Just who were the real authors of the Bibles? How big was the first New Testament?

1- When was the New Testament written?

How big was the first New Testament? (google). The Roman massacres also wiped out the original texts.

Hardly a total of 2 pages, and it was written 100 to 200 years after Jesus. Not early enough by any stretch. Also, the first 200 years there were no gospels or writings, and they admit that much forgeries were "fairly common":

Also visit section #4 below: 4- The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered" [4].

What about NT manuscripts immediately after Jesus?

Zero were ever found. They were never found because none of the writings that were ever made have survived:

what_christians_do_not_know_about_their_holy_book_series.zip

www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNZ5dcsJaeJ3NWwvDoFuyzufcRfwJcDia
www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJbHbdU-4Yg&list=PLdQd7rfq4N2Y3X0BNyWh5A-fv5IZFUnMe
www.youtube.com/@Albyyinah
www.youtube.com/@Albyyinah/videos

Only centuries-late small 11 fragments of Papayris were found and at a much latter date, which collectively were less than 2 pages altogether. A papayri (papyrus) is a scroll, which is equivalent to a letter-size page. The 11 fragments found were dated between years 100 to 300. So even those are not even original, but are copies of copies of copies of copies and documentations of oral church teachings and fabrications. At any rate, the 11 fragments of papayris found are. They're hardly worth showing or be given a URL-link. They hardly fill 2 pages when put together:

Papayri P52
Papayri P90
Papayri P104 (only 6.35 cm by 9.5cm in size)
Papayri P98
Papayri P137

"The earliest extant fragment of the New Testament is the Rylands Library Papyrus P52, a piece of the Gospel of John dated to the first half of the 2nd century." (Dating the Bible - Wikipedia)

"The first complete copies of single New Testament books appear around 200, and the earliest complete copy of the New Testament, the Codex Sinaiticus dates to the 4th century." (Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia and Google Search)

Six other small fragments found were dated to the 2nd or 3rd centuries. Not even worthy of being URL-linked:

Papayri P32
Papayri P46
Papayri P66
Papayri P77
Papayri P103
Majuscule GA0189

The so-called "5800 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, with an astounding 2.6 million pages of biblical text" were all writings from 5th to the 19th century in so many languages. Like all other false religions' writings, these are irrelevant writings of church fathers and people that are similar to articles Christians write today on blogs and websites. They are totally irrelevant to the question at hand and have nothing to do with the earliest manuscripts that don't seem to to have ever existed, from the first place, during the time of Jesus and early believers (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.

Also, Sam Shamoun declares 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries:

If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Plus, Jews and Christians went through waves and waves of Roman massacres, and their texts were wholesale burnt:

Roman massacres:

It is also important to know that the following seven Roman Emperors have thoroughly burned all (burnt all) of the early believers' writings:

1. Nero (54-68)
2. Domitian (81-96)
3. Marcus Aurelius (161-180)
4. Septimius Severus (193-211; up to a point)
5. Maximinius I Thrax (235-8; up to a point)
6. Trajanus Decius (249-251)
7. Valerian (253-260)

Read all the details with references here. Also visit: How big was the first New Testament?

What we have today from "gospels" and "New Testament" were written 100 years to 300 years after Jesus' departure from this earth. So, the current writings that we have are not original writings. Also, to appease the Roman Empire's 3-headed pagan religion and practices, the pagan 3-headed trinity was invented [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Many lies had been fabricated after the original writings were all lost. The Jews and Christians of Arabia, however, did have writings that predicted the coming of Prophet Muhammad. These were some of the original texts that survived.

The early believers were expecting an Arabian Prophet. The OT thoroughly talks about him and his new Covenant coming from Kedar in Arabia, and the NT talks about him coming after the Messiah:

Why wasn't Prophet Muhammad preached by the early Christians in Jerusalem, Arabia, Africa and Europe? Early cities like Antioch, Corinth, Rome and others were never taught the coming of Prophet Muhammad. Doesn't this prove that Islam is false? But he was preached!

Prophet "AHMAD" is found in the Dead Sea Scrolls:

Click on image to play video:

(Clip also in this article)

Prophet Muhammad in the previous Scriptures. Prophet Muhammad was thoroughly foretold in the Bible, and his prophetic Name, "Ahmed", was also found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, and it was mentioned precisely in the Glorious Quran for the Prophet to be foretold by this very Name, Ahmed [1] [2].

Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.


Also, Sam Shamoun declares 2nd and 3rd centuries bibles-writings are forgeries:



If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:



Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Four false promises made by Jesus regarding the Holy Spirit:

Jesus' confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language that falsely turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples of blasphemies and quackery) definitely make him a 100% GOd-sent lying spirit in Matthew 7:22-23.

1- Your sperma (Greek for sperm) will not cause you to sin fornication or adultery or masturbation if you have enough Holy Spirit in you. So why then did you amputate your own testicles and head of penis Jesus? Why did you castrate and emasculate yourself? You had no need for this. Who on this planet could've had more Holy Spirit in him than you? Or were you also drunk when you uttered this lie? The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34).   Jesus was addicted to alcohol. Jesus commanded to amputate your sinful body parts (cut off hand, penis, pluck eyes, etc...). Paul said amputated flesh gets sent to satan. Were you someone's boyfriend Jesus? Or were you someone's girlfriend? Why did you amputate your Holy Divine Genitals (??) and send them to satan?

         And why did you then keep your eyes??

Also Jesus, why are your churches, even from the times of Paul, were and are still are notorious in sexual assaults and rapes?

Paul also commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11–13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages.

Even the 12th disciple was chosen by rolling the dice (casting lots), - a game of chance, - and not by the Holy Spirit. Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. Also, Trinity is a lie from Hell. Why was GOD Almighty charitable (χάριτι) and forgiving to Jesus in Luke 2:52?

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

2- If a snake bites you and runs its poison through your blood, it will not hurt you (Mark 16:17-18). Jesus even promised in the plural that you will be picking up deadly snakes and they will inject their poisons into you and you shall not be harmed!. This false prophesy is one of the NT's biggest lies, because it never happened. Not only that, but all Christians who genuinely attempted it in the past were killed by the snakes' poisons.

Furthermore, the NT's writers lied when they said Paul was bit by a poisonous snake and was not hurt when he was in Malta (Acts 28:7–10). There are many problems with this:

1- Paul is singular. Jesus' bold promise was in the plural. "You shall pick up....". Well, historically all who genuinely picked up died from poison.

2- It's been proven that many non-venomous snakes existed in Malta. Some even look like Vipers. So there is not proof that Paul's snake was a poisonous one:

"Four species of snakes are present (in the wild) in the Maltese Islands of which three are relatively recent additions. The only indigenous snake is the Western Whip Snake Coluber viridiflavus which is a non-poisonous species. The other three, namely Algerian Whipsnake Coluber algirus, Leopard Snake Elaphe situla and Cat Snake Telescopus fallax have been introduced by man. Of these only the latter has some form of poison. Although snakes appear in the archaeological context (eg. the stone slab in Mus of Archaeology of Gozo - from ggantija, which has a snake on its side) this does not imply that they were poisonous. On the other hand, poisonous species such as Natrix natrix which occurs in nearby Sicily may have been eradicated by man through time." (Source)

3- Jesus' promise dismally fails, and it is one of the most embarrassing lies, and most dangerous to its followers, in the New Testament, which again and again proves that Jesus was indeed a GOD-sent lying spirit as GOD Almighty deceived false people in the Old Testament.

3- You can lift mountains and throw them in the sea with only one command only if you had the Holy Spirit in you. Not even Jesus, with all of his glory and sperms, was able to do this miracle.

4- Jesus promised the disciples that after he departs it will not be them speaking. It will be the Holy Spirit will be speaking through their mouths. Yet, after he departed, they split into Peter and Paul opposing teams, and they started hurling insults and accusations towards each others' teachings, and calling each others: Anathema (cursed by GOD in Greek), follower of Satan, your Gospel is of the devil, you are a false apostle, you are dogs, and several other serious accusations and insults.

Where was the promised Holy Spirit in all of this, and all of the above??

Where is Jesus' promise??

- He promised that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, guide them in all ways, and that it will be the Holy Spirit speaking, not them.
- They ended up splitting into Paul vs. Peter two opposing groups, and were at odds with each other on several theological issues.
- 1 Corinthians 7:40 Paul wasn't sure if he had the Holy Spirit in him or not. He said "I think I have the Holy Spirit".
- Their differences remain unsettled till this day in the NT. They were never resolved.

- 12th disciple was also chosen by holy gambling.

- They were barking at each other like rabid dogs calling each other cursed, false, liar, satanic, your gospel is from satan! [1] Their books didn't even exist for the first 200 to 300 years, says most Bibles theologians. They are very highