Answering Christianity Research Center

(Also the following detailed refutation is a must read: http://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php/topic,1105.msg5574.html#msg5574)


As'salamu Alaikum dear brother Farhan Uddin,

Let's look at the Hadith that you mentioned:

"Abu Harb b. Abu al-Aswad reported on the authority of his father that Abu Musa al-Ash'ari sent for the reciters of Basra. They came to him and they were three hundred in number. They recited the Qur'an and he said: You are the best among the inhabitants of Basra, for you are the reciters among them. So continue to recite it. (But bear in mind) that your reciting for a long time may not harden your hearts as were hardened the hearts of those before you. We used to recite a surah which resembled in length and severity to (Surah) Bara'at. I have, however, forgotten it with the exception of this which I remember out of it:" If there were two valleys full of riches, for the son of Adam, he would long for a third valley, and nothing would fill the stomach of the son of Adam but dust." And we used so recite a slirah which resembled one of the surahs of Musabbihat, and I have forgotten it, but remember (this much) out of it:" Oh people who believe, why do you say that which you do not practise" (lxi 2.) and" that is recorded in your necks as a witness (against you) and you would be asked about it on the Day of Resurrection" (xvii. 13)." (Sahih Muslim, Book 5: The Book of Zakat (Kitab Al-Zakat), Book 005, Number 2286)

The answer is very simple:

1-  The doubt happened in Iraq, not in Madina or Mecca.

2-  Why go to a doubtful source, when you have the primary source?

3-  The Holy Quran was written and compiled on the spot during Prophet Muhammad's days, peace be upon him.

4-  Memorizing the Holy Quran was something the Muslims big on, because it was from Allah Almighty, and also because they needed to read the Holy Book in their daily Prayers.

5-  The Holy Quran was perfectly preserved in Mecc and Madina.

6-  The noise that you hear is from places that were many 100s of miles away, on foot.

7-  And who told you that these Hadiths are reliable?  I am one Muslim that believes that there are consipracies done in the Bukhari and Muslim and other Hadith collections.  Yes, they contain Truth in them.  But they also contain what clearly appears to be deliberate poisons in there to poison the believers' faith.  Example of this:  A person was walking down, and saw monkies stonning to death an adulterous she-monkey?? (Source).  Do animals even have these types of rituals and intelligence among them?

And what's even funnier is that the narrator (the guy) says that he started stonning the she-monkey with them (Source).  I mean this is as if he is deliberately spitting in the face of the reader, and the reader's intelligence!  It is as if there is a hidden message to the Muslim reader that says:  "Hey stupid!  This is in your so-called most authentic hadiths collections."

Why does such garbage exist in the Sahih Bukhari and Muslim and other Hadith collections?



Two simple missing "verses" caused so much noise:

Another example of the poisons injected in the Sahih Hadiths literature is this:

1-  The so-called missing stonning (rajm) Verse (Ayah).

2-  The so-called ADULTS ALLOWED TO SUCH breasts and become foster children to any female verse (ayah).

I ask you in the Holy Name of GOD Almighty, could not any living person in Mecca and Madina even memorize the texts of these two small and simple verses??  We're not talking BOOKS MISSING HERE.  We're talking about two simple short verses that we don't even have their texts??

Clearly this is nothing but poison of lies injected in the Sahih Hadiths volumes.  It's a conspiracy against Islam from within!  Again, spitting in the face and intelligence of the reader! 

What's even more funnier and monkier than this is that in Egypt and Saudi Arabia they had huge debates about whether a grown up man can suck a woman's breasts and become her foster child.  Yet, in the Holy Quran, sucking the breasts is only for the first two years of the child's life.  So even a small kid is not allowed to suck his mother's breasts; let alone a grown up man like ME sucking a a woman's breasts:

"The mothers shall give suck to their offspring for two whole years, if the father desires to complete the term....  (The Noble Quran, 2:233)"



Would not the drawn attention have caused for the "verses" to be memorized and documented?

