Answering Christianity Research Center

Asalam ul laykum brothers and sisters, I was wondering in regards to this page I came across that was written by the Answering-Islam team. It is regards to the Quran 9:30 "The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is the saying from their mouth; (In this) they are intimate; what the Unbelievers of the old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the truth. "

Answering islam team claims that there were no such Jews who believed that Uzair as was son of Allah swt, that the claim that there were a group of jews in Yemen who called Uzair as son of Allah swt is a false claim because Ibn Hazm lived during 9th or 10th century.

they also claim this:

"The Encylopedia Judaica article cited by the “Islamic Awareness” team continues:

An allusion to the figure of Ezra as the apostle of the messiah is found in a tale which is widespread among the Jews of Yemen, according to which Ezra requested that they emigrate to Erez Israel, and because they did not, he cursed them. Yemenite Jews have therefore refrained from naming their children Ezra."

Also they claim that just because the Jews did not dispute it isn't a good argument since they were already having problems of their own.

Also they claim that the verse says "THE JEWS" not "SOME JEWS"

I am wondering, did Brother Osama or anyone else refute this. If so, plz I would like the link to the page, I would like to use it when necessary.

I have neen debating with a trinitarian, who even though i refutted, he keeps changing topic and brining in one topic after another. What should i do about this guy?

P.s. i already refutted most of the topics he asked, some i just didnt do because he was throwing way to many topics. So i told him that i already refutted the main topic and if he wants to mention all misconceptions he could just come here on this site.

 Here is the link.  https://plus.google.com/105840929921688771466/posts/F7HQxjw7VS7

Asalam ul laykum brother truthexposer, sorry bro i don't have facebook, i got rid of it long ago. I always had doughts about it and what i suspected came true when the whole NSA survaillence got blown open by Edward Snowden.

Keeping in mind that Big Bang is not only the beginning of Universe but also beginning of time, due to the Planck Epoch which we know is the earliest time and time did not exist before it before the creation of the universe.



This also shows us that before the Big Bang since time didn't exist, our laws cannot also apply OUTSIDE the Universe. Thus, the Atheist use of any Law or Principle to undermine god's existence, cannot be applied since God who is outside the Universe isn't bound by the Laws and Principles of the Universe. Making him without an end.

Now that we have looked at science effectively to see that we cannot prove that god doesn't exist, But that at the same time we have proven that time and universal laws do not exist outside our universe. We can Clearly see that existence of God is definatly possible, also due to the Fact of Law of Cause and Effect we know for certain that everything needs to have a Cause, in this case the Effect being the BIG BANG, the Cause being the Eternal Creator [Allah swt (Quran 112:2)]

Asalam ul laykum brother omar, there isn't any such thing. Probably a creation that was created delibertly to attack islam. There are many fake claims with no evidence. Rasool saw, sent letters to the kings only once and it was a adomination for the kings to testify in islam and tawheed in allah. There was nothing about jesus pbuh on it. Ask who ever made that lie to provide reference or evidence for the claim.

Brother osama i hope u add these rebuttals to ur site because it defeats the answering islam claims.

Asalam ul laykum brothers. If anyone wants to read the Gospel of Barnabas, it is available here: http://barnabas.net/

Also refer to my other thread in regards to the answering-islam team's so called "contradictions between quran and gospel of barnabas" argument. I found a webpage where a brother named Adeel, refuted the answering-islam team's claims.

Asalam ul laykum brothers, the discovery was of 16th century or so. However, the work os translated to italian then translated to engliah, arabic and urdu, far as i know. The people qho reject this doscovery try to use many techniques to disprove it's legitmacy, i admit some of the issue to sound as though that do not correspond with quran. However when looked at with "microscopic lens" you can see it very well corresponds with the quran.