Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 10
1
Surah Fatir

43. Arrogance in the land and plotting of evil – but evil plotting encloses only its own people. Then do they await except the way [established for] the former peoples? But you will never find in the way of Allah any change, and you will never find in the way of Allah any alteration.

Surah Al-Fath

22. If those who disbelieve had fought you, they would have turned their backs [in flight]. Then they would not find a protector or a helper.

23. [This is] the established way of Allah which has occurred before. And you will never find in the way of Allah any change.

"Allah's sunnah" mentioned in the verses is not the laws of the universe. When the related verses are considered in their entirety, it is clearly seen that what is mentioned is Allah's fundamental religious commands and practices.

Belief in the existence and oneness of Allah, the necessity of avoiding polytheism, etc., fundamental beliefs have been conveyed to all societies. Indeed, from the first human being onwards, our Lord has presented us with only and only Islam. Both the signs within us (given in creation) and the holy books always give the same divine fundamental information. The religion that came is the same, but sometimes different commands in its details have been in question for the purpose of testing or punishment. Like the prohibition of clawed animal meat or working on Saturday for some Jewish communities in the past... Or again, like the command to slaughter a cow for the community that worshiped the calf, or the prohibition of cutting down a certain she-camel brought to the denying Thamud people... But the fundamental beliefs and commands are always the same. Polytheism and denial are always the greatest sins, and actions that harm individual rights such as stealing are always forbidden.   

Allah's religion is unchanging; throughout the adventure of servants in this universe, there has been only one divine religion (Islam). People have given baseless names to the name of Allah's religion (even changing their books), such as Christianity or Judaism in the past, but in reality, only Islam came to all of them, and all prophets were Muslims.

In contrast, the laws of the universe, that is, Allah's method of creation, can change, and very different examples can be exhibited. And the concept called "miracle," which is also described in the Quran, is generally acts-events realized outside of what the order of this universe allows us.

Going beyond the laws of the universe is already an event that only the Lord can do. Miracles-signs within the boundaries of the laws of the universe can also be realized by servants one day thanks to science and technology. But never, no servant can do anything outside the laws of physics. For this reason, it is these extraordinary events that primarily show that a miracle is not man-made but a universal sign realized by Allah.

The examples given by the verses, such as Adam's and Jesus' creation without "mother+father=birth," that is, without sexuality (sex) (giving life directly without ancestors), the resurrection of the dead, and Jesus giving life to shapes he made of clay, and Moses' staff turning into a snake, clearly prove that Allah truly possesses unlimited power and is not subject to the laws He has set.

What we call the law of the universe is actually our Lord's "way of doing things." Because we constantly witness Him doing it in the same way, we perceive it as something that happens automatically and is unchangeable. In contrast, with the miracles in these stories that He narrates in the verses, Allah is giving us the lesson, "Look, I am actually doing this, and if I wish, I can do it in the exact opposite way as well." And He repeatedly shows that He is not obliged to abide by any order or power, and that He is the One who created these orders.

Surah Al-Imran 49 And [make him] a messenger to the Children of Israel, [who will say], "Indeed I have come to you with a sign from your Lord in that I design for you from clay [something] like the form of a bird, then I breathe into it, and it becomes a bird by permission of Allah. And I cure the blind and the leper, and I give life to the dead - by permission of Allah. And I inform you of what you eat and what you store in your houses. Indeed in that is a sign for you, if you are believers.

Surah Al-Ma'idah 110 [Mention] when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, remember My favor upon you and upon your mother when I supported you with the Holy Spirit and you spoke to the people in the cradle and in maturity; and when I taught you writing and wisdom and the Torah and the Gospel; and when you designed from clay [something] like the form of a bird with My permission and you breathed into it and it became a bird with My permission; and you cured the leper and the blind with My permission; and you brought forth the dead with My permission; and when I restrained the Children of Israel from [killing] you when you came to them with clear proofs and those who disbelieved among them said, "This is not but obvious magic."   

As can be seen, again, just like in the creation of Adam, Jesus, and "people in the hereafter," the creation of birds and similar living things in the miracles of Prophet Jesus described in these verses is also extraordinary. In fact, it is directly from soil. Just as there is no question of derivation from another living thing, there is not even mother and father, that is, sexuality, in these special creations. It is repeatedly emphasized again in the Quran that the creation in the hereafter is also taking place in the same way. Especially if it is taken into consideration that the creation of the universe is also "from nothing," it can be better understood that Allah creates in various ways and that "the laws of physics we call order" cover only a certain area.   

Surah Al-A'raf 107 So [Moses] threw his staff, and suddenly it was a conspicuous serpent.

Surah Al-A'raf 117 And We inspired to Moses, "Throw your staff," and at once it devoured what they were falsifying.

In the pantheistic philosophy's universe=god understanding, the laws of the universe are unfortunately thought to be divine, unchanging, sacred things, and some people unfortunately worship them. But in reality, the universe is also a servant created from nothing. And what we call the order of the universe can also be changed by Allah, who is again its realizer, and as presented in the verses, they have been changed from time to time.   

Let's give another "proof":

Surah Al-Baqarah 259 Or [consider such an example as] he who passed by a town which had fallen into ruin. He said, "How will Allah bring this to life after its death?" So Allah caused him to die for a hundred years; then He revived him. He said, "How long have you remained [dead]?" He said, "I remained a day or part of a day." He said, "Rather, you have remained one hundred years. Look at your food and your drink; it has not spoiled. And look at your donkey. And We will make you a sign for the people. And look at the bones [of this donkey] - how We arrange them and then We cover them with flesh." And when it became clear to him, he said, "I know that Allah is over all things competent."

A similar miracle was also presented during the time of Moses:

Surah Al-Baqarah

72. And [remember] when you slew a man and disputed over it, but Allah was to bring out what you were concealing.

73. So We said, "Strike the slain man with part of it [i.e., the cow]." Thus does Allah bring the dead to life, and He shows you His signs that you might reason.

The creation of the universe from nothing is already the most magnificent example of creation ex nihilo, a miracle.

[He is] Originator of the heavens and the earth. When He decrees a matter, He only says to it, "Be," and it is.   

2-Surah Al-Baqarah 117

The creation of the first human being takes place from materials called soil and water, but since it did not come from a living thing, it is also outside the order (sexuality and birth). The situation is similar in some other examples I presented here. Furthermore, in the second creation for the hereafter universe (the Presence of the Lord), there is again the event of reviving people without sexuality and birth, that is, creating from soil.   

29: 19 Have they not seen how ALLAH initiates creation, then repeats it? Surely, that is easy for ALLAH.

29: 20 Say, "Roam the earth and see how He initiated the creation." Thus will ALLAH initiate the final creation (in the hereafter). ALLAH is capable of doing all things.

Of course, in addition to these events that take place outside the laws of physics, there are also miracles realized within them. But as we said, these kinds of events can also be realized by people one day thanks to science and technology (and are being realized). Matter can be made invisible, diseases can be cured, non-flammable materials can be produced, rains can be made to fall (intervening in the weather), the sea can be split, etc... But going beyond the laws of the universe will never be realized by any servant through science or technology. They will never be able to create from nothing, they will not be able to turn a staff into a living animal. Only Allah can do these things, and for this reason, it is primarily these miracles (realized outside the laws of physics, outside the order) that reveal that the proof comes from Him.

Otherwise, if an advanced civilization presented technological events to a society that is lagging behind in science, this would also be understood as a miracle, and it would be expected of this primitive society to believe in what they said. No, the main miracles, that is, the proofs, are those realized outside the laws of physics. Already, one of the main reasons that obliges servants to believe in what the messengers brought is this (the other is that they present verses/books that are compatible with the verses within us). The timeless, that is, universal proofs/verses they brought can never be realized by any servant.

Seeing through these miracles that the Exalted Creator is not obliged to abide by a certain physical system enables us to fully perceive that He is the sole master with unshared, free will.   

It should be noted again that these extraordinary developments/miracles are also actually part of Allah's plan. These things that are happening are His realization of an act in more than one way/method... Just as He applies different methods of animating, such as "creation from nothing," "direct creation from soil," "derivation from living things (birth)," "creating everyone from soil in the hereafter universe," He also uses many methods in revealing to people:

Surah Ash-Shura 51 And it is not for any human being that Allah should speak to him except by revelation or from behind a partition or that He sends a messenger to reveal, by His permission, what He wills. Indeed, He is the Most High, Most Wise.

These examples can be multiplied. Our Lord, who has unlimited power and free will, can realize one thing through unlimited different methods. With the proofs presented to us, we are made to witness this.


Greetings and love.

Emre Karaköse
2
As'salamu Alaikum,

Hebrew is prone to scribal errors:

"אתמך" (Atmk)  X

     kmta

"אחמד" (Ahmd)
     dmha




Take also this example:




https://www.answering-christianity.com/predict.htm

Take care,
Osama Abdallah
3
As-salam aleikum wa rahmatullahi wa baraketuh,

dear brother Ramihs97, it is a long subject to discuss here all of the details, so I will try to explain it you briefly:

1. In regards to the word etmak in DSS (Isaiah 42:1), there are strong cases which indicates that it is an altered form of ahmad. Kab al-Ahbar (d. 652), a learned rabbi from Yemen was quoted by Ibn Asakir as saying:

I find in the Torah: Ahmad, My Chosen Servant (in another narration: My Servant Ahmad, The Chosen). Verily, he is neither rude nor harsh. He would not yell or scream in markets. And he will never award an ill deed with an ill deed, rather, he will always award ill deeds with forgiveness.

Notice that he was quoting Isaiah 42:1-3. In LXX the name Jacob appears first, and then “My servant” so it refers to the first variant narration mentioned by Kab i.e. “Ahmad, My servant”. In Masoretic Text, the chapter begins with [Behold] My servant, and then etmak, so it refers to the second variant narration mentioned by Kab, i.e. My servant Ahmad…. Now, the fact that Kab mentioned two different variant of the first fragments from Isaiah 42:1 indicates that there were different manuscripts containing different variants of reading, as I've said above in the case of Septuagint and Hebrew text we have today. In LXX, the Jews must have inserted the words Jacob and Israel instead of Ahmad, since it does not appear neither in Masoretic Text, neither in Aramaic Peshitta, nor in 1QIsaa. There are too possible way to explain the origin of etmak:

a) NON-INTENTIONAL CHANGE - The Jewish scribe could have misread the original form אחמד (ahmad), because in general, the Hebrew letter ת (tav) is visually very similar to ח (chet), and the letter ך (kaph) looks very similar to ד (dalet). The later one i.e. kaph and dalet are especially similar to each other in the old Aramaic alphabet.
b) INTENTIONAL CHANGE - The Jews could have changed the name of Ahmad when they acknowledged that Prophet Mohammed is an Arab not Israeli (6th century AD). In fact there Ibn Saad in his Kitab Tabaqat al-Kabit related a narration from which can be concluded that immediately after their acknowledgement of prophet's Mohammed Arabic roots, Jews deliberately changed the name Ahmad. It says that this Jew changed Ahmad by covering or hiding it not removing it entirely. The natural consequence of such argumentation is that till Prophet’s Mohammed time there were no attempts to corrupt his second prophetic name Ahmad, so the pre-Islamic Torah would have not made any modification. You will ask: but what about DSS ? The Great Isaiah Scroll does not mentioned Ahmad, but etmak right ? You should know that before DSS were discovered, the earliest manuscript of the Hebrew Bible were Aleppo Codex and Leningrad Codex (10th century AD). So it was easy for Muslim to claim: Mohammed was mentioned in the original Torah (i.e. from ancient times), but you Jews do not possess such one, you have only those one dated back to 10th cent. so how we would know whether your rabbis does not changed the Torah after the time of Mohammed ? So what was the plan ? They must prepare some kind of proto-Masoretic Text which would agree their Masoretic one from 10th cent. (but in order to eliminate a possible suspicions from intelektualists they gave a multiple variations of textual reading so to keep scholars constantly working on formulating new theories, resolving puzzles etc.). Can you believe in this fairy, stupid story about a Hebrew text from 2 cent. BC which perfectly agrees in chronological order of chapters and verses, and with no significant departure from its Masoretic version ? I will never believe in such a crap. There was different arrangement of whole chapters in Isaiah. Frankly, there are serious reasons to think that this so called Great Isaiah Scroll which has been claimed to come allegedly from 2 cent. BC. is not an ancient autograph (at least in part). This Isaiah Scroll in many passages shares the same textual variant as the Hebrew MSS from medieval period collected by Kennicott and de Rossi.

Let us return to the subject of mentioning Ahmed in DSS.

If you recall Matthew 12:18 you will see that his quotation is unique, i.e. is not similar as in Old Testament Hebrew Isaiah or Greek Septuagint:

Behold, my servant whom I have chosen, my beloved (agapetos) with whom my soul is well pleased. I will put my Spirit upon him, and he will proclaim justice to the Gentiles.

