Rebuttal to Sam Shamoun’s article

A Series of Answers to Common Questions

By

 

http://www../Shamoun/zaid_zaynab.htm

Much like the Christians out-dated argument on Muhamamd and Aisha, the marriage of Muhamamd to Zaynab is also another out-dated argument by Christians along side their argument of Muhammad and Aisha. Once again there will be no need for me to write a rebuttal refuting Sam Shamoun’s arguments word for word as I usually do. The reason being is because this argument has also been explained and refuted by Muslims countless of times. Here are the links:

https://www.answering-christianity.com/lesbian_rebuttal.htm#zaynab

https://www.answering-christianity.com/adopted_sons.htm

https://www.answering-christianity.com/naked_pagan_society.htm

https://www.answering-christianity.com/jesus_kissed_mary_magdalene.htm   Jesus lusted after Mary Magdalene, according to the well-popular and widely-accepted by early Christians, "Gospel of Philip"!

http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/Muhammad/qadi-iyad.htm

http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/Muhammad/zaynab-marriage.htm

So I call upon Christians to go to those links and educate themselves on this situation, rather than wasting everybody’s time with baseless arguments which have already been responded to and refuted. Once again I tell the Muslims, that the Christian nevertheless will continue to use this argument against Islam, but don’t blame them since they don’t have the truth and we do. So they must do everything they can to discredit us, but just back and ignore them, the best thing to do in fact is just to laugh at them. That may sound rude but that’s how you should deal with them in certain cases as this. So if they continue making the same out-dated weak argument, which has been already addressed, such as Aisha, and Muhammads marriage to Zaynab, just ignore them. Just remember we have the truth, which they will never have.