We are taught in our Islamic Hadiths literature that Caliph Omar said the following to the Muslims:

Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:

'Umar said, "I am afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, "We do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy Book," and consequently they may go astray by leaving an obligation that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm that the penalty of Rajam be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual intercourse, if he is already married and the crime is proved by witnesses or pregnancy or confession." Sufyan added, "I have memorized this narration in this way." 'Umar added, "Surely Allah's Apostle carried out the penalty of Rajam, and so did we after him."  (Sahih Bukhari, Book 82: Punishment of Disbelievers at War with Allah and His Apostle, Volume 8, Book 82, Number 816)

And regarding the verses about the suckling of adults:

عن عائشة قالت لقد نزلت آية الرجم ورضاعة الكبير عشرا ولقد كان في صحيفة تحت سريري فلما مات رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وتشاغلنا بموته دخل داجن فأكلها

Reported 'Aisha (RA): ‘the verse of stoning and of suckling an adult ten times was revealed, and they were (written) on a paper and kept under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) expired and we were occupied by his death, a goat entered and ate away the paper.’ (Sunan Ibn Majah, Hadith 1944)

Question:  Since supposedly so much light was shed upon these two topics by Omar and Aisha, and so much attention was drawn to them, how come then no one was able to come up with their texts??  Today, we do not have the actual texts of those alleged "verses".  All we have are empty claims in the poisoned books!  Doesn't this prove that these alleged conversations by Omar and Aisha, may Allah Almighty be pleased with them, - in the narrations above, - never actually took place?  In other words, they are lies on the mouths of Omar and Aisha, just like that lie above about the stoning of the she-monkey!

This should further demonstrate that there are injected lies and conspiracies in our Hadiths collections.  Now, this doesn't mean that we should reject the Hadiths by the wholesale.  No.  I am not a Qurani or Quran-Only Muslim.  In fact, I exposed this false cult on the this website.  But false hadiths above clearly demonstrate that there are conspiracies, from within, against Islam.  You couldn't possibly be a sane person, and at the same time accept the stoning of the she-monkey Hadith!  Yet, it's in our strongest and supposedly most authentic Hadiths collections.

The same goes with the suckling for adults and the stoning alleged "verses".  With all of the supposed drawn attention to them, it should've been very easy for Muslim to write them down.  After all,

1-  Did they not come down for all Muslims? 

2-  Were they not memorized by many Muslims?

3-  Were they not written down by other Muslims?



The Prophet got bewitched through a piece of his hair??

Here is another example that further demonstrates the clear conspiracy and poisons of lies that were deliberately injected into our Hadiths literature, from within.  Consider the following absurd Hadith:

Narrated 'Aisha:

"That Allah's Apostle was affected by magic, so much that he used to think that he had done something which in fact, he did not do, and he invoked his Lord (for a remedy). Then (one day) he said, "O 'Aisha!) Do you know that Allah has advised me as to the problem I consulted Him about?" 'Aisha said, "O Allah's Apostle! What's that?" He said, "Two men came to me and one of them sat at my head and the other at my feet, and one of them asked his companion, 'What is wrong with this man?' The latter replied, 'He is under the effect of magic.' The former asked, 'Who has worked magic on him?' The latter replied, 'Labid bin Al-A'sam (a Jew).' The former asked, 'With what did he work the magic?' The latter replied, 'With a comb and the hair, which are stuck to the comb, and the skin of pollen of a date-palm tree.' The former asked, 'Where is that?' The latter replied, 'It is in Dharwan.' Dharwan was a well in the dwelling place of the (tribe of) Bani Zuraiq. Allah's Apostle went to that well and returned to 'Aisha, saying, 'By Allah, the water (of the well) was as red as the infusion of Hinna, (1) and the date-palm trees look like the heads of devils.' 'Aisha added, Allah's Apostle came to me and informed me about the well. I asked the Prophet, 'O Allah's Apostle, why didn't you take out the skin of pollen?' He said, 'As for me, Allah has cured me and I hated to draw the attention of the people to such evil (which they might learn and harm others with).'

Narrated Hisham's father: 'Aisha said, "Allah's Apostle was bewitched, so he invoked Allah repeatedly requesting Him to cure him from that magic)." Hisham then narrated the above narration. (See Hadith No. 658, Vol. 7)""  (Sahih Bukhari, Book 75: Invocations, Volume 8, Book 75, Number 400)

So a Jew steals a piece of the Prophet's hair, says abakadabra on it, and the Prophet gets betwiched??  Seriously??  Why can't this be a Jew-hating lie that was invented by liars who fabricated this entire story for propaganda?  Now, you all know how vicious I am against zionism on this website.  But I am not against innocent Jews or any innocent person, in general.  This false story just doesn't make any sense, and it is quite absurd!  Not only that, but it clashes head-on with the Holy Quran:

[017:047]  We know best why it is they listen, when they listen to thee; and when they meet in private conference, behold, the wicked say, "Ye follow none other than a man bewitched!"

[025:008]  "Or (Why) has not a treasure been bestowed on him, or why has he (not) a garden for enjoyment?" The wicked say: "Ye follow none other than a man bewitched."

So if Prophet Muhammad was betwiched, then the Quran has failed in Noble Verses 17:47 and 25:8!  Furthermore, how could the people who made the claim be then "wicked", if their claim was true?

Think about it:  If you have a video recording of Osama Abdallah (me) committing adultery with a woman, and you decide to expose me on it, because you just got sick and tired of my lies and hypocrisy.  How on EARTH would that make you wicked??  If the Prophet was indeed bewitched, then how could saying that he is indeed bewitched make one wicked??



So now all Muslims are wicked??

Think about it.  This makes every Muslim, who believes that the Prophet was indeed bewitched, a wicked person!  If you believe in those Hadiths, then you have become a wicked person according to Noble Verses 17:47 and 25:8!



Here is the bottom line:  What agrees with the Holy Quran from the hadiths and also from the Bible and other scriptures is closest to the Truth, but not absolute Truth like the Holy Quran.  And what disagrees with the Holy Quran belongs to the garbage.  You may use the toilet too if you'd like, just as long as it doesn't have GOD Almighty's or any Sacred Word or Name in it.

And last and not least, please visit the following link to see the Overwhelming Scientific Miracles of the Holy Quran:

http://www.answering-christianity.com/ac20.htm#links

Also, Prophet Muhammad and Islamthoroughly prophesied, even by the name, in the Bible, Dead Sea Scrolls, and other previous Scriptures: http://www.answering-christianity.com/predict.htm.



Where is the proof for my statement above?

I was asked before how can I substantiate the following statement from the Holy Quran:

Here is the bottom line:  What agrees with the Holy Quran from the hadiths and also from the Bible and other scriptures is closest to the Truth, but not absolute Truth like the Holy Quran.  And what disagrees with the Holy Quran belongs to the garbage.

Here is the proof from the Holy Quran:

[016:044] (We sent them) with Clear Signs and Books of dark prophecies; and We have sent down unto thee (also) the Message; that thou mayest explain clearly to men what is sent for them, and that they may give thought.

[004:115] After the guidance has been revealed and explained, if anyone parts his way with the messenger and follows a path different from that of the believers, then We will divert him along his (chosen) path. We will hurl him in the hell (in the hereafter). What a despicable destination!

[006:046] Say, “Have you (ever) considered? What if Allah took away your hearing and your sight, and sealed off your heart? Is there a god besides Allah, who could give you back these senses?” Observe, how We explain the revelations in detail. Yet, they turn away (disdainfully).

[006:055] In this manner, We explain Our revelations in detail, so that the ways of the criminals would become (widely known and) well recognized.