According to early church tradition, the Gospel of Matthew was originally written in Hebrew, and then it was translated into Greek. Notice that in Matthew you will not find such word as whom I uphold/I support for Hebrew etmak. Why ? Here is the answer… the Greek term ἀγαπητός (agapetos) for my beloved which occurs in the text of Matthew 12:18 is actually an equivalent for Hebrew חמד (chamad) found e.g. in Joshua 7:21 under the form אחמדם which can be read as ahmadam or echmedem. The point I ’am going to is that the Hebrew scroll from which Matthew quoted Isaiah 42:1 must have contain the word composed with the root חמד (chamad), yet it cannot be found in today’s Masoretic Text ! Beside this, there are many other details which supports the view that the name Ahmad indeed was mentioned in the original text of Isaiah 42:1.

2. In regards to the Zohar book, it is a great possibility that it talks ocasionally about Ahmed, notice the words occurring around it: through him in ancient of days, Isaiah, sent etc. I ’am simply guessing that it is about prophet Ahmad who was foretold in Isaiah and from ancient of days. I currently waiting for the answer of some certain rabbi. The text of Zohar is specifically in Aramaic, not in Hebrew as I previously thought.

Take care, and salam
Ahmed (Poland, Warsaw)


salam alaikum brother wa rahmatullahi barakatuh ahmad,

Abdullah bin Issa Al Abdul-Jabbar (عبدالله بن عيسى آل عبدالجبار) stated that Matthew 12:18 is evidence original Isiah did have a word with h-m-d root, because the word αγαπητος [agapétos] (means= beloved, Strong's Dictionary) and מחמד [machmad] (means= beloved, Strong's Dictionary), but the problem with that that agapétos does not come from h-m-d root,

the old testemant greek translation (LXX) uses agapétos word words with no h-m-d roots.=

Old testament = https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g25/lxx/lxx/0-1/#lexResults
New testamnet (only greek) = https://biblehub.com/greek/agape__26.htm

Now i get the hadith narations mentiond about Ka'b Al A7bar,

[ في السطر الأول محمد رسول الله عبدي المختار ... ]،
[ أجد في التوراة: أحمد عبدي المختار ... ]،  [ محمد عبدي المختار ... ]،
[ أجد في التوراة: عبدي أحمد المختار ... ]،  [ نجد مكتوبا محمد رسول الله لا فظ ... ]

Source=
https://ar.lib.efatwa.ir/40314/1/186
https://ar.lib.efatwa.ir/40314/1/187
https://ar.lib.efatwa.ir/40314/1/188
https://ar.lib.efatwa.ir/40314/1/189

These text show that Is. 42 could possibly also have the word Machmad written in it, not just Ahamd.
We did see that ka'b Al A7bar did qoute torah verses that are very similiar to our modern day one specifically Is 42:1, Now the qestion that arises in my head is...

we know that: [ early Christian tradition from the 2nd-century bishop Papias of Hierapolis. According to Papias, Matthew the Apostle was the first to compose a gospel, and he did so in Hebrew. Papias appeared to imply that this Hebrew or Aramaic gospel (sometimes called the Authentic Matthew) was subsequently translated into the canonical Gospel of Matthew. Jerome took this information one step further and claimed that all known Jewish-Christian gospels really were one and the same, and that this gospel was the authentic Matthew. As a consequence he assigned all known quotations from Jewish-Christian gospels to the "gospels of the Hebrews", but modern studies have shown this to be untenable.[1]

The hypothesis has some overlap with the Aramaic original New Testament theory, which posits Gospels originally written in Aramaic rather than Hebrew. Modern versions of the Hebrew gospel hypothesis often overlap with the Augustinian hypothesis. ]

Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_Gospel_hypothesis#:~:text=According%20to%20Papias%2C%20Matthew%20the,he%20did%20so%20in%20Hebrew.

ibn taymya said=

 وقد كانت ترجمة البشيطا هي الأشهر عند نصارى الجزيرة العربية وما جاورها، ونصها محفوظ إلى اليوم، وفيها ما يُعرف من مناكير التوراة التي ردّها القرآن .

وأمّا يهود الجزيرة العربيّة : فالراجح أنهم كانوا يعتمدون على الترجومات (الترجمات الآرامية)، وهي ، وإن كانت ترجمات تفسيريّة ؛ إلا أنّها توافق النص المشهور في منكراته.".

translation to English=

The Peshitta translation was the most famous among the Christians of the Arabian Peninsula and its surroundings, and its text is preserved to this day. It contains what is known of the Torah's objectionable elements, which the Quran refuted.

As for the Jews of the Arabian Peninsula, it is most likely that they relied on the Targums (Aramaic translations), which, although interpretive translations, agree with the well-known text in its objectionable elements.

source= https://islamqa.info/ar/answers/285261/%D9%83%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%AE-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%86-%D8%AA%D9%8A%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%B1%D8%AD%D9%85%D9%87-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87-%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%B9%D9%86-%D9%85%D8%AF%D9%89-%D8%B5%D8%AD%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B0%D9%8A-%D9%8A%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%84%D9%87-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%89-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AC%D9%8A%D9%84

As we know the greek Matthew 12:18 is from the LXX  =

οπως (ἵνα) πληρωθη το ρηθεν δια ησαιου του προφητου λεγοντος: Ιδου ο παις μου ον ηρετισα “ο αγαπητος μου” ον ευδοκησεν η ψυχη μου θησω το πνευμα μου επ αυτον και κρισιν τοις εθνεσιν απαγγελει

it came as “ο αγαπητος μου” my beloved, so its not a name rather an verb,

But an argument against it, the similarity between Isiah 42 and haggai 2: 7 wich speaks about חֶמְדָּה that will be light for nations and the gentiles same figure appears in Is. 42..

hebrew haggai 2: 7 contains חֶמְדָּה chamdat, while LXX has τὰ ἐκλεκτὰ (the chosen) instead of the word חֶמְדָּה, could that mean that ahamd was synoymous with the chosen one?

What supports the idea that the word in Isaiah is 'Ahmad' is the remarkable similarity between the texts of Isaiah and Haggai:

Isiah: הן עבדי "אחמד" בו בחירי... משפט לגוים יוציא
Haggai: ובאו "חמדה" (τὰ ἐκλεκτὰ) כל ה

Isaiah: Behold, my servant 'Ahmad' whom I have chosen... He will bring justice to the nations
Haggai: And 'Hamada' (the chosen - τὰ ἐκλεκτὰ) will come to all the nations

It seems that some of the scribes of Haggai used 'Hamada' instead of 'the chosen' because they knew that this was referring to this, based on the prophecy of Isaiah or others. And God knows best."

It is known that the book of Isaiah precedes the book of Haggai, and this is another evidence of the connection between 'Hamada' or 'Ahmad' or 'Muhammad' or 'Mahmad' and the chosen one, and that this refers to that. Therefore, in the version of Haggai used by the translators of the Septuagint, 'the chosen' was replaced with 'Hamada'. Transalted from arabic to English, Source: Abdullah bin Issa Al Abdul-Jabbar (عبدالله بن عيسى آل عبدالجبار) AHMED mentioned in Dead Sea Scroll Old Testament.

So now, I can speak my question.. is it realy valuable to use Matthew 12:18 as a clear cut evidence, We know absolutly that it doesn't have conection with the masoretic text not LXX and qumran Isiahs (Only 1Q Isaiaha, quite coincidental 4Q56 Isaiahb doesn't have the first verse 42:2-12, and 4Q61 Isaiahg 42:14-25 also, but what is more coincidental 1Q Isaiahb it contains Isiah chapter from chapter 38 to chapter 64, but there is a whole chapter lost in it, can you guess wich it?? ISIAH 422222222!!!!)

Because  “ο αγαπητος μου” can just mean MY BELOVED, not a name?

May allah bless you and your family brother Ahmad in this holy month!, looking for you response.

Greetings from the Netherlands
[ In fact there Ibn Saad in his Kitab Tabaqat al-Kabit related a narration from which can be concluded that immediately after their acknowledgement of prophet's Mohammed Arabic roots, Jews deliberately changed the name Ahmad. It says that this Jew changed Ahmad by covering or hiding it not removing it entirely./quote]        Aslam alaikum brother ahamd, do you have source for this narration. in arabic or english?
4
As'salamu Alaikum,

It is not Jesus vs. Muhammad.  Christianity is a total church-made fraudelant lie.  Even the name "Jesus" is pagan, and "Christian" is pagan.  The originals in Palestine were called Muslims, and the Messiah was called Eesa (means healer or doctor in Hebrew).

The New promised Covenant includes both the Messiah and Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon them both.  Remember that GOD will sing a New Song from Arabia, and will send a New Covenant from Arabia.  Even the invasion of unwalled Palestine in 1948 is prophesied in Ezekiel.  GOD will then come from the EAST to destroy this evil force and system that has defiled the Holy Land.

This is all thoroughly proven at:

https://www.answering-christianity.com/convert_christians.htm
https://www.answering-christianity.com/east.htm
https://www.answering-christianity.com/predict.htm
https://www.answering-christianity.com/paran.htm
https://www.answering-christianity.com/dajjal.htm
https://www.answering-christianity.com/goddess_asherah_pornography_return_of_messiah_damascus.htm

https://www.answering-christianity.com/eesa.htm
https://www.answering-christianity.com/luke6_40.htm


Take care,
Osama Abdallah



5
Quote
I don't agree very much with your proofs, that babylon here is meant arabia

Wa Alaikum As'salam Wa Rahmatu Allah Wa Barakatuh,

I never said Arabia is Babylon, brother.  The Torah and NT speak of three Babylons:

1-  Actual literal Babylon (Iraq and other territories in Syria, Jordan and Iran).

2-  Virgin Daughter of Babylon, Arabia.

3-  Future Babylon of pornography.  Asherah in the OT, Jezebel in the NT:

https://www.answering-christianity.com/goddess_asherah_pornography_return_of_messiah_damascus.htm

All Bible theologians agree that the Daughter of Babylon is Arabia, and it is virgin because it had no Scriptures nor Prophets.

Aslam alaikum Brother Osama,

I have sent you a message, did you recive it?, because I don't see it in my send messages
6
Even Sam barfoon quotes the early church considering those who say that Jesus died for your sins as a blasphemy.  Click the link above.
7
Isaiah 53 proves that the Messiah will not be killed.  His life will be prolonged by GOD Almighty.  This is even listed in Isaiah 53 itself.  And if you look at the Psalms, GOD Almighty will save him.  Jesus and Mary even thank GOD Almighty for saving Jesus from death and harm:

www.answering-christianity.com/isaiah_53.htm
8
The New Covenant that is promised in the Torah includes both the Messiah and Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon them.  They both compliment and complete each other.  It is not one on the expense of the other.  The Torah is filled with Prophesies about the two great Prophets:

www.answering-christianity.com/predict.htm

The Bibles all greatly support that the Messiah was never crucified.  He was saved:

www.answering-christianity.com/isaiah_53.htm

9
Quote
I don't agree very much with your proofs, that babylon here is meant arabia

Wa Alaikum As'salam Wa Rahmatu Allah Wa Barakatuh,

I never said Arabia is Babylon, brother.  The Torah and NT speak of three Babylons:

1-  Actual literal Babylon (Iraq and other territories in Syria, Jordan and Iran).

2-  Virgin Daughter of Babylon, Arabia.

3-  Future Babylon of pornography.  Asherah in the OT, Jezebel in the NT:

https://www.answering-christianity.com/goddess_asherah_pornography_return_of_messiah_damascus.htm

All Bible theologians agree that the Daughter of Babylon is Arabia, and it is virgin because it had no Scriptures nor Prophets.
10
the part from Isaiah 52= 13 See, my servant will act wisely[a];
    he will be raised and lifted up and highly exalted.
14 Just as there were many who were appalled at him
    his appearance was so disfigured beyond that of any human being
    and his form marred beyond human likeness—
15 so he will sprinkle many nations,[c]
    and kings will shut their mouths because of him.
For what they were not told, they will see,
    and what they have not heard, they will understand.

53 Who has believed our message
    and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?
2 He grew up before him like a tender shoot,
    and like a root out of dry ground.

to makes sense if it could have been talking about the prophet muhhamd (pbuh) but when the text continuous, = He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him,
    nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.
3 He was despised and rejected by mankind,
    a man of suffering, and familiar with pain.
Like one from whom people hide their faces
    he was despised, and we held him in low esteem.

4 Surely he took up our pain
    and bore our suffering,
yet we considered him punished by God,
    stricken by him, and afflicted.
5 But he was pierced for our transgressions,
    he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was on him,
    and by his wounds we are healed.
6 We all, like sheep, have gone astray,
    each of us has turned to our own way;
and the Lord has laid on him
    the iniquity of us all.

I began to doubt!, do you brother Ahamad have any valid arguments it could talk about messianc fifure in emd times (Muhammad pbuh), the isiah 52:13-15, is without no doubt about the prophet Muhammad (pbuh)
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... 10

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube