Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - There is only one God

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 ... 21
121
Sorry guys. I have realized he died for our sins. You know, the son of God. He who turned water into wine, our risen savior who performed miracles, had a communal meal of bread and wine! You guys just don't understand!






Dionysus died for our sins! Look!



As'salamu Alaikum dear brother,

Good post.  Did he also rise from the dead?  And do you have more examples of this?  I made a video few days ago giving examples of metaphorical rising from the dead that happened in ancient times, including one that happened in the Old Testament as well.  I'd like to update the video with your examples if you have them, insha'Allah.

Take care and may Allah Almighty bless you.  Ameen.

Osama

The 'resurrection' is just the sun moving one degree to the North at the end of the three day winter solstice period. They are ALL derived from Horus, which was a personification in the ancient Egyptian times for the Sun. The study of this is called astrotheology. There's a 25 minute video that will show you an intro https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvgY6YRxBlw
Sure, I can give you more examples:


    "Osiris, the Egyptian Saviour, was crucified in the heavens. To the Egyptian the cross was the symbol of immortality, an emblem of the Sun, and the god himself was crucified to the tree, which denoted his fructifying power.

    "Horus was also crucified in the heavens. He was represented, like...Christ Jesus, with outstretched arms in the vault of heaven."

    Thomas W. Doane, Bible Myths and Their Parallels in Other Religions (484)

They say Buddha sat under the tree for three days to be enlightened.

The cross isn't an original Christian symbol either. It comes from the cross of the zodiac of the ancient Egyptians!

Oh and if you put this on your site, the Christians will deny it. So you should put these quotes from Christian church fathers that the pagan Gods also had crucifixions..

Tertullian (c. 160-c. 200) and Minucius Felix (2nd-3rd cents.). In his Apology (16), Tertullian remarks:

    "We have shown before that your deities are derived from shapes modelled from the cross. But you also worship victories, for in your trophies the cross is the heart of the trophy. The camp religion of the Romans is all through a worship of the standards, a setting the standards above all gods. Well, as those images decking out the standards are ornaments of crosses. All those hangings of your standards and banners are robes of crosses." (Roberts, ANCL, 85)

Ad Nationes (12), in a lengthy treatise which includes the following remarks:

    "...The Heathens Themselves Made Much of Crosses in Sacred Things; Nay, Their Very Idols Were Formed on a Crucial [Crosslike] Frame.

    "...your gods in their origin have proceeded from this hated cross... if you simply place a man with his arms and hands outstretched, you will make the general outline of a cross...." (Roberts, ANF, III, 122)

In his Octavius (29), Minucius echoes the same sentiment:


    "...The Egyptians certainly choose out a man for themselves whom they may worship... Crosses, moreover, we neither worship nor wish for. You, indeed, who consecrate gods of wood, adore wooden crosses perhaps as parts of your gods. For your very standards, as well as your banners, and flags of your camp, what else are they but crosses gilded and adorned? Your victorious trophies not only imitate the appearance of a simple cross, but also that of a man affixed to it." (Roberts, ANF, IV, 191)

In the same passage, Minucius states, "...crucis signum est, et cum homo porrectis manibus deum pura mente veneratur." (Felix, 66) To wit, "...the sign of the cross it is, also when a man stretching out his hands venerates God with a pure mind."

In his First Apology Church father Justin Martyr (c. 150) writes:

    "Chapter 21. Analogies to the history of Christ.

    "And when we say also that the Word, who is the first-birth of God, was produced without sexual union, and that He, Jesus Christ, our Teacher, was crucified and died, and rose again, and ascended into heaven, we propound nothing different from what you believe regarding those whom you esteem sons of Jupiter..." (Roberts, ANF, I, 170)

Rev. William W. Seymour remarks:

    "Examples of this posture in prayer are found in the Catacombs...."

"We find that the ancient Egyptians used this posture in prayer, as is figured in the hieroglyphics on the obelisk before the Church of S. John Lateran at Rome. This also was the custom of the Romans... The Hebrews spread forth their hands before the Lord; in short, this posture in devotion we believe may be traced the world over..." (Seymour, 432-433)

In reality, non-Christian gods were represented in cruciform centuries before Christ was portrayed likewise; in fact, the first depiction of Jesus on a cross in art did not occur until the fifth century AD/CE. As stated by the Catholic Encyclopedia ("Cross and the Crucifix"):

    "The sign of the cross, represented in its simplest form by a crossing of two lines at right angles, greatly antedates, in both the East and the West, the introduction of Christianity. It goes back to a very remote period of human civilization....

"...It is also...a symbol of the sun...and seems to denote its daily rotation.... Cruciform objects have been found in Assyria. Shari people in Egypt wearing crucifixes around their necks. The statutes of Kings Asurnazirpal and Sansirauman, now in the British Museum, have cruciform jewels about the neck.... Cruciform earrings were found by Father Delattre in Punic tombs at Carthage."

"Another symbol which has been connected with the cross is the ansated cross (ankh or crux ansata) of the ancient Egyptians.... From the earliest times also it appears among the hieroglyphic signs symbolic of life or of the living... perhaps it was originally, like the swastika, an astronomical sign. The ansated cross is found on many and various monuments of Egypt.... In later times the Egyptian Christians (Copts), attracted by its form, and perhaps by its symbolism, adopted it as the emblem of the cross...

"...In the proto-Etruscan cemetery of Golasecca every tomb has a vase with a cross engraved on it...

    "...On an ancient vase we see Prometheus bound to a beam which serves the purpose of a cross.... In the same way the rock to which Andromeda was fastened is called crux, or cross....

    Andromeda chained in a cross shape or crucifix"...The Christian apologists, such as Tertullian (Apol., xvi; Ad. Nationes, xii) and Minucius Felix (Octavius, lx, xii, xxviii), felicitously replied to the pagan taunt by showing that their persecutors themselves adored cruciform objects. Such observations throw light on a peculiar fact of primitive Christian life, i.e. the almost total absence from Christian monuments of the period of persecutions of the plain, unadorned cross...

    "...The early years of the fifth century are of the highest importance in this development, because it was then that the undisguised cross first appears.... But the fifth century marks the period when Christian art broke away from old fears, and, secure in its triumph, displayed before the world, now become Christian also, the sign of its redemption....

    "...The most ancient text we have relating to a carved cross dates from later than A.D. 362....

    Early Christian crucifix"...Although in the fifth century the cross began to appear on public monuments, it was not for a century afterwards that the figure on the cross was shown; and not until the close of the fifth, or even the middle of the sixth century, did it appear without disguise...." (CE, IV, 517ff)

In its article entitled "Images," the Catholic Encyclopedia relates:

    Crucifix from Santa Sabina Church, Rome, 5th century"...The first mentions of [Christian] crucifixes are in the sixth century.... The oldest crucifixes known are those on the wooden doors of St. Sabina at Rome and an ivory carving in the British Museum... Both are of the fifth century...." (CE, VII, 667)

122
Sorry guys. I have realized he died for our sins. You know, the son of God. He who turned water into wine, our risen savior who performed miracles, had a communal meal of bread and wine! You guys just don't understand!






Dionysus died for our sins! Look!


123
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Nice update`
« on: January 30, 2013, 10:28:49 PM »
Like the new layout. Why can't I change my username D:

124
What Hadith show that the first four Caliphs were and in this order-

Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali ?

Or each one being appointed by the previous one?

And how do we determine that they were all within the best first three generations?

nope, you have to guess. and make sure your guess doesn't get you blown up. Also, if you guess the wrong successor you might be called a non-Muslim, so be VERY careful when guessing. If it was so straightforward, why would the Shiites and Sunnites continue to slice each other in half even to this day? Answer: politics. Yup, it's a politico-religious ideology. This contributed to the downfall of the Islamic golden age (apart from Crusades and Mongol conquests).
Im kinda confused by how the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs contributed to the downfall of the Islamic golden age. They helped to start it. The people who turned it into politics were the shias. They believe(d) in a monarchy. I do believe there is a hadith in Ibn Majah and Abu Dawood which says "Hold firmly to my example (sunnah) and that of the Rightly Guided Caliphs". As for their order and apointing. Like zulfiqar said, history.

I meant the politics, not the Caliphs. The Caliphs contributed to the progression, not the downfall, of the golden age. Oh btw, there's a reason Muhammad (PBUH) did not mention a successor: It's not important!
Shi'as will use Sahih Muslim, Chapter of the virtues of the companions, section of the virtues of Ali, 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1873, Tradition #36 to cite the Ahlul-Bayt as successors, whereas Sunnis will cite the democratic side of things. The Qur'an precisely says democracy. I smell a contradiction.
The confusion has cleared up a bit now. A question if you dont mind me asking. Do you believe the title Rightly Guided Caliphs is justifiable? And do you agree with the Shia line of thinking or sunni? I always thought the Prophet PBUH didnt choose a successor because people might start to think too highly of the appointed one. I know its not important for you but could you tell me your reason as to why he didnt choose a successor? :P

He didn't choose a successor for either one of these two reasons:
1) He wanted us to fight each other to the death for it
2) He thought it was a political issue, not a religious one. And I agree.
Ah. Thanks TIOOG. I think we can discard the 1st one. I find it hard to imagine the Prophet PBUH, the best example to mankind, would do something like that, ya know?

Here's a quote about the "best example to mankind":
 
"If a man like Muhammed were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness." George Bernard Shaw (Nobel prize holding journalist, now retired)

125
GENERAL TOPICS | BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS / Re: help brothers!
« on: January 30, 2013, 11:26:05 AM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qngieHWZXcM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=pIJHJzDQcRM

is this against god? quantum theory

lol..you yelled help as if it's something serious. That stuff only disproves the Christian God, who's supposedly in the sky. Allah is omnipresent.

126
Quran Morality and Moral Code, Laws & QA / Re: Is music allowed?
« on: January 30, 2013, 08:08:35 AM »
Firstly , I believe that if one saying tells us music is forbidden then it is forbidden . So let us stay with this one Hadith . It is mentioned in Bukhari . And the authorized of Bukhari is the second most truthful book after Quran . There are some few sayings within it which are weak or Israeli . But they're not over 8 or 9 as I remember . Anyway , you say that this one is weak . What for ? That's what we shoul focus on right now . Mention what makes it so and we'll see if it's true or not .
Go knows best .

Are you serious? That book was written by a human, humans make mistakes. You can never give a book a title like that.

127
What Hadith show that the first four Caliphs were and in this order-

Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali ?

Or each one being appointed by the previous one?

And how do we determine that they were all within the best first three generations?

nope, you have to guess. and make sure your guess doesn't get you blown up. Also, if you guess the wrong successor you might be called a non-Muslim, so be VERY careful when guessing. If it was so straightforward, why would the Shiites and Sunnites continue to slice each other in half even to this day? Answer: politics. Yup, it's a politico-religious ideology. This contributed to the downfall of the Islamic golden age (apart from Crusades and Mongol conquests).
Im kinda confused by how the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs contributed to the downfall of the Islamic golden age. They helped to start it. The people who turned it into politics were the shias. They believe(d) in a monarchy. I do believe there is a hadith in Ibn Majah and Abu Dawood which says "Hold firmly to my example (sunnah) and that of the Rightly Guided Caliphs". As for their order and apointing. Like zulfiqar said, history.

I meant the politics, not the Caliphs. The Caliphs contributed to the progression, not the downfall, of the golden age. Oh btw, there's a reason Muhammad (PBUH) did not mention a successor: It's not important!
Shi'as will use Sahih Muslim, Chapter of the virtues of the companions, section of the virtues of Ali, 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1873, Tradition #36 to cite the Ahlul-Bayt as successors, whereas Sunnis will cite the democratic side of things. The Qur'an precisely says democracy. I smell a contradiction.
The confusion has cleared up a bit now. A question if you dont mind me asking. Do you believe the title Rightly Guided Caliphs is justifiable? And do you agree with the Shia line of thinking or sunni? I always thought the Prophet PBUH didnt choose a successor because people might start to think too highly of the appointed one. I know its not important for you but could you tell me your reason as to why he didnt choose a successor? :P

He didn't choose a successor for either one of these two reasons:
1) He wanted us to fight each other to the death for it
2) He thought it was a political issue, not a religious one. And I agree.

128
What Hadith show that the first four Caliphs were and in this order-

Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali ?

Or each one being appointed by the previous one?

And how do we determine that they were all within the best first three generations?

nope, you have to guess. and make sure your guess doesn't get you blown up. Also, if you guess the wrong successor you might be called a non-Muslim, so be VERY careful when guessing. If it was so straightforward, why would the Shiites and Sunnites continue to slice each other in half even to this day? Answer: politics. Yup, it's a politico-religious ideology. This contributed to the downfall of the Islamic golden age (apart from Crusades and Mongol conquests).
Im kinda confused by how the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs contributed to the downfall of the Islamic golden age. They helped to start it. The people who turned it into politics were the shias. They believe(d) in a monarchy. I do believe there is a hadith in Ibn Majah and Abu Dawood which says "Hold firmly to my example (sunnah) and that of the Rightly Guided Caliphs". As for their order and apointing. Like zulfiqar said, history.

I meant the politics, not the Caliphs. The Caliphs contributed to the progression, not the downfall, of the golden age. Oh btw, there's a reason Muhammad (PBUH) did not mention a successor: It's not important!
Shi'as will use Sahih Muslim, Chapter of the virtues of the companions, section of the virtues of Ali, 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1873, Tradition #36 to cite the Ahlul-Bayt as successors, whereas Sunnis will cite the democratic side of things. The Qur'an precisely says democracy. I smell a contradiction.

129
What Hadith show that the first four Caliphs were and in this order-

Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali ?

Or each one being appointed by the previous one?

And how do we determine that they were all within the best first three generations?

nope, you have to guess. and make sure your guess doesn't get you blown up. Also, if you guess the wrong successor you might be called a non-Muslim, so be VERY careful when guessing. If it was so straightforward, why would the Shiites and Sunnites continue to slice each other in half even to this day? Answer: politics. Yup, it's a politico-religious ideology. This contributed to the downfall of the Islamic golden age (apart from Crusades and Mongol conquests).

130
Both of you have hurled insults, and mocked, at each other in this and other posts

Can you show me where I used offensive language? He's the one using words like sh**y and stuff. He hasn't brought ONE quality argument against my beliefs. All of them are fallacious arguments like "all the scholars say so it must be true, non-muslims agree therefore it is false". Don't ever drink Fanta again, because it was invented in Nazi Germany. Nazis invented it, therefore it is evil.

If you want to leave "Adnaanshaikh195", go ahead. Don't crave for attention, just do it. It won't make a difference.

131
Keep making a mockery of me, you seem like the guy who will interpret a hadith in a certain way to get fame out of it, I already said there is a system of Dajjal, and there is a physical form too.

No, you've become like the Christians, not WE.

" Is circulating the Kaaba a form of idol worship ??? Someone help me??? "

Keep looking for fame, you're not getting it kid.
The majority of muslims believe Dajjal will be a physical person too, it's only fools like you, and other so called 'sects' who aren't even muslim like Ahmadiyya believe the Dajjal is Christianity. You're gullible and stupid, 'OH STOP USING THE WORD HOLY, IT COMES FROM PAGANISM'

Lol piss off.

And before you cry, I never said you aren't muslim.

I gave you clear cut evidence, that the Dajjal is not released yet, such as the conquest of Constantinople (Rome), but you have problems understanding, and you expect me to listen to your stupid theories.

The Sea of Galilee (Lake Tiberius) has not dried up yet, The dajjal has NOT been released.

Keep posting rubbish, and I will stop using this forum, seriously.

You can clearly see holy is derived from helios. They had a book in the past called helios biblios, or the book of the Sun. Criticizing me for asking a question is just retarded. I question things, unlike you, accepting everything on blind faith like mommy and daddy told you. I pity you when cyclops comes.

"The Sea of Galilee (Lake Tiberius) has not dried up yet, The dajjal has NOT been released."
That's because it is rising by seven inches daily, and it is expected to do so for the next thousand years.

"it's only fools like you, and other so called 'sects' who aren't even muslim like Ahmadiyya believe the Dajjal is Christianity"
Actually, everyone educated knows that the world won't end by the coming of cyclops. You enjoy your life :)


"Keep posting rubbish, and I will stop using this forum, seriously."
GOODBYE!

132
adnaanshaikh195's children? Or will he change his claim and say "I meant the Mediterranean sea"? It seems like we've become just like the Christians, taking metaphors in scripture literally and using them as a politico-religious tool to motivate and scare children. Today I heard a little kid talking about Dajjal and he said "He will enter every house. Meaning, he will ring the doors of every house and kill people". [censored]? The "he will enter every house" line is just a metaphor for pagan symbolism unknowingly present in all the houses, symbols like the star of Saturn, the cross of the zodiac, chess boards, etc.

133
As'salamu Alaikum everyone,

This is not an official article yet, but these are my brainstorms and notes that I was able to gather regarding this topic.

The question that I am raising here is this: Was Mankind created through cloning from Spinal Stem Cells?

Answer:

While I was reading the Glorious Quran, I ran into the following Noble Verse:

‏7:172 واذ اخذ ربك من بني ادم من ظهورهم ذريتهم واشهدهم على انفسهم الست بربكم قالوا بلى شهدنا ان تقولوا يوم القيامة انا كنا عن هذا غافلين

[007:172]  When thy Lord drew forth from the Children of Adam - from their loins backs (ظهورهم)- their descendants, and made them testify concerning themselves, (saying): "Am I not your Lord (who cherishes and sustains you)?"- They said: "Yea! We do testify!" (This), lest ye should say on the Day of Judgment: "Of this we were never mindful":

The idea of Adam and Eve, peace be upon them, had sexual intercourse which resulted in children (siblings to each others) who then married each others and multiplied, and then their children married and multiplied and so on is not supported at all in the Glorious Quran.  Yes, Adam and Eve were a husband and a wife, and they were the first male and female of Mankind (Adam was created first):

"We said: 'O Adam! dwell thou and thy wife in the Garden; and eat of the bountiful things therein as (where and when) ye will; but approach not this tree, or ye run into harm and transgression.'  (The Noble Quran, 2:35)"

For ample more Noble Verses, visit: http://www.answering-christianity.com/adam.htm.

But the generations that came after them and their children were clearly created through the process of cloning, specially by taking stem or somatic cells from the back, and creating other humans with them ("When thy Lord drew forth from the Children of Adam - from their loins backs (ظهورهم)- their descendants....").

The following articles further talk about extracting brain stem cells from the spinal fluid, and the importance of such stem cells in cloning:

http://www.livescience.com/24005-human-cadaver-brains-stem-cells.html
http://www.google.com/patents/US20100055079

(More research is being done on this)

Furthermore, the concept of cloning and the alteration of Allah Almighty's creations isn't something new in the Glorious Quran.  Satan promised Allah Almighty that in the End of Times, he (satan) will deceive mankind, and will cause them to slit the cattle's ears and alter the creation of Allah Almighty:

‏4:119 ولاضلنهم ولامنينهم ولامرنهم فليبتكن اذان الانعام ولامرنهم فليغيرن خلق الله ومن يتخذ الشيطان وليا من دون الله فقد خسر خسرانا مبينا

[004:119] `And assuredly I will lead them astray and assuredly I will arouse in them vain desires, and assuredly I will incite them and they will cut the ears of cattle; and assuredly I will incite them and they will alter ALLAH's creation.' And whoever takes Satan for a friend instead of ALLAH, he certainly suffers a manifest loss.

This was satan's response to Allah Almighty after he was cursed for refusing to bow down to Adam as all of the Beings were Commanded to do so by Allah Almighty.  Satan's final battle on earth is make a complete mockery of Allah Almighty's creations, but causing us humans to alter the creations of Allah Almighty.  And yes, it all started with taking somatic cells from the ear.

For ample quotes from Western Sources on the somatic cells taken from the ears, and how the ear was the first to have cells taken from it, and how ears are the PREFERRED AND BEST parts to take somatic cells from, visit: http://www.answering-christianity.com/cloning.htm.

Again, the Western Scientists say that the ear is the best part of the body to take Somatic Cells from, and it is their preferred one, and it was the FIRST used for taking somatic cells from it to make the first cloning.

Feel free to comment.  I am still researching this, and will write a detailed article about it here and on the website's main page soon, insha'Allah (if Allah Almighty is Willing).

Take care,
Osama Abdallah
Allah created the universe from 'nothing', which could be a reference to timelessness:
Quran 6:101 - "Creator of the heavens and the earth from nothingness..."

1) Matter is condensed in "smoke" (41:11)
2) It separates to form the universe (21:30)
3) The Earth's surface had an abundance of water (80:25)
4) Since the sun is the principle source of light energy through radiation, (10:5)
5) The first living organism was a type of plant, which received nutrition from water (logically acceptable from
6) The plant was prokaryotic, since prokaryotes have cell walls.
7) Through endosymbiosis, the prokaryotes evolved into other creatures to create variety, they still share genetic information (Qur'an, 25:54) [relations by blood and marriage]



The catalysis of montmorillonite clay crystals under aqueous conditions, precisely mentioned in the Qur'an (it says man was made from clay, and from water, and spirit)



134
Also, kid, The illuminati were not founded in the 17th century, the foundations of illuminati/freemasonry go to the time period of Nimrood, the evil ruler who argued with Ibrahim Aleyhisalam, this includes the trinity too, the pagan concept of itself go all the way back. Btw, I will create a new topic soon, and tell you (not you specifically), why the Jews think that King Sulaiman (peace be upon him) did idolatry (some secret societies began at this moment). Anyway, if you actually believe that the Illuminati were founded in the 18th Century, you'll believe anything, and for your own sake, stop making foolish topics, for example, asking if circling the Kaaba is idol worship etc, just stop, or telling us to not use the world 'Holy'.


As far as I know, you're a convert, now, i'm not saying that converts automatically have lack of knowledge, but please don't tell other people who have probably more knowledge you what's right and wrong, (based on the topics you've created, which speak for themselves (lol).)

The arguments over. Also, the Shiites, believe that the Dajjal is only a system, and that their 12th 'Imam' will return, and coincidentally, the description of their '12th Imam' matches the Dajjals description, in so many different ways.

Btw, people, I will create a few topics, such as exposing Paul, who used a dual identity (he was at a top level in degree in freemasonry), the trinity in other religions, and so on.

Yea. Your post shines with ignorance. I don't have to argue. You're right, it IS done.

135
"So when I went to bed one night, I said, "O Allah! If you see any good in me, show me a good dream." So

while I was in that state, there came to me (in a dream) two angels. In the hand of each of them, there was a mace of iron, and

both of them were taking me to Hell, and I was between them, invoking Allah, "O Allah! I seek refuge with You from Hell." Then

I saw myself being confronted by another angel holding a mace of iron in his hand. He said to me, "Do not be afraid, you will be

an excellent man if you only pray more often." So they took me till they stopped me at the edge of Hell, and behold, it was built

inside like a well and it had side posts like those of a well, and beside each post there was an angel carrying an iron mace. I saw

therein many people hanging upside down with iron chains, and I recognized therein some men from the Quraish. Then (the

angels) took me to the right side. I narrated this dream to (my sister) Hafsa and she told it to Allah's Apostle. Allah's Apostle said,

"No doubt, [Osama] 'Abdullah is a good man." (Nafi' said, "Since then 'Abdullah bin 'Umar used to pray much.)" [Sahih of Bukhari, vol 9 p

127-8 no 155]


Not even kidding...:P

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 ... 21

What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube