am Alpha and Omega,
the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and
which is to come, the Almighty.
9
I John,
who also am your brother, and companion
in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in
the
isle that is called
Both times were
the I am alpha and omega is used, is not said by Jesus
but by THE God as the text clearly shows. Christians would like to say
read on
which shows that it is indeed Jesus, so let us read on and see:
12 And I turned to see the voice
that spake with me. And being turned, I
saw seven golden candlesticks; 13 And in the midst of
the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a
garment
down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle. 14 His head and his hairs were
white like wool, as white as snow; and his
eyes were as a flame of fire; 15 And his feet like
unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the
sound of
many waters. 16 And he had in his right hand seven stars: and
out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was
as the
sun shineth in his strength. 17 And when I saw him, I
fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying
unto me,
Fear not; I am the first and the last: 18 I am he
that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen;
and have
the keys of hell and of death
Christians
will see since John tuned back to see who was speaking, and he saw
Jesus then
this would mean it was Jesus speaking. That does not work neither, John
heard a
voice as a trumpet behind him saying ' I am the Alpha and Omega' the
first and
last. John simply turned around to see who was speaking to him, when he
turned
around he had a vision, what he saw in this vision does not mean what
he sees
in the vision is what was talking to him. God not Jesus told John I am
the
Alpha and Omega and to WRITE what thou sees, so God already told John
to make
sure what he sees, because God knew John would turn around to see what
was
speaking to him. As soon as John turns he sees this vision, the man he
sees in
the vision is assumed to be Jesus, however so Jesus is not the one who
made the
Alpha and omega statement, they are two different situations.
1-
God tells John I am the Alpha and Omega, the first and last, and be
sure to
write what you see.
2-
John turns around and sees a vision, he sees Jesus.
So
even reading on it is still not Jesus saying I am the Alpha and Omega.
Now
Christians will be shouting that Jesus told John I am the first and
last and I
was dead and I am alive evermore. That is Jesus without a doubt.
However
so let us read Revelations 1:1:
1 The
Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave
unto him
So from the
first verse see that Jesus cannot be God. God gave Jesus the
revelation, does God give God a revelation? It has already been shown
that
Jesus is not God in this article, and this supports the case even
further, so
hence if Jesus said I am the first and the last to signify that he is
God then
this would be blasphemy! So hence Jesus commits blasphemy if he is
trying to
imply he is God. I don’t think he is, so I don’t
believe when Jesus said I am
the first and last, that he meant he was God. Secondly Jesus said he
was dead,
God never dies to be dead, God is never dead PERIOD. So it would seem
funny if
Jesus is trying to claim he is God and also say he died when death is
something
God does not go through. So this does not prove Jesus is God, not at
all.
Revelations 21:
1-8
1 And I saw a new heaven and a
new earth: for the first heaven and the
first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. 2 And I John saw the holy city,
new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of
heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. 3 And I
heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God
is with
men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God
himself
shall be with them, and be their God. 4 And God
shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more
death,
neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for
the
former things are passed away. 5 And he that sat upon
the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me,
Write: for
these words are true and faithful. 6 And he
said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and
Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that
is athirst of
the fountain of the water of life freely. 7 He that
overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he
shall be my
son. 8
But the
fearful, and unbelieving, and the
abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and
idolaters, and
all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire
and
brimstone: which is the second death.
This is not
Jesus speaking but rather the Father. As it says I will be
his God and he will be my son. Or does Jesus have a son now?
Revelations
22 : 6-18
6 And he said unto me, These
sayings are faithful and true: and the Lord
God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the
things
which must shortly be done. 7 Behold, I come
quickly: blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this
book. 8
And I John
saw these things, and heard them. And when I had heard and
seen, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel which shewed
me these
things. 9 Then saith he unto me, See thou do it not: for
I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren the prophets, and of them
which
keep the sayings of this book: worship God. 10 And he
saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for
the time
is at hand. 11 He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and
he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous,
let him
be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still. 12 And, behold, I come quickly;
and my reward is with me, to give every man
according as his work shall be. 13
I am Alpha and Omega,
the beginning and the end, the first and the last. 14 Blessed are they that do his
commandments, that they may have right to
the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. 15 For without are dogs, and
sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers,
and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie. 16 I Jesus
have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches.
I am the
root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star. 17 And the Spirit and the bride
say, Come. And let him that heareth say,
Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him
take the
water of life freely. 18 For I testify unto
every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any
man shall
add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are
written in
this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words
of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the
book of
life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written
in this
book.
Christians
once again will say that is Jesus. In fact
it is clear that that is not Jesus. Read the text very carefully, you
will
notice that it is suddenly THE God speaking when he says I am alpha and
omega.
Let us Quote to make it simple so every one can see who is talking
rather than
making everyone confused:
This
is John
6 And he said unto me, These
sayings are faithful and true: and the Lord
God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the
things
which must shortly be done. 7 Behold, I come
quickly: blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this
book. 8
And I John
saw these things, and heard them. And when I had heard and
seen, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel which shewed
me these
things
This is angel
9 Then saith he unto me, See thou
do it not: for I am thy fellowservant,
and of thy brethren the prophets, and of them which keep the sayings of
this
book: worship God. 10 And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of
the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand. 11 He that is
unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be
filthy
still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he
that is
holy, let him be holy still. 12 And, behold, I come
quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his
work
shall be
Now
this is THE God
13 I am Alpha and Omega, the
beginning and the end, the first and the last.
14
Blessed
are they that do his commandments, that
they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the
gates
into the city. 15 For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and
whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and
maketh a
lie
Now
it is Jesus
16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to
testify unto you these things in the
churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and
morning
star. 17
And the
Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let
him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And
whosoever
will, let him take the water of life freely. 18 For I
testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this
book, If
any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues
that
are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall
take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take
away his
part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the
things
which are written in this book.
So
it is not good English, no one knows who is talking unless you really
try to
find out. When you do, you see that Jesus is not claiming to be alpha
and omega
first and last.”
Source : https://www.answering-christianity.com/muslim1/rebuttaltosamshamoun24.htm
(
Now
let us say that indeed Jesus claimed that
he is alpha and omega. I am asking, so what?
“When
Muslims corner
Christians on the subject “Is Jesus God”?
Christians often try to prove the
divinity of Jesus by quoting the passage from the Revelation that Jesus
said,
“I am Alpha and the Omega”. However, this argument
is soundly refuted:
https://www.answering-christianity.com/muslim1/rebuttaltosamshamoun24.htm
Now
personally I want to draw the attention of the Christians in another
passage of
the Bible, in the book of Hebrews we read:
1. For
this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met
Abraham
returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him;
2. To whom
also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation
King of
righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of
peace;
3. Without
father,
without mother, without descent, having
neither
beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the
Son of God;
abideth a priest continually. ( Hebrews 7:13)
Notice
this Priest Melchisedec “has neither beginning of days, nor
end of life”, in
other words very logically we can say that this statement is much more
superior
than the statement supposed uttered by Jesus (that he is Alpha and the
Omega).
Because alpha and Omega has a beginning and end but this Priest
Melchisedec has
no beginning and no end, therefore why Christians don’t
consider this Priest as
God Almighty? Because his superiority from Jesus is not only for his
eternal
existence but also because he does not have a mother, Jesus had a
mother, and
he does not have a descent, Jesus had descents (two genealogies
according to
the gospels). So when Christians try to prove the divinity of Jesus by
the statement
“Iam Alpha and Omega” I advise them to better look
the statement of Melchisedec
which is much more superior than Jesus. However, Christians do not
support that
Melchisedec is God. So there is no big deal when Jesus said I am Alpha
and the
Omega.
Source : https://www.answering-christianity.com/ahmed_eldin/Alpha_and_Omega.htm
Answering his eighth
response:
Gale
Present some quotes from the Gospels:
Not everyone
who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the
kingdom of heaven
He argues that Jesus
used the word “not everyone” not
“all” in order to prove that some people
calling him lord will enter the kingdom of heaven. Yes because Jesus
refers to
the people that call him Lord in the wrong essence, these people will
not
enter, the people that will enter the kingdom of heaven are the people
that
call him Lord in the essence of his prophet hood. Because Lords are
called
other biblical Prophets. As for the quote:
MANY WILL SAY TO ME on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did
we not
prophesy in your name, and in
your name drive out demons
and perform many miracles?
The
coward Gale afraid to post the next verse
that Jesus will reject such people(making such testimonies) that did in
his
name all this things happened.
Then I will tell them plainly,
‘I
never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’" Matthew 7:23
According to Jesus all this people
are evil doers. Gale asks
“If
this referred to all who called him Lord
then why does Jesus only say “many”?”
Because
many like you Gale you take Jesus as
God Lord and you will be rejected infront of Jesus, because you took
Jesus as
Lord God and you and many others worship him in vain. Jesus confirms
that many
people after him will worship him in vain
But in vain they do worship me,
teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.( Matthew 15:9)
All this stuff that you call
Christianity, Jesus called them “teachings and doctrines of
men” wow, how much
clear can it be?
Gale continuous his funny article
by claiming that Jesus is the lord of the Sabbath, therefore his God.
Again
this missionary like all of them use arguments that already have been
dealt.
Read about the Lord of the Sabbath in details here:
https://www.answering-christianity.com/bassam_zawadi/lord_of_sabbath_rebuttal.htm
Even if this desperate
Christians invent someday a clearly statement that Jesus say
“I am God” we must
never give attention simply because others have been called Gods:
Psalms 82:6
6
"I said, 'You are "gods"; you are all sons of the
Most High.'
Actually Moses deserves
to be worshiped as God according to the bible not Jesus because Moses
was
called God of Pharaoh;
Exodus 7:1
Then
the LORD said to Moses, "See, I have
made you like God to Pharaoh,
and your brother Aaron will be your
prophet
Lord of The Sabbath, and
Moses being God, and the Gods that God address, is just respectful
titles and
nothing else. Wake up Gale.
Answering his ninth
response:
Here Gale ignore in a
very diplomatic way that God gave power and authority to Jesus. For
detail
answer check the fifth response that I proved the inferiority of Jesus
comparing the father.
Gale presents this
Quranic verses and wonders how Allah will be the heir of his own things
"And certainly We! We it is Who give life, and cause death, and We are THE HEIRS." S. 15:23
"Lo! We, only We, inherit the earth and all who are thereon,
and unto
Us they are returned." S. 19:40
The
fool missionary does not understand that
this is an expression of speech. In addition, God gave the earth for
the
service of people then to him all belongs. It is a metaphorical tone.
Finally,
he boasts that Jesus will inherit God and therefore Jesus is God but
this
argument also has been addressed here:
https://www.answering-christianity.com/jesus_heir_of_god_lie.htm
Also check the rebuttal
section of Quennel Gale:
https://www.answering-christianity.com/quennel_gale_rebuttals.htm
Rebuttals and Exposing the lies of the Answering Islam
team.
Contradictions and History of Corruption in the
Bible.
Back to brother Ahmed Eldin's section.
Also Visit:
John 1:1
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
with God, and the Word was God
was with
authority (same Greek word for
satan's rule [2]
[3])."
Also visit:
Is Jesus Allah Almighty for creating things in the Noble Quran? And is he better than Prophet Muhammad for being a creator? And is there a contradiction in the Noble Quran regarding idol gods not being able to create and Jesus Christ? See the Books that Allah Almighty gave to certain powerful Beings to enable them to possess certain Powers and to do certain Miracles, including limited Creations.
Other important links: [1] [2] [3]
Also:
Jesus
had no Divine Will according to the New Testament. How could he be our
Creator?
Jesus said he had no Divine Will.
Jesus had to
seek permission
from GOD before performing any
Miracle.
Does Muhammad exist in the Bible? |
|||
|
Also visit: Prophet Muhammad was mentioned in the previous Scriptures. Also, his Prophetic Name, AHMED or AHMAD, was both mentioned in the Glorious Quran and the DEAD SEA SCROLLS. Yes, his name was recently found in the Dead Sea Scrolls as the coming Servant. See the image for yourself.
What parts of the Bible and Hadiths do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth, and Why? [1] [2]
Note to Muslims:
As Muslims, we must be very careful when we comment on the previous Scriptures, because there is always a possibility that there might be Divine Revelations parts in the verses that we might be objecting to. I know that the many of the disbelievers constantly insult and mock Islam all the time, and even lie on their own Scriptures with their "End of Times Prophecies" lies, -where they hijacked even the Bible with their bigotry, hate and lies, - but still dear brothers and sisters in Islam, we must always be very careful when we deal with previous Scriptures, because as Muslims we do believe that they do contain remnants of Divine Revelations in them. May Allah Almighty forgive me, and forgive all sincere Muslims, for any and all mistakes and errors that we may have fell into. Ameen.
