Peace
It seems you didnt read the links i sent you.
If you DID read them, Abu Iyas's article deals with this Hadith particularly, PS the 2nd one is not attributed to the prophet.
PLease read the 2 links.
i will post what sheikh Abu Iyas said about this hadith (ITS IN THE LINK, PLEASE READ IT BEFORE YOU RESPOND NEXT TIME, ITS NOT THAT LONG, i WONT RESPOND TO YOUR AGUEMENTS NEXT TIME UNLESS YOU READ IT)
This is what he said
"There is one hadith remaining which was reported in Sahih al-Bukhari which is a mu’allaq hadith, and this is one of the evidences for the ones who say that music and musical instruments are not allowed, we shall look into this hadith in some detail:
This hadith although narrated in Sahih al-Bukhari, it would be not correct to say that Bukhari narrated this hadith since Bukhari does not say (he informed us) or (he told us) or something of the similar words, he reports in a mu’allaq manner in the format (and Hisham ibn ‘Ammar said) and the mu’allaq Ahadeeth in Sahih al-Bukhari are not obliged to be taken as evidence although they can be referred to. The Ahadeeth mua’llaqa means that one narrator or more are not mentioned in the chain, and thereby the hadith is Munqat’i (unconnected), and I question: why did not Bukhari mention the one who narrated this hadith to him? Does this not indicate Imam Bukhari’s suspicion on the narration and the narrator, and therefore this hadith falls down from the level of being Saheeh.
Hisham bin ‘Ammar was a man of trust but when he became old his condition changed, his sayings could not be taken doubtlessly, Abu Hatim arRazi says (when Hisham became old he changed, he would read whatever was given to him and whatever was dictated to him, he would accept) and Abu Dawud from whom Al-’Ajari narrated (Hisham narrated four hundred Ahadeeth but his chains do not have a base), and he also said that Hisham would take the Ahadeeth from Abu Mish’ar and then narrate them, and after this he i.e. Abu Dawud said (I was afraid he would create doubts in the matter of Islam itself). Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal said: “He was somewhat fickle†and also said: “If you happen to pray behind him, repeat your prayers.†It is not correct to take Ahadeeth from such a narrator, moreover, Sahih Ahadeeth refute what he narrated.
Abu Dawud narrated in his Sunan with a good chain, starting with Hisham bin ‘Ammaar: (Abdul Wahab bin Najdah narrated to us, that Bashar bin Bakr narrated to us, from Abdul Rahman Ibn Yazid Ibn Jabir, that ‘Atiyah Ibn Qays narrated to us: I heard Abdul Rahman Ibn Ghanam al’Ash’ari say: Abu Amir narrated to us or Abu Malik, I swear by Allah another oath that he did not believe me that he heard the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) say: There will be among my community people who will make lawful (the use of) khazz and silk. Some of them will be transformed into apes and swine till the day of judgementâ€. And this has a strong chain with out any doubt but there is no mention of musical instruments and female singers, so it is obvious as to which of these narrations is preferred?
The Shari’a came inline with the innate nature of man and there is no proof to say that it is in conflict with the nature of man, and the singing as all of us know, is from the nature which I cannot comprehend that a man who lives for four years or more and does not listen to songs, our children from a very young age tend to sing and dance, so has Islam come to prohibit what is part of our nature?
In the end I say, if this was a hadith, with no contradiction with the other Saheeh Ahadeeth which we have presented, we would have relied upon it over weaker Ahadeeth. But the issue here is different, that there are many Ahadeeth which are Saheeh and Hasan and contradictory to this hadith, so how do we take it?
For these 5 reasons I do not take this hadith as an evidence for prohibiting singing and musical instruments."
the scholars i have mentioned before, such as ibn hazm, rehject this hadith for this very reason.
Bukhari is just a scholar, he is not divine, and scholars do make mistakes, and although he probably made less than, less say, Timidhi, he still did.
remember that.
I (nor sheikh abu Iyas, Abu Bakr bin Arabi, or ibn Hazm) are changing the meaning, we are saying that it is not authentic.
Bukhari=/= Authentic Bukhari= most likely authentic
I cant emphasis this enough
and I cant emphaisis this enough, READ THE 2 LINKS I POSTED BEFORE YOU RESPOND NEXT TIME, THEY DEAL WITH EVERY SINGLE HADITH THAT FORBIDS MUSIC AND REFUTE IT, while showing evidence of the permisibily of music though other hadith.
I repeat, READ THE LINKS
Peace bro
