Thank you so much brothers i am still going through all this info u have provided me, also i came across this info:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/islamistruth.wordpress.com/2011/08/15/battle-of-jamal-its-real-face/amp/?client=ms-android-verizonIbn Habban narrated in al-Thiqat that ‘Aisha wrote to Abu Musa al-Ash’ari and to ‘Ali in al-Kufa: “You have witnessed the events leading to the murder of ‘Uthman and I have decided to go and fix the matters between the people…”
وقال:أي أُمه، ما أشخصك وما أقدمك هذه البلدة؟ قالت: أي بنى، إصلاح بين الناس
‘Ali then sent al-Qa’qa’ ibn ‘Amr al-Tamimi to ‘Aisha and he said: “O mother, what brings you to these lands?” she said: “my son I have come to settle matters between the people.”
And after the war of al-Jamal ‘Ali told ‘Aisha:
فقاللها: غفر الله لك. قالت: ولك، ما أردت إلا الإصلاح
“May Allah forgive you” she said: “And you, I only wished to fix the affairs.”
As for the Shia who said that she went to rebel against ‘Ali and take the Caliphate for herself, that is a lie, she went to make reform by punishing the killers of Ameer al-Mumineen and she had a Mahram with her that is her sister’s son ‘Abdullah ibn al-Zubair, because going out to reconcile and fix the affairs of the people in the time of Fitnah is an order from Allah just like Hajj is an order. Another lie being spread is that al-Zubair forced her to go out but this is not true as this was her opinion even before al-Zubair and Talha came to Mecca, we read in the Hadith that when she was on her way back to Mecca:
عبدالله بن عامر الحضرمي فقال: ما ردك يا أم المؤمنين؟ قالت: ردّني أن عثمان قُتلمظلومًا، وأن الأمر لا يستقيم ولهذه الغوغاء أمر، فاطلبوا دم عثمان تعزُّواالإسلام. فكان عبد الله أول من أجابها
‘Aisha met ‘Abdullah bin ‘Amer al-Hadrami who said: “What brings you back O mother of believers?” she said: “What brings me back is that ‘Uthman was killed and he was innocent, the affair of the Muslims will not be fixed while these rebels run rampant, so ask for ‘Uthman’s blood to fortify Islam.” And ‘Abdullah was the first member of their army.
I have not come to full conclusion since i still need to go through throughly the links u brothers provided me. But so far it seems that this was a big misunderstanding and manipulation by a munafiks and hypocrites, such as ibn saib and jabalah.
Even though this was clear work of the hypocrites and the munafik jews who even the quran tells achieve great highets of evil and are the people who have great deal of hatred towards us, it seems that the shia want to use this situation to attack aisha ra, instead of blaming ibn saba and jabalah and rest of the hypocrites and munafiks. It is foolishbess from shias to think that we hate hazrat ali ra, when he was the 4th calipha and was always loved. In the twist of the shias i think they take out the name of ibn saba and blame it all on aisha ra, when they don't realize she is also considered ah lal byat(family of rasool raw). So there propaganda is very contridictory.
