Sometimes certain disingenuous authors draw conclusions beforehand and start searching, high and low, for evidence to support those conclusions. What is being done in these arguments is that several accusations with a lot of accompanying rhetoric are mentioned and then to prove
all of them just one supporting "evidence" is presented insincerely cherry-picked from the entirety of Muslim scripture.
This can be observed in the first paragraph, using the event of the Prophet visiting his wives. However, the following testimony which directly contradicts the author's conclusions is ignored:
... `Aisha added, "None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet (ﷺ) could."
Source:
https://sunnah.com/bukhari/6/7Regarding the veil for wives of the Prophet, those special rules came to them because of their special status in the society as the hypocrites could have found opportunities to tarnish their characters and thereby hurt Islam in that particular society. Additionally, from what I've read, there were instances that when wives of the Prophet used to go to the fields to relieve themselves, some among the malicious non-Muslims would move towards them and when they got caught, used to make the excuse that they mistook them for
their women. For such cases, the veil was introduced, so that those individuals wouldn't have any excuse, and to even be killed if they tried such tactics again.
Furthermore, Allah through the Qur'an gives the wives of the Prophet, the choice to either remain with him and be subject to a special lifestyle (involving additional restrictions) or to leave the Prophet. As the authors of such anti-Islam arguments believe that the Prophet himself authored the Qur'an, they have to accept that the Prophet himself mentioned such allowances. This would directly contradict the accusations of paranoia, insecurity, and jealousy.
Regarding the quoted narration, it
is an actual Bukhari narration (
https://sunnah.com/bukhari/2/8). I personally don't see much issue with it, as how are the people supposed to follow the Messenger of God's commands and sacrifice their personal interests if they give preference to their spouses, or their parents, or their children, or their worldly material belongings over God and His Prophet?
The next paragraph presents an extraordinary amount of assumptions as fact, without providing any supporting evidence. "Spurned by his mother", "loveless childhood", "who took pity on him", "spoiled him", "not receiving love", "not receiving discipline", "narcissistic personality disorder", "bereft of conscience", "fantasized about unlimited power", "expected praise and admiration", "took advantage of others", "jealous", "extremely hurt when rejected", "killing those who deserted him", "lied", "deceived", "entitled and justified in doing so".
While all
may be traits of narcissistic personality disorder, evidence has not been presented to prove that they were the
Prophet's traits. A lot of accusations are made, but it would've been more beneficial if
more content was spent on actually proving those assertions than on simply enumerating them.
The next paragraph suffers from the same fault i.e. of no supporting evidence. Furthermore, if the Prophet's brain and psychology was
so susceptible that he would accept mundane environment influences as signs of extraordinary, supernatural divinity - then why was this susceptible-ness absent in arguably the most significant supernatural event (for which everyone was a witness to) of his lifetime i.e. the day of the solar eclipse.
Narrated Al-Mughira bin Shu`ba:
"The sun eclipsed in the lifetime of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) on the day when (his son) Ibrahim died. So the people said that the sun had eclipsed because of the death of Ibrahim. Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "The sun and the moon do not eclipse because of the death or life (i.e. birth) of someone. When you see the eclipse pray and invoke Allah."
Source:
https://sunnah.com/bukhari/16/4The Prophet's alleged vulnerable mind should have quickly and automatically made the connection that a divine power had darkened the mighty Sun, in sorrow and consolation over his son's death.
Regarding the Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) allegation, see my replies here
http://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php/topic,2598.msg12726.html#msg12726.