Mary: Fornicate with you "in my mother's bed" [1]??? | 200 years no gospels | 24 other thrones besides Jesus' | Jesus was created | What's new | A-Z library (3300+ articles) | "Muslims" was the original title | Quran Search | Quran Moral Code (100s of them) | Quran: Bibles are filled with corrupt قول qaowl (doctrines of sayings and writings) | "bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah | Jesus said he was powerless | Paul wasn't sure about the Holy Spirit | Paul commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11â€"13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages | Research & Blog | 9/11 Israel-lie | Youtube | 
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
The Romans had to fake fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues: [1]
1-
When was the New Testament written?
How big was the first New Testament?
(google). The
Roman massacres
also wiped out the original texts.
Hardly a total of 2 pages, and it was written 100 to 200 years after Jesus. Not early enough by any stretch.
Also, the first 200 years there were no gospels or writings, and they admit that much forgeries were "fairly common":
Also visit section #4 below: 4-
The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered" [4].
What about NT manuscripts immediately after Jesus?
Zero
were ever found.
They
were
never
found because none of the writings that were ever made have survived:
what_christians_do_not_know_about_their_holy_book_
www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNZ5dcsJaeJ3NWwvDoFuyzufcRfwJcDia
Only
centuries-late small
11 fragments of Papayris
were found and at a much latter date, which collectively were less than 2 pages
altogether. A papayri (papyrus) is a scroll,
which is equivalent to a letter-size page. The 11 fragments found were
dated between years 100 to 300. So
even those are not even original, but are copies of copies of copies of copies and
documentations of oral church teachings and fabrications. At any rate, the 11 fragments
of papayris found are. They're hardly worth showing or be given a
URL-link. They hardly fill 2 pages when put together:
Papayri P52 "The earliest extant
fragment of the New Testament is the Rylands Library
Papyrus P52, a piece of
the
Gospel of John dated
to the first half of the
2nd century."
(Dating the Bible - Wikipedia)
"The first complete copies of single New Testament books appear
around 200,
and the earliest complete copy of the New Testament, the Codex Sinaiticus dates
to the
4th century."
(Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia
and
Google Search)
Six other
small fragments found were dated to the 2nd or 3rd centuries.
Not even worthy of being URL-linked:
Papayri P32
The so-called
"5800
Greek manuscripts
of the New Testament, with an astounding 2.6 million
pages of
biblical text"
were all writings from
5th
to the 19th
century in so many languages.
Like all other false religions' writings, these are irrelevant writings of
church fathers and people that are similar to articles Christians write today on
blogs and websites. They are totally irrelevant to the question at hand
and have nothing to do with the earliest manuscripts that don't seem to to have
ever existed, from the first place, during the time of Jesus and early
believers (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Also, Sam Shamoun declares 2nd and 3rd centuries
bibles-writings are forgeries:
If Paul is false, then Jesus
is insufficient:
www.youtube.com/@Albyyinah
www.youtube.com/@Albyyinah/videos
Papayri P90
Papayri P104 (only 6.35 cm by 9.5cm in size)
Papayri P98
Papayri P137
Papayri P46
Papayri P66
Papayri P77
Papayri P103
Majuscule GA0189
Holy Gambling:
Sam Shamoun promoted Christianity's Holy Gambling, and he even funded other gamblers. He himself spent 10s of thousands of dollars on it. Also, the 12th disciple, Mathias, was chosen via gambling by the other disciples. They literally rolled the holy dice [1] amongst each other to choose him from among other choices. Then they claimed it was the Holy Spirit that chose him (??). Dice and chance had nothing to do with it.
Plus, Jews and Christians went through waves and waves of Roman massacres, and
their texts were wholesale burnt:
|
Roman massacres: It is also important to know that the following seven Roman Emperors have thoroughly burned all (burnt all) of the early believers' writings:
1. Nero
(54-68) Read all the details with references here. Also visit: How big was the first New Testament?What we have today from "gospels" and "New Testament" were written 100 years to 300 years after Jesus' departure from this earth. So, the current writings that we have are not original writings. Also, to appease the Roman Empire's 3-headed pagan religion and practices, the pagan 3-headed trinity was invented [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Many lies had been fabricated after the original writings were all lost. The Jews and Christians of Arabia, however, did have writings that predicted the coming of Prophet Muhammad. These were some of the original texts that survived. The early believers were expecting an Arabian Prophet. The OT thoroughly talks about him and his new Covenant coming from Kedar in Arabia, and the NT talks about him coming after the Messiah:
Why wasn't Prophet Muhammad preached by the early Christians in Jerusalem, Arabia, Africa and Europe? Early cities like Antioch, Corinth, Rome and others were never taught the coming of Prophet Muhammad. Doesn't this prove that Islam is false? But he was preached!
Prophet "AHMAD" is found in the
Dead Sea Scrolls:
(Clip also in this article) Prophet Muhammad in the previous Scriptures. Prophet Muhammad was thoroughly foretold in the Bible, and his prophetic Name, "Ahmed", was also found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, and it was mentioned precisely in the Glorious Quran for the Prophet to be foretold by this very Name, Ahmed [1] [2]. |
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Holy Gambling:
Sam Shamoun promoted Christianity's Holy Gambling, and he even funded other gamblers. He himself spent 10s of thousands of dollars on it. Also, the 12th disciple, Mathias, was chosen via gambling by the other disciples. They literally rolled the holy dice [1] amongst each other to choose him from among other choices. Then they claimed it was the Holy Spirit that chose him (??). Dice and chance had nothing to do with it.
Also, Sam Shamoun declares 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries:
If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
|
Four false promises made by Jesus
regarding the Holy Spirit: 1- Your sperma (Greek for sperm) will not cause you to sin fornication or adultery or masturbation if you have enough Holy Spirit in you. So why then did you amputate your own testicles and head of penis Jesus? Why did you castrate and emasculate yourself? You had no need for this. Who on this planet could've had more Holy Spirit in him than you? Or were you also drunk when you uttered this lie? The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol. Jesus commanded to amputate your sinful body parts (cut off hand, penis, pluck eyes, etc...). Paul said amputated flesh gets sent to satan. Were you someone's boyfriend Jesus? Or were you someone's girlfriend? Why did you amputate your Holy Divine Genitals (??) and send them to satan? And why did you then keep your eyes?? Also Jesus, why are your churches, even from the times of Paul, were and are still are notorious in sexual assaults and rapes?
Paul also commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11-13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages.
Even the 12th disciple was chosen by rolling the dice (casting lots), - a game of chance, - and not by the Holy Spirit. Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. Also, Trinity is a lie from Hell. Why was GOD Almighty charitable (χάριτι) and forgiving to Jesus in Luke 2:52?
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD
sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying
spirit
2- If a snake bites you and runs
its poison through your blood, it will not hurt you (Mark 16:17-18). Jesus even promised in the plural that you will be picking up deadly snakes and they will inject their poisons into you and you shall not be harmed!. This false prophesy is one of the NT's biggest lies, because it never happened. Not only that, but all Christians who genuinely attempted it in the past were killed by the snakes' poisons. Furthermore, the NT's writers lied when they said Paul was bit by a poisonous snake and was not hurt when he was in Malta (Acts 28:7-10). There are many problems with this: 1- Paul is a single person. Jesus' bold promise was in the plural. "The believers shall pick up poisonous snakes, and if anyone gets bit by a poisonous snake and have the poison run through their blood, the poison shall not harm any believer!". Well, historically all who genuinely picked up died from poison. 2- It's been proven that many non-venomous snakes existed in Malta. Some even look like Vipers. So there is not proof that Paul's snake was a poisonous one: "Four species of snakes are present (in the wild) in the Maltese Islands of which three are relatively recent additions. The only indigenous snake is the Western Whip Snake Coluber viridiflavus which is a non-poisonous species. The other three, namely Algerian Whipsnake Coluber algirus, Leopard Snake Elaphe situla and Cat Snake Telescopus fallax have been introduced by man. Of these only the latter has some form of poison. Although snakes appear in the archaeological context (eg. the stone slab in Mus of Archaeology of Gozo - from ggantija, which has a snake on its side) this does not imply that they were poisonous. On the other hand, poisonous species such as Natrix natrix which occurs in nearby Sicily may have been eradicated by man through time." (Source) 3- Jesus' promise dismally fails, and it is one of the most embarrassing lies, and most dangerous to its followers, in the New Testament, which again and again proves that Jesus was indeed a GOD-sent
lying spirit as GOD Almighty deceived false people in the Old Testament.
John 3:13-14
2 Kings 2:11
Genesis 5:24
Again,
where did Enoch and Elijah go to?
Jesus' statement is simply
a lie. He didn't know that Elijah, Enoch and others (ex: Uzair or Ezra) were taken up to
Heaven by GOD Almighty. Was he also here a
fat drunk as the NT says he was? Jesus here added Elijah and Enoch to the 39+ list of barfinity (trinity), because we now have Elijah, Enoch and Jesus as their own trinity. Moses was scared to even pass the Judgment: 2- 3- 4-
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
Jesus' confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language that falsely turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other
examples of blasphemies and quackery) definitely make him a 100% GOd-sent
lying spirit in Matthew 7:22-23. 3- You can
lift mountains and throw them in the sea with only
one command only if you had the Holy Spirit in you. Not even Jesus,
with all of his glory and sperms, was able to do this miracle. 4- Jesus
promised the disciples that after he departs it will not be them
speaking. It will be the Holy Spirit will be speaking through their
mouths. Yet, after he departed, they split into Peter and Paul opposing
teams, and they started hurling insults and accusations towards each others'
teachings, and calling each others: Anathema (cursed by GOD in Greek), follower
of Satan, your Gospel is of the devil, you are a false apostle, you are dogs,
and several other serious accusations and insults. Where was the promised
Holy Spirit in all of this, and all of the above?? Where is Jesus' promise?? - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - 12th disciple was also chosen by
holy gambling.
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in their conflicting scriptures?
Remember: If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
The one unforgivable sin?! Jesus further says: The only unforgivable sin is blaspheming the Holy Spirit (Luke 12:10). But your entire package that is called the NT and church is the greatest insult and blasphemy against GOD Almighty's Holy Spirit. It is like a prostitute preaching, and while continuing to prostitute, that the one unforgivable sin is fornication. How many times did you fornicate and continue to fornicate? How many times did you lie on the Holy Spirit and continued to lie on the Holy Spirit of GOD Almighty? Were you also a fat drunk in this one?
Was Jesus drunk? High Concentrations and Intoxication:
The alcohol-less Baptist is greater than Jesus: John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a
fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol:
winebibber a habitual drinker of alcohol. Of course it never did! (See Holy Spirit of Islam, and alcohol is forbidden in Islam)
High Concentrations and Intoxication: Yahweh despised Jesus' wisdom: for he (John the Baptist) will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born. So according to the New Testament itself, we have: 1- John the baptist.  .Is John the Baptist another member of the barfinity? |
|
Satan was part of the trinity
(Ezekiel 28:13-19),
then got
subtracted
(-1):
GOD in the OT spoke a poem of regret [1] regarding Satan. GOD expresses how regretful He is that all of the Glory that He has created for and given to Satan will no longer be given to him. It was now given to a lesser second-hand, Jesus, whom otherwise would've received none of it. Jesus was GOD's plan B not A. 1. "You were perfect from the day you were created". Jesus was also created from the Word of GOD.2. Glorious. 3. "the chosen one". 4. The "Anointed". 5. ruler over earth. 6. Ruler over the "Holy Mount" of GOD.
Question to every polytheist trinitarian pagan: If Jesus replaced Satan, then: 1- How can Jesus be our Creator? 2- How can Satan be part of a trinity? 3- How can Jesus be given the glory that was created for and given to satan, not Jesus, and Jesus still be considered our Creator? 4- How come Satan was the primary and Jesus was secondary?
Of course, there is no Trinity, and Satan was not subtracted from any Trinity. The above exposes the lie of trinity; a word that does not even exist in any of the Jewish and Christian scriptures (Bibles and outside Bibles). Also, since we have
24 other thrones besides Jesus'
And Melchizedek was Jesus' Elder in Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20. Then, we also clearly have Satan as: 1- One of the elders and had his throne. 2- Satan too was Jesus' elder. 3- When compared to Melchizedek and Satan, Jesus was secondary.
Angels are scared of the mighty Satan: Even Michael, the chief angel, did not dare to insult the devil.
Using the polytheist trinitarian pagans' illogic, satan was indeed a Mighty Member of the Barfinity, but then got subtracted. And since satan was subtracted, then Jesus could've also gotten himself subtracted when satan made Jesus covet the sins of the world for 40 days and 40 nights. Do you see now how blasphemous and stupid Christianity is?
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
|
2- Just who were the real authors of the Bible?
The sections of this article are:
1- Exposing the Bible's books' and gospels' corruptions.
- Exposing the New Testament.
- Exposing
Paul.
- Paul
calls the Jewish law fables
and lies (Titus
1:10-16).
- Exposing the Old Testament.
- 600+ Commandments from GOD Almighty to Moses and the Israelites.
2- So who wrote the Bible then? Were they really the
original Prophets and Disciples?
3- The New Testament was written in the 4th
century by Constantine and his council by their own words.
4- The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered" [4].
5- Contradictions in
historical claims and accounts.
6- Conclusion.
7- Further Sites to Research.
8- Book Information (Bibliography).
1- Exposing the Bible's books' and gospels' corruptions:
Below, we'll also see that the New Testamanet's gospels and books were written around between 80 to 300 years after the departure of Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
|
Unknown dates and authors? Keep in mind also that shortly after Jesus, 10s of false messiahs and prophets emerged. Below, you'll see that the Bible's books and gospels were:
Also keep in mind that the Bibles' words are marred with lies: The Bibles also state:
Also Visit: What is the definition of Messiah in the Quran? Deuteronomy 4:2 clearly declares that the Bible is corrupt! Also, which "Book" is the People of the Book? The best way to convert a non-Muslim to Islam? Covers the Hijacked Bible in great details. |
|
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other?? The Romans had to fake fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues: [1]
Never happened: 1- Jonah was alive on the shore, alive in the whale's belly, and alive when vomited out of the whale. Alive, alive, alive!2- Jesus laid on the floor in a tomb (a cave-like room) as shown above, got healed, and got up and left. He was never inside any coffin nor ever got buried. 3- The Jewish Passover, where 1/2 million pilgrims were about to arrive, forced the Romans to abruptly end the crucifixion. Jesus only stayed for 3 hours. 100s of thousands of pilgrims were coming to Jerusalem for the Passover, Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other?? The Romans had to fake rush his "crucifixion" and bring him down. The soldiers were even denied food due to lack of time. 4- Jesus original name
in
Luke 5:31, Matthew 9:12, Mark 2:17
was Healer or Doctor. Jesus was miraculous and
could self-heal
as he has done miraculous medical miracles in the past.
5- Jesus
never got crucified: [1]
[2]
[3]
[4].
The OT and NT clearly spell it out. He
was saved.
6- The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). See also Daniel 7:25: Christianity will change time and the Law.
5- The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). See also Daniel 7:25: Christianity will change time and the Law. John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol: winebibber a habitual drinker of alcohol.
High Concentrations and Intoxication: Yahweh despised Jesus' wisdom: Luke 1:15 So according to the New Testament itself, we have: 1- John the baptist.
6- Jesus' Hyperboles: Confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language falsely made sinful lawful and lawful sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples.
This statement "shall be buried deep in the heart of earth for 3 days" is a problematic, oxymoronic, self-contradicting, and exaggerated Jesus Hyperbole.
No miracle. A WWII soldier survived 63 hours on the cross by his captors. Jesus only stayed for 3 hours. Also, first 200 years there were no gospels or writings, and they admit that much forgeries were "fairly common".
Keep in mind:
Matthew 7:22-23:
GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying
spirit
Two Jesus: : There were two Jesuses! Not one. Allah Almighty also said in the Glorious Quran:[004:156] That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge; [004:157] That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Apostle of God";-but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- [004:158] Nay, God raised him up unto Himself; and God is Exalted in Power, Wise;- Divine Setup for Conjecture: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.  "bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah Eesa is Iesu and Iesus in Latin and Greek for Jesus, and Eesa is also a Hebrew word that means doctor"...are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow..." (The Noble Quran, 4:157) "... but so it was made to appear to them..." (Quran 4:157)
The two double-Jesus men & Pontus Pilate in Matthew 27:16-17: According to the Gospel of Matthew, Pontus Pilate was standing between two double-Jesus men:
1- Jesus
Barabbas. "...The Bibles' Christ was put on the cross for three hours. Any one of us would've survived this silly crucifixion. Your human body, when faced with death, can become 10+ times stronger, more resilient, more resistant and more stubborn than normal. This is what would enable you, for example, to lift an entire truck with your bare hands if your precious child was under it. Similarly, if you were put on the cross for three silly hours, your body would've survived it. A soldier was placed on the cross for 63 hours and still lived to tell the world about it." (Source) A Divine Setup for Conjecture. And
again, the "buried deep
in the heart of earth" Prophecy
never happened, Jesus
laid on the floor, got healed, and got up and left. He
was never
inside any coffin nor
ever got buried.
Also, because 100s of thousands of pilgrims were coming to Jerusalem
for the Passover,
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
Was
Jesus Christ Crucified?
Christianity's Salvation Lie:
Because
Christianity's scriptures didn't get documented for 200+
years after Jesus, the Church and Christians
had developed and invented the crucifixion lie and its requirement
to save a person from Hell (by him believing in it), which had been
thoroughly proven from both the Bible and the Glorious Quran, to be
a fabricated lie [1].
Salvation verses like John
3:16 and others are all forgeries that
were invented by liars 100s
of years after the real Eesa
Matthew 9 Matthew 5:7 Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy. Being Merciful to others makes you a good person. And Jesus didn't come for you if you are. Jesus didn't come to invite merciful and good people. They're already saved. They need no invitation. The Christian lie about one must accept that Jesus died on the cross for his/her sins is mandatory for their salvation, and that otherwise they'd be doomed to Hell is thoroughly destroyed in Matthew 9:12-13. In fact, both the OT and NT in many passages confirmed that GOD Almighty will save his Messiah from crucifixion and from death and harm.
Matthew 9:12-13 I have not come for you if you're a merciful Jew.
7. The New Testament further says that as Jesus grew up, he learned more and more about GOD: (Luke 2:52)
8. How is Jesus our Creator? Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23:
GOD sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying
spirit
Yes, the Jews did call Ezra a special Son of GOD
with special
Divine Connections. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Gospel of John:
Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:
"Many scholars of the past two centuries have denied that John wrote this book, partly because of their belief that the author fabricated many details such as the miracles and the discourses of Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
(The Holman Illustrated Study Bible, ISBN: 978-1-58640-275-4, Gospel of John, Page1540)""Critical Analysis makes it difficult to accept the idea that the gospel as it now stands was written by one person. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"Within the gospel itself there are also some inconsistencies. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"To solve these problems, scholars have proposed various rearrangements that would produce a smoother order. However, most have come to the conclusion that the inconsistencies were probably produced by subsequent editing in which homogeneous materials were added to a shorter original. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"Other difficulties for any theory of eyewitness authorship of the gospel in its present form are presented by its highly developed theology and by certain elements of its literary style. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"The gospel contains many details about Jesus not found in the synoptic gospels. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
"The final editing of the gospel and arrangement in its present form probably dates from between A.D. 90 and 100. Traditionally, Ephesus has been favored as the place of composition, though many support a location in Syria, perhaps the city of Antioch, while some have suggested other places, including Alexandria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
| 1 John and Galatians
forgeries:
From www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm: 3- Furthermore, we find even more alarming troubles with the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe that the writer of the gospel of John is the same one as the one who wrote 1 John, then it is important to point out the following absurdity in the authenticity of this gospel from its last and concluding chapter: John
21:24-25
"We know that his testimony is true"?! Wasn't the disciple John the one who supposedly wrote the gospel of John? How can he say about himself that "we know that his (the author) testimony is true"?! Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book was written by an unknown person? Below in this article, we see:
The Gospel of 1 John: Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel: "....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)" "The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
1 John forgeries: 1 John forgeries by church fathers: The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.
From www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=3480.msg16733#msg16733: By Mustafa Ahmad It's amazing how the two verses commonly used by Christians against Muslims fail! But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed. (Galatians 1:8) Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son. (1 John 2:22)
1) Not to accept any other gospel even if an angel from heaven. This writing is not from the time of Paul. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 3rd century P46 . We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd century. there is no direct evidence that Paul wrote it. 2) Anyone who rejects Jesus as Christ and the son is the antichrist. This writing is not from the time of John. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 4th century GA 01, א - Codex Sinaiticus. We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd or 3rd century. there is no direct evidence that John wrote it. How embarrassing both verses used against Muslims don't even go back to the "alleged authors". |
So again, no one knows regarding the "Gospel of John":
Also, when one reads this gospel, he would immediately notice that it was not written by John himself. Christians say that it was John the Apostle writting about John the Baptist. The evidence in the quotes above clearly proves that this is a desperate lie! I submit to you that neither John wrote anything! Let us look at the following verses from the gospel:
"And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:19)"
"John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:26)"
"For John was not yet cast into prison. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:24)"
etc...
Whoever wrote the gospel, was he appointed or inspired by GOD Almighty? If yes, then who is that man? It can't be John for it is quite obvious from the above verses and many more throughout the gospel that John wasn't the original author. One has to be ridiculously biased and blind in faith to deny that.
So now, what about these most popular verses:
"In the beginning was the
Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was was God was
with authority (the
same Greek word used for satan's
rule [2]
[3]). (From
the King James Version Bible, John 1:1)"
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:16)"
These verses were obviously written by mysterious men and not by any of Jesus' original disciples. Therefore, it is blasphemy to consider such verses as Divine and to try to prove Jesus is the Creator of the Universe through them. The lie of trinity was born between the years of 150 to 300. It is quite possible and highly probable that some church wrote the so-called "Gospel of John" from excerpts that they found. Notice that there are 24,000 "letters" or papers found that were not included in today's New Testament, which means that the excerpts that were used for writing the "Gospel of John" and all of the other books and gospels of the NT are highly doubtful and contain no proof what so ever that they were written by any of Jesus' original disciples. The Gospel of John was written about John but not by the original "Saint John". Big difference and big corruption! You can't consider such rubbish as GOD Almighty's Divine Holy Words.
Again, please visit: The Gospel of John, Gospel or gossip? to see proof about early Christians rejecting the so-called Gospel of John. They believed it was all man-made.
None of Jesus' disciples witnessed the crucifixion. They "all fled" and "deserted" Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). This further confirms Islam's claims.
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing his face down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.
|
From https://www.answering-christianity.com/jesus_problematic_hyperboles.htm: .......... Infestation: Again, the New Testament's confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to become lawful and for lawful things to become sinful. This in itself is a blasphemy against GOD Almighty. The New Testament gives warnings about the infestation of existing false prophets and messiahs [1] at the time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus). The analysis below clearly show that the false "Jesus" of the full-of-fabrications, the corrupt Bible, is not what Isa (eesa), the true Messiah and the son of our virgin mother Mary, is. Peace and blessings be upon Isa and his mother. We believe in the virgin birth of the Messiah, and we believe he will return to fight the armies of satan. Both the Bible and Islam agree that he will return as an Arab [2] from Damascus, Syria.
Baptist called Jesus a liar! The infestation gets even more ridiculous when we read from the NT that John the Baptist, the supposed great Prophet, called Jesus a liar before he died: Yes, John the Baptist died disbelieving in Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). |
The Gospel of Matthew:
"The unknown author, whom we shall continue to call Matthew for the sake of convenience, drew no only up the Gospel according to Mark but upon a large body of material (principally, sayings of Jesus) not found in Mk that corresponds, sometimes exactly, to material found also in the Gospel according to Luke. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1008)"
"As for the place where the gospel was composed, a plausible suggestion is that it was Antioch, the capital of the Roman province of Syria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1009)"
So we clearly see, both the author or authors and the place of composition of the "Gospel of Matthew" are unknown.
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.
"bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah
Eesa is Iesu and Iesus in Latin and Greek for Jesus, and Eesa is also a Hebrew word that means doctor
"...are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow..." (The Noble Quran, 4:157)
|
Jesus Castrated Himself: Jesus amputated his own (satanic?) testicles and penis' head. He said it was to remain sanctified and holy (??) for the Kingdom of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). How is running away is actually defeating to satan's temptations? Jesus also kissed Mary Magdalene on the mouth. GOD Almighty was also "charitable" (Luke 2:52) with Jesus and forgave him.Oxymoron: Paul said maimed flesh gets sent to satan. Jesus said maim your sinful body parts. Jesus maims his testicles and the head of his penis, but also never his (satanic?) eyes. See also Oxymoron Trinity (100+ verses). All Bibles call Jesus slave of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Jesus' Hyperboles: Confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language falsely made sinful lawful and lawful sinful (ex: pork [1] became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples of blasphemies and quackery) Quran: All Bibles are mostly of corrupt [1] (Quran 10:94 and 10s others discussed). See also the 39+ members of trinity. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40. |
If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Holy Gambling:
Sam Shamoun promoted Christianity's Holy Gambling, and he even funded other gamblers. He himself spent 10s of thousands of dollars on it. Also, the 12th disciple, Mathias, was chosen via gambling by the other disciples. They literally rolled the holy dice [1] amongst each other to choose him from among other choices. Then they claimed it was the Holy Spirit that chose him (??). Dice and chance had nothing to do with it.
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
The Romans had to fake fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues: [1]
Paul commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11-13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages.
Yet, Paul admits that he speaks through a lying spirit (Romans 3:7 But if through my lie God's truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?), while Jesus promised all of the disciples that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, and that it will not be them speaking, but the Holy Spirit. Yet, Paul says he was lying. 12th disciple was also chosen by holy gambling.
Only Islam completes GOD Almighty's Religion. See
ample prophecies.
Paul and his team of disciples were also calling Peter's team, - and vice versa,
- anathema
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Paul also admits that he speaks through a lying spirit:
Romans 3:7
7 But if through
my lie God's truth abounds
to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?
| NASB © | Greek | Strong's |
| But if | 1487: sometimes used with a command or as an indirect question, etc.) | |
| through | 1722: in, on, at, by, with | |
| my lie | (pseusmati) |
5582: a lie, falsehood |
See full verse and table here [2].
Yet, Jesus promised them that it
will NOT be them speaking but the Holy Spirit speaking
through their mouths??!! How is this not an oxymoron?
The twelfth (12th) disciple, Matthias, was also chosen
by rolling the dice (casting lots); via a game of chance.
Where again was the Holy Spirit in all of this? Christianity permits stealing and robbing. Robbing includes physical assault on someone. To steal something you stealthily snatch it and run away. To rob someone, you either steal from them or forcefully take it from them via assault and force. 2 Corinthians 11:8 I robbed other assemblies (often translated as churches, but the Greek ἐκκλησίας (ekklēsias) means summoned people; a group of people; assemblies, which includes non-Christians) by aggressively taking λαβὼν ("to lay hold by aggressively"; hustling; STEALING by force; robbing) their wages/salaries/money to serve you. https://biblehub.com/greek/2564.htm Christians even have this saying: "To rob Peter to pay Paul" The Glorious Quran's Scientific Miracle on Lying: The Noble Quran on the Cerebrum: Lying is generated from the person's forehead. The region in the brain that controls our movements - In Noble Quran and confirmed by Science. www.answering-christianity.com/detailed_meanings_of_scientific_words_in_verses.htm#embryology www.answering-christianity.com/ac20.htm#embryology
Jesus' oxymoronic hyperboles and incoherence created serious problems blasphemies!
Christianity permits lying while preaching. This clip shows a pastor lying while clearly knowing he was lying. Play clip here.
Robbing, hustling and stealing permitted:
https://biblehub.com/greek/1537.htm
https://biblehub.com/greek/2983.htm
https://biblehub.com/lexicon/2_corinthians/11-8.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_rob_Peter_to_pay_Paul
Quran Moral Code (100s of them)
Quran: All Bibles are mostly corrupt [1] قول (Quran 10:94 and 10s others discussed). See also the 39+ members of trinity. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.
Paul also ordered killing and maiming of flesh.
Remember:
If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Holy Gambling:
Sam Shamoun promoted Christianity's Holy Gambling, and he even funded other gamblers. He himself spent 10s of thousands of dollars on it. Also, the 12th disciple, Mathias, was chosen via gambling by the other disciples. They literally rolled the holy dice [1] amongst each other to choose him from among other choices. Then they claimed it was the Holy Spirit that chose him (??). Dice and chance had nothing to do with it.
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
The Romans had to fake fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues: [1]
Paul commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11-13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages.
Paul and his team of disciples were also calling Peter's team,
- and vice versa, - anathema
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Paul calls the Jewish law fables and lies (Titus 1:10-16).
The Gospel of Mark:
This gospel is the oldest and is supposedly the most original one in the New Testament.
"Although the book is anonymous, apart
from the ancient heading "According to Mark" in manuscripts, it
has traditionally been assigned to John Mark, in whose mother's
house (at Jerusalem) Christians assembled. (The
New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"
"Although there is no direct internal evidence of authorship, it was the unanimous testimony of the early church that this Gospel was written by John Mark. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1488)"
"Traditionally,
the gospel is said to have been written shortly before A.D. 70 in
Rome, at a time of impending persecution and when destruction loomed over
Jerusalem. (The New American Bible, ISBN:
978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"
"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"
"This verse, which reads, "But if you do not forgive, neither will your heavenly Father forgive your transgressions," is omitted in the best manuscripts. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1081)"
"This passage, termed the Longer Ending to the Marcan gospel by comparison with a much briefer conclusion found in some less important manuscripts, has traditionally been accepted as a canonical part of the gospel and was defined as such by the Council of Trent. Early citations of it by the Fathers indicate that it was composed by the second century, although vocabulary and style indicate that it was written by someone other than Mark. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1088)"
So, in reality, we don't really know whether Mark was the sole author of this Gospel or not, nor do we know when and where the "gospel" was even written. And since The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus, then how are we to know for sure that the current "Gospel of Mark" wasn't written by some pro of Mark?
A new captured image of this book's corruption:
(http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark 16:9-20;&version=31;)
The above text reads: "The most reliable early manuscript and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20."
Now my concern to this corruption and 'answer-the-problem-away' statement is that what are those so-called "reliable early manuscript(s)" and who are the "ancient witnesses"?
According to the early Christians' manuscripts, Jesus never got crucified, and trinity is a lie. The so-called "gospel of Mark", along with all of the "gospels" of the NT, were written by third-party narration, as clearly demonstrated and shown in the sections below. People wrote on the tongue of Jesus' Disciples those books. They are neither original nor are the Pure Word of GOD Almighty.
If the "gospel
of Mark" was indeed Divine and from
GOD Almighty, then we wouldn't have
this corruption, that they're
admitting above, in it.
I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!
Further regarding this Gospel, we read the following commentary about Mark 16:9-20:
"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"
This quote raises a very serious issue here. First of all, as we've seen above in the first quote, we have no evidence that proves that John Mark was the sole author of this so called "Gospel". Second of all, we see that this Gospel has some serious problems/suspicions in it. The issue of Mark 16:9-20 is a scary one, because many Christian cults today use poisonous snakes in their worship and end up dying.
Removing Mark 16:9-20 is quite appreciated by me personally (to be quite honest with you), because it prevents people from dying from snake bites. But however, the serious issue of man's corruption of the Bible remains.
We can be absolutely certain now that the above quotes prove without a doubt that the Bible is doubtful. The quote "or its original ending has been lost" proves that what we call today "Gospels" were not written by their original authors such as Mark, John, Matthew, etc... It proves that the Gospel had been tampered with by man. Let alone considering it as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.
If John Mark wasn't the one who wrote Mark 16:9-20, then who did? And how can you prove the ownership of the other person? Let alone proving that it was GOD Almighty's Revelation. And as we saw in the first quote above, we don't even know that John Mark was indeed the one who wrote the so called "Gospel of Mark".
To say the least in our case here, we now have enough evidence to discard the entire Gospel of Mark from the Bible, because you can't take bits and pieces of it and say some of it belongs to him and some of it doesn't! Let alone considering the entire corrupted Gospel as the True Living Word of GOD Almighty, which is a complete blasphemy.
Please visit A dangerous forgery was inserted at the end of the so-called "Gospel of Mark".
Here is an email that I received from a Christian
regarding Mark 16:17-18.
Emphasis below are mine:
From: R.Mercer
To: Osama Abdallah
Subject: I Totally Agree
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:41:57 -0700
"What credibility does Christianity have when it
scriptures are littered
with such dangerous and obvious forgeries?"
You summed it up very well on your web page. That is my
question
entirely. Just what are we to believe? If forgeries have been proven to
exist in the Bible, then how many more must there be? What about
the
chapters and verses we all guide our whole life/styles by? Are they
forgeries, too?
This verse in Mark 16:17-18, has always bothered me. I have, and
still do believe the rest of that passage (laying on of hands, healing
the sick,...), so how can that part of the passage be true when the
serpent part is forged?
I know the part on drinking any poison says "IF", but the part on
taking up serpents says "SHALL", which has always been a problem for me
to believe. Imagine us all being forced to take up serpents in order to
serve God.
On the other hand, if this was forged, then that creates an even
bigger concern for me. Not knowing what text in our Bible is authentic
and what is not.
Thanks for letting me take up so much of your time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus). Like I said
before, this passage always bothered me, probably more so than any other.
Thanks, once again. Good Day.
|
Four false promises made by Jesus
regarding the Holy Spirit: 1- Your sperma (Greek for sperm) will not cause you to sin fornication or adultery or masturbation if you have enough Holy Spirit in you. So why then did you amputate your own testicles and head of penis Jesus? Why did you castrate and emasculate yourself? You had no need for this. Who on this planet could've had more Holy Spirit in him than you? Or were you also drunk when you uttered this lie? The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol. Jesus commanded to amputate your sinful body parts (cut off hand, penis, pluck eyes, etc...). Paul said amputated flesh gets sent to satan. Were you someone's boyfriend Jesus? Or were you someone's girlfriend? Why did you amputate your Holy Divine Genitals (??) and send them to satan? And why did you then keep your eyes?? Also Jesus, why are your churches, even from the times of Paul, were and are still are notorious in sexual assaults and rapes?
Paul also commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11-13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages.
Even the 12th disciple was chosen by rolling the dice (casting lots), - a game of chance, - and not by the Holy Spirit. Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. Also, Trinity is a lie from Hell. Why was GOD Almighty charitable (χάριτι) and forgiving to Jesus in Luke 2:52?
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD
sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying
spirit
2- If a snake bites you and runs
its poison through your blood, it will not hurt you (Mark 16:17-18). Jesus even promised in the plural that you will be picking up deadly snakes and they will inject their poisons into you and you shall not be harmed!. This false prophesy is one of the NT's biggest lies, because it never happened. Not only that, but all Christians who genuinely attempted it in the past were killed by the snakes' poisons. Furthermore, the NT's writers lied when they said Paul was bit by a poisonous snake and was not hurt when he was in Malta (Acts 28:7-10). There are many problems with this: 1- Paul is a single person. Jesus' bold promise was in the plural. "The believers shall pick up poisonous snakes, and if anyone gets bit by a poisonous snake and have the poison run through their blood, the poison shall not harm any believer!". Well, historically all who genuinely picked up died from poison. 2- It's been proven that many non-venomous snakes existed in Malta. Some even look like Vipers. So there is not proof that Paul's snake was a poisonous one: "Four species of snakes are present (in the wild) in the Maltese Islands of which three are relatively recent additions. The only indigenous snake is the Western Whip Snake Coluber viridiflavus which is a non-poisonous species. The other three, namely Algerian Whipsnake Coluber algirus, Leopard Snake Elaphe situla and Cat Snake Telescopus fallax have been introduced by man. Of these only the latter has some form of poison. Although snakes appear in the archaeological context (eg. the stone slab in Mus of Archaeology of Gozo - from ggantija, which has a snake on its side) this does not imply that they were poisonous. On the other hand, poisonous species such as Natrix natrix which occurs in nearby Sicily may have been eradicated by man through time." (Source) 3- Jesus' promise dismally fails, and it is one of the most embarrassing lies, and most dangerous to its followers, in the New Testament, which again and again proves that Jesus was indeed a GOD-sent
lying spirit as GOD Almighty deceived false people in the Old Testament.
John 3:13-14
2 Kings 2:11
Genesis 5:24
Again,
where did Enoch and Elijah go to?
Jesus' statement is simply
a lie. He didn't know that Elijah, Enoch and others (ex: Uzair or Ezra) were taken up to
Heaven by GOD Almighty. Was he also here a
fat drunk as the NT says he was? Jesus here added Elijah and Enoch to the 39+ list of barfinity (trinity), because we now have Elijah, Enoch and Jesus as their own trinity. Moses was scared to even pass the Judgment: 2- 3- 4-
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
Jesus' confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language that falsely turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other
examples of blasphemies and quackery) definitely make him a 100% GOd-sent
lying spirit in Matthew 7:22-23. 3- You can
lift mountains and throw them in the sea with only
one command only if you had the Holy Spirit in you. Not even Jesus,
with all of his glory and sperms, was able to do this miracle. 4- Jesus
promised the disciples that after he departs it will not be them
speaking. It will be the Holy Spirit will be speaking through their
mouths. Yet, after he departed, they split into Peter and Paul opposing
teams, and they started hurling insults and accusations towards each others'
teachings, and calling each others: Anathema (cursed by GOD in Greek), follower
of Satan, your Gospel is of the devil, you are a false apostle, you are dogs,
and several other serious accusations and insults. Where was the promised
Holy Spirit in all of this, and all of the above?? Where is Jesus' promise?? - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - 12th disciple was also chosen by
holy gambling.
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in their conflicting scriptures?
Remember: If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
The one unforgivable sin?! Jesus further says: The only unforgivable sin is blaspheming the Holy Spirit (Luke 12:10). But your entire package that is called the NT and church is the greatest insult and blasphemy against GOD Almighty's Holy Spirit. It is like a prostitute preaching, and while continuing to prostitute, that the one unforgivable sin is fornication. How many times did you fornicate and continue to fornicate? How many times did you lie on the Holy Spirit and continued to lie on the Holy Spirit of GOD Almighty? Were you also a fat drunk in this one?
Was Jesus drunk? High Concentrations and Intoxication:
The alcohol-less Baptist is greater than Jesus: John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a
fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol:
winebibber a habitual drinker of alcohol. Of course it never did! (See Holy Spirit of Islam, and alcohol is forbidden in Islam)
High Concentrations and Intoxication: Yahweh despised Jesus' wisdom: for he (John the Baptist) will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born. So according to the New Testament itself, we have: 1- John the baptist. .Is John the Baptist another member of the barfinity? |
|
Satan was part of the trinity
(Ezekiel 28:13-19),
then got
subtracted
(-1):
GOD in the OT spoke a poem of regret [1] regarding Satan. GOD expresses how regretful He is that all of the Glory that He has created for and given to Satan will no longer be given to him. It was now given to a lesser second-hand, Jesus, whom otherwise would've received none of it. Jesus was GOD's plan B not A. 1. "You were perfect from the day you were created". Jesus was also created from the Word of GOD.2. Glorious. 3. "the chosen one". 4. The "Anointed". 5. ruler over earth. 6. Ruler over the "Holy Mount" of GOD.
Question to every polytheist trinitarian pagan: If Jesus replaced Satan, then: 1- How can Jesus be our Creator? 2- How can Satan be part of a trinity? 3- How can Jesus be given the glory that was created for and given to satan, not Jesus, and Jesus still be considered our Creator? 4- How come Satan was the primary and Jesus was secondary?
Of course, there is no Trinity, and Satan was not subtracted from any Trinity. The above exposes the lie of trinity; a word that does not even exist in any of the Jewish and Christian scriptures (Bibles and outside Bibles). Also, since we have
24 other thrones besides Jesus'
And Melchizedek was Jesus' Elder in Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20. Then, we also clearly have Satan as: 1- One of the elders and had his throne. 2- Satan too was Jesus' elder. 3- When compared to Melchizedek and Satan, Jesus was secondary.
Angels are scared of the mighty Satan: Even Michael, the chief angel, did not dare to insult the devil.
Using the polytheist trinitarian pagans' illogic, satan was indeed a Mighty Member of the Barfinity, but then got subtracted. And since satan was subtracted, then Jesus could've also gotten himself subtracted when satan made Jesus covet the sins of the world for 40 days and 40 nights. Do you see now how blasphemous and stupid Christianity is?
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
|
The Book of 1 and 2 Peter:
"Some modern scholars on the basis of a number of features that they consider incompatible with Petrine authenticity, regard the letter as the work of a later Christian writer. Such features include the cultivated Greek in which it is written, difficult to attribute to a Galilean fisherman, together with its use of the Greek Septuagint translation when citing the Old Testament; the similarity in both thought and expression to the Pauline literature; and the allusions to widespread persecution of Christians, which did not occur until at least the reign of Domitian (A.D. 81-96). In this view the letter would date from the end of the first century or even the beginning of the second, when there is evidence for persecution of Christians in Asia Minor. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1348)"
"Nevertheless, acceptance of 2 Peter into the New Testament canon met with great resistance in the early church. The oldest certain reference to it comes from Origen in the early third century. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1354)"
"Among modern scholars there is wide agreement that 2 Peter is a pseudonymous work, i.e., one written by a later author who attributed it to Peter. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1354)"
So like the rest of the books and gospels of the Bible, we don't even know regarding 1 Peter:
The Book of Acts:
"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1643)"
So based on some conclusion, you're willing to die for defending the idea that the Book of Acts was the True Word of GOD Almighty? If the book was inspired by GOD Almighty, then how come it wasn't mentioned in the book itself to help us filter it out from the many other "Satanic false books"? Are we sure that this book too is not a man-made Satanic book?
After all, its just a conclusion, isn't it?
Beside, what evidence are they talking about?! The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 80-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we would know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone considering it as the True Living Word of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
Please visit:
None of Jesus' disciples witnessed the crucifixion. They "all fled" and "deserted" Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). This further confirms Islam's claims.
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing his face down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.
The Gospel of Luke:
"The identification of Luke as the author is primarily based on the "we" passages in Acts (beginning in Acts 16:10), which indicate that Luke was associated with Paul in his ministry and wrote down the account of his activities. (The Amplified Bible, Page 1153)"
The only proof that they have about Luke being the sole author of this gospel is a weak speculation on "we". This is absurd at best! This speculation shows:
It is also worth mentioning that the author of the book of Acts is also unknown as shown above:
"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1643)"
So their whole speculation is absurd at best!
There is a serious forgery about Jesus' "resurrection on the third day" claiming that it was foretold in the OT when it wasn't! Let us look at Luke 24:44-48 from the NIV Bible:
Luke 24
44 He said to them, "This is
what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is
written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms."
45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.
46 He told them, "This is what is written: The Christ will suffer and
rise from the dead on the third day,
47 and repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all
nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
48 You are witnesses of these things.
Luke 24:44-48 says that it is written in the Law of Moses (i.e., the Torah) that Jesus will die and resurrect on the third day. Where in the entire Old Testament (not just in the 5 books of Moses that make up the Law of Moses or the Torah) do you have that?! Show me one Old Testament verse that prophesized about Jesus' third day resurrection?
In fact, in my article Answering Isaiah 53, I clearly proved that the Old Testament actually confirms the Noble Quran's claims about Jesus never got crucified! Let alone dying and resurrecting on the third day!
Anyway, Let us see what the NIV Bible's theologians said about this book:
"The author's name does not appear in the book, but much unmistakable evidence points to Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1529)"
Again, we don't know for sure whether it was Luke or not who wrote the "Gospel of Luke" since his name doesn't appear in the Book. The Gospel itself seems to be a compromising one to the Word of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Let us look at the following:
"Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, (Luke 1:3)"
Few problems with this Gospel from the quote above:
1- The author was not inspired, and knew for sure that he was not inspired by GOD Almighty to write the Book since he didn't mention about any divine inspiration, and he said "...since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning..." Where do we see GOD's inspiration in this?
2- The author wrote it for the purpose of "his most excellent Theophilus." Since when we compromise GOD Almighty and document His Holy Words for the purpose of other higher (in rank) human beings?
I say it again, I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!
Also, beside, what evidence are they talking about?! The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we would know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone considering as the True Living Word of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
Further from brother Vipor Poison; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him:
Luke 1:3
Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the
beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most
excellent Theophilus,
The following is from the Catholic
Encyclopedia:
http://newadvent.org/cathen/14625b.htm
http://newadvent.org/cathen/14625a.htm
If Theophilus existed in either the 2nd or the 4th centuries then how could the writer of this gospel be the same Luke who is supposed to be with Jesus in the 1st century.
Maybe he lived to about 200 years.. :)
From brother Amir AbdulRahim; may Allah Almighty
always be pleased with him:
The subject of Mankind's Corruption of the Bible has interested me greatly, and I have taken a closer look at this subject. Its seems it's not only your site that brings this subject up, but a couple of Christian sites too.
For example, an article in the Catholic
Encyclopaedia that you mentioned in regard to the 'Theophilus' mentioned in
Luke's Gospel (from your Just Who Are The Real Authors Of The Bible? article)
testifies to this fact (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14530a.htm):
"IV. TRANSMISSION OF THE TEXT
No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author-- all have been in some way altered. The material conditions under which a book was spread before the invention of printing (1440), the little care of the copyists, correctors, and glossators for the text, so different from the desire of accuracy exhibited to-day, explain sufficiently the divergences we find between various manuscripts of the same work. To these causes may be added, in regard to the Scriptures, exegetical difficulties and dogmatical controversies. To exempt the sacred writings from ordinary conditions a very special providence would have been necessary, and it has not been the will of God to exercise this providence."
Lets just go through that again - "No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author--all have been in some way altered." All have been in some way altered! In view of this blatant admission, how can anyone expect me, or any muslim, to follow an impure book?
When you compare this to the great lengths taken to preserve the original Qur'an, there's no contest!
The Book of Hebrews:
"The writer of this letter does not identify himself, but he was obviously well known to the original recipients. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1856)"
So because the guy was supposedly "well known (which we don't really know that for sure anyway)", then would that give us the right to consider his words as the Words of GOD Almighty?! I am sorry, but I don't really see the logic behind this! The Book of Hebrews is one of the highly used Books among Christians. I hear references from it a lot when listening to Christians preaching. Yet, no one really knows who wrote it!. This is quite ironic, because Christians use such highly doubtful books in their teachings as if they were the True Living Words of GOD Almighty. I don't care what you call this, but I call it blasphemy, because it is the most ridiculous insult to GOD Almighty and His Holy Words that I have ever seen.
I just hope you see the real cheap quality in the religion of Christianity, with all my respect due to every Christian reader.
Please visit:
None of Jesus' disciples witnessed the crucifixion. They "all fled" and "deserted" Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). This further confirms Islam's claims.
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing his face down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.
The Gospel of 1 John:
Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:
"....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)"
"The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
| 1 John and Galatians
forgeries:
From www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm: 3- Furthermore, we find even more alarming troubles with the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe that the writer of the gospel of John is the same one as the one who wrote 1 John, then it is important to point out the following absurdity in the authenticity of this gospel from its last and concluding chapter: John
21:24-25
"We know that his testimony is true"?! Wasn't the disciple John the one who supposedly wrote the gospel of John? How can he say about himself that "we know that his (the author) testimony is true"?! Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book was written by an unknown person? Below in this article, we see:
The Gospel of 1 John: Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel: "....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)" "The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"
1 John forgeries: 1 John forgeries by church fathers: The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.
From www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=3480.msg16733#msg16733: By Mustafa Ahmad It's amazing how the two verses commonly used by Christians against Muslims fail! But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed. (Galatians 1:8) Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son. (1 John 2:22)
1) Not to accept any other gospel even if an angel from heaven. This writing is not from the time of Paul. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 3rd century P46 . We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd century. there is no direct evidence that Paul wrote it. 2) Anyone who rejects Jesus as Christ and the son is the antichrist. This writing is not from the time of John. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 4th century GA 01, א - Codex Sinaiticus. We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd or 3rd century. there is no direct evidence that John wrote it. How embarrassing both verses used against Muslims don't even go back to the "alleged authors". |
1 John forgeries:
1 John forgeries by church fathers:
The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.
| From www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm:
Walid Shoebat said that Muslims deny the Father and Son, and the Bible in 1 John 2:22 states clearly that who ever denies that Jesus is the Christ is the liar: 1 John 2:18-27 2- The author himself (of 1 John) makes it clear that he's writing from his own head without Divine inspirations. Notice his wrong prediction about his followers living in the "last hour" and that the reason it is the last hour was because they've had an epidemic of anti-Christs coming and going during their time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus). |
The Book of Revelation:
"The author of the book calls himself John, who because of his Christian faith has been exiled to the rocky island of Patmos, a Roman penal colony. Although he never claims to be John the apostle, he was so identified by several of the early church Fathers, including Justin, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Terullian, Cyprian, and Hippolytus. This identification, however, was denied by other Fathers, including Denis of Alexandria, Eusebius of Caesarea, Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory Nazianzen, and John Chrysostom. Indeed, vocabulary, grammar, and style make it doubtful that the book could have been put into its present form by the same persons responsible for the fourth gospel. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1373)"
"Four times the author identifies himself as John (1:1,4,9; 22:8).....In the third century, however, an African bishop named Dionysius compared the language, style and thought of the Apocalypse (Revelation) with that of the other writings of John and decided that the book could not been written by the apostle of John. He suggested that the author was a certain John the Presbyter, whose name appears elsewhere in ancient writings. Although many today follow Dionysius in his view of authorship, the external evidence seems overwhelmingly supportive of the traditional view. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1922)"
Again, we don't know who wrote the Book of Revelation. It is certainly highly doubtful that it was written by Apostle John. The Theologians and Historians of the NIV Bible seem to agree with the invalidity of this book from the above quote. So are you now going to consider the other John's words as the Words and Inspirations of GOD Almighty?
As we see, the style of writing in the book of Revelation is different from the books that are believed to be from John which are the Gospel of John, 1 John, 2 John and 3 John. The book of Revelation's style seems to be closer to John the Presbyter's writings. This man is known in ancient writings. There are also many Christian theologians today that hold the same view about the falsety of the book of Revelation.
Isn't this sufficient enough to prove that the book is doubtful?
Notice that in the sections of "Gospel of John" and "Gospels of 1, 2 & 3 John" above, the author did not identify himself and it was ASSUMED without actual proofs that it was Saint John who wrote them. Notice how they said that if he were to identify himself, then it would be hard for them to explain it.
Now, notice the author in the Book of Revelation does identify himself as John, but he has a complete different language and style of writing from the other books, which created much uncertainty about its validity in the Church.
My questions here are: Who wrote the Books? And is or is not Saint John supposed to identify himself in his books? And where are his books that have his name on them?
Again, keep in mind that the NT was not even
documented on paper until 150 to 300 years after Jesus (depending on what
Christian you talk to). So the dating is way too long for us to be assuming
books to belong to certain people. Let alone considering their nonsense
(contents) as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.
Please visit: Jesus the "Alpha and Omega". Not only this quote doesn't prove Jesus as GOD, but it was also written in a book that is unreliable in later bibles. In the original Bibles, the quote doesn't even exist!!
Arche of the Creation of God as Alpha and Omega. The "Alpha and Omega" doesn't even exist in the original Bibles! It's a lie that was later inserted by trinitarians. See the historical proofs in the article. If their site is down, then you can read the article at this link ON MY SITE.
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.
The Book of Revelation is a very important, probably the most important
Book in the Bible today, because it has prophecies in it of what Christians
believe is for our future today, even though it has nothing to do with our
current world. It talks about Jesus soon (1800 to 2000 years ago) will return
(Revelation 22:7). I don't know how soon is 2000 years to the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). All the
people that this book was told to had died.
It also talks about the great battle of Gog
and Magog fighting the righteous; "and will go out to
deceive the nations in the four corners of the earth [The
earth DOES NOT have four corners and no the earth is not a square or rectangle.
It is round almost like an egg!!]--Gog and
Magog--to gather them for battle. In number they are like the sand on the
seashore. (From the NIV Bible, Revelation 20:8)"
The thing that we need to notice here beside the grave error about the shape of
the earth in this false book (sorry to say that), is that the Gog and Magog
existed before. Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal (Ezekiel 39:1), is
the name of the leader and Magog is the name of his nation (Ezekiel 38 and 39).
The Gog and Magog army had already been defeated and the Noble
Quran confirms their story. There had been historical discoveries that
perfectly match the Noble Quran's claims regarding the Gog and Magog, such as
the discovery of the "Iron Gates", and other literature that mentions the Gog
and Magog army and location. There is even historical
documentation about them which matches the Noble Quran in London, England.
Please visit The story of Gog and Magog and the Iron Gates in the Noble Quran and the Bible to see the references and proofs of these historical discoveries and several more.
The Bible says: The earth is flat! See all the verses in the Bible that claim the earth is flat.
It is a common Christian answer to say "We support Israel because it is God's promised land to the Jews, and He will prevail them against the army of Gog and Magog who seems to be mainly an Islamic army today." They mostly rely on the Book of Revelation from the Bible to support this claim.
The story of the Gog and Magog army attacking the Jews exists in both the Book of Ezekiel and the Book of Revelation in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). The Book of Ezekiel which came literally thousands of years before the Book of Revelation predicted the attack and defeat of the army of Gog and Magog.
The Noble Quran (The Muslims' Holy Scripture) talks about the army of Gog and Magog in details and explains the events that ALREADY took place. As I mentioned above, there had been historical discoveries that perfectly match the Noble Quran's claims regarding the Gog and Magog, such as the discovery of the "Iron Gates", and other literature that mentions the Gog and Magog army and location.
Please visit The army of Gog and Magog and the Iron Gates in the Noble Quran and the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
The lie (sorry to say that) of the Book of Revelation, however, also predicts the coming of the army of Gog and Magog. But as I said, the army of Gog and Magog were ALREADY predicted in the Bible thousands of years before the Book of Revelation.
So, the prediction in the Book of Revelation proves that the writer of the book, lacked a great deal of knowledge about history, because as I said, the event of the Gog and Magog battle (i.e., the battle of Armageddon) already happened!
The point is that the Book of Revelation, however, like most of the Bible today seems to be nothing but a big hoax (sorry to say that). It is very doubtful, but yet ironically, very important to the Christians of today.
Would you honestly deep inside yourself call nonsense of this kind the True Living Words of GOD Almighty, especially after knowing that very important early Christian resources thought "the book could not been written by the apostle of John"?
Please visit What parts of the Bible do Muslims believe in?
|
Oxymoron Trinity [1]: Jesus is the resurrection (John 11:25), but yet does not know when the Hour of the resurrection will come (Matthew 24:36) [1], and he had to cry, weep and beg GOD to resurrect Lazarus back to life. And this proves he is our Creator? And how is he exactly The Resurrection? Could Jesus and the disciples honestly even resurrect or create a fly on their own? This is one of the Glorious Quran's challenges to the polytheists from mankind who insist on deifying flesh and blood, dust and water, and idols. All are helpless. All are worthless when compared to Allah Almighty. In the OT, Elisha and many others also raised the dead: 2 Kings 4 Is Elisha and others like him now our Creator?
John 5:30 "I cannot do anything on my own." And Jesus could not determine who gets to sit on his right and on his left in Heaven. Only GOD alone decides this, Jesus said. Visit also:
Muslims honor the Virgin Birth: We Muslims believe in the virgin birth of Isa Al-Maseeh, from our mother Mariam, peace be upon them both. We also believe Isa performed many Miracles. In fact, it was the Christians who doubted the virgin birth. Islam came to cement it. But Isa (eesa) was nonetheless a creation of GOD Almighty, and a slave of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Even the Old Testament calls Jesus "Slave of GOD":
What is Islam?
Other: |
|
Four false promises made by Jesus
regarding the Holy Spirit: 1- Your sperma (Greek for sperm) will not cause you to sin fornication or adultery or masturbation if you have enough Holy Spirit in you. So why then did you amputate your own testicles and head of penis Jesus? Why did you castrate and emasculate yourself? You had no need for this. Who on this planet could've had more Holy Spirit in him than you? Or were you also drunk when you uttered this lie? The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol. Jesus commanded to amputate your sinful body parts (cut off hand, penis, pluck eyes, etc...). Paul said amputated flesh gets sent to satan. Were you someone's boyfriend Jesus? Or were you someone's girlfriend? Why did you amputate your Holy Divine Genitals (??) and send them to satan? And why did you then keep your eyes?? Also Jesus, why are your churches, even from the times of Paul, were and are still are notorious in sexual assaults and rapes?
Paul also commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11-13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages.
Even the 12th disciple was chosen by rolling the dice (casting lots), - a game of chance, - and not by the Holy Spirit. Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. Also, Trinity is a lie from Hell. Why was GOD Almighty charitable (χάριτι) and forgiving to Jesus in Luke 2:52?
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD
sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying
spirit
2- If a snake bites you and runs
its poison through your blood, it will not hurt you (Mark 16:17-18). Jesus even promised in the plural that you will be picking up deadly snakes and they will inject their poisons into you and you shall not be harmed!. This false prophesy is one of the NT's biggest lies, because it never happened. Not only that, but all Christians who genuinely attempted it in the past were killed by the snakes' poisons. Furthermore, the NT's writers lied when they said Paul was bit by a poisonous snake and was not hurt when he was in Malta (Acts 28:7-10). There are many problems with this: 1- Paul is a single person. Jesus' bold promise was in the plural. "The believers shall pick up poisonous snakes, and if anyone gets bit by a poisonous snake and have the poison run through their blood, the poison shall not harm any believer!". Well, historically all who genuinely picked up died from poison. 2- It's been proven that many non-venomous snakes existed in Malta. Some even look like Vipers. So there is not proof that Paul's snake was a poisonous one: "Four species of snakes are present (in the wild) in the Maltese Islands of which three are relatively recent additions. The only indigenous snake is the Western Whip Snake Coluber viridiflavus which is a non-poisonous species. The other three, namely Algerian Whipsnake Coluber algirus, Leopard Snake Elaphe situla and Cat Snake Telescopus fallax have been introduced by man. Of these only the latter has some form of poison. Although snakes appear in the archaeological context (eg. the stone slab in Mus of Archaeology of Gozo - from ggantija, which has a snake on its side) this does not imply that they were poisonous. On the other hand, poisonous species such as Natrix natrix which occurs in nearby Sicily may have been eradicated by man through time." (Source) 3- Jesus' promise dismally fails, and it is one of the most embarrassing lies, and most dangerous to its followers, in the New Testament, which again and again proves that Jesus was indeed a GOD-sent
lying spirit as GOD Almighty deceived false people in the Old Testament.
John 3:13-14
2 Kings 2:11
Genesis 5:24
Again,
where did Enoch and Elijah go to?
Jesus' statement is simply
a lie. He didn't know that Elijah, Enoch and others (ex: Uzair or Ezra) were taken up to
Heaven by GOD Almighty. Was he also here a
fat drunk as the NT says he was? Jesus here added Elijah and Enoch to the 39+ list of barfinity (trinity), because we now have Elijah, Enoch and Jesus as their own trinity. Moses was scared to even pass the Judgment: 2- 3- 4-
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
Jesus' confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language that falsely turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other
examples of blasphemies and quackery) definitely make him a 100% GOd-sent
lying spirit in Matthew 7:22-23. 3- You can
lift mountains and throw them in the sea with only
one command only if you had the Holy Spirit in you. Not even Jesus,
with all of his glory and sperms, was able to do this miracle. 4- Jesus
promised the disciples that after he departs it will not be them
speaking. It will be the Holy Spirit will be speaking through their
mouths. Yet, after he departed, they split into Peter and Paul opposing
teams, and they started hurling insults and accusations towards each others'
teachings, and calling each others: Anathema (cursed by GOD in Greek), follower
of Satan, your Gospel is of the devil, you are a false apostle, you are dogs,
and several other serious accusations and insults. Where was the promised
Holy Spirit in all of this, and all of the above?? Where is Jesus' promise?? - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - 12th disciple was also chosen by
holy gambling.
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in their conflicting scriptures?
Remember: If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
The one unforgivable sin?! Jesus further says: The only unforgivable sin is blaspheming the Holy Spirit (Luke 12:10). But your entire package that is called the NT and church is the greatest insult and blasphemy against GOD Almighty's Holy Spirit. It is like a prostitute preaching, and while continuing to prostitute, that the one unforgivable sin is fornication. How many times did you fornicate and continue to fornicate? How many times did you lie on the Holy Spirit and continued to lie on the Holy Spirit of GOD Almighty? Were you also a fat drunk in this one?
Was Jesus drunk? High Concentrations and Intoxication:
The alcohol-less Baptist is greater than Jesus: John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a
fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol:
winebibber a habitual drinker of alcohol. Of course it never did! (See Holy Spirit of Islam, and alcohol is forbidden in Islam)
High Concentrations and Intoxication: Yahweh despised Jesus' wisdom: for he (John the Baptist) will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born. So according to the New Testament itself, we have: 1- John the baptist. .Is John the Baptist another member of the barfinity? |
|
Satan was part of the trinity
(Ezekiel 28:13-19),
then got
subtracted
(-1):
GOD in the OT spoke a poem of regret [1] regarding Satan. GOD expresses how regretful He is that all of the Glory that He has created for and given to Satan will no longer be given to him. It was now given to a lesser second-hand, Jesus, whom otherwise would've received none of it. Jesus was GOD's plan B not A. 1. "You were perfect from the day you were created". Jesus was also created from the Word of GOD.2. Glorious. 3. "the chosen one". 4. The "Anointed". 5. ruler over earth. 6. Ruler over the "Holy Mount" of GOD.
Question to every polytheist trinitarian pagan: If Jesus replaced Satan, then: 1- How can Jesus be our Creator? 2- How can Satan be part of a trinity? 3- How can Jesus be given the glory that was created for and given to satan, not Jesus, and Jesus still be considered our Creator? 4- How come Satan was the primary and Jesus was secondary?
Of course, there is no Trinity, and Satan was not subtracted from any Trinity. The above exposes the lie of trinity; a word that does not even exist in any of the Jewish and Christian scriptures (Bibles and outside Bibles). Also, since we have
24 other thrones besides Jesus'
And Melchizedek was Jesus' Elder in Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20. Then, we also clearly have Satan as: 1- One of the elders and had his throne. 2- Satan too was Jesus' elder. 3- When compared to Melchizedek and Satan, Jesus was secondary.
Angels are scared of the mighty Satan: Even Michael, the chief angel, did not dare to insult the devil.
Using the polytheist trinitarian pagans' illogic, satan was indeed a Mighty Member of the Barfinity, but then got subtracted. And since satan was subtracted, then Jesus could've also gotten himself subtracted when satan made Jesus covet the sins of the world for 40 days and 40 nights. Do you see now how blasphemous and stupid Christianity is?
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
|
Also visit: Paul's contradictions and corruptions.
Before we start on the analysis of Paul's Books, we must first know that Paul who's Books are believed to be inspired by GOD Almighty Himself and who is a disciple of Jesus peace be upon him never actually met Jesus in person (Acts 9:2-4. Note: Paul's name used to be Saul. Yet, Paul admittedly wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspirning him or not). Jesus had 12 disciples when he was on earth. Paul was not one of them.
Paul calls the Jewish law fables and lies (Titus 1:10-16).
|
The Glorious Quran also speaks about The
fights between Paul's vs. Peter's teams (43:65) apostatizing each
other (Quran, 2:253,
43:63-68). GOD's stupidity is smarter than all of us?! Paul's contradictions of Jesus. Many contradictions. Google this site: Paul contradicted Jesus.Shortly after Jesus, 10s of false messiahs and prophets emerged.
Paul's Delusions: In 1
Corinthians 7:40, he claimed that he
"thinks" that he has the Holy Spirit in him!
He also contradicted Jesus in other passages. Paul never met Jesus
in person.
Paul could lift mountains, and Jesus' disciples raising people from the dead. The Bible's metaphoric resurrections.
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
Yet, Paul admits that he speaks through a lying spirit (Romans 3:7 But if through my lie God's truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?), while Jesus promised all of the disciples that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, and that it will not be them speaking, but the Holy Spirit. Yet, Paul says he was lying. 12th disciple was also chosen by holy gambling. Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Paul also admits that he speaks through a lying spirit:
Romans 3:7
Jesus' oxymoronic hyperboles and incoherence created serious problems blasphemies! Christianity permits lying while preaching. This clip shows a pastor lying while clearly knowing he was lying. Play clip here.
Christianity permits stealing and robbing. Robbing includes physical assault on someone. To steal something you stealthily snatch it and run away. To rob someone, you either steal from them or forcefully take it from them via assault and force. 2 Corinthians 11:8 I robbed other assemblies (often translated as churches, but the Greek ἐκκλησίας (ekklēsias) means summoned people; a group of people; assemblies, which includes non-Christians) by aggressively taking λαβὼν ("to lay hold by aggressively"; hustling; STEALING by force; robbing) their wages/salaries/money to serve you. https://biblehub.com/greek/2564.htm Christians even have this saying: "To rob Peter to pay Paul" The Glorious Quran's Scientific Miracle on Lying: The Noble Quran on the Cerebrum: Lying is generated from the person's forehead. The region in the brain that controls our movements - In Noble Quran and confirmed by Science. www.answering-christianity.com/detailed_meanings_of_scientific_words_in_verses.htm#embryology www.answering-christianity.com/ac20.htm#embryology Remember: If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
Paul and his team of disciples were also calling Peter's team,
- and vice versa, - anathema Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
The New Testament calls for the death of all Jews who reject Jesus as Christ. Jesus also abrogated "love" in Matthew 5 with "hate" in Matthew 7,15. Simple yet devastating proof about Paul was NEVER inspired by the Holy Spirit! Contradiction in divorce between Jesus and Paul. Paul literally allowed lying! The end literally justifies the means to him! Paul nullified and contradicted the point of Baptism. Him calling the disbelievers, who are supposed to be doomed to Hell, as "sanctified" and "holy" is clear nonsense and stupidity, and further proves with CLEAR-CUT proofs that his words were not Revelations from GOD Almighty. It also contradicts GOD Almighty's verdict about them in the Old Testament.
The Anti-Christ Paul. (By Abdullah
Smith) Paul the Corrupter. (By Abdullah Smith) The Romantic Origins of Christianity. (By Abdullah Smith) Paul v/s the Old Testament: 59 Contradictions.
The Jews did kill Jesus according to Paul. Are these Paul's words or GOD Almighty's Divine Revelations???? Disciples inviting each others to diner and deciding to "winter there". Paul of Tarsus: The Clear-Cut Hypocrite The Problem of Paul Regarding Esau Paul of Tarsus: The False Apostle According to Islam 'The Apocryphal Books of Elijah' & Paul Epimenides Paradox: Was Paul "Inspired"? Paul's Dependency on Talmudic Writings: Evidence of New Testament Borrowing Paul and The 'Inspiration' of Scripture The Influence of the Pauline Epistles Upon The Gospels of The New Testament: Study and Criticism
Is circumcision allowed or not allowed in the Bible? See the clear contradiction between Jesus and Paul. Paul contradicted himself regarding the women's head covering. The authors of the New Testament had conflicts (hostility) with each others. How about for Paul to punch Peter on the face?? That would've been "inspired", wouldn't it? The disciples fighting with each others! Jesus (peace be upon him), Paul and the Christian Church. What Did Paul Want To Know About Jesus? Paul Broke The Covenant Of God. Who's Gospel Is Paul Preaching? Rebuttal To Sam Shamoun's Article "To Deceive Or Not To Deceive". Where Is This Promise Paul Is Referring To? Why is Paul still giving offerings? Does The Quran Affirm The Teachings Of Paul: Christian Missionary's Use Of Surah 61:14. |
The Book of Romans:
Keep in mind that Paul himself admitted that he wasn't sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspiring him or not. Please visit:
Having said that, let us now see what the Bible theologians say about Paul's books:
"Although the introduction, which is rather lengthy, and
the conclusion, which has a longer list of greetings than usual, identify this
book as an epistle, the content as a whole does not have the occasional
character or personal touch usually found in the Pauline letters. (The
Amplified Bible, Page 1297)"
So it's quite possible and probable that the letter (book) of Romans was any of the following:
"The writer of this letter was the apostle Paul (see 1:1). No voice from the early church was ever raised against his authorship. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1705)"
Ok, but notice how in this Book, we see the actual author himself, and in the ones above, we see nothing but conclusions. If GOD was the actual inspirer of all of these Books, then He wouldn't put us in the agony of making some conclusions to figure out His Words. Is GOD the author of confusion? Paul is also clear about his ownership of the Books of 1 Corinthians and 2 Corinthians.
