Answering Christianity Research Center

Oh God this person is back to show his lack of knowledge on Islam more.

He says 2:14 says
2:14 "a fragment of the heaven falling?" Didn't Muhammad realize the sky is not solid?  Or did he think the firmament was a solid structure?


First of all 2:14 doesnt even say that it says

"And when they meet those who believe, they say, "We believe"; but when they are alone with their evil ones, they say, "Indeed, we are with you; we were only mockers."

This problem has been there for a while since I really cant read the Bible,its banned in UAE libraries so can you tell me any verse against Trinity in the Bible?

"4:11-12 Allah (thus) directs you as regards your Children's (Inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females; if only daughters, two or more, their share is two-thirds of the inheritance; if only one, her share is a half. For parents, a sixth share of the inheritance to each, if the deceased left a child; if no child, and the parents are the (only) heirs, the mother has a third; if the deceased left brothers (or sisters) the mother has a sixth. The distribution in all cases (is) after the payment of legacies and debts. Ye know not whether your parents or your children are nearest to you in benefit. These are settled portions ordained by Allah; and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.

In what your wives leave, your share is a half, if they leave no child; but if they leave a child, ye get a fourth; after payment of legacies and debts. In what ye leave, their share is a fourth, if ye leave no child; but if ye leave a child, they get an eighth; after payment of legacies and debts. If the man or woman whose inheritance is in question, has left neither ascendants nor descendants, but has left a brother or a sister, each one of the two gets a sixth; but if more than two, they share in a third; after payment of legacies and debts; so that no loss is caused (to any one). Thus is it ordained by Allah. and Allah is All-knowing, Most Forbearing.

4:176 They ask thee for a legal decision. Say: Allah directs (thus) about those who leave no descendants or ascendants as heirs. If it is a man that dies, leaving a sister but no child, she shall have half the inheritance: If (such a deceased was) a woman, who left no child, Her brother takes her inheritance: If there are two sisters, they shall have two-thirds of the inheritance (between them): if there are brothers and sisters, (they share), the male having twice the share of the female. Thus doth Allah make clear to you (His law), lest ye go astray. And Allah hath knowledge of all things."

Yeah, great, you have identified the relevant passages.  Now, explain what to do if a man dies intestate and is survived by his two parents, three or more daughters (but no sons), and one or more wives.

"1. The first major point to note is that there are two types of inheritors. The first category are those who have recieved a fixed inheritance, which includes the spouse and the parents. The second category includes those who take their share AFTER the shares of the first category are distributed. This includes siblings and children."

How in the heck are children included in this second category?  They obviously belong to the first.  Again, read 4:11 - Allah (thus) directs you as regards your Children's (Inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females; if only daughters, two or more, their share is two-thirds of the inheritance; if only one, her share is a half

Nowhere is it stated that the children's share comes after any allowances are made for any other heirs.  That is a complete fabrication.  You are no longer a Muslim because you have denied the clear words of the Koran.

"So if we understand this, we know that the parents and the wife would recive their amount, and the daughters would get a share of what remains. This explanation on its own solves the problem, because:

-1/3 for the parents together
-1/8 for the wife
-And for the daughters 2/3 of what remains = 2/3 of 13/24=13/36 of the total amount

So what remains after is 13/72 of the original amount. This remaining portion is to be given to whoever the deceased person appointed as their heir. The deceased can choose to have it given in charity or to the local masjid etc. If they have not specified any destination for the remaining wealth then it is given to the closest male relative."

Where are you getting any of this nonsense, Muslim?  The daughters' share is clearly out of the total estate; not after prior takers.

"2. Let us now address the specific claims. The first claim is that 2/3 (daughters) +1/3 (parents) +1/8 (wife) will add up to more than available. But the truth is that the Qur'an does not specify what the parents and the wife will recieve if there are three daughters. The Qur'an states that the parents get 1/6 each if the deceased left a child. And the wife gets 1/8 if the deceased left a child. Both times it is singular, but in the proposed scenario, there are three daughters, not one."

Oh, so you think that the Koran LEFT THIS OUT?  In that case, you're even more up a creek with this document as any kind of a legal code.

"Some confusion may have caused this misunderstanding because in some translations, the word walad (child) is mistranslated as children. But in most translations like Pickthall, Asad, Shakir, Daryabadi, Irving, etc. the word has been correctly translated in the singular form."

Yeah, and if we have this same phrasing ("left a child") in English law then it would also extend to circumstances in which more than one child survived the decedent because it would be read as "at least one child."  In the following SENTENCE, the same word (waladun) is used in a form in which it is clearly meant to refer to "any child."  "For parents, a sixth share of the inheritance to each, if the deceased left a child; if no child [lit. not any child, where "any child" is "waladun"], and the parents are the (only) heirs, the mother has a third; if the deceased left brothers (or sisters) the mother has a sixth."  So it's clear that it's being used as an indefinite nominative and not restricted to a single child.

Why do Muslims have to lie about the very grammatical structure of the Koran in order to make any sense of the book?  Isn't it written in plain Arabic that is easy to understand?
Show less

These contradictions are too clear to be refuted..
And there is NO,literally NO explanation for these refutations and we caught them out bad.

And even today people are saying Christianity is dying yet Christians disagree and go to tell us lies like "Christians are still more than Muslims"

This now has also led me to a debate, I'll use this blog as a helpful tool and ask questions if I cannot answer some questions.

Arabic is a ancient language and has developed a long time ago,and is developing over time and again so we never know if there were verses in Quran which contain farsi or something,Allah SWT inspired The Quran in the arabic of that time,so probably these words were in arabic.

1.He says he doesn't believe in hell but fears the thought of eternal hellfire,sigh this guy just never quits does he?

2."Evolutionism" Arguements against Religion are used in almost many of his videos.

3.As I have noticed in all his videos he's forcing people to watch his videos and promoting Anti-Islamic channels like the Masked arab.

4.He presents arguements such as "Abrogations",etc,etc which were used once by David wood and his likes in the past.

5.His most weakest arguements,none they all are weak,but I'll just present one
That Mecca was not known as a trade route back then,Alright,what!?

First of all,no Muslim source claimed it to be a trade route,it was just famous among pagan Arabs,second of all he claims Muhammad SAW's time Mecca didnt exist,alright mr.retard Sameer here(Dont call him Abdullah he's a liar,from now on this will call him Sameer)

Didnt hear of references to a blocky building in the BIble,or Macoraba or any ancient views of the Ka'aba and Mecca.
Strange huh?.

6.He's probably not really the person you wanna be talking to,he's a stalker,Ali Dawah wanted to debate him,but when he wasnt joining Ali Dawah's Skype call,Ali Dawah left and didnt debate him,I do admit Ali Dawah did come across as rude in his last comment,but even he has a life.
but after this issue he went and sent people to Ali Dawah's acc to attack him and stalk him along with himself.

7.I've seen him ignorantly debate on a youtube video,okay so he claims that Muhammad SAW should've known the PERFECT words for all Scientific Verses these,well Sameer doesn't know Arabic I guess,if we read Arabic we can clearly see none of these words have a problem at all,Look Arabic is a ancient language,translating it into english will give us simplistic terms,but when we translate the Quran from basic arabic with all the analogys,etc we see that the Quran is perfect in its scientific terms.

And basically these are all the tyrades he went on.

I used to believe what Abdullah Sameer(For a day until research)said until I realized his ignorance,first of all his newer videos I want to point out,he ignores 2:256 when speaking about the Muslim world view completely he ignores 60:8 and many verses in the Qur'an and goes into his own tyrades on the muslim world View,rest is just gibberish where he can't comprehend what the Qur'an or the hadith is saying.


And on a new debate video he did he uses Anti Islamic sources such as "Embryology in the Quran refuted" which,by the way also has been refuted by Muslims with Arabic linguistics.

Abdullah Sameer claims he has been a Muslim for 16 years,but he couldn't refute simple allegations against the Prophet(SAW),And couldn't find for himself Isnads on hadiths he gives out(which are by the way very da'if by Isnad)

And also people who Dawah like Abdullah Sameer used to(As he claimed) would be very knowledgable on the subject of beating wives yet Abdullah Sameer again refutes himself by re-using Anti-islamist claims that he stole from Atheist sites


For Dhul-Qurnain He claims closing 2 people behind a gate is impossible and would need a flat earth for that,well then I guess he forgot the great wall of China,or the Caspian gates,Abdullah Sameer is embarrasing himself with these claims,a gate between two mountains is possible,as it has been done before and infact The thought of location of Gog and Magog is inside the Caspian gates,even Dariyal Gorge.


Abdullah Sameer has this strong desire of making money because for a matter of fact,his videos all have Advertisements.

Abdullah Sameer's Wife learned and converted to Islam,and every video with his wife,it is seen his wife doesn't really take him that seriously.

Abdullah Sameers Case is supposed to be religion itself like every other atheist says "How do you know which belief is true?" Well Islam has 0 Contradictions,so afcourse it has to be true,Abdullah Sameer doesn't realize this.

So since Abdullah Sameer has no life and makes over 100s of videos I'll just keep this in Part 1

For a while I've watching this fools videos trying to bring Muslims out of Islam,also sometimes calling hate against Muslims,so I want someone to refute his video:"Muhammad SAW explains stuff"
(without the SAW he isnt muslim)