Allah Almighty also called the Holy Quran "Muhaymin" (مهيمن, "Has all Authority above all", or "the dominant Book with the Highest Authority").  See Noble Verse 5:48.  For ample more on this point, please visit:

www.answering-christianity.com/was_muta_immoral.htm


So the real genuine Hadiths that are Quran-Approved are the ones that directly explain and detail the Holy Quran's Commands.  Not every word that came out of the Prophet's mouth is a legitimate Hadith:

Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari: "The Prophet used to invoke Allah, saying, "Allahumma ighfirli khati'ati wa jahli wa israfi fi amri, wa ma anta a-'lamu bihi minni. Allahumma ighfirli hazali wa jiddi wa khata'i wa amdi, wa kullu dhalika 'indi"

WHICH READS IN ENGLISH AS:

"O Allah! Forgive my mistakes and my ignorance and my exceeding the limit (boundaries) of righteousness in my deeds; and forgive whatever You know better than I. O Allah! Forgive the wrong I have done jokingly or seriously, and forgive my accidental and intentional errors, all that is present in me."  (Sahih Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 75, Number 408))

This is why those who say that the Prophet never spoke out of his own desire, and that every word he spoke was an inspiration are all in error.  The following Noble Verses that they use only refer to the Holy Quran's Revelations:

[053:002]  You companion has neither erred, nor has he gone astray,
[053:003]  Nor does he speak out of his own desire.
[053:004]  It is nothing but pure revelation revealed by God.
[053:005]  The Lord of the Mighty Powers has taught him (i.e., Angel Gabriel),

Those who say that Prophet Muhammad was a "Walking Quran", and that every single word he spoke was an inspiration are full of rubbish nonsense.  This is further supported in the following Noble Verse:

[003:159]  It is part of the Mercy of God that thou dost deal gently with them Wert thou severe or harsh-hearted, they would have broken away from about thee: so pass over (Their faults), and ask for (God's) forgiveness for them; and consult them in affairs (of moment). Then, when thou hast Taken a decision put thy trust in God. For God loves those who put their trust (in Him).

‏3:159 فبما رحمة من الله لنت لهم ولو كنت فظا غليظ القلب لانفضوا من حولك فاعف عنهم واستغفر لهم وشاورهم في الامر فاذا عزمت فتوكل على الله ان الله يحب المتوكلين

Why should the Prophet consult anybody when every word he spoke was a Divine Inspiration or Revelation?  This Noble Verse clearly proves that the Prophet was only inspired at certain fixed times, and not all of the time.  So him not speaking out of his own desire refers to the Holy Quran's Divine Revelations. 

And again, the following detailed refutation is a must read: http://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php/topic,1105.msg5574.html#msg5574.

I hope this helps, insha'Allah

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

As'salamu Alaikum Everyone,

The following are two debates that I uploaded today from the four.  There are two more, which I'll get to tomorrow, insha'Allah:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gk826x7KbU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUNKYYkfuM8

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

As'salamu Alaikum dear brother,

Please visit the following links:

http://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php/topic,43.msg137.html#msg137

http://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php/topic,1020.msg3398.html#msg3398

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

ASSALAMUALYKUM,

 I think Muslims army of Palestine are the only remaining Muslim Army. Because except Palestine no other Muslim countries are raising their voice against the oppression by the Zionist Israel. Yes, one might say Iran is against the Israel . But they are not also real Muslims. They are killing thousands of Sunnis a year I guess. I feel like crying, our brothers there in Palestine are getting killed, and we can't do anything. Shame on us. Even KSA is in the side of USA.

As'salamu Alaikum dear brother,

I am a Palestinian myself, and I tell you that we are among the most divided people.  Not all Palestinians are like you may think, even among the religious ones.  The entire Middle East got so used to be hypocratical and corrupt, that it needs quite a restart. 

Also, Palestinians in the West are far from being a good example for Islam and Muslims.  They are too greedy and too into worldly materials.  I personally don't like them that much.  Also, many of the Arabs today also, in the Gulf countries and others, are the same as well.  They're not carrying Islam the way it should be carried.  And worst of all, the Islamic clerics are tools in the hands of the corrupt dictators.  Cowardice and hypocrisy is what they turned Islam into.

As to Iran, the government there is only opportunistic.  The same with the Turkish government.  Everytime an outsider wants to enter the Arab world and gain the hearts of the people, he would sing the "Poor Palestinian People" song.  In other words, they use the Palestinian cause to strengthen their political agendas.  Otherwise, they wouldn't have cared.

The Arabs right now are going through a very critical "U Turn".  Either they succeed and rid themselves from the corrupt religious and political rulers that are ruling them, and also rid themselves from the sick materialistic, worldly and paganistic traditions, and the pagan divisions ("me and my brother against my cousin, and me and my cousin are against the stranger" pagan tribal beliefs, which the Arab tribes still hold on to for dear life, and caused all types and kinds of divisions), or they can go to Hell.

Justice has become a FOREIGN CONCEPT among the Arabs.  And the most injustice comes from our religious ones.  Islam is innocent from them:

[004:135]  Oh you who believe! Be upright, and uphold justice staunchly. (Always) bear testimony for (the sake of) Allah, even if it goes against you, your parents or your near relatives. (Bear true testimony) whether it is (for or against) a rich man or a poor man. (The commands of) Allah has priority over (the concern for) any of them. Do not pursue your passions, lest you lapse into injustice. If you (conceal), distort or (otherwise) fail to mention the truth, then remember, Allah is very well Aware of everything you do.

Please visit: http://www.answering-christianity.com/justice.htm.

I hope this helps, insha'Allah.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

As'salamu Alaikum dear brothers and sisters,

One important point in the debates that came up, which I believe I have refuted it soundly is this:

1-  Prophet Muhammad was presented a scroll from the Jewish Law, and the Prophet used it to execute Judgment on a Jew.  And the Prophet further said to the Scroll: "I believe in you, and in the One who sent you!"

So does this mean that the Bible is perfectly preserved according to Islam?

RESPONSE:

1-  The Scroll was written in Arabic, and the Prophet read it in Arabic.

2-  It's a translation.

3-  There is no original text.  The Bible's original text doesn't exist, nor was the scroll that was presented to the Prophet original.

4-  Hebrew is a developed language from the ancient Phoenecian language.  It's not original.  It's like Italian, which was developed and originated from Latin.

5-  So what does all of this mean?  It means that the Law of GOD Almighty EXISTS in the Jewish Law.  So while for instance we have "Thou shalt not steal" in the Jewish Law today.  The Original Command of GOD Almighty might have been either longer or shorter in text.  But the LIVING LAW IS THERE.  Do not steal.  That is a Living Law from the many Living Laws that the Jews have to abide by and honor.

6-  The Arabic scroll that was given to Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, was not in text of the original Law.  But nonetheless, the LIVING LAW was still there.  It was preserved.

I hope this helps, insha'Allah.  I will post the debates as soon as possible, insha'Allah.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

As'salamu Alaikum dear brothers and sisters,

This links too should also give thorough answers, insha'Allah:

http://www.answering-christianity.com/bones_then_muscles_wrapping.htm

http://www.answering-christianity.com/sex_determination.htm

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

As'salamu Alaikum dear brother,

All celestial bodies are يعرجون Yaa'rujoon (traveling in orbits) in space.  See The countless orbits in the Universe, and the day-layer reveals the sun's brightness.  This video is about Noble Verses 32:5, 34:2, 57:4, 70:3-4 and others, and the Arabic words عرج , عروج , معارج  and  معراج  that all refer to "going in an orbital and curvy path" in the Glorious Quran and our Islamic Texts.

Your points are answered in this video.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah