Quran's STUNNING Divine Miracles: [1] Allah Almighty also promised in several Divine Prophecies that He will show the Glorious Quran's Miracles to mankind: 1- The root letters for "message" and all of its derivatives occur 513 times throughout the Glorious Quran. Yet, all Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty Alone, the Prophets' and Messengers' actual names (Muhammad, Moses, Noah, Abraham, Lot etc....) were also all mentioned 513 times in the Glorious Quran. The detailed breakdown of all of this is thoroughly listed here. This Miracle is covered in 100s (hundreds) of Noble Verses.2- Allah Almighty said that Prophet Noah lived for 950 years. Yet, all Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty Alone, the entire Noble Surah (chapter Noah) is exactly written in 950 Letters. You can thoroughly see the accurate count in the scanned images.Coincidence? See 1,000s of examples [1]. Quran's Stunning Numerical & Scientific Miracles. |
What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube
Chapter 2: Christian Proof Texts
Jeremiah 8:8
By
Issa Ahmad Khalid
(A new convert from Italy)
CHAPTER 2: CHRISTIAN PROOF TEXTS
How can you say; We are wise, since we
have Yahwehs Law?. Look how it has been falsified by the lying pen of the
Scribes! Jeremiah 8:8
One
can look at this passage and draw two conclusions. Either it is referring to the constant
changes the text of the Bible has undergone throughout the centuries, or how one can take
a passage from the Bible and build any belief they wish from it. The latter can best be
referred to as Proof Texting, where one can add
their own interpretation to a Biblical passage, thus putting their own spin
on the message being relayed. Much, if not all, of Christianity falls under this analogy
with respect to passages from the Hebrew Scriptures. Even aspects outside Biblical
passages have found their way into Christian belief. For example; the cross
was not utilized as the symbol of Christianity until the 4th Century A.D.,
prior to which the symbol used by the early Christian Church was that of a fish.
It seemed that Emperor Constantine claimed to have had a vision or
dream of a cross in the sky during a battle in 312 A.D. Thereafter, in 326 A.D.,
There were no predictions about Buddha, Muhammad, or
anyone else except Christ. Others just came and said: Here I am, believe me.
Christ alone steps out of the line and answers: My coming was foretold, even to the
smallest detail.
This, however, is so off the mark that I
will use the very Bible of the Christians to disprove all they have come to accept,
especially as it pertains to the delusions of this Bishop and others like him. With
respect to Prophet Muhammad(saas), I will also prove further in this book, using the same
Bible of the Christians, that his advent was in fact foretold (see chapter 4). Please keep in mind that it is not my intention to
disrespect Prophet Jesus(as) in any way; as a Muslim I could never do that.
However, I would to show my Christian brothers and sisters
how far they have been lead astray and how they are now worshipping
the creature instead of the Creator (Romans
How long will you waver between two opinions? If
the Lord is God(Yahweh/Allah), follow him: but if Baal(Satan), follow him. 1
Kings 18:21
Genesis 3:15;
And I will put enmity between thee
(the serpent) and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head
and thou shalt bruise his heel.
Humans and snakes have always been natural
enemies. Snakes strike at our lower extremities, and we smash their heads to kill them.
When did the serpent, which it seems to Christian interpretation is Satan, ever bruise the heel of Prophet Jesus(as)? This verse does not pertain to Jesus(as) in
any way. This is, rather, a lesson being relayed to us by Almighty God that one should
avoid sin and crush it once it rears its ugly head, much as we would do with snakes.
This passage is also used by the Catholic Church to establish the doctrine of Mother
of God to Mary(ra), the mother of Prophet Jesus(as). This is a fallacious
attempt to establish a dogma that finds no support in The Holy Bible.
2 Samuel 7:14 & Hebrews 1:5;
In the book of Hebrews 1:5, the New Testament quotes a verse
from 2 Samuel 7:14;
I will be a father to him, and he
shall be a son to Me.
This is said by Christian clergy to be a prophetic reference to Prophet
Jesus(as) as the son of God. However, if we look at this verse from 2nd Samuel in its entirety, the verse doesnt end
with the phrase quoted in the New Testament, but continues;
When he commits iniquity, I will
correct him with the rod of men.
This can in no way possibly fit the Christian Bibles view of a sinless
Jesus(as). This verse is speaking specifically about King Solomon(as), as can be proven by
1 Chronicles 22:9-10;
His name shall be Solomon
he
shall build a house for My Name and I will be a father to him and he will be a son to
Me.
