Further Topic Research: Site---------------------------SiteBlogNoble QuranHadiths

200 years no gospels | 24 other thrones besides Jesus'  | Jesus' problematic hyperboles: made sinful lawful and lawful sinful | Jesus was created | What's new | A-Z library (3300+ articles) | "Muslims" was the original title | Quran Search | Quran Moral Code (100s of them) | Quran: Bibles are filled with corrupt  قول  qaowl (doctrines of sayings and writings)  | "bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah | Jesus said he was powerless |  Paul said he wasn't sure about Holy Spirit | Disciples called each other liars, satanic, false | Paul commanded women to not expose  sex predators | Research & Blog | 9/11 Israel-lie | Youtube | |

Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??

The Romans had to fake fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues: [1]

First of all, in regards to Genesis 18 & 19, see my thorough refutation to the trinity lie that was invented using them.

From www.jewsforjudaism.com

Question: Isn't the doctrine of the Trinity supported by Genesis 19:24:
"Then the Lord caused to rain upon Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire
from the Lord out of heaven"?

Answer: It has been alleged by some Christian theologians that there are
two divine personalities mentioned in this verse, one on earth,
conversing with Abraham, and the other in heaven. The one on earth, it
is claimed, rained down fire upon the two cities from the one in heaven.

There is, however, no grammatical basis for such an inference. In
accordance with the construction of the Hebrew language, we find that in
the first half of the verse, the reader is informed who caused the
brimstone and fire to fall upon the two cities. In the second half of
the verse he is told for emphasis, not only from whom it came but also
from where. The verse emphasizes that it is "from the Lord," in order to
leave no doubt as to who is in command of events.
An individual will often speak of himself in the third person instead of
using the first person. Examples of this may be seen in the following:
Lamech said, "Hear my voice you wives of Lamech" (Genesis 4:23), not "my
voice"; similarly David said, "Take with you the servants of your lord"
(1 Kings 1:33), and not "my servants"; and Ahasuerus said, ". . . in the
name of the king" (Esther 8:8), not "in my name." They are all referring
to themselves in the third person not to another personality. Likewise,
when God speaks of Himself in the third person He is also not speaking
of another personality.
God uses the technique of speaking in the third person about Himself in
a number of scriptural contexts. It is a common feature of the
Scriptures, when "the Lord" (HaShem) speaks, for the text to repeat the
noun rather than make use of a pronoun (e.g. Genesis 18:19; Exodus 3:12,
24:1; Numbers 19:1-2; Zechariah 1:17).
As we can see, the use of "from the Lord" rather than "from Him," in the
verse under discussion, conforms to the biblical usage. There is no
scriptural reason to assume that two divine personalities are mentioned.

Back to Answering Trinity section.

Send your comments.

Back to Main Page.

|

Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??

The Romans had to fake fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues: [1]

200 years no gospels | 24 other thrones besides Jesus'  | Jesus' problematic hyperboles: made sinful lawful and lawful sinful | Jesus was created | What's new | A-Z library (3300+ articles) | "Muslims" was the original title | Quran Search | Quran Moral Code (100s of them) | Quran: Bibles are filled with corrupt  قول  qaowl (doctrines of sayings and writings)  | "bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah | Jesus said he was powerless |  Paul said he wasn't sure about Holy Spirit | Disciples called each other liars, satanic, false | Paul commanded women to not expose  sex predators | Research & Blog | 9/11 Israel-lie | Youtube