The Gospel Christ:
So, what was the Gospel of Jesus Christ then, i.e., the Injil of Jesus Christ? Even among Christians, this remains a mystery. But the Didache; a Gospel which existed even before the current Bible-Gospels (or canonized Gospels), contains a great deal of teachings of Jesus Christ. The following points are important to always keep in mind: (1)- No single Scripture, the Didache or any other Scripture, is 100% pure and accurate. There are always forgeries and alterations. This is the same with every single book and gospel. (2)- The Original Teachings of Christ exist in Scriptures that are in the Bible and outside the Bible.
For ample proofs, watch the debate-video above.
Prophet Muhammad thoroughly prophesied in the Bible & Old Scriptures.
See also: Islam's end of times STUNNING Prophecies section.
Zionist Israel will rule the earth with Mighty Evil! (Islamic Prophecy) The Glorious Quran declared 1,400 years ago that the Israeli Zionist machine will rule the entire earth with mighty evil and power. They will reach "Mighty Heights" علوا كبيرا of evil power and might on earth. See Noble Verses 17:4-8: Also, Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, made a stunning prophecy about the one-eyed anti-Christ who will rule the infidels and the world: Narrated Ibn Umar: "Once Allah's Apostle stood amongst the people, glorified and praised Allah as He deserved and then mentioned the Dajjal (anti-Christ) saying, "l warn you against him (i.e. the Dajjal) and there was no prophet but warned his nation against him. No doubt, Noah warned his nation against him but I tell you about him something of which no prophet told his nation before me. You should know that he is one-eyed, and Allah is not one-eyed." (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 55, Number 553)" Prophet Muhammad had many visions about the dajjal, and gave many signs about him. Some of the things the Prophet said about the dajjal were literal, and some were vision-metaphors. The most prominent one is that he will be one-eyed. This is both literal and metaphoric. It is literal today because the zionist anti-Christ system is indeed represented by the ONE-EYE symbol as seen in the following images. The metaphors here are Allah Almighty not being ONE-EYED, because nothing can describe Allah Almighty. There is "none like unto Him" (Quran, 112:4). In other words also, the Prophet warned that this ONE-EYED SATANIC system will be a worshiped deity. And that false deity is not Allah Almighty. For ample more details and proofs, please visit link below. Was the Islamic ONE-EYE Prophecy foretold before Islam in the Bible's Zechariah 11:17? I demonstrated using ample Biblical verses that the ONE-EYED DAJJAL (anti-Christ) was never prophesied in the Bible to be ONE-EYED, nor was this Sign ever given in the Bible to any being. For ample Noble Verses and Hadiths (Sayings of the Prophet), and proofs, please visit: Many references of this Hadith (Saying) exist throughout our Islamic Texts. This is one of the most popular Hadiths and Prophecies of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. And indeed, we are seeing it come to pass before our very eyes. Please also visit: |
The Gospel Christ:
So, what was the Gospel of Jesus Christ then, i.e., the Injil of Jesus Christ? Even among Christians, this remains a mystery. But the Didache; a Gospel which existed even before the current Bible-Gospels (or canonized Gospels), contains a great deal of teachings of Jesus Christ. The following points are important to always keep in mind: (1)- No single Scripture, the Didache or any other Scripture, is 100% pure and accurate. There are always forgeries and alterations. This is the same with every single book and gospel. (2)- The Original Teachings of Christ exist in Scriptures that are in the Bible and outside the Bible.
For ample proofs, watch the debate-video above.
See Also:
The "Son of God" Title in the 1 John 2:22
Jesus is Yahweh the Son? See how Christians got this very wrong in the NT,
using Jesus' words himself!
Also, is Islam the anti-Christ system according to 1 John 2:22?
666 | Anti-Christ | Dividing Israel
Also visit:
Doubting Thomas couldn't raise Jesus?? No way!! He raised many before (Matthew 10:7-8): Thomas raised many people from the dead (Matthew 10:7-8). Yet, he and the disciples could not raise Jesus back to life after the crucifixion? Not only that, but they all fled, and Thomas became the "doubting Thomas" because he did not believe that the man who returned was Jesus. But did you not raise people from the dead already, Thomas? What happened there? You could've raised Jesus himself back to life with your own hands! Yet, it was impossible for you to believe that it was Jesus who returned? Why?
www.answering-christianity.com/trinity_crucified.htm
These alleged miracles are very loud!
If you raise people from the dead, then the entire land of
Palestine would've heard about it. Yet, nothing
recorded historically about them. So do we have here loud
miracles or loud lies? Doubting Thomas also said "My Lord and my God" to Jesus. Yet, all believers were called "God", and Moses was the "God" of the Believers, Aaron and Pharaoh: Jesus never got crucified: [1] [2] [3] [4]. The OT and NT clearly spell it out. He was saved. Matthew 27:16-17: There were two Jesuses! Not one. Allah Almighty Said in the Glorious Quran:
King Melchizedek [1]: [1] church-written lie are discussed further down in details in this table. Ironically, the Bible's own theologians admit that 1 John contains forgeries by church fathers.
For ample more details, visit:
www.answering-christianity.com/godtitle.htm
www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=1904.msg7673#msg7673
Jesus forbade people from calling him "son of David" and "son of Abraham" (Muslims bless Abraham everyday. Shedding light on Genesis 12:1-3 "I will bless those who bless you..."). He said he is greater than them, and no one should call him son of any of these two servants of GOD Almighty. Yet, Jesus walked around and called himself son of Adam countless times: Is Jesus greater than Adam? NT says no.
Note: The (*) links below are html backups of the website's blog topic threads, in case the blog and its database are down.
From: www.answering-christianity.com/convert_christians.htm:
1 John 2:22-23
[1]
church-written lie are discussed further down in details in
this table. Ironically, the Bible's own theologians
admit that
1 John contains
forgeries
by church fathers.
Also visit:
Jonah was alive: But Jonah was always alive in his ordeal. He was alive on the shore,
This Prophecy is a lie!
Jesus laid on the floor, got healed, and got up and Matthew 27:16-17: There were two Jesuses! Not one. Allah Almighty Said in the Glorious Quran:
Father and Son Definitions: Definition of Key Terms (*) (a discussion between me and a Christian): 1- What does "The Father" really mean in the Bible? How is it defined in Islam? (see point #5 below) How does the Bible really define it? 2- What does "Son of GOD" really mean in the Bible? 3- Jesus had to match Melchizedek in Miracles and Power, according to the New Testament. See this text-debate (*) between me and a Christian. Jesus' Miracles and Miraculous Birth and Nature were given to him because he needed to be in according to Melchizedek. He had to be “in according to Melchizedek” as the Bible specifically says. See Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20 [2].
Who is Melchizedek? According to the Bible, he was the Jews' highest priest who had "no father and no mother", and "no beginning and no end" (Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20) [2]. The Bible literally says that. Jesus had to be similar and inline with him; another proof that Jesus being "God" doesn't mean he is the Creator of the Universe. 4- Does the Bible say that Yahweh created Jesus? Yes it does (*). "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word (a)- GOD Almighty, who is not seen by anyone or anything, nor is like unto anyone or anything. (b)- The World of Command, which is the invisible world of the Beings that were made by the Word and the Spirit. (c)- The World of Creation, the flush and blood, dust and water physical world and Universes (plural). Also visit: Is the Noble Quran a Creator or Creation?
1 John 2:22-23:
1 John 2:22-23 is another
church-written lie. Again, ironically, the Bible's own
theologians admit that
1 John contains
forgeries
by church fathers.
Christians often quote the following verses to
prove that Islam is the Anti-Christ:
1 John 2
22 Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 23 No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also. Muslims firmly believe in the Messiah and his virgin birth miracle. Islam cemented the virgin birth of Jesus belief after it was fading away. Christians admit this. Also, the Glorious Quran claims that sons of GOD title was used for servants raised to honor: Sons of GOD in the Glorious Quran. They are "....no more than servants raised to honor. (The Noble Quran, 21:26)".
"Messiah" is the sonship: Jesus said
Prophets are Servants, Jesus is the Son.
But the Old Testament thoroughly calls Jesus the
slave
of GOD
[1]
and who also fears GOD.
Yes
indeed, the Islamic
Isa (eesa) is
the Messiah.
This is his special sonship. He is also the Lord of his
Mansion, which has
twelve thrones or fruits
[2].
He is more than a mere Jewish Rasul (Prophet) in this regard.
He is also
heir of GOD on earth
only. That's the limit of his sonship. Otherwise, it
is sun chips! There is nothing GODly about him. He
is not our Creator. With all of his glory and might, he
still remains a mere
abd (slave) of GOD
[1]
as all sons of GOD were also called slaves of GOD.
See also:
5- What does the Glorious Quran say about the “Father” and “Son” titles:
Isaiah 41:8/font> "But you, Israel, my servant, Jacob, whom I have chosen, you descendants of Abraham my friend, Chronicles 20:7 Our God, did you not drive out the inhabitants of this land before your people Israel and give it forever to the descendants of Abraham your friend? James 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled that says, "Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness," and he was called God's friend. [002:257] Allah is the friend (ولي) and patron of those who believe. He brings them out of the depths of darkness into light. While those who do not believe, have the forces of evil as their friends; they lead them out of light, into the very depths of darkness. Such ones shall be the inmates of the fire. They will stay there forever. [003:122] (And remember) when the two groups among you lost heart (and almost fell out), even though Allah was their Friend and Protector (وليهما)? In Allah (alone), should the believers place their trust! [004:125] Who can be better in religion than one who submits his whole self to God, does good, and follows the way of Abraham the true in Faith? For God did take Abraham for a friend (خليلا). 1- Is the Protector. 2- Is the Friend. 3- Is the Guardian. - Guardian - Friend - Protector - And the One who Chose us.
So, is Islam the anti-Christ system according to 1john 2:22? No it isn't. Here are some Quran and Bible facts regarding "FATHER" and "SON" in more details: (a)- Allah Almighty is the Believers' only Guardian (المولى): See Noble Verses 8:40, 22:13, 22:78. In Arabic we say ولي الأمر , which means "The Legal Guardian". المولى is derived from the root word ولي .ولي also means a chosen friend to Allah Almighty, as in the following point. (b)- FRIENDS = SONS in the Bible and Quran (ولي , وليهما and خليلا): We further read the following in the Bible:
Isaiah 41:8
Chronicles 20:7
James 2:23 So being GOD Almighty's "SON" in the Bible is equal to being GOD Almighty's "FRIEND". Now compare this to the following from the Holy Quran: [002:257] Allah is the friend (ولي) and patron of those who believe. He brings them out of the depths of darkness into light. While those who do not believe, have the forces of evil as their friends; they lead them out of light, into the very depths of darkness. Such ones shall be the inmates of the fire. They will stay there forever. [003:122] (And remember) when the two groups among you lost heart (and almost fell out), even though Allah was their Friend and Protector (وليهما)? In Allah (alone), should the believers place their trust! [004:125] Who can be better in religion than one who submits his whole self to God, does good, and follows the way of Abraham the true in Faith? For God did take Abraham for a friend (خليلا). So the Bible's "FATHER" & "SON" for GOD Almighty and the Believers is clearly metaphoric, and it only means that GOD Almighty: 1- Is the Protector. Please visit the following link to further see what Words the Glorious Quran uses for these words and definitions: https://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php/topic,1368.msg5203.html#msg5203 (backup)
Regarding the following verse, and many others like it:
Let us look at Noble Verses 27:59, 3:33, 3:42, 7:144, 22:75, 35:32, 38:47, 39:4 from the Glorious Quran: [027:059] Say: Praise be to God, and Peace on his servants whom He has chosen اصطفى (for his Message). (Who) is better?- God or the false gods they associate (with Him)? 27:59 قل الحمد لله وسلام على عباده الذين اصطفى ءالله خير اما يشركون [003:033] God did choose اصطفى Adam and Noah, the family of Abraham, and the family of 'Imran above all people,- 3:33 ان الله اصطفى ادم ونوحا وال ابراهيم وال عمران على العالمين [003:042] Behold! the angels said: "O Mary! God hath chosen thee اصطفاك and purified thee- chosen thee above the women of all nations. 3:42 واذ قالت الملائكة يامريم ان الله اصطفاك وطهرك واصطفاك على نساء العالمين
[007:144] (God)
said: "O
Moses! I have chosen thee
اصطفيتك above (other) men, by the mission I
(have given thee) and the words I (have spoken to thee): take then
the (revelation) which I give thee, and be of those who give