The Bible frequently refers to individuals
as Gods son (see
Genesis 2&4, Exodus 4:22, Deuteronomy 32:6, Psalms 2:7, 82:6, 89:26-27, Jeremiah 31:9,
Hosea 1:10, Matthew 5:9, Luke 3:38, John 1:12, 20:17 and 2 Corinthians 6:18 just to name
but a few). Incidentally, in the Semitic languages (Arabic, Aramaic, Hebrew), the term Son of
God is synonymous with the term Righteous Man as I have covered in
chapter 1 of this book.
Psalms 2:7;
I will declare the decree: the Lord
hath said unto me, Thou are my son; this day have I begotten thee.
Prophet David(as) is saying that the Lord
said this to him
.to his own
person, King
David. It is not a prophecy of some future event, but rather, a statement. This is not about Prophet Jesus(as). It is
a statement made about Prophet David(as), many centuries before Prophet Jesus(as) was
even born.
Psalms 22:16(17);
For dogs have compassed me: the
assembly of the wicked have enclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.
In this passage, we have a
mistranslation of the Hebrew text. The Christian Bible has the following, they
pierced my hands and my feet, however, when correctly translated from the
Hebrew text, it will read, they surrounded my hands and feet like a
lion, referring to Prophet David(as) being pursued by his enemies, who are
often referred to as a lion (see Psalms 7 and 17). The Hebrew word kaari
in the passage clearly means lion, as is evident from its use
in Isaiah 38:13. With this passage being
mistranslated, it intentionally conjures up thoughts of Prophet Jesus(as) and the events
of the cross.
Psalms 49:15;
But God will redeem my soul from the
power of the grave: for He shall receive me.
David(as) here is saying that regardless of
what earthly riches one has obtained and acquired, they are meaningless and worthless when you die as everything in this
world will turn to dust. Basically, what Prophet David(as) is saying is, You cant take it with you. All you can take of value with you into death is love and
fear of God. David(as) is further saying that God will redeem his soul from the power of
the grave, as He will for all His righteous servants; that God will receive him after he dies. All this is
said with no mention of Prophet
Jesus(as).
Psalms 68:18;
Thou has ascended on high, thou hast
led captivity captive: thou has received gifts for men; yea, for the rebellious also, that
the Lord God might dwell among them.
Prophet David(as) is saying here that Almighty God
in Heaven has freed
Isaiah 7:14 & Matthew 1:22-23;
Now all this was done, that it might
be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophets, saying, Behold a virgin
shall be with child and will bear a son and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which
translated means God with us.
Christian missionaries claim that Jesus(as)
is the fulfillment of this prophecy, however, there are numerous inaccuracies in the
Christian translation. First off, I would like to point out that at no time was Jesus(as)
ever referred to as Emmanuel (see Luke 1:31) and secondly, the Hebrew text of Isaiah 7:14 actually reads as
follows;
Behold, the young woman
is with child and will bear a son and she will call his name
Emmanuel.
The Hebrew word almah
means a
young woman, not a virgin, a fact recognized by
most Biblical scholars. The proper
Hebrew word for virgin is bethulah.
Missionaries argue their point by claiming that in an ancient translation of the Bible called the Septuagint, 70 great Rabbis
translated the word almah in Isaiah 7:14 as parthenos
and that this Greek word means a virgin. This claim is false for
several reasons:
1. The 70 Rabbis did not translate the book of Isaiah, they only translated the
Pentateuch, the first 5 books of the Bible known as the Torah or
the books of Moses. In fact, the introduction to the English edition of the
Septuagint states the following concerning the translation;
The Pentateuch is considered to be the
part the best executed, while the book of Isaiah appears to be the very worst.
2. In Genesis 34:2-3, the word parthenos
is used in reference to a non-virgin, a young woman who had been raped.
3. The entire Septuagint
version that Christian missionaries quote from is not the original, but from a later,
corrupted version.
The verse also says ha-almah,
Hebrew for the
young woman, not a young woman, specifying a
particular woman that was known to Prophet Isaiah(as) during his lifetime. Further, it
says she
will call him Emmanuel, not they will call him.
This chapter speaks of a prophecy made to King Ahaz to calm his fears of the impending invasion of two kings, those of Damascus and of Samaria, who were preparing to invade Jerusalem about 600 years before the birth of Prophet Jesus(as). Isaiahs(as) point is that these events will take place in the very near future and not 600 years later, as Christians claim.
Verse
16 of this same chapter makes this abundantly clear;
For before the boy will know enough to
refuse evil and choose good, the land whose two kings you dread will be forsaken.
In fact, in the very next chapter of Isaiah,
this prophecy is fulfilled with the birth of a son to Prophet Isaiah(as). As it says in Isaiah 8:4;
For before the child shall know to
cry, My father and my mother, the riches of Damascus and the spoils of Samaria
shall be taken away before the king of Assyria.
This verse entirely rules out any connection
to Prophet Jesus(as), who would not be born for another 600 years. Incidentally,
this mistranslation
of Isaiah
Isaiah 9:5(6);
For a child has been born unto us, a
son has been given to us, and the government has been placed upon his shoulders, and his
name shall be called wonderful counselor, mighty God, everlasting father, prince of
peace.
This passage, from the Christian Bible,
implies that the child will be called Mighty God and Everlasting Father and that this child will appear divine, however, this
translation is wrong. In the Hebrew text, after upon his shoulders, the rest of
the verse should read as follows; and the wonderful counselor, the mighty God, the
everlasting father (ie..God) has called his name prince of peace.
In this correct translation, Mighty God and Everlasting Father are not a part of the childs
name or attributes at all. The child in this verse is actually Hezekiah, and the wondrous
deed is the destruction of Sennacheribs army (see
2 Kings 19:35 and 2 Chronicles 32:21). This verse does not speak of a divine or
everlasting son and it certainly does not apply to Prophet Jesus(as).
Isaiah 53 (The Suffering Servant);
He is despised and rejected of men; a man of
sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was
despised, and we esteemed him not. verse 3
This verse could not pertain to Prophet
Jesus(as) as it says the servant would be despised and rejected by all, yet the Gospels say that Jesus(as) was
universally popular (see Mark 3:7-9 and Luke
4:14-15). This verse also states that the servant would be well acquainted with sickness and pain, however, we can find no evidence that this was true of Prophet Jesus(as)
in the Gospels. In this verse,
Prophet Isaiah(as) is speaking of
himself in his Prophetic role between God and his people Israel. The Israelites did not
accept Isaiahs(as) message and rejected him.
But he was wounded for our transgressions, he
was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his
stripes we are healed. verse 5
Isaiah(as) had been whipped and beaten for
the preaching and prophesying he had been doing to the Children of Israel. Nevertheless, despite these adversities
and setbacks, common among all prophets of Almighty God, he had delivered the message and had accomplished his
mission. By his stripes he showed his commitment to his faith and Almighty God, and this
persuaded others to heed his words and warnings, and turn from their evil ways and follow Almighty
Gods commands and teachings. Prophet Isaiah(as) is speaking of his own stripes and wounds, no
one elses. This is not a prophecy of the future, but rather a statement in the past
and present tense by Isaiah(as), about Isaiah(as) and not Jesus(as).
He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he
opened not his mouth; he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her
shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth. verse 7
This verse states that the servant will
not open his mouth and protest before
his tormentors, yet in the Gospels, Prophet Jesus(as) defends himself quite cleverly at his trial before the Romans (see John 18:1-40). Prophet Jesus(as) had also
protested on the cross; Elih Elih, Lama Sabacthani- God God, Why Has Thou Forsaken Me? (see Matthew 27:46). Therefore, according to the
Gospels, this verse could not pertain to Prophet Jesus(as) as he did indeed open his mouth and responded to Pilate and
the Chief Priests during questioning as well as protest in anguish on the cross.
He was taken from prison and from judgement: and
who shall declare his generation? For he was cut off out of the land of the living: for
the transgression of my people was he stricken. verse 8
Here, Isaiah(as) is speaking about a group
of people who will suffer great torment and hardship, not an individual. The nation of Israel is always
identified as an individual in the Bible (see
Exodus 4:22, Deuteronomy 32, Jeremiah 50:19, Hoseah 8:3 and 14:5-6 to name but a few
examples). This passage does not pertain to Prophet Jesus(as).
And he made his grave with the wicked, and with
the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his
mouth. verse 9
This also could not pertain to Prophet
Jesus(as) for the following reasons;
1. Jesus(as) did not make his grave with the wicked, but rather, was put into the
tomb of Joseph of Arimathea.
2. The passage states that their would be no deceit in him, however, Jesus(as) contradicts himself in John 18:20 because he
always taught secretly (see Matthew 16:20, Mark
4:10-12 and Luke 8:56).
3. Further deceit is attributed to Prophet Jesus(as)-(AhuduBillah) when he told the Romans that his kingdom
was a spiritual kingdom (see John 18:36) and
yet he told his followers to purchase swords (see
Luke 22:36), which denotes materialism.
Furthermore, this passage could not
possibly pertain to Prophet Jesus(as)
as it states that the servant would do no violence, yet Jesus(as):
1.
Needlessly killed an
entire herd of swine. (see Matthew 8:30-32)
2.
Needlessly destroyed a fig
tree. (see Mark 11:12-14)
3. Jesus(as) said in a parable, Those
enemies of mine who didnt want me to rule over them, bring them here and slay them
in my presence. (see Luke 19:27)
4.
Attacked people with a
whip in the temple. (see John 2:15)
Yet it pleased the Lord to bruise him; he hath
put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his
offspring and prolong his days, and the pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in his
hand. verse 10
Here it says that the suffering servant
would see his offspring and have prolonged days, however, according to the Christian New Testament,
Jesus(as) was crucified at 33 years of age and departed this world by physical ascension (see Mark 16:19) [oddly, the ascension of Jesus(as) does not appear in
the Revised Standard Version of the Bible], leaving no offspring to speak of. This passage could not be about Jesus(as)
as it clearly states that the servant would live a long life and have children. This
passage refers to Isaiah(as) and not to Jesus(as). Was this a prophecy about Prophet
Jesus(as), as Christians claim? If so, it would only serve to prove the fallacies of the New Testament for, according to the
New Testament, as well as Christianity, Jesus(as) did not see his offspring or have his days prolonged as he parished on the cross. Again I stress, that is in accordance with Christian dogma and does
not reflect the belief of this author.
Therefore will I divide him a portion with the
great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul
unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sins of many, and
made intercession for the transgressors.
verse 12
Prophet Isaiah(as) wrote this as a form of deathbed
statement prior to his being killed by these transgressors,
although he did attempted to
reconcile them with Almighty God. Their evil was marked all over his back and body from
the torture and evil that they inflicted
upon him. Another scenario one could
use is to identify the suffering servant with the nation
of Israel. This point can also be proven by Prophet Isaiah(as) identifying the servant
with the nation of Israel (see Isaiah 41:8-9,
43:10, 44:1-2 & 21, 45:4, 48:20, 49:3 and 54:16-17). Isaiah 53 is clearly a continuation of Isaiah 52 and has nothing at all to do with
Prophet Jesus(as).
Isaiah 59:20 & Romans 11:26;
In Romans
11:26, the Christian Bible quotes Isaiah 59:20
as saying;
The deliverer will come
from Zion, he will remove ungodliness from Jacob.
This is an attempt to establish scriptural
support for the Christian dogmatic belief that the Messiah will come to take away the sins of the world, however, a careful examination of the original Hebrew
text reveals a powerful dilemma for the Christians. Isaiah 59:20 of the original Hebrew text actually
says the opposite;
A redeemer will come to
Zion and to those who turn from transgression in Jacob, declares the
Lord.
The original Hebrew text clearly states that
the Messiahs role is not to take away the sins of the world, but rather, when the world turns away from sin, the Messiah will come. This is according to the Hebrew Bible. It is also noteworthy that the New Testament
translates this verse correctly in Isaiah, but incorrectly in Romans.
Isaiah 61:1-2;
The Spirit of the Lord is upon me;
because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; He hath sent me to
bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and opening the prison to
them that are bound; To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord and the Day
of Vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn.
In this passage, Prophet Isaiah(as) is speaking of himself, that he has been anointed by Almighty God to be His Prophet and preach good tidings to the Children of Israel. This is not a prophecy about a future person, namely Prophet Jesus(as), but it is a statement Isaiah(as) is making about himself.
Jeremiah 31:15;
Thus sayeth the Lord: A voice was
heard in Ramah, lamentation, and bitter weeping; Rachel weeping for her children refused
to be comforted for her children. Because they were not.
Almighty God is Speaking through
Prophet Jeremiah(as) to describe how,
after being scattered in 597 BC, the Children of Israel were carried off (in 586 BC) as slaves to Babylon. Their children
were sold as property (as were the adults as well)
and were separated for life. This does not pertain in any way to the life of Prophet
Jesus(as).
Hosea 11:1;
When Israel was a child, then I loved
him, and called my son out of Egypt.
The Prophet Hosea(as) here is speaking of the Exodus of the Children of Israel out of Egypt and complains in the next verse that they sacrificed to Baalim (Satan), as well as burning incense to graven images (idols). Clearly, there is no reference to a future time in this passage with regards to Prophet Jesus(as), but to a time that has already passed.
Malachi 3:1;
Behold, I will send My messenger, and
he shall prepare the way before Me; and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to His
temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come,
sayeth the Lord of Hosts.
Malachi
4:5 states who the
messenger is. He is identified by name;
Behold, I will send you Elijah the
prophet before the coming of the Great and Dreadful Day of the Lord.
This puts Christians in a bit of a spot
with respect to the Christians love of Literal Interpretations of
Biblical passages. John the
Baptist(as) prepared the way for Prophet Jesus(as). However, Malachi(as) did not say; I will
send someone who is like Elijah, or one who will function in place of Elijah,
it clearly states; I will
send Elijah. In Matthew 11:14,
Jesus(as) is quoted as saying;
If ye will receive it, this is Elijah
which was to come. He that has ear to hear, let him hear.
Prophet Jesus(as) clearly says that John the
Baptist(as) was Elijah(as) if they only would believe it. Yet, this is the doctrine of reincarnation,
which the Christian churches adamantly denounces. Either we have a false prophecy from the
book of Malachi or Prophet Jesus(as) is preaching and teaching the reincarnation of Elijah(as) as John the Baptist(as)-(AhuduBillah). In any event, no one has ever appeared
since Malachis(as) writing to announce himself as Elijah(as) and furthermore, John
the Baptist(as) denied being Elijah(as) in the book of John 1:21. The point I am trying to make
here is this, when it comes to the fulfillment of Biblical prophesies, either you employ a
literal interpretation, or a metaphorical interpretation and not a Double
Standard.
Matthew 1:1-16 & Luke 3:23-38;
These passages pertain to the so-called genealogies of Prophet Jesus(as) found in the New Testament of the Bible. In an attempt to prove that Jesus(as) is of the tribe of Judah(as), of the seed of David(as), the Bible authors have compiled two contradicting genealogies that only serve to disprove Prophet Jesus(as) as the Messiah (AhuduBillah). In an attempt to explain away the contradiction of these two genealogies, Christian leaders have determined that one is of Joseph (the carpenter) and the other of Mary(ra), the mother of Jesus(as). However, this is inconsistent with their very own scriptures. Both genealogies clearly state that they are of Joseph (the carpenter) and the only mention of Mary(ra) is found in Matthew 1:16; and Jacob fathered Joseph, the husband of Mary. This in no way implies that the genealogy found in Matthew is that of Mary(ra), it merely states that she was the wife of Joseph (the carpenter). As I mentioned above, these two genealogies only serve to disprove Jesus(as) as the Messiah (AhuduBillah) and as such creates quite a dilemma for Christians. According to Jewish Scriptures, tribal membership is transmitted through ones physical father (see Numbers 1:18 and Jeremiah 33:17), not ones mother, and considering that Joseph (the carpenter), is not Jesus(as) physical father, that is according to Christians and most Muslims; a belief to which I personally do not adhere to, Jesus(as) could not possibly be of the tribe of Judah(as). However, this dilemma can be easily solved if one would merely accept the fact that Joseph (the carpenter) was in fact the physical father of Prophet Jesus(as). We also find another problem in Matthew 1:11, where King Jeconiah of the Babylonian exile is among the ancestors of Joseph (the carpenter). In the Hebrew Bible, King Jeconiah was cursed by Almighty God to never have a descendant sitting on the throne of David(as) and ruling in Judah ever again (see Jeremiah 22:28-30). Along with King Jeconiah, we also find among the ancestors of Joseph (the carpenter) Jehoiakim (see Matthew 1:11 and also 1 Chronicles 3:16). Jehoiakim was also cursed by Almighty God to never have his descendants sitting on the throne of David(as) and ruling in Judah ever again (see Jeremiah 36:30). In light of this, the genealogy found in Matthew would only serve to disprove Prophet Jesus(as) as the Messiah (AhuduBillah). We find yet even further problems with the genealogy found in the Book of Luke. In Luke 3:31, Joseph (the carpenter) is listed as a descendent of David(as) through his son Nathan, but in 1 Chronicles 22:10, it clearly states that the Messiah must be a descendent of David(as) through his son Solomon(as). So, in Luke we find another instance of disproving Jesus(as) as the Messiah (AhuduBillah). Again, dear reader, this is according to the Christian Bible and Judeo/Christian belief. In Islam, all Muslims firmly believe that Prophet Jesus(as) is indeed the Messiah as Almighty God made Himself clear on that fact in The Holy Quran.
However,
most Muslims, like the
Christians, also believe that Prophet
Jesus(as) was born miraculously, without the agency of a father by a special miracle
from Almighty God and as such, Joseph (the
carpenter) could not possibly be the father of Jesus(as) and that the only genealogy that would matter in the
case of Prophet Jesus(as) would be that of his mother Mary(ra) who was a Levite, being a descendent of Aaron(as), the
brother of Moses(as). The fact
of the Levite connection is confirmed in not only Jewish literature (the Talmud), but also the New Testament {Mary(ra) being the cousin of Zakariah(as), the
father of John the Baptist(as) of the tribe of Levi(as)}, as well as The Holy Quran. It is in this to
which I implore that Muslims should not adhere to the so-called virgin
birth of Prophet Jesus(as) as such a concept goes against the nature that
Almighty God has Created for us. Also, virgin births have always been
associated with the birth of pagan gods all through history (see Appendix 3). To even apply such a concept in
the case of Prophet Jesus(as) would only serve to dishonour this mighty messenger of
Almighty God. As such, it would be wrong to discount the lineage of Joseph (the carpenter), who was indeed of the tribe of
Do you
not know that Jesus was conceived by a woman in the manner in which all women conceive?
Then she was delivered of him as women are delivered of their children? Then he was fed as
children are fed. Then he ate food and drank water and answered the call of nature as all
mortals do? Then how can your claim that he was God or Son of God be true?
Aside from the clear arguments presented by Prophet Muhammad(saas) refuting the divinity of Prophet Jesus(as), in which the Najran deputation concurred, he also makes clear the fact that Prophet Jesus(as) was conceived in the manner which all women conceive; that is conceived in the ordinary manner and that Mary(ra) became a wife and mother in the ordinary way. In what manner other than the coming together of a man and a woman is there for a woman to conceive in the manner in which all women conceive? Muslims should consider this deeply before succumbing the Christian belief of a virgin birth, which has its roots in paganism, and coming to accept that what Almighty God meant by Be and it is, is Almighty God bringing about the conditions necessary for Mary(ra) to have a child when no man had touched her. That is; she became betrothed to Joseph (the carpenter), got married to him and eventually becoming pregnant with child by him after the consummation of their marriage.
In this I encourage my Muslim brothers and sisters to read Chapter 7 of my book, Rational Thinking And Misconceptions Cleared, to which I cover this topic of the so-called virgin birth rather extensively.
Curiously, the Bible does not support the virgin birth of Prophet Jesus(as) either. Let us examine the two Biblical passages that deal with this so-called virgin birth. In Matthew 1: 23, it makes reference to Isaiah 7:14, with regards to the virgin giving birth to Emmanuel, however, as I pointed out earlier in this chapter, there is no mention of a virgin in Isaiah 7:14, but rather, a young woman. As such, this passage cannot serve as proof of a virgin birth. In Luke 1: 26-38, we also have a problem. In verse 27, it states that a virgin, Mary(ra), was espoused to Joseph (the carpenter), and further down in verse 34, Mary(ra) states she was never with a man, yet moving back up to verse 26, it clearly says that the Archangel Gabriel(as) visited Mary(ra) after she had been married for six months. In this case, what we have is an unconsummated marriage, which after six months, would be nullified. Bear in mind, no mention of the virgin birth is mentioned in either Gospel of Mark or John.
At this point, we should employ historical authenticity. Mark is the oldest of the canonical Gospels, dating to roughly 70 AD. Matthew, which contains the deliberate mistranslation of Isaiah 7:14, dates roughly 80 AD. Luke was composed in and around 95 AD and John at about 115 AD. So, what is the significance of dating the Gospels? If no mention is made in Mark, the oldest of the Gospels, and Matthews only proof is a deliberate mistranslation of Isaiah 7:14, should we accept the evidence, weak as it is, in the much later Gospel of Luke? And why is no mention made of the virgin birth in the Gospel according to John, which is the favorite Gospel of the Christian Evangelist? In light of this, one cannot accept the virgin birth of Prophet Jesus(as) based on the testimony of Gospel writers who did not even know Prophet Jesus(as). Curiously, St. Paul, the founder of modern Christian thought, did not himself hold the belief in the virgin birth of Prophet Jesus(as) as was reflected in the statement he made in the book of Romans 1:3 from the Bible where he made reference to the fact that Prophet Jesus(as) was made of the seed of David according to the flesh. This simple statement speaks volumes. I will not get into a long drawn out discourse with respect to this subject; however, I would like to refer you, the reader, to the following book;
Jesus In Heaven On Earth by Khwaja Nazir Ahmad
This book deals extensively with all subjects relating to Christian dogma including the so-called virgin birth. You may also read this book on-line at;
http://www.muslim.org/bookspdf/jihoe/conts.htm
I highly
recommend this book to all those in search of truth as this particular publication does a
far better and extensive job at explaining this so-called virgin
birth concept than I could ever hope to do. Therefore, like the bodily
ascension and descension, along with original sin and blood atonement, we can safely
conclude that the virgin birth was yet another pagan
concept applied to the good name of Prophet Jesus(as) in order to validate the
churchs claim to his divinity. A claim which finds no support from their very own
scriptures, The Holy Bible.
Matthew 2:23;
He came and resided in a city called
Nazareth, that what was spoken through the prophets might be fulfilled, He shall be
called a Nazarene.
The easiest prophecy to fulfill is one you
have invented yourself. The New Testament of the Bible certainly bears witness to this
principle, fabricating a prophecy out of thin air and
attributing it to the Hebrew Scriptures (Old
Testament). Matthew 2:23 claims that
Prophet Jesus(as) advent out of
Nazareth was foretold by the prophets and that he would be a Nazarene. Since a Nazarene is a resident of the city of Nazareth,
and this city did not exist during the time period of the Old Testament of the
Bible, it is impossible to find this
quotation in any of the prophetic books of the Old Testament of the Bible. This prophecy
was fabricated out of thin air. It does not exist and is yet another example of fabricated
evidence.
JOHN 10:30;
"I and the Father are one."
All Christians believe that this is indeed proof
in the words of Jesus(as) himself that he is God Incarnate, however, this verse is taken completely out of context.
Once again, I give you the analogy
that I gave at the introduction to this chapter, to which I feel, deserves further
mention, and that is of one who draws
a circle on a tree and then proceeds to shoot an arrow in the middle of it. In this
interpitation of John 10:30, it
certainly appears that the arrow has
been shot first and then the circle drawn around it. If one were to study this verse in
its proper context, rather than just reading this particular text, you will have a better
understanding of what Prophet Jesus(as) meant by these words. When one reads John 10 from verse 25 up to and including verse 30 and beyond to verse 38, you see that what Jesus(as) meant was
that he and Almighty God were one in purpose. Almighty God wants people to follow the straight path
and Jesus(as), as a True Prophet of Almighty God, is the means to follow that straight
path, hence the statement of Prophet Jesus(as) when he said, I am the way the truth and the life. Noone
comes to the father but by me. As a Prophet of Almighty God, Jesus(as) was the way for
his time, just as Moses(as) was the way for his time as well as Noah(as), Abraham(as) and
Prophet Muhammad(saas). If we were to take Prophet Jesus(as) literally in John 10:30, then what do we make of his words in John 17:20-23, were he states the he, along with
his apostles and disciples, were one with Almighty God? Are we to take this statement
literally also? No, of course not. In this verse we have no evidence of the divinity of
Prophet Jesus(as).
At this point, I would like to go a
bit off topic, and make a brief reference to one proof
text the Christian Church uses in regards to Prophet Muhammad(saas). Martin
Luther, the father of the Protestant Reformation, once claimed that the Papacy in Rome was the head of the
anti-Christ and that Islam was its tail (AhuduBillah).This, from the man who stated that, You can
fornicate and murder a thousand times a day, as long as you believe in the blood of Jesus
Christ, you will be saved, as well as saying that ..all
peasants were demons and as such should be slaughtered and massacred...
Sadly, to this day, Christians still adhere to the belief that Prophet Muhammad(saas) was
an anti-Christ (AhuduBillah). Let us examine their evidence
to see if in fact it holds water, and I am referring to Ezekiel
38:4,5,9.
Ezekiel
38:4,5,9 makes reference
to Gog and Magog as well as Persia attacking Palestine (Israel) and making war on its peaceful
inhabitants. This is to happen in some future time of peace in the middle east. The
Christians claim that Gog and Magog is Russia,
while Persia
are the Muslims. However, this is utterly false. This event being described in Ezekiel 38 has already occurred and as such cannot lend
support to the fabricated
evidence provided by the Christian Church. In the early to mid 1200s, the Mongol hordes began to attack Muslim lands under
the leadership of Genghis Khan. They wreaked
havoc where ever they went. Mass slaughters and massacres the likes of which were never
before seen. They marched from the area now known as Russia (Gog and Magog) and on February 10th, 1258, they attacked and
seized Baghdad (Persia). By this time many of
the Muslim lands were under the control of the Mongols. When the Mongols moved in from Persia,
they conquered Gaza, just as Ezekiel 38 foretold. Palestine (Israel)
was left waste with all the inhabitants being slaughtered. The peace that was Palestine (Israel)
was shattered. With the exception of a brief period in which Jerusalem was under the
control of the Christian Crusaders, Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in peace and
harmony as one. In July of 1260, the Sultan of Egypt, Saif ad-Din Qutuz attacked the Mongols in Palestine (Israel)
and ended their reign of terror. The Mongol power was finally broken by the Muslims, who
were the true successors of the Son of Man, Prophet Muhammad(saas). For this act,
Christian Europe owes Islam a great debt. If the Muslims had not finally put an end to
the Mongols destructive path, they would have eventually attacked Christian lands and laid
waste to the same people who were supporting the Mongols in their raids on Muslim lands.
How ironic. There are several other so-called proof text the established
Christian Church uses in
regards to Prophet Muhammad(saas) to further slander this Great Man, however, I will not dwell on them as the purpose of
this discourse was to examine the proof text as pertaining to
Prophet Jesus(as). I would, however, like to point you, dear reader, to the book;
Muhammad In The Bible by Abdul Ahad Dawud ( Father David Benjamin
Keldani)
Brother Abdul was a Roman Catholic Priest who embraced Islam after
discovering the Truth. This is perhaps one of the
greatest books dealing with the advent of Prophet Muhammad(saas) from the Bible ever
written. You can also visit this book on-line at;
http://www.muhammad.net/biblelp/index.htm
Any seekers of truth would find this information most enlightening. The information is invaluable, drawing from both Biblical and historical facts to prove the rightful status of Muhammad Mustafa(saas) as a True Prophet of Almighty God.I can only hope and pray that, InshaAllah(God Willing), our Christian brothers and sisters will finally open their hearts and minds and allow the Truth of Islam to penetrate them. Prophet Jesus(as) was and is one of Almighty Gods mightiest messengers, and to elevate Jesus(as) to God like status would only serve to dishonor him, for he considered himself nothing more than a servant of Almighty God, as well as to dishonor his true monotheistic teachings. To follow those who go against monotheism and rational thinking will only lead you away from the Grace and Mercy of Almighty God. The Truth of Prophet Jesus(as) can be found in the following web-site as pertaining to his life, teachings and subsequent death at 120 years of age in Kashmir, where he spent his remaining days preaching among the Children of Israel who were living in that region. For proof of this, I urge you to visit the following web-site;
Here you will find the truth of Prophet
Jesus(as) as well as evidence of his journey
into Asia were he seeked out the Lost Sheep of the
House of Israel as he promised he would (see
John 10:16). Please keep in mind,
dear reader, in no way is this information a means to mock Christians, nor should it be
used as such. Coming from a Christian background, I very well understand the confusion of
Christian dogma and the effect it can have on the believer. Christianity is a religion
built on emotions
and as such must be examined in the light of rationality and common sense. What I
have done above was use the very book of the Christians, The Holy Bible, in the most
respectful way to show them how far they have strayed from the true monotheistic teachings
of Prophet Jesus(as), and the Commands of Almighty God. I wish to end this discourse with
a plea to my Christian brothers and sisters; Use the faculties that Almighty God gifted you with and
explore the truth, examine the truth and accept the truth. You will indeed find joy and
happiness at the end of your journey.
May Allah(swt) guide us all to the truth,
InshaAllah(God Willing).
Back to Contradictions and Errors in the Bible.
Articles by Issa Ahmed Khalid.
What's new | A-Z | Discuss & Blog | Youtube
Quran's STUNNING Divine Miracles: [1] Allah Almighty also promised in several Divine Prophecies that He will show the Glorious Quran's Miracles to mankind: 1- The root letters for "message" and all of its derivatives occur 513 times throughout the Glorious Quran. Yet, all Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty Alone, the Prophets' and Messengers' actual names (Muhammad, Moses, Noah, Abraham, Lot etc....) were also all mentioned 513 times in the Glorious Quran. The detailed breakdown of all of this is thoroughly listed here. This Miracle is covered in 100s (hundreds) of Noble Verses.2- Allah Almighty said that Prophet Noah lived for 950 years. Yet, all Praise and Glory are due to Allah Almighty Alone, the entire Noble Surah (chapter Noah) is exactly written in 950 Letters. You can thoroughly see the accurate count in the scanned images.Coincidence? See 1,000s of examples [1]. Quran's Stunning Numerical & Scientific Miracles. |