But why must we take every single word that Paul spoke especially during his conversations with others as Words of GOD Almighty?!
Is Paul GOD Himself? No Christian believes in that. Paul fought with Saint Peter and accused him of being "clearly in the wrong" (Galatians: 2:11-12), and had a huge argument with Saint Barnabas (Acts 15:36-39).
Did GOD favor Paul over Barnabas and Peter and inspired him the words while he was fighting with them? I don't think so!.
Paul himself admitted before that he wasn't always inspired by GOD Almighty himself (1 Corinthians 7:25-30).
And since Paul never met Jesus in person (Acts 9:2-4. Note: Paul's name used to be Saul. Yet, Paul admittedly wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspirning him or not), and only claimed that Jesus came to him in person then there is always the possibility of him being untruthful. Since Paul never performed any miracles to help us believe his claim of Prophet hood, then his claim about him being GOD's apostle is just as good as me for instance claiming to be GOD's apostle.
Benny Hyne, one of today's famous Christian missionaries who have millions of fans world wide, claims and shows on TV how he could cure the paralyzed and makes him walk again. He claims that Jesus is inside him when he performs his so-called miracles. Why can't it be a bunch of liars that he paid and brought on TV, pretend to act paralyzed and pretend to act healed?
Paul could just as well be another Benny Hyne, except that Benny Hyne performed miracles (that are fake of course), but Paul never performed anything.
I hope you see how confusing the Bible really is. Its books are believed today from conclusions only as you've seen above, and it is only to be believed by blind faith. Blind faith is not the way to believe in GOD Almighty's Words, because GOD is not the author of confusion.
Please visit: Famous Theologians and Historians believe that Paul was not truthful.
Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture.
What parts of the Bible do Muslims believe in?
The Books of 1 and 2 Corinthians:
"Scholars have noticed a lack of continuity in this document. For example the long section of 2, 14-7, 4 seems abruptly spliced into the narrative of a crisis and its resolution. Identical or similar topics, moreover, seem to be treated several times during the letter. Many judge, therefore, that this letter as it stands incorporates several briefer letters sent to Corinth over a certain span of time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus). If this is so, then Paul himself or, more likely, some other editor clearly took care to gather those letters together and impose some literary unity upon the collection, thus producing the document that has come down to us as the Second Letter to the Corinthians. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1252)"
Again, we have no idea how many people wrote and edited the letters, and we don't know where and when this happened.
And again, Paul admitted that he wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspiring him or not: Paul's Delusions: In 1 Corinthians 7:40, he claimed that he "thinks" that he has the Holy Spirit in him!
The Book of Philippians:
"The early church was unanimous in its testimony that Philippians was written by the apostle Paul (see 1:1). Internally the letter reveals the stamp of genuineness. The many personal references of the author fit what we know of Paul from other NT books. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1803)"
Again, it was assumed that this book was written by Paul himself. No one knows for sure whether it was Paul or somebody else. The New Testament wasn't even documented until 150-300 years after the disappearance of Jesus peace be upon him. If we're going to assume that Books that look appealing to us as the True Word of GOD Almighty, then we are committing a great crime against GOD Almighty and His Holy Words. No where in this Book we see a statement saying that it was inspired by GOD Almighty Himself.
And again, Paul admitted that he wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspiring him or not: Paul's Delusions: In 1 Corinthians 7:40, he claimed that he "thinks" that he has the Holy Spirit in him!
The Book of Colossians:
"That Colossians is a genuine letter Paul is not usually disputed. In the early church, all who speak on the subject of authorship ascribe it to Paul. In the 19th century, however, some thought that the heresy refuted in ch. 2 was second-century Gnosticism. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1813)"
Again, it was assumed that Paul was the one who wrote the Book. But again, who's to say that it was inspired by GOD Almighty Himself?
And again, Paul admitted that he wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspiring him or not: Paul's Delusions: In 1 Corinthians 7:40, he claimed that he "thinks" that he has the Holy Spirit in him!
The Books of 1 and 2 Thessalonians:
"Paul's authorship of 2 Thessalonians has been questioned more often than that of 1 Thessalonians, in spite of the fact that it has more support from early Christian writers. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1829)"
So basically we're not certain whether or not Paul wrote the Book. And even if Paul was the one who wrote it, we still don't know whether it was the True Words of GOD Almighty or not, because no where in the Book we see any indication that it was inspired by the Almighty GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
Exposing the Old Testament's historical corruptions
As we see in the introduction above in Jeremiah 8:8, the entire Bible is doubtful and full of man-made lies that were inserted into it through the scribes and other means of alterations. The Bible is obviously a corrupted book! See also 600+ Commandments from GOD Almighty to Moses and the Israelites.
And again, Paul admitted that he wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspiring him or not: Paul's Delusions: In 1 Corinthians 7:40, he claimed that he "thinks" that he has the Holy Spirit in him!
The Book of Genesis:
"Historically, Jews and Christians alike have held that Moses was the author/compiler of the first five books of the OT. These books, known also as the Pentateuch (meaning "five-volumed book"), were referred to in Jewish tradition as the five fifths of the law (of Moses). The Bible itself suggests Mosaic authorship of Genesis, since Ac 15:1 refers to circumcision as "the custom taught by Moses," an allusion of Ge 17. However, a certain amount of later editorial updating does appear to be indicated (see, e.g., notes on 14:14; 36:31; 47:11). (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 2)"
So in reality, the book of Genesis had been tampered with by man. It had been corrupted. It is dangerous to consider all of it as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty, because by doing so, we are running into the risk of committing a crime against Him since we are claiming that He spoke words that He never spoke.
Please also visit: The
Bible's Scientific Absurdities!
A 51-second clip of Dr. Neil deGrasse
Tyson exposes the fundamental problem
of the Bibles' ample scientific absurdities.
The Book of Numbers:
"It is not necessary, however, to claim that Numbers came from Moses' hand complete and in final form. Portions of the book were probably added by scribes or editors from later periods of Israel's history. For example, the protestation of the humility of Moses (12:3) would hardly be convincing if it came from his own mouth. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 183)"
So in reality, we don't know who were all the authors who wrote the book of Numbers. How is it possible then to call the book of Numbers the True Living Revelations of GOD Almighty if the book had been tampered with by the man-made laws of the scribes?
As you clearly saw in Jeremiah 8:8 in the introduction above, GOD Almighty condemned the laws of the scribes and accused them for turning the Bible into a lie.
The book of Deuteronomy:
"The book itself testifies that, for the most part, Moses wrote it (1:5; 31:9,22,24), and other OT books agree (1Ki 2:3, 8:53; 2ki 14:6; 18:12)--though the preamble (1:1-5) may have been written by someone else, and the report of Moses' death (ch.34) was almost certainly written by someone else. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 240)"
As we clearly see, there is ample evidence that proves beyond the shadow of the doubt that Moses was not the sole author of the book. He couldn't have possibly have written about his own death. Again, another corrupted book by man in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). How can you claim that the book of Deuteronomy was indeed all revealed by GOD Almighty? If you're not sure, and you still insist on your claim, then you are committing a crime against GOD Almighty's Revelations.
The book of Joshua:
"It seems safe to conclude that the book, at least in its early form, dates from the beginning of the monarchy. Some think that Samuel may have had a hand in shaping or compiling the materials of the book, but in fact we are unsure who the final author or editor was. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 286)"
Again, another book whom we don't know who in the world wrote it. Yet, Jews and Christians consider this nonsense as a Revelation from GOD Almighty.
The book of Judges:
"Although, according to tradition, Samuel wrote the book, authorship is actually uncertain."
"The date of the composition is also unknown, but it was undoubtedly during the monarchy."
(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 322).
Another book with many doubts had been inserted into the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). How much more evidence do you need to be convinced that the Bible is corrupted, or to say the least, not a perfect book?
The book of Ruth:
"The author is unknown. Jewish tradition points to Samuel, but it is unlikely that he is the author because the mention of David (4:17,22) implies a later date. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 360)"
Same as above.
The books of 1 and 2 Samuel:
"Many questions have arisen pertaining to the literary character, authorship and date of 1,2 Samuel."
"Who the author was cannot be known with certainty since the book itself gives no indication of his identity."
(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 368).
Again, unknown books with unknown authors had been inserted into the Bible and are now considered GOD's Revelations. What a joke! Since when do we consider man-made stories and narrations as GOD's Revelations?
The books of 1 and 2 Kings:
"There is little conclusive evidence as to the identity of the author of 1,2 Kings."
"Whoever the author was, it is clear that he was familiar with the book of Deuteronomy."
(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 459).
Again, another unknown books with unknown authors had corrupted the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
The books of 1 and 2 Chronicles:
"According to ancient Jewish tradition, Ezra wrote Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah (see Introduction to Ezra: Literary Form and Authorship), but this cannot be established with certainty. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 569)"
Again, another doubtful nonsense had been considered to be GOD's Revelations.
The book of Esther:
"Although we do not know who wrote the book of Esther, from internal evidence it is possible to make some inferences about the author and the date of composition. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 707)"
Same as above.
The book of Job:
"Although most of the book consists of the words of Job and his counselors, Job himself was not the author."
"The unknown author probably had access to oral and/or written sources...."
(From the NIV Bible commentary [1], page 722).
Ironically, the book is named as "The book of Job", but yet, Job was not the author, and no one in this world knows who wrote the book. Today, it is considered GOD's Revelations.
It's quite pathetic to consider unknown people as GOD's Messengers and attribute their work to GOD's real Messengers.
It's obvious that like most of the Bible's book and gospels, the Book of Job had been lost.
The books of Psalm:
"Regarding authorship, opinions are even more divided. The notations themselves are ambiguous since the Hebrew phraseology used, meaning in general "belonging to", an also be taken in the sense of "concerning" or "for the use of" or "dedicated to". The name may refer to the title of a collection of Psalms that had been gathered under a certain name. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 773)"
"The Psalms
consist of one hundred fifty poems of Israel written at different times by
different authors, though mainly by David, around 1000 B.C.
..........
Because of the vast range of human feelings expressed in the Psalms, this book
remains one of the best loved and most used books of the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). (From
the King James Version Bible Commentary [1], page 801)"
As we clearly see above from the NIV and KJV Bibles' commentaries, this book can not be considered as the True Words of GOD Almighty, because it was written by many unknown authors! There is no proof that these authors were True Messengers of GOD Almighty. Another corruption and man-made alterations had invaded the Bible and corrupted it.
This corrupted book claims that the Earth is flat and never moves:
"He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"
Since when the Earth is flat and can never move?! We all know that the Earth and the other planets rotate and move in space around the Sun.
For those Jews and Christians who would like to see where in the Noble Quran does Allah Almighty say that the planets in space rotate and move, read the following Noble Verse:
"It is He who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon, all (the celestial bodies) swim along, each in its orbit with its own motion. (The Noble Quran, 21:33)"
For more information and other Noble Verses, please visit:
Science in the Noble Quran and Islam.
The Earth is round according to Islam.
Also visit The Earth is flat according to the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
The book of Proverbs:
"Although the book begins with a title ascribing the proverbs to Solomon, it is clear from later chapters that he was not the only author of the book. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 935)"
Can anyone please tell me who that other author was? And did GOD Almighty speak those words through his tongue?
These are fair questions, aren't they?
The book of Ecclesiastes:
"No time period or writer's name is mentioned in the book, but several passages strongly suggest that King Solomon is the authors. On the other hand, the writer's title, his unique style of Hebrew and his attitude toward rulers may point to another person and a later period. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 988)"
Was it or was it not Solomon who wrote this book? If you say it was Solomon, then how can you prove it?
And by the way, was this book a revelation to Solomon, or just Solomon's own personal writings, if it were Solomon's book from the first place?
This corrupted book claims that the Sun hurries back to where it rises:
"The sun rises and the sun sets, and hurries back to where it rises. (From the NIV Bible, Ecclesiastes 1:5)"
Since when the Sun hurries back to where it rises, like if there is some hole it rises from and another hole it sets through on Earth?!
For those Jews and Christians who would like to see where in the Noble Quran does Allah Almighty say that the planets in space rotate and move, read the following Noble Verse:
"It is He who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon, all (the celestial bodies) swim along, each in its orbit with its own motion. (The Noble Quran, 21:33)"
For more information and other Noble Verses, please visit:
Science in the Noble Quran and Islam.
The Earth is round according to Islam.
Also visit The Earth is flat according to the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
The Book of Ecclesiasticus:
This book does not even exist in the NIV Bible! It however exists in the Roman Catholics "The New Jerusalem Bible" [3]. This book consists of 51 chapters that apparently the NIV Bible Historians and Theologians don't believe that they are the True Words of GOD Almighty.
Talk about major and serious differences and corruptions in the Bibles today.
Let us look at this verse from this book: "....and the birth of ANY daughter is a loss. (From the New Jerusalem Bible, Ecclesiasticus 22:3)" Since when does GOD give stupid generalizing statements for ALL the members of a certain group of His creation?
The Book of Wisdom:
Again, this book does not even exist in the NIV Bible! It however exists in the Roman Catholics "The New Jerusalem Bible" [3]. This book consists of 19 chapters that apparently the NIV Bible Historians and Theologians don't believe that they are the True Words of GOD Almighty.
Again, talk about major and serious differences and corruptions in the Bibles today.
The book of Song of Songs:
"Verse 1 appears to ascribe authorship to Solomon. Solomon is referred to seven times, and several verses speak of the 'king', but whether he was the author remains an open question. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 997)"
"Two lovers, Solomon and a Shulamite girl, express their feelings for one another, with occasional comments made by friends. (From the King James Version Commentary [2], page 945)"
Again, we don't know who wrote the book. Please visit X-Rated Pornography in the Bible regarding this pornful and sick book; the book of:
1- She wished if her lover was her brother nursed at her "mother's breasts" so she wouldn't have to take him home in secret.
2- Her breasts and vagina taste like wine for him.
The KJV Bible's Theologians and Historians say that the porn-full book talks about Solomon and his lover. But we don't know whether it was Solomon who wrote this book or not, nor do we know whether this is some ridiculous poem and a lie written after he died or not.
One must ask a simple question here: Why should there be "lovers" in the Bible? Why should there be illegal sex and disgusting pornography in the Bible?
The book of Lamentations:
"Although Lamentations is anonymous and we cannot be certain who wrote it, ancient Jewish and Christian tradition ascribes it to Jeremiah. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1207)"
What a joke! Christians and Jews point the book to Jeremiah without any certainty to who wrote the book. How is it possible for us to consider this book as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty?
Christians and Jews have yet to find and prove the original author of the book and all of the books mentioned above, and then prove that they were indeed Revelations from GOD Almighty.
Failure to accomplish the two tasks and inserting this type of nonsense into the Bible and claiming that it was the Words of GOD Almighty is A CRIME AGAINST GOD!
Embrace Islam, the religion of The One True Living Undivided GOD Almighty, and you will be saved! Please visit What is the Wisdom of Islam?
2- So who wrote the Bible then? Were they really the original Prophets and Disciples?
This section is an article and a small chapter of a book that was forwarded to me. I thought it would be very good to add it to this article.
So, who then are the authors of the books of the Bible? Obviously the Church must know them very well since they are popularly believed to have received divine inspiration from God Himself. Right? Actually, they don't. For example, we will note that every Gospel begins with the introduction "According to....." such as "The Gospel according to Saint Matthew," "The Gospel according to Saint Luke," "The Gospel according to Saint Mark," "The Gospel according to Saint John." The obvious conclusion for the average man on the street is that these people are known to be the authors of the books attributed to them. This, however is not the case. Why? Because not one of the vaunted four thousand copies existent carries its author's signature. It has just been assumed that certain people were the authors. Recent discoveries, however, refute this belief. Even the internal evidence suggests that, for instance, Matthew did not write the Gospel attributed to him:
"...And as Jesus passed forth thence, HE (Jesus) saw a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and HE (Jesus) saith unto HIM (Matthew), follow ME (Jesus) and HE (Matthew) arose, and followed HIM (Jesus). (Matthew 9:9)"
Did "Matthew" write this about himself? Why then didn't Matthew write for example: "he (Jesus) saw ME, and my name is Matthew. I was sitting at the receipt of custom…" etc.
Such evidence can be found in many places throughout the New Testament. Granted, it may be possible that an author sometimes may write in the third person, still, in light of the rest of the evidence that we shall see throughout this book, there is simply too much evidence against this hypothesis.
This observation is by no means limited to the New Testament. There is even similar evidence that at least parts of Deuteronomy were not written by their claimed author, prophet Moses . This can be seen in Deuteronomy 34:5-10 where we read
"So Moses....DIED... and he (God Almighty) BURIED HIM (Moses)... He was 120 years old WHEN HE DIED... and there arose not a prophet SINCE in Israel like unto Moses....(Deuteronomy 34:5-10)"
Did Moses write his own obituary? Similarly, Joshua too speaks in detail about his own death in Joshua 24:29-33.
"And it came to pass after these things, that Joshua the son of Nun, the servant of the Lord, DIED, … And they BURIED HIM … And Israel served the Lord all the days of Joshua, and all the days of the elders that over lived Joshua, and which had known all the works of the Lord, that he had done for Israel ….(Joshua 24:29-33)"
Such evidence is part of the large cache which has driven the Biblical scholars to come to the current recognition that most of the books of the Bible were not written by their supposed authors. For example, the authors of the Revised Standard Version of the Bible by Collins honestly say that the author of "Kings" is "Unknown." But if the author is unknown then why attribute it to God? How can it then be claimed to have been "inspired"? Continuing, we read that the book of Isaiah is "Mainly credited to Isaiah. Parts may have been written by others (See also Isaiah 1:9-17: Yahweh called Israel Sodom, because it spreads evil and is unjust)." Ecclesiastics: "Author. Doubtful, but commonly assigned to Solomon." Ruth: "Author. Not definitely known, perhaps Samuel." and on and on.
Let us have a slightly more detailed look at only one book of the New Testament, that of 'Hebrews':
"The author of the Book of Hebrews is unknown. Martin Luther suggested that Apollos was the author...Tertullian said that Hebrews was a letter of Barnabas...Adolf Harnack and J. Rendel Harris speculated that it was written by Priscilla (or Prisca). William Ramsey suggested that it was done by Philip. However, the traditional position is that the Apostle Paul wrote Hebrews...Eusebius believed that Paul wrote it, but Origen was not positive of Pauline authorship."
From the introduction to the King James Bible, New revised and updated sixth edition, the Hebrew/Greek Key Study, Red Letter Edition
and one book of the Old Testament:
"In tradition, [David] is credited with writing 73 of the Psalms; most scholars, however, consider this claim questionable."
Encarta Encyclopedia, under "David"
Is this how we define "inspired by God"?
I asked a reverend of the local church in my neighborhood, on what gospel most often quoted and used, he quickly answered, the Gospel of St. John!
Let us examine the Contextual Problems of the Gospel of John - Highly Recommended! Even though this is a Darwinist site, but it has some very good and important historical facts about the Bible's corruption. What makes it interesting is that many of their articles were written by former Christian missionaries.
Codex Vaticanus Graece:
"Fool and knave, can't you leave the old reading alone and not alter it?" [1]
SOURCE: Codex
Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03, A critical note. Dr. Wieland Willker, University of
Bremen. Retrieved on 2008-02-12.
https://orthodoxwiki.org/Codex_Vaticanus
Click to enlarge:
This is a note that exists in one of the Bible's paparys! It's a note of demanding to not alter the text after apparently having terrible experiences with this problem [1].
3- The New Testament was written in the 4th century by Constantine and his council by their own words:
As we clearly see above, the books and gospels of the bible were written by mysterious authors. The New Testament of today was written in the third century by Constantine and his council. That is why you read things such as:
"...And as Jesus passed forth thence, HE (Jesus) saw a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and HE (Jesus) saith unto HIM (Matthew), follow ME (Jesus) and HE (Matthew) arose, and followed HIM (Jesus). (Matthew 9:9)"
"And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:19)"
"John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:26)"
"For John was not yet cast into prison. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:24)"
etc.....
Also in the first 4 centuries, Christians mostly and widely believed that Jesus never got crucified. See the proof at:
1- www.answering-christianity.com/early_christians.htm.
2- www.answering-christianity.com/ac24.htm#links. The Disciples' early writings clearly claimed that Jesus never got crucified.
The following links contain details about Constantine, his work in the Bible and
history:
http://www.kenanderson.net/bible/constantine.html
http://gbgm-umc.org/umw/bible/cea.stm
http://www.bibleufo.com/anomlostbooks.htm
http://www.earlychurch.org.uk/constantine.html
The point from this is that when you read "Jesus is the
Son of God", please keep in mind that it is quoted from a corrupted
book. The Old Testament makes numerous references about "son
of God" to many people. As I proved at: www.answering-christianity.com/son_translation.htm,
the word "son of God" literally means "SERVANT OF GOD" in
the original Hebrew.
4- The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered":
From brother Amir AbdulRahim; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him:
The subject of Mankind's Corruption of the Bible has interested me greatly, and I have taken a closer look at this subject. Its seems it's not only your site that brings this subject up, but a couple of Christian sites too.
For example, an article in the Catholic
Encyclopaedia that you mentioned in regard to the 'Theophilus' mentioned in
Luke's Gospel (from your Just Who Are The Real Authors Of The Bible? article)
testifies to this fact (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14530a.htm):
"IV. TRANSMISSION OF THE TEXT
No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author-- all have been in some way altered. The material conditions under which a book was spread before the invention of printing (1440), the little care of the copyists, correctors, and glossators for the text, so different from the desire of accuracy exhibited to-day, explain sufficiently the divergences we find between various manuscripts of the same work. To these causes may be added, in regard to the Scriptures, exegetical difficulties and dogmatical controversies. To exempt the sacred writings from ordinary conditions a very special providence would have been necessary, and it has not been the will of God to exercise this providence."
Lets just go through that again - "No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author--all have been in some way altered." All have been in some way altered! In view of this blatant admission, how can anyone expect me, or any muslim, to follow an impure book?
When you compare this to the great lengths taken to preserve the original Qur'an, there's no contest!
Further from brother Vipor Poison; may Allah
Almighty always be pleased with him:
Luke 1:3
Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the
beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most
excellent Theophilus,
The following is from the Catholic
Encyclopedia:
http://newadvent.org/cathen/14625b.htm
http://newadvent.org/cathen/14625a.htm
If Theophilus existed in either the 2nd or the 4th centuries then how could the writer of this gospel be the same Luke who is supposed to be with Jesus in the 1st century.
Did he live for 200 years?
Codex Vaticanus Graece:
"Fool and knave, can't you leave the old reading alone and not alter it?" [1]
SOURCE: Codex
Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03, A critical note. Dr. Wieland Willker, University of
Bremen. Retrieved on 2008-02-12.
https://orthodoxwiki.org/Codex_Vaticanus
Click to enlarge:
This is a note that exists in one of the Bible's paparys! It's a note of demanding to not alter the text after apparently having terrible experiences with this problem [1].
Which Book is the people of the Book's according to the Quran?
|
From www.answering-christianity.com/deuteronomy4_2.htm:
Does the Quran say conclusively the bible was corrupted? Also visit:
Is there anything legitimate called "Bible" to begin with? There is no Divine book called "Bible". It's a man-made lie. The Bible is no more than a book that contains collections of writings of people that were not the original Prophets and Disciples. Even the Christian theologians declare this:
www.answering-christianity.com/authors_gospels.htm Ironically, the very Bible itself also declares this:
www.answering-christianity.com/warning.htm
Question: I've heard that Quran 2:79 is not really referring to the Jews, but the "ummi", the gentiles who write books, because the verse right before 2:78 is talking about people who don't know the book, writing the book. Also the others say that the Quranic mensions of "distort the scripture" is "by their tongue". So they are not describing the written text being distorted, but the way they speak, they distort it. If someone can show me that the context of this verse is referring to the Jews corrupting the scripture, that would be very helpful! :) If there is any new thing you could add, it would be helpful to me for native Arabic speakers like Osama to help prove that the Quran conclusively says the older scriptures were corrupted. Answer: [002:078] And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book, but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. [002:079] Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say:"This is from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. Again, these Noble Verses confirm that there is nothing called "Bible". It is a book of conjecture, false desires and lies. Indeed, woe to them for what their hands do write.
Notice how Allah Almighty mentions His Divine Book, and also mentions their corrupt book that they fabricate in Noble Verses 2:78-79, above. Two books mentioned. Their Divine Book is the Laws that call for the Oneness of GOD Almighty, and the Laws that Allah Almighty called "burdens and shackles" (7:157) upon the Jews that Islam came to free them from:
www.answering-christianity.com/islam.htm
Like all previous Divine Books that Allah Almighty willed for them to be lost forever (ex: books of Ishmael, Noah and others), the people of the Book's "book" is no different. It's original text too got lost forever. However, the Divine Commandments still live. Again, those are the BURDENS AND SHACKLES that Islam came to free them from. What the Jews and Christians have is crookedness of false desires and conjecture. This is why Allah Almighty said this about the Glorious Quran: [018:001] Praise be to God, Who hath sent to His Servant the Book, and hath allowed therein no Crookedness: [039:028] (It is) a Quran in Arabic, without any crookedness (therein): in order that they may guard against Evil.
So the Ultimate Book of the people of the Book is the Glorious Quran. Not the pile of dung of praising boyfriend-girlfriend fornication in an incestuous-like description that is called "the Bible":
www.answering-christianity.com/ac10.htm#links
From www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=1940.msg7927#msg7927: If Gospel was corrupted then why Allah ordered to judge by corrupted book? It was God's orders at time of Prophet Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Now, things changed. Quran: The Ultimate Reference. Just read in context.
Noble Verses 5:46-49 above in
text: |
5- Contradictions in historical claims and accounts:
Also visit: 101 Contradictions in the Bible!
Consider the following few examples that consist of historical contradictions in the Bible:
2 Samuel
10:18 - David slew 700 and 40,000
horsemen and Shobach the commander.
1 Chronicles 19:18 - David slew 7000
chariots and 40,000 footmen.
2 Chronicles
9:25 - Solomon had 4000 stalls for
horses and chariots.
1 Kings 4:26 - Solomon had 40,000
stalls for horses.
Ezra 2:5 - Arah had 775 sons.
Nehemiah 7:10 - Arah had 652 sons.
2 Samuel 24:13 -
SEVEN YEARS OF FAMINE.
1 Chronicles 21:11-12 - THREE
YEARS OF FAMINE.
How did Judas die?
Matthew 27:5 - Hanged himself.
Acts 1:18 - And falling
headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all of his bowels gushed out.
2 Samuel 6:23 -
MICHAL never had a child until she died.
2 Samuel 21:8 - MICHAL had 5
sons.
2 Kings 24:8 -
Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he began to reign.
2 Chronicles 36:9 - Jehoiachin
was 8 years old when he began to reign.
1 Kings 16:6-8 -
26th year of the reign of Asa, Baasha reigned over Israel.
2 Chronicles 16:1 - 36th year
of the reign of Asa, Baasha reigned over Israel.
How old was Ahaziah when he began to reign?
22 in 2
Kings 8:26
42 in 2
Chronicle 22:2
Who was Josiah's successor?
Jehoahaz - 2
Chronicle 36:1
Shallum - Jeremiah
22:11
What did the inscription on Jesus' cross say?
John 19:19 Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews.
Matthew 27:37 This is Jesus, the King of the Jews.
Luke 23:38 This is the King of the Jews.
Mark 15:26 The King of the Jews.
You know, there was only one cross, and not ten, for Jesus! Yet, the gospels can't even get the inscription quoted correctly. Can you honestly tell me what the exact quote was? Because all four are way off from each others, especially the one in John 19:19.
Why is this relevant? Because it serves to prove that the gospels were written by men who were not inspired by GOD Almighty. The historical errors and contradictions prove that the work is not that of GOD Almighty.
Also, your original scriptures are all doubtful according to the Bible's own theologians and historians. It's quite hilarious that even the Bible itself admits that it has been tampered with and corrupted by man's garbage:
"`How can you say, "We [the Jews] are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?' (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"
The Revised Standard Version
makes it even clearer: "How
can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us'? But, behold, the
false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie. (From
the RSV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"
And regarding who wrote the books and gospels of the Bible, as I quoted above, here is a sample of what the NIV Bible's theologians and historians wrote:
"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes, page 1528)"
"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 1643)"
"The writer of this letter does not identify himself, but he was obviously well known to the original recipients. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 1856)"
"The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 1905)"
"It seems safe to conclude that the book, at least in its early form, dates from the beginning of the monarchy. Some think that Samuel may have had a hand in shaping or compiling the materials of the book, but in fact we are unsure who the final author or editor was. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 286)"
"Although, according to tradition, Samuel wrote the book, authorship is actually uncertain. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 322)"
"The date of the composition is also unknown, but it was undoubtedly during the monarchy. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 322)"
"The author is unknown. Jewish tradition points to Samuel, but it is unlikely that he is the author because the mention of David (4:17,22) implies a later date. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 360)"
"Who the author was cannot be known with certainty since the book itself gives no indication of his identity. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 368)"
"There is little conclusive evidence as to the identity of the author of 1,2 Kings. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 459)"
"Whoever the author was, it is clear that he was familiar with the book of Deuteronomy. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 459)"
"According to ancient Jewish tradition, Ezra wrote Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah (see Introduction to Ezra: Literary Form and Authorship), but this cannot be established with certainty. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 569)"
"Although we do not know who wrote the book of Esther, from internal evidence it is possible to make some inferences about the author and the date of composition. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 707)"
"The unknown author probably had access to oral and/or written sources....(From the NIV Bible commentary, page 722)"
"Regarding authorship, opinions are even more divided....(From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 773)"
etc...
How do you respond to this?
Please visit: Contradictions
and proofs of Historical Corruptions in the Bible,
and see exactly what I mean, instead of acting like a total fool and saying
things that even the Bible refutes in it!
It is quite obvious that Christians today believe in third party authors' words as the words of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). This is a very serious corruption in the Bible that must be taken into deep consideration by the Bible's followers. Please visit "Is the Bible the true word of GOD?" to see a full and complete paper about the logical corruptions in the Bible, along with many Christian famous priests and ministers opinions that agree with the Bible's corruption. I have their personal quotes in that site.
Also, as to the parts of the Bible that Muslims believe are closest to the
Truth, please visit: www.answering-christianity.com/warning.htm
After that, please visit: Prophet Muhammad was foretold in many places in the Bible in both the Old and New Testaments.
101 Contradictions in the Bible!
|
Four false promises made by Jesus
regarding the Holy Spirit: 1- Your sperma (Greek for sperm) will not cause you to sin fornication or adultery or masturbation if you have enough Holy Spirit in you. So why then did you amputate your own testicles and head of penis Jesus? Why did you castrate and emasculate yourself? You had no need for this. Who on this planet could've had more Holy Spirit in him than you? Or were you also drunk when you uttered this lie? The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol. Jesus commanded to amputate your sinful body parts (cut off hand, penis, pluck eyes, etc...). Paul said amputated flesh gets sent to satan. Were you someone's boyfriend Jesus? Or were you someone's girlfriend? Why did you amputate your Holy Divine Genitals (??) and send them to satan? And why did you then keep your eyes?? Also Jesus, why are your churches, even from the times of Paul, were and are still are notorious in sexual assaults and rapes?
Paul also commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11-13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages.
Even the 12th disciple was chosen by rolling the dice (casting lots), - a game of chance, - and not by the Holy Spirit. Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. Also, Trinity is a lie from Hell. Why was GOD Almighty charitable (χάριτι) and forgiving to Jesus in Luke 2:52?
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD
sent Jesus to
be Christianity's lying
spirit
2- If a snake bites you and runs
its poison through your blood, it will not hurt you (Mark 16:17-18). Jesus even promised in the plural that you will be picking up deadly snakes and they will inject their poisons into you and you shall not be harmed!. This false prophesy is one of the NT's biggest lies, because it never happened. Not only that, but all Christians who genuinely attempted it in the past were killed by the snakes' poisons. Furthermore, the NT's writers lied when they said Paul was bit by a poisonous snake and was not hurt when he was in Malta (Acts 28:7-10). There are many problems with this: 1- Paul is a single person. Jesus' bold promise was in the plural. "The believers shall pick up poisonous snakes, and if anyone gets bit by a poisonous snake and have the poison run through their blood, the poison shall not harm any believer!". Well, historically all who genuinely picked up died from poison. 2- It's been proven that many non-venomous snakes existed in Malta. Some even look like Vipers. So there is not proof that Paul's snake was a poisonous one: "Four species of snakes are present (in the wild) in the Maltese Islands of which three are relatively recent additions. The only indigenous snake is the Western Whip Snake Coluber viridiflavus which is a non-poisonous species. The other three, namely Algerian Whipsnake Coluber algirus, Leopard Snake Elaphe situla and Cat Snake Telescopus fallax have been introduced by man. Of these only the latter has some form of poison. Although snakes appear in the archaeological context (eg. the stone slab in Mus of Archaeology of Gozo - from ggantija, which has a snake on its side) this does not imply that they were poisonous. On the other hand, poisonous species such as Natrix natrix which occurs in nearby Sicily may have been eradicated by man through time." (Source) 3- Jesus' promise dismally fails, and it is one of the most embarrassing lies, and most dangerous to its followers, in the New Testament, which again and again proves that Jesus was indeed a GOD-sent
lying spirit as GOD Almighty deceived false people in the Old Testament.
John 3:13-14
2 Kings 2:11
Genesis 5:24
Again,
where did Enoch and Elijah go to?
Jesus' statement is simply
a lie. He didn't know that Elijah, Enoch and others (ex: Uzair or Ezra) were taken up to
Heaven by GOD Almighty. Was he also here a
fat drunk as the NT says he was? Jesus here added Elijah and Enoch to the 39+ list of barfinity (trinity), because we now have Elijah, Enoch and Jesus as their own trinity. Moses was scared to even pass the Judgment: 2- 3- 4-
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
Jesus' confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language that falsely turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other
examples of blasphemies and quackery) definitely make him a 100% GOd-sent
lying spirit in Matthew 7:22-23. 3- You can
lift mountains and throw them in the sea with only
one command only if you had the Holy Spirit in you. Not even Jesus,
with all of his glory and sperms, was able to do this miracle. 4- Jesus
promised the disciples that after he departs it will not be them
speaking. It will be the Holy Spirit will be speaking through their
mouths. Yet, after he departed, they split into Peter and Paul opposing
teams, and they started hurling insults and accusations towards each others'
teachings, and calling each others: Anathema (cursed by GOD in Greek), follower
of Satan, your Gospel is of the devil, you are a false apostle, you are dogs,
and several other serious accusations and insults. Where was the promised
Holy Spirit in all of this, and all of the above?? Where is Jesus' promise?? - He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them. - 12th disciple was also chosen by
holy gambling.
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in their conflicting scriptures?
Remember: If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:
Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
The one unforgivable sin?! Jesus further says: The only unforgivable sin is blaspheming the Holy Spirit (Luke 12:10). But your entire package that is called the NT and church is the greatest insult and blasphemy against GOD Almighty's Holy Spirit. It is like a prostitute preaching, and while continuing to prostitute, that the one unforgivable sin is fornication. How many times did you fornicate and continue to fornicate? How many times did you lie on the Holy Spirit and continued to lie on the Holy Spirit of GOD Almighty? Were you also a fat drunk in this one?
Was Jesus drunk? High Concentrations and Intoxication:
The alcohol-less Baptist is greater than Jesus: John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a
fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol:
winebibber a habitual drinker of alcohol. Of course it never did! (See Holy Spirit of Islam, and alcohol is forbidden in Islam)
High Concentrations and Intoxication: Yahweh despised Jesus' wisdom: for he (John the Baptist) will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born. So according to the New Testament itself, we have: 1- John the baptist. .Is John the Baptist another member of the barfinity? |
6- Conclusion:
The current Bible is not all the True Word of GOD Almighty. It is full of doubts and man made corruption as was proven above. How can we believe in a doubtful book as the Perfect Book of GOD Almighty? Allah Almighty said in the Noble Quran regarding those who try to corrupt His Holy Words:
"Know they not Allah Knoweth what they conceal and what they reveal? And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book [the Bible], but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. Then woe to those who write the Book [the Bible] with their own hands, and then say: 'This is from Allah,' To traffic with it for a miserable price! Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. (The Noble Quran, 2:77-79)"
I really don't see any point in even trying to argue with anybody about any verse from the Bible at this point after reading this article, because most of the books of the bible are not valid enough to be trusted. So to try to prove Trinity from a book that is for the most part a big hoax would indeed be a blasphemy.
The Bible's books and gospels had been clearly and indisputably proven to be:
Embrace Islam and you'll be saved. May Allah Almighty Lead you and your families to Islam. Ameen.
Which Book is the people of the Book's according to the Quran?
|
From www.answering-christianity.com/deuteronomy4_2.htm:
Does the Quran say conclusively the bible was corrupted? Also visit:
Is there anything legitimate called "Bible" to begin with? There is no Divine book called "Bible". It's a man-made lie. The Bible is no more than a book that contains collections of writings of people that were not the original Prophets and Disciples. Even the Christian theologians declare this:
www.answering-christianity.com/authors_gospels.htm Ironically, the very Bible itself also declares this:
www.answering-christianity.com/warning.htm
Question: I've heard that Quran 2:79 is not really referring to the Jews, but the "ummi", the gentiles who write books, because the verse right before 2:78 is talking about people who don't know the book, writing the book. Also the others say that the Quranic mensions of "distort the scripture" is "by their tongue". So they are not describing the written text being distorted, but the way they speak, they distort it. If someone can show me that the context of this verse is referring to the Jews corrupting the scripture, that would be very helpful! :) If there is any new thing you could add, it would be helpful to me for native Arabic speakers like Osama to help prove that the Quran conclusively says the older scriptures were corrupted. Answer: [002:078] And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book, but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. [002:079] Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say:"This is from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. Again, these Noble Verses confirm that there is nothing called "Bible". It is a book of conjecture, false desires and lies. Indeed, woe to them for what their hands do write.
Notice how Allah Almighty mentions His Divine Book, and also mentions their corrupt book that they fabricate in Noble Verses 2:78-79, above. Two books mentioned. Their Divine Book is the Laws that call for the Oneness of GOD Almighty, and the Laws that Allah Almighty called "burdens and shackles" (7:157) upon the Jews that Islam came to free them from:
www.answering-christianity.com/islam.htm
Like all previous Divine Books that Allah Almighty willed for them to be lost forever (ex: books of Ishmael, Noah and others), the people of the Book's "book" is no different. It's original text too got lost forever. However, the Divine Commandments still live. Again, those are the BURDENS AND SHACKLES that Islam came to free them from. What the Jews and Christians have is crookedness of false desires and conjecture. This is why Allah Almighty said this about the Glorious Quran: [018:001] Praise be to God, Who hath sent to His Servant the Book, and hath allowed therein no Crookedness: [039:028] (It is) a Quran in Arabic, without any crookedness (therein): in order that they may guard against Evil.
So the Ultimate Book of the people of the Book is the Glorious Quran. Not the pile of dung of praising boyfriend-girlfriend fornication in an incestuous-like description that is called "the Bible":
www.answering-christianity.com/ac10.htm#links
From www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=1940.msg7927#msg7927: If Gospel was corrupted then why Allah ordered to judge by corrupted book? It was God's orders at time of Prophet Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Now, things changed. Quran: The Ultimate Reference. Just read in context.
Noble Verses 5:46-49 above in
text: |
|
The Almighty Dollar: [1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5] The Almighty Dollar & Power were the Ultimate Reason: "Everyone who owned land or houses would sell them and bring the money to the apostles" (The Bible, Acts 4:34-35)
The infestation of the Pauls:
Paul was certainly a product of the plenty of false liars that were roaming around: |
7- Further Topics to search:
600+ Commandments from GOD Almighty to Moses and the Israelites.
Contradictions and History of Corruption in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him)
.Deuteronomy 4:2 clearly declares that the Bible is corrupt!
The best way to convert a non-Muslim to Islam? Covers the Hijacked Bible in great details.
Keep in mind also that shortly after Jesus, 10s of false messiahs and prophets emerged.
Exposing Paul's Lies section. Tons of verses and articles exposing him.
What is the definition of Messiah in the Quran?
GOD's stupidity is smarter than all of us???
The Bible's Scientific Absurdities!
Will Judas or Matthias sit at the Throne? Is Gambling allowed in Christianity?
Why were the disciples disputing on the 12th disciple if the Holy Spirit was the
One who chose him?
Some important questions to
consider when reading this article:
101 Contradictions in the Bible!
My response to Quennel Gale's rebuttal to my article "Just who were the real authors of the Bible?"
Who Authored The New Testament? with a citation from conservative evangelical scholar Tom Wright.
Obvious mistranslations of the Hebrew Manuscripts. See proofs of alterations and deceptions done by the Jews and Christians to disprove Islam in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
Answering Trinity. This section is a library that has many articles that refute Trinity, and shows in much great details the history of man's corruption in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
Famous Theologians and Historians believe that Paul was not truthful.
Contradictions in 2 Timothy 3:16.
Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT as an inspired scripture.
Why do Muslims believe in Jesus' personal quotes only as closest to the Truth in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
"Son of GOD" conflict between the Bible and the Noble Quran.
Books mentioned in the Bible that are not part of the "Today's Bible"
More on "Who were the real authors of the Bible?" This is a great article that exposes the man made narration/corruption in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). We read in the Books of Moses about Moses' own burial. Did Moses himself write it when he was already dead? If not then who did? And how can we prove that the person was appointed by GOD Almighty to write it as a Divine Revelation (since it now exists in the Bible)? And what makes us be so sure that it is indeed a Divine Revelation?
Man's history of corrupting the Old Testament.
None of Jesus' disciples witnessed the crucifixion. They "all fled" and "deserted" Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). This further confirms Islam's claims.
Isaiah 53 further confirms Islam's Divine claims about Jesus never got crucified.
Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.
Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing his face down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.
8- Book Information (Bibliography):
1- The NIV Study Bible, 10th
Anniversary Edition.
General Editor: Kenneth Barker.
Associate Editors: Donald Burdick, John Stek, Walter Wessel and Ronald
Youngblood.
Published at: Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, MI 49530, USA.
ISBN: 0-310-92589-4.
2- Holy Bible - King James
Version.
KJV Giant Print, personal size reference Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
Published by Zondervan Publishing House.
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49530, U.S.A.
Printed in the United States of America.
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
3- The New Jerusalem Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
Published by Doubleday, A division of Bantam Doubleday, Dell Publishing Group,
Inc.
1540 Broadway, New York, New York 10036.
ISBN: 0-385-14264-1 (Regular Edition).
ISBN: 0-385-46961-6 (Deluxe Edition).
|
The Almighty Dollar: [1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5] The Almighty Dollar & Power were the Ultimate Reason: "Everyone who owned land or houses would sell them and bring the money to the apostles" (The Bible, Acts 4:34-35)
The infestation of the Pauls:
Paul was certainly a product of the plenty of false liars that were roaming around: |
Also Visit:
The Bible's Scientific Absurdities!
A 51-second clip of Dr. Neil deGrasse
Tyson exposes the fundamental problem
of the Bibles' ample scientific absurdities.
Constantine's unified "Bible" was
permanently lost! Only portions of it were found
almost 1/2 century later [2]
Which "Book" is the "People of the Book's"?
The Law of Moses is the "Book" that the Noble Quran
mentioned.
Also Visit:
John 1:1 "In
the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was
God was
with authority (same Greek word for satan's
rule [2]
[3])."
Also visit:
Is Jesus
Allah Almighty for creating things in the Noble Quran? And is he better
than Prophet Muhammad for being a creator? And is there a contradiction in the
Noble Quran regarding idol gods not being able to create and Jesus Christ?
See the Books that Allah Almighty gave to certain powerful Beings to enable them
to possess certain Powers and to do certain Miracles, including limited
Creations.
Other important links:
"bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah
Eesa is Iesu and Iesus in Latin and Greek for Jesus, and Eesa is also a Hebrew word that means doctor
"...are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow..." (The Noble Quran, 4:157)
Also:
Jesus had no Divine Will according to the New Testament. How could he be our
Creator?
Jesus said he had no Divine Will. Jesus had
to seek permission from GOD before performing any Miracle.
Prophet Muhammad was mentioned in the previous Scriptures. Also, his Prophetic Name, AHMED or AHMAD, was both mentioned in the Glorious Quran and the DEAD SEA SCROLLS. Yes, his name was recently found in the Dead Sea Scrolls as the coming Servant. See the image for yourself.
What parts of the Bible and Hadiths do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth, and Why? [1] [2]
|
See also: Islam's end of times STUNNING Prophecies section.
Zionist Israel will rule the earth with Mighty Evil! (Islamic Prophecy) The Glorious Quran declared 1,400 years ago that the Israeli Zionist machine will rule the entire earth with mighty evil and power. They will reach "Mighty Heights" علوا كبيرا of evil power and might on earth. See Noble Verses 17:4-8: Also, Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, made a stunning prophecy about the one-eyed anti-Christ who will rule the infidels and the world: Narrated Ibn Umar: "Once Allah's Apostle stood amongst the people, glorified and praised Allah as He deserved and then mentioned the Dajjal (anti-Christ) saying, "l warn you against him (i.e. the Dajjal) and there was no prophet but warned his nation against him. No doubt, Noah warned his nation against him but I tell you about him something of which no prophet told his nation before me. You should know that he is one-eyed, and Allah is not one-eyed." (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 55, Number 553)" Prophet Muhammad had many visions about the dajjal, and gave many signs about him. Some of the things the Prophet said about the dajjal were literal, and some were vision-metaphors. The most prominent one is that he will be one-eyed. This is both literal and metaphoric. It is literal today because the zionist anti-Christ system is indeed represented by the ONE-EYE symbol as seen in the following images. The metaphors here are Allah Almighty not being ONE-EYED, because nothing can describe Allah Almighty. There is "none like unto Him" (Quran, 112:4). In other words also, the Prophet warned that this ONE-EYED SATANIC system will be a worshiped deity. And that false deity is not Allah Almighty. For ample more details and proofs, please visit link below.
   Was the Islamic ONE-EYE Prophecy foretold before Islam in the Bible's Zechariah 11:17? I demonstrated using ample Biblical verses that the ONE-EYED DAJJAL (anti-Christ) was never prophesied in the Bible to be ONE-EYED, nor was this Sign ever given in the Bible to any being. For ample Noble Verses and Hadiths (Sayings of the Prophet), and proofs, please visit: Many references of this Hadith (Saying) exist throughout our Islamic Texts. This is one of the most popular Hadiths and Prophecies of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. And indeed, we are seeing it come to pass before our very eyes. Please also visit: |
The Gospel Christ:
So, what was the Gospel of Jesus Christ then, i.e., the Injil of Jesus Christ? Even among Christians, this remains a mystery. But the Didache; a Gospel which existed even before the current Bible-Gospels (or canonized Gospels), contains a great deal of teachings of Jesus Christ. The following points are important to always keep in mind: (1)- No single Scripture, the Didache or any other Scripture, is 100% pure and accurate. There are always forgeries and alterations. This is the same with every single book and gospel. (2)- The Original Teachings of Christ exist in Scriptures that are in the Bible and outside the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
For ample proofs, watch the debate-video above.
See Also:
The "Son of God" Title in the 1 John 2:22
Jesus is Yahweh the Son? See how Christians
got this very wrong in the NT, using Jesus' words himself!
Also, is Islam the anti-Christ system
according to 1 John 2:22?
Anti-Christ | 1john 2:22-23 | 911 was 100% an Israeli Lie | Boston | 666| Dividing Israel
|
Also visit:
Doubting Thomas couldn't raise Jesus?? No way!! He raised many before (Matthew 10:7-8): Thomas raised many people from the dead (Matthew 10:7-8). Yet, he and the disciples could not raise Jesus back to life after the crucifixion? Not only that, but they all fled, and Thomas became the "doubting Thomas" because he did not believe that the man who returned was Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). But did you not raise people from the dead already, Thomas? What happened there? You could've raised Jesus himself back to life with your own hands! Yet, it was impossible for you to believe that it was Jesus who returned? Why?
www.answering-christianity.com/trinity_crucified.htm
These alleged miracles are very
loud! If you raise people from the dead, then the entire land of
Palestine would've heard about it. Yet, nothing recorded
historically about them. So do we have here loud
miracles or loud lies? Doubting Thomas also said "My Lord and my God" to Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Yet, all believers were called "God", and Moses was the "God" of the Believers, Aaron and Pharaoh: King Melchizedek [1]:
For ample more details, visit:
www.answering-christianity.com/godtitle.htm
www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=1904.msg7673#msg7673
Jesus forbade people from calling him "son of David" and "son of Abraham". He said he is greater than them, and no one should call him son of any of these two servants of GOD Almighty. Yet, Jesus walked around and called himself son of Adam countless times:
Note: The (*) links below are html backups of the website's blog topic threads, in case the blog and its database are down.
From: www.answering-christianity.com/convert_christians.htm: 1 John
2:22-23 [1] church-written
lie are discussed further down in details in this table.
Ironically, the Bible's own theologians admit that 1
John contains forgeries by
church fathers.
Also visit:
Jonah was alive:
But Jonah was always alive in his ordeal. He was alive on the
shore,
This Prophecy is a lie! Jesus
laid on the floor, got healed, and got up and Matthew 27:16-17: There were two Jesuses! Not one.
Father and Son Definitions: Definition of Key Terms (*) (a discussion between me and a Christian): 1- What does "The Father" really mean in the Bible? How is it defined in Islam? (see point #5 below) How does the Bible really define it? 2- What does "Son of GOD" really mean in the Bible? 3- Jesus had to match Melchizedek in Miracles and Power, according to the New Testament. See this text-debate (*) between me and a Christian. Jesus' Miracles and Miraculous Birth and Nature were given to him because he needed to be in according to Melchizedek. He had to be "in according to Melchizedek" as the Bible specifically says. See Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20 [2].
Who is Melchizedek? According to the Bible, he was the Jews' highest priest who had "no father and no mother", and "no beginning and no end" (Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20) [2]. The Bible literally says that. Jesus had to be similar and inline with him; another proof that Jesus being "God" doesn't mean he is the Creator of the Universe. 4- Does the Bible say that Yahweh created Jesus? Yes it does (*). (a)- GOD Almighty, who is not seen by anyone or anything, nor is like unto anyone or anything. (b)- The World of Command, which is the invisible world of the Beings that were made by the Word and the Spirit. (c)- The World of Creation, the flush and blood, dust and water physical world and Universes (plural). Also visit: Is the Noble Quran a Creator or Creation?
1 John 2:22-23:
1 John 2:22-23 is another
church-written lie. Again, ironically, the Bible's own theologians
admit that 1
John contains forgeries by
church fathers. Christians
often quote the following verses to prove that Islam is the
Anti-Christ:
1 John 2
22 Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 23 No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also. Muslims firmly believe in the Messiah and his virgin birth miracle. Islam cemented the virgin birth of Jesus belief after it was fading away. Christians admit this. Also, the Glorious Quran claims that sons of GOD title was used for servants raised to honor: Sons of GOD in the Glorious Quran. They are "....no more than servants raised to honor. (The Noble Quran, 21:26)".
"Messiah" is the sonship: Jesus said Prophets
are Servants, Jesus is the Son. But
the Old Testament thoroughly calls Jesus the slave
of GOD [1] and
who also fears GOD. Yes
indeed, the Islamic Isa
(eesa) is the Messiah.
This is his special sonship. He is also the Lord of his
Mansion, which has twelve
thrones or fruits [2].
He is more than a mere Jewish Rasul (Prophet) in this regard.
He is also heir
of GOD on
earth only. That's the limit of his sonship. Otherwise, it is
sun chips! There is nothing GODly about him. He is not our
Creator. With all of his glory and might, he still remains a
mere abd
(slave) of GOD [1] as
all sons of GOD were also called slaves of GOD
(Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). See
also:
5- What does the Glorious Quran say about the "Father" and "Son" titles:
So, is Islam the anti-Christ system according to 1john 2:22? No it isn't. Here are some Quran and Bible facts regarding "FATHER" and "SON" in more details: (a)- Allah Almighty is the Believers' only Guardian (المولى): (b)- FRIENDS = SONS in the Bible and Quran (ولي , وليهما and خليلا): We further read the following in the Bible:
Isaiah 41:8
Chronicles 20:7
James 2:23 So being GOD Almighty's "SON" in the Bible is equal to being GOD Almighty's "FRIEND". Now compare this to the following from the Holy Quran: [002:257] Allah is the friend (ولي) and patron of those who believe. He brings them out of the depths of darkness into light. While those who do not believe, have the forces of evil as their friends; they lead them out of light, into the very depths of darkness. Such ones shall be the inmates of the fire. They will stay there forever. [003:122] (And remember) when the two groups among you lost heart (and almost fell out), even though Allah was their Friend and Protector (وليهما)? In Allah (alone), should the believers place their trust! [004:125] Who can be better in religion than one who submits his whole self to God, does good, and follows the way of Abraham the true in Faith? For God did take Abraham for a friend (خليلا). So the Bible's "FATHER" & "SON" for GOD Almighty and the Believers is clearly metaphoric, and it only means that GOD Almighty: 1- Is the Protector. Please visit the following link to further see what Words the Glorious Quran uses for these words and definitions: https://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php/topic,1368.msg5203.html#msg5203 (backup)
Regarding the following verse, and many others like it:
Let us look at Noble Verses 27:59, 3:33, 3:42, 7:144, 22:75, 35:32, 38:47, 39:4 from the Glorious Quran: [027:059] Say: Praise be to God, and Peace on his servants whom He has chosen اصطفى (for his Message). (Who) is better?- God or the false gods they associate (with Him)? 27:59 قل الحمد لله وسلام على عباده الذين اصطفى ءالله خير اما يشركون [003:033] God did choose اصطفى Adam and Noah, the family of Abraham, and the family of 'Imran above all people,- 3:33 ان الله اصطفى ادم ونوحا وال ابراهيم وال عمران على العالمين [003:042] Behold! the angels said: "O Mary! God hath chosen thee اصطفاك and purified thee- chosen thee above the women of all nations. 3:42 واذ قالت الملائكة يامريم ان الله اصطفاك وطهرك واصطفاك على نساء العالمين
[007:144] (God)
said: "O
Moses! I have chosen thee اصطفيتك above
(other) men, by the mission I (have given thee) and the words I
(have spoken to thee): take then the (revelation) which I give thee,
and be of those who give thanks." [022:075] God chooses يصطفي messengers from angels and from men for God is He Who hears and sees (all things). 22:75 الله يصطفي من الملائكة رسلا ومن الناس ان الله سميع بصير [035:032] Then We have given the Book for inheritance to such of Our Servants as We have chosen اصطفينا: but there are among them some who wrong their own souls; some who follow a middle course; and some who are, by God's leave, foremost in good deeds; that is the highest Grace. 35:32 ثم اورثنا الكتاب الذين اصطفينا من عبادنا فمنهم ظالم لنفسه ومنهم مقتصد ومنهم سابق بالخيرات باذن الله ذلك هو الفضل الكبير [038:047] They were, in Our sight, truly, of the company of the Elect المصطفين and the Good. 38:47 وانهم عندنا لمن المصطفين الاخيار [039:004] Had God wished to take to Himself an (actual) son, He could have chosen لاصطفى whom He pleased out of those whom He doth create: but Glory be to Him! (He is above such things.) He is God, the One, the Irresistible. 39:4 لو اراد الله ان يتخذ ولدا لاصطفى مما يخلق مايشاء سبحانه هو الله الواحد القهار Furthermore, when Jesus was asked about when the Hour will come, he replied by saying that only GOD Almighty Knows, and that no one knows, and that Jesus himself also didn't know. Please visit:
https://www.answering-christianity.com/questions.htm
Jesus spelled it out clearly that he knew NOT. And as to calling GOD Almighty "Father", and that Islam denies that GOD Almighty is an ACTUAL FATHER to anyone, in Islam GOD Almighty is called: 1- Rab - Lord, Father (you are the Rab of your home for being the husband and the father). 2- Wali - Guardian. In the old Aramaic and Hebrew, GOD Almighty was called what-is-equivalent-to-Islam our Rab and Wali. But that doesn't make GOD Almighty our actual Father. This is exactly as Judaism metaphors such as idolatry is equivalent to spiritual adultery. No Jew is actually married to GOD Almighty to actually commit a personal marriage-adultery against GOD Almighty! Yet, the Jews use metaphors like these. Islam came to straighten all of this out and to set the record straight that GOD Almighty has no son and no daughter. Otherwise, why would GOD Almighty torture us to Hell if we were His perfect sons and daughters?? No imperfect being could be an actual son of GOD Almighty (and no being is the son or daughter of GOD Almighty, period!): [005:018] (Both) the Jews and the Christians say: "We are sons of God, and his beloved." Say: "Why then doth He punish you for your sins? Nay, ye are but men,- of the men he hath created: He forgiveth whom He pleaseth, and He punisheth whom He pleaseth: and to God belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that is between: and unto Him is the final goal (of all)" Again, please visit: https://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php/topic,1368.msg5203.html#msg5203 (backup).
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
Jonah was alive:
But Jonah was always alive in his ordeal. He was alive on the
shore,
This Prophecy is a lie! Jesus
laid on the floor, got healed, and got up and Matthew 27:16-17: There were two Jesuses! Not one.
6- Did you know that Elohim is Allah [1, *]
[2]
[3].
The "im" in Hebrew is a majestic plural for GOD Almighty. The root
Word is "Eloh". And the more original Jews such as Yemenites and
others say Alohim or Alah-im.
And when you yourself pronounce it, you do naturally pronounce it with
a double "l": Allah. Jews do call Him: Allah-im.
Aramaic-speaking people also call GOD Almighty Allah.
See the following videos for Biblical references and proofs. Also, pre-Islamic
Biblical archeological findings have GOD Almighty as
"Allah". So the Original Holy Name for GOD Almighty is not Eloh. It
is Allah! Eloh is a Hebrew dialect, which not all Hebrew
speakers use anyway. Allah had always been the Original and
Universal GOD Almighty even before birth of Judaism, and the
existence Hebrew. And Hebrew is a developed language from
Phoenician. See the following links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenician_alphabet |
Also Visit:
The Bible's Scientific Absurdities!
A 51-second clip of Dr. Neil deGrasse
Tyson exposes the fundamental problem
of the Bibles' ample scientific absurdities.
|
Will Judas or Matthias sit at the Throne? Is Gambling allowed in
Christianity? Why were the disciples disputing on the 12th disciple
if the Holy Spirit was the One who chose him?
|
|
Quran Miracle: The Jews' and Christians' scribes changed and still change the Words. Proven with images, text and videos from their corrupt bible and books! See how they removed words and altered words.
Bible Hoaxes on GOD: Rebekah's story is a clear and indisputable proof that many of the Bible's accounts are full of hoaxes!
MORE LIES ON GOD: Rebuttal to Jochen Katz on FOX News' lying on their motto (Balanced Lies Rebuttal). Who was the sacrificed son? Isaac or Ishmael? Even the altered Bible thoroughly supports that it was Ishmael [1] in many passages. And in Islam there is no "El" (God) in names as in Ishmael or Gabriel in Hebrew? Is the GOD of Islam different? Allah Almighty allowed for His Holy Name to be shortened (as "El" in Ishmael, and Lillah for Li-Allah in the Quran, as in Alhamdulillah) in both Islam and Judaism [1]. Differences between the Noble Quran and Bible only prove Islam's Truthfulness and Divinity. GOD became concerned that the Babylonians' Tower that they were constructing will reach Him??? The Bibles also state:
Also Read: Bible defines "Lying Spirits by GOD" to mean GOD MAKES YOU LIE; you have no will (2 Samuel 12:7-12). Made to be prostitutes by GOD: In 2 Samuel 12:7-12, King David's wives were turned into ***** prostitutes by GOD Almighty [1] as a punishment for David's sins with Bathsheba. This means that GOD Almighty can create custom Laws for punishment even if they fully contradict GOD Almighty's Moral Code on morality and chastity. Also, seduction and RAPING of virgins isn't a physically punishable crime in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). See Deuteronomy 22:25-29, Exodus 22:16-17. |
Also Visit:
Who was the sacrificed son? Isaac or Ishmael? Even the altered Bible thoroughly supports that it was Ishmael [1] in many passages. And in Islam there is no "El" (God) in names as in Ishmael or Gabriel in Hebrew? Is the GOD of Islam different? Allah Almighty allowed for His Holy Name to be shortened (as "El" in Ishmael, and Lillah for Li-Allah in the Quran, as in Alhamdulillah) in both Islam and Judaism [1].
The Bible's Sacred Black Stones
Bible's Sacred Lunar Festivals
Gambling allowed in Christianity
Hadith of the fly - Scientifically proven Western Scientists!
The Quran Declares that the earth [1]:
|
1- Spherical. |
Who killed Muhammad? Another lie refuted.
In the Bible, GOD swore by His creation. Does Islam's GOD swear by His creations? Contradiction between Amos 8:7 and Hebrews 6:12-14.
Jesus, Isa (eesa): Which one is the original name in Hebrew and Aramaic?
Dhul Qarnayn's story. Sunrise and sunset. Also Why حمئة and not حاميةٍ. Dhil Qarnayn's journey is detailed with scientific and geographical maps that are more 1000 years old.
Is the Tale of the Army of the Elephants being bombed/struck by the Sijjeel (سجيل) Stones by the Ababeel (أبابيل) Birds, a mere fable or a True Historical Event, in the Glorious Quran? See the new archeological discoveries.
Did Prophet Muhammad kiss
the penis of his baby grandson Hasan?
The Jews and Christians actually suck
the penises with ample quotes and proofs.
|
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other?? The Romans had to fake fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues:
Never happened: 1- Jonah was alive on the shore, alive in the whale's belly, and alive when vomited out of the whale. Alive, alive, alive!
2-
Jesus laid on the floor in a
tomb
(a cave-like room) as shown above, got healed, and got up and left.
He was
never
inside
any
coffin
nor ever
got
buried. 3- The Jewish Passover, where 1/2 million pilgrims were about to arrive, forced the Romans to abruptly end the crucifixion. Jesus only stayed for 3 hours. 100s of thousands of pilgrims were coming to Jerusalem for the Passover, the Romans had to rush his "crucifixion" and bring him down. The soldiers were even denied food due to lack of time. 4- Jesus original name
in
Luke 5:31, Matthew 9:12, Mark 2:17
was Healer or Doctor. Jesus was miraculous and
could self-heal
as he has done miraculous medical miracles in the past.
5- Jesus never got crucified: [1] [2] [3] [4]. The OT and NT clearly spell it out. He was saved.
5- The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). See also Daniel 7:25: Christianity will change time and the Law. John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol: winebibber a habitual drinker of alcohol.
High Concentrations and Intoxication: Yahweh despised Jesus' wisdom: Luke 1:15 So according to the New Testament itself, we have: 1- John the baptist.
6- Jesus' Hyperboles: Confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language falsely made sinful lawful and lawful sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples.
This statement "shall be buried deep in the heart of earth for 3 days" is a problematic, oxymoronic, self-contradicting, and exaggerated Jesus Hyperbole.
No miracle. A WWII soldier survived 63 hours on the cross by his captors. Jesus only stayed for 3 hours. Also, first 200 years there were no gospels or writings.
Keep in mind:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Two Jesus:
Matthew 27:16-17: There were two Jesuses! Not one. Allah Almighty
also said in the Glorious Quran: Divine Setup for Conjecture: Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit "... but so it was made to appear to them..." (Quran 4:157)
The two double-Jesus men & Pontus Pilate in Matthew 27:16-17: According to the Gospel of Matthew, Pontus Pilate was standing between two double-Jesus men: 1- Jesus Barabbas. "...The Bibles' Christ was put on the cross for three hours. Any one of us would've survived this silly crucifixion. Your human body, when faced with death, can become 10+ times stronger, more resilient, more resistant and more stubborn than normal. This is what would enable you, for example, to lift an entire truck with your bare hands if your precious child was under it. Similarly, if you were put on the cross for three silly hours, your body would've survived it. A soldier was placed on the cross for 63 hours and still lived to tell the world about it." (Source)A Divine Setup for Conjecture. And again, the "buried deep in the heart of earth" Prophecy never happened, Jesus laid on the floor, got healed, and got up and left. He was never inside any coffin nor ever got buried. Also, because 100s of thousands of pilgrims were coming to Jerusalem for the Passover, the Romans had to rush his "crucifixion" and bring him down. The soldiers were even denied food due to lack of time. Jonah was alive. Jonah was always alive in his ordeal. He was alive on the shore, alive in the whale's belly, and alive when vomited out of the whale. Alive, alive, alive! Jesus never got crucified: [1] [2] [3] [4]. The OT and NT clearly spell it out. He was saved.
Was Jesus Christ Crucified?
Christianity's Salvation Lie: Because Christianity's scriptures didn't get documented for 200+ years after Jesus, the Church and Christians had developed and invented the crucifixion lie and its requirement to save a person from Hell (by him believing in it), which had been thoroughly proven from both the Bible and the Glorious Quran, to be a fabricated lie [1]. Salvation verses like John 3:16 and others are all forgeries that were invented by liars 100s of years after the real Eesa Matthew 9 Matthew 5:7 Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy. Being Merciful to others makes you a good person. And Jesus didn't come for you if you are. Jesus didn't come to invite merciful and good people. They're already saved. They need no invitation. The Christian lie about one must accept that Jesus died on the cross for his/her sins is mandatory for their salvation, and that otherwise they'd be doomed to Hell is thoroughly destroyed in Matthew 9:12-13. In fact, both the OT and NT in many passages confirmed that GOD Almighty will save his Messiah from crucifixion and from death and harm.
Matthew 9:12-13 I have not come for you if you're a merciful Jew.
7. The New Testament further says that as Jesus grew up, he learned more and more about GOD: (Luke 2:52)
8. How is Jesus our Creator? Also visit:
Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit
Yes, the Jews did call Ezra
a special Son of GOD with special
Divine Connections. Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes, the Jews did call Ezra
a special Son of GOD with special
Divine Connections.
| Camel Urine as Medicine: [1] |
In 2
Samuel 12:7-12, King
David's wives were turned into ***** prostitutes
by GOD Almighty ***** as
a punishment for David's sins with Bathsheba. This means that GOD Almighty can
create custom Laws for punishment even if they fully contradict GOD Almighty's
Moral Code on morality and chastity. Also,
seduction and raping
of virgins isn't a
physically punishable crime in the Bible in Deuteronomy
22:25-29, Exodus 22:16-17.
Note: Please also visit my My response to Quennel Gale's rebuttal to this article.
Constantine's unified "Bible" was permanently lost! Only portions
of it were found almost 1/2 century later [2]
The New Testament calls for
the death of all Jews who reject Jesus as Christ.
Which "Book" is the "People of the Book's"?
The Law of Moses is the "Book" that the Noble
Quran mentioned.
Also visit:
The bible is a book that contains countless contradictions and corruptions as ironically the bible's own theologians openly admit! They even claim that it contains fables and fairy tales:
101 Contradictions in the Bible!
James White admits that the Bible is corrupt!
Where was the promised Holy Spirit in the disciples' apostatizing of each other??
The Romans had to fake fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues: [1]
200 years no gospels | 24 other thrones besides Jesus' | Jesus' problematic hyperboles: made sinful lawful and lawful sinful | Jesus was created | What's new | A-Z library (3300+ articles) | "Muslims" was the original title | Quran Search | Quran Moral Code (100s of them) | Quran: Bibles are filled with corrupt قول qaowl (doctrines of sayings and writings) | "bar Allahin" in Daniel 3:25-26 means the chosen one of Allah | Jesus said he was powerless | Paul said he wasn't sure about Holy Spirit | Disciples called each other liars, satanic, false | Paul commanded women to not expose sex predators | Research & Blog | 9/11 Israel-lie | Youtube
Quran's STUNNING Divine Miracles: [1] Allah Almighty also promised in several Divine Prophecies that He will show the Glorious Quran's Miracles to mankind. For example:
Coincidence? See 1,000s of examples [1].Quran's Stunning Numerical & Scientific Miracles.
"I cannot do anything on my own." (i.e., Jesus could not perform a single Miracle without GOD sending it down to him first!). I can not perform a single Miracle on my own!! I am totally POWERLESS without Allah Almighty! John 5:31 "if I (Jesus) bear witness of myself, then I would be a liar!" GOD didn't talk this way when He spoke to Moses. GOD's testimony alone is always sufficient! Jesus also bowed his face down to the ground, like we Muslims (Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name, and sons and daughters of GOD titles will be "no more"; |
.jpg)
