What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube

Goats above 7^th heaven hadith? What is the distance between first heaven and earth?

By Mahir

There is a hadith talking about some goats above the 7^th heaven, and that the distance between the first heaven and earth is 70 years, Sam Shamoun, Ali Sina and many others have complained about this hadith, how do we Muslims respond to this?

Answer:

I remember Sam Shamoun mentioning this hadith in a debate he had with Osama Abdallah, here is the entire response which utterly debunks and humiliates Sam:

This article contains:

1.   The Hadith and man in question.

2.   Fatwa regarding the hadith and the man that narrated it, evidence by numerous scholars.

3.   What about the Bible's heaven?

4.   Conclusion

1. The hadith and man in question

The man that reported this hadith is:

al-‘Abbaas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib (may Allah be pleased with him)

The hadith in question is:
Sunan Abu Dawud Book 40, Number 4705:

It was narrated that al-‘Abbaas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: 

I was in al-Batha’ with a group of people, among whom was the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). A cloud passed over him, and he looked at it and said, “What do you call this?” They said, Sahaab (a cloud). He said, “And muzn (rain cloud).” They said, And muzn. He said, “And ‘anaan (clouds).” Abu Bakr said: they said, “And ‘anaan.” He said: “How much (distance) do you think there is between you and the heaven?” They said, we do not know. He said, “Between you and it is seventy-one or seventy-two or seventy-three years, and there is a similar distance between it and the heaven above it [and so on]” – until he has counted seven heavens. “Then above the seventh heaven there is a river, between whose top and bottom is a distance like that between one heaven and another. Then above that there are eight (angels in the form of) mountain goats. The distance between their hooves and their knees is like the distance between one heaven and the next. Then on their backs is the Throne, and the distance between the top and the bottom of the Throne is like the distance between one heaven and another. Then Allaah is above that, may He be blessed and exalted.”

So basically, this hadith is telling us that there are angels in the form of goats above the seventh heaven, you see, the Kuffar will always look for weak hadiths to “Debunk” Islam the religion of Haq (Truth), lets see what the earliest scholars said about this man and his hadiths.

2. Fatwa regarding the hadith and the man that narrated it, evidence by numerous scholars.

Fatwa by Islam-qa

“..some of the scholars criticized him for some strange matters in his hadeeth(1). Hence he was classed as da’eef (weak) by Shu’bah and Ibn al-Mubaarak(2), and Ibn Abi Khaythamah said: I heard Ibn Ma’een being asked: What is his fault? He said: He narrated ahaadeeth which no one else narrated(3), but he is thiqah. Ibn ‘Ammaar said: They say that he used to make mistakes(4), and they differed concerning his hadeeth(5). Al-Thawri regarded him as somewhat da’eef(6) but no one rejected him. Al-Nasaa’i said: Sometimes he repeats everything he hears, therefore when he narrates a hadeeth which no one else narrated(7), that cannot be regarded as sound. Ibn Hibbaan said in al-Thiqaat: he makes many mistakes(8). 

See his biography in Tahdheeb al-Tahdheeb (4/204) 

Note from me Mahir: Just to keep it clean and simple, the man in question was criticized for:

1.   strange matters in his hadith (As the one above)

2.   he was classed as weak

3.   he narrated things NO ONE heard before him

4.   he used to make mistakes

5.   they differed among his hadith

6.   some said he was somewhat weak

7.   he repeats everything he hears even if it’s from a bad source, thus it makes him a weak reporter

8.  He made MANY mistakes!

Continuing with the fatwa:

As for ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Umayrah: we do not know anything about his biography except that he narrated from al-Ahnaf ibn Qays, and no one is known to have narrated from him except Simaak ibn Harb. None of the scholars stated whether he was thiqah or da’eef except Ibn Hibbaan who mentioned him in al-Thiqaat. Ibn Hajar said in Tahdheeb al-Tahdheeb (5/301): al-Bukhaari said: It is not known whether he heard from al-Ahnaf. He was mentioned by Ibn Hibbaan in al-Thiqaat, and al-Tirmidhi classed his hadeeth as hasan. I (Ibn Hajar) say: Abu Na’eem said in Ma’rifat al-Sahaabah: He lived during the Jaahiliyyah and he was the guide of al-A’sha, but it is not proven that he accompanied the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or saw him. Muslim said in al-Wuhdaan: Simaak alone narrated from him. Ibraaheem al-Harbi said: I do not know him. End quote. 

Because Simaak’s report is not to be accepted when he is the only one narrating it, and because we find that there are some doubts about ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Umayrah, the scholars differed as to whether the hadeeth should be classed as saheeh or da’eef. 