thanks." [022:075] God chooses يصطفي messengers from angels and from men for God is He Who hears and sees (all things). 22:75 الله يصطفي من الملائكة رسلا ومن الناس ان الله سميع بصير [035:032] Then We have given the Book for inheritance to such of Our Servants as We have chosen اصطفينا: but there are among them some who wrong their own souls; some who follow a middle course; and some who are, by God's leave, foremost in good deeds; that is the highest Grace. 35:32 ثم اورثنا الكتاب الذين اصطفينا من عبادنا فمنهم ظالم لنفسه ومنهم مقتصد ومنهم سابق بالخيرات باذن الله ذلك هو الفضل الكبير [038:047] They were, in Our sight, truly, of the company of the Elect المصطفين and the Good. 38:47 وانهم عندنا لمن المصطفين الاخيار [039:004] Had God wished to take to Himself an (actual) son, He could have chosen لاصطفى whom He pleased out of those whom He doth create: but Glory be to Him! (He is above such things.) He is God, the One, the Irresistible. 39:4 لو اراد الله ان يتخذ ولدا لاصطفى مما يخلق مايشاء سبحانه هو الله الواحد القهار Furthermore, when Jesus was asked about when the Hour will come, he replied by saying that only GOD Almighty Knows, and that no one knows, and that Jesus himself also didn't know. Please visit:
https://www.answering-christianity.com/questions.htm Trinity Crucified! 100s of verses prove trinity is false. Jesus healed others only after getting permissions from GOD Almighty. His wishes were sometimes denied. [1] [2]
Jesus spelled it out clearly that he knew NOT. And as to calling GOD Almighty "Father", and that Islam denies that GOD Almighty is an ACTUAL FATHER to anyone, in Islam GOD Almighty is called: 1- Rab - Lord, Father (you are the Rab of your home for being the husband and the father). 2- Wali - Guardian. In the old Aramaic and Hebrew, GOD Almighty was called what-is-equivalent-to-Islam our Rab and Wali. But that doesn't make GOD Almighty our actual Father. This is exactly as Judaism metaphors such as idolatry is equivalent to spiritual adultery. No Jew is actually married to GOD Almighty to actually commit a personal marriage-adultery against GOD Almighty! Yet, the Jews use metaphors like these. Islam came to straighten all of this out and to set the record straight that GOD Almighty has no son and no daughter. Otherwise, why would GOD Almighty torture us to Hell if we were His perfect sons and daughters?? No imperfect being could be an actual son of GOD Almighty (and no being is the son or daughter of GOD Almighty, period!): [005:018] (Both) the Jews and the Christians say: "We are sons of God, and his beloved." Say: "Why then doth He punish you for your sins? Nay, ye are but men,- of the men he hath created: He forgiveth whom He pleaseth, and He punisheth whom He pleaseth: and to God belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that is between: and unto Him is the final goal (of all)" Again, please visit: https://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php/topic,1368.msg5203.html#msg5203 (backup).
The Romans had to fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues:
Jonah was alive: But Jonah was always alive in his ordeal. He was alive on the shore,
This Prophecy is a lie!
Jesus laid on the floor, got healed, and got up and Matthew 27:16-17: There were two Jesuses! Not one. Allah Almighty Said in the Glorious Quran:
6- Did you know that Elohim is Allah [1, *] [2] [3]. The "im" in Hebrew is a majestic plural for GOD Almighty. The root Word is "Eloh". And the more original Jews such as Yemenites and others say Alohim or Alah-im. And when you yourself pronounce it, you do naturally pronounce it with a double "l": Allah. Jews do call Him: Allah-im. Aramaic-speaking people also call GOD Almighty Allah. See the following videos for Biblical references and proofs. Also, pre-Islamic Biblical archeological findings have GOD Almighty as "Allah". So the Original Holy Name for GOD Almighty is not Eloh. It is Allah! Eloh is a Hebrew dialect, which not all Hebrew speakers use anyway. Allah had always been the Original and Universal GOD Almighty even before birth of Judaism, and the existence Hebrew. And Hebrew is a developed language from Phoenician. See the following links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenician_alphabet
|
What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube
Quran's STUNNING Divine Miracles: [1] Allah Almighty also promised in several Divine Prophecies that He will show the Glorious Quran's Miracles to mankind: 1- The root letters for "message" and all of its derivatives occur 513 times throughout the Glorious Quran. Yet, all Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty Alone, the Prophets' and Messengers' actual names (Muhammad, Moses, Noah, Abraham, Lot etc....) were also all mentioned 513 times in the Glorious Quran. The detailed breakdown of all of this is thoroughly listed here. This Miracle is covered in 100s (hundreds) of Noble Verses.2- Allah Almighty said that Prophet Noah lived for 950 years. Yet, all Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty Alone, the entire Noble Surah (chapter Noah) is exactly written in 950 Letters. You can thoroughly see the accurate count in the scanned images.Coincidence? See 1,000s of examples [1]. Quran's Stunning Numerical & Scientific Miracles. |