Answering Christianity Research Center

1.)Muhammad SAW never went to river sindhu which is in India,he never stepped foot out of Arabia
2.)King Bhojaraja was in 1100s,not 500s.
3.)No Muhammad SAW did not meet kalidasa.
4.)No,muslims donot scream or be loud.
5.)No,muhammad saw never bathed an idol.
6.)No,we are strictly forbidden from wickedness.
7.)There were no muslims in gandhar or shath at the time,only in Arabia,
8.)Baltic Sea isnt even close to Arabia,but to Asia.
9.)We donot cut our genitals,we cut a part of it,even jews and christians do,it is good for health,if
Your geetah cannot coincide with science it is not our fault if it really does mean  a part.
10.)We donot preform a ritual?! WHAT is Eid Ul Adha for?!
11.)Musulmans own THE WHOLE of Sindhu river,93% belongs to Pakistan,get your facts straight we arent on the other side.
12.)Muhammad SAW was born in the tribe of Quraysh not in the order of bali,which is in Indonesia.
13.)Medina doesnt look like a ghost or Bhuta,what are you spewing sir?
14.)Muhammad SAW never acted like a ghost,he met people,spoke with people,had a wife,and a daughter,also had a job,he was like any Human being,the only difference was that he was pure from sin and perfect.
15.)Muhammad SAW never stood infront of Bhojaraja at Night,infact after in night no Arab would even get out of where they were,it was a dangerous place.and Bhojaraja didnt even exist.

Sahih bukhari

This ignorant man is back for more and says


"I mean talk it into a historical point of view. Do you think that if the Muslims won they would have been spared? would think no, but that's what they gave their enemies." Actually the historical context of this passage tells us that Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and weren't even under attack by their Meccan adversaries. So it is once again, not defensive warefare, infact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city as i stated in my previous comment.

And also claims 9:41 is vulgar and clear in its wordings and that all muslims should follow it.

Ill keep you updated with the debate and ask some some questions,

Nvm he replied saying "Ibn Ishaqs book is rhe most reliable source,and no i wont join your pety biased website"

I donot believe this i can disprove it but i dont have the verses to since ive found tafseers to disprove this claim but this man is soo arrogant he says all historical contexts are false,only one and this is what he said about verse 2:190

"But the use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous the actual Arabic words for persecution is "idtihad" - and  zlm isnt there in the verse"

I want to know the ruling of Homosexuality in Islam,people are telling me its evil to Punish gays