Al-Tirmidhi said concerning the hadeeth: it is hasan ghareeb. It was classed as saheeh by Ibn Khuzaymah in his report in his book al-Tawheed where he stipulated some conditions for its soundness. Al-Haakim said in al-Mustadrak: it is saheeh according to the conditions of Muslim although they (al-Bukhaari and Muslim) did not narrate it.

Among the later scholars, Ibn Taymiyah in Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (3/192) and Ibn al-Qayyim in Mukhtasar al-Sawaa’iq (433) said its isnaad is jayyid. 

With regard to the scholars who classed it as da’eef: 

This is what is understood from the words of al-Bazaar in his Musnad (4/115), where he says: We do not know of these words being narrated except with this isnaad from al-‘Abbaas from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). We do not know of anyone who narrated from ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Umayrah except Simaak ibn Harb. End quote. 

Ibn ‘Adiyy said in al-Kaamil (9/27): it is not known. 

Al-Mazzi indicated that it is da’eef in Tahdheeb al-Kamaal (10/391). 

Al-Dhahabi said in al-‘Uluw (1/60): It was narrated only by Simaak from ‘Abd-Allaah, and ‘Abd-Allaah is somewhat unknown. End quote. But al-Dhahabi classed the hadeeth as hasan in al-‘Arsh (24). 

Another of the later scholars who classed it as da’eef was al-Albaani in al-Silsilah al-Da’eefah (1247). 

What seems most likely – and Allaah knows best – is that the hadeeth is da’eef. As Simaak ibn Harb was the only one who narrated this hadeeth which has to do with matters of the unseen, this means that it is not acceptable. The fact that little is known about ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Umayrah further damages the soundness of the hadeeth. Then there is the interruption (in the isnaad) between him and al-Ahnaf ibn Qays. 

If anyone wants to quote this hadeeth as evidence that Allaah is above His creation and that He is above the mighty Throne, the Qur’aan and saheeh Sunnah are full of such evidence and there is no need to quote this hadeeth as evidence. There are a thousand pieces of evidence which Imam al-Dhahabi compiled in his book al-‘Uluw, for those who want to know more.

End of the Fatwa!

Keep in mind that the scholars classed him as weak not because he narrated things that went against science, but because he actually IS a weak narrator!

We see that this hadith is NO PROOF at all that there is an error in Islam regarding cosmology, the infidels are just too desperate to find a mistake, and all they do is look for weak hadiths to “Debunk” Islam.

3. What about the Bible's heaven?

Genesis 1:6-7

“And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.”

“And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.”

So according to the Bible, there is a firmament dividing the earths waters from the heavenly waters! Yep, that’s why the heaven is blue! (Because that’s actually WATER above you), scientists recently discovered that the earth is flat and that the firmament is in the midst of the waters…..NOT!

4. Conclusion

I would LOVE to see a Christian responding to “3. What about the Bibles heaven?” they are so desperate and believe people will leave Islam because of weak hadiths, I know very well that they check the sources twice because they are keen to say “This is a Saheeh hadith”

Saheeh = authentic!

They point out “Errors” from the Hadiths but haven’t even solved 20% of the errors found in the Bible at www.1001errors.com.

May Allah send blessings and peace on our prophet, our teacher Muhammad!

And Allah knows best

Please visit: SCIENTIFIC MIRACLES IN QURAN

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube

The Overwhelming Scientific Miracles in the Noble Quran section.

Abortion in Islam is a crime after the first 120 days!

Rebuttals, and exposing the lies of the Answering Islam team section.

Rebuttals by Mahir.

Islam and the Noble Quran - Questions and Answers.

Answering Trinity.

Contradictions and History of Corruption in the Bible.

Questions about Jesus that trinitarian Christians don't have logical answers for.

What parts of the Bible do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth? and Why?

"Allah" was GOD Almighty's original Name in the Bible according to the Hebrew and Aramaic sources.

Scientific Miracles in Islam and the Noble Quran.

Most of the Bible's books and gospels were written by mysterious people!

Jesus mentioned Muhammad by the name in the Bible.

Did Isaiah 53 really prophesies about the crucifixion of Jesus? It supports Islam's claims about Jesus peace be upon him never died on the cross.  I also addressed John 19:36-37 from the Bible and proved that Jesus never got crucified, since GOD Almighty promised that he will protect Jesus' body and not let even a single bone be broken.    My question to all Christians is: How in the world is it possible for the feet to get nailed on the cross without any penetration to the bones by the nails, hence breaking part of the feet's bones?! I also added refutations to Exodus 12:46, Numbers 9:12, Zechariah 12:10 and Psalm 34:20, which supposedly prove the Christians' belief about Jesus crucifixion.  I proved that this dogma has no truth what so ever and exposed the wrong Trinitarian English translation of Zechariah 12:10.

Send your comments.

Back to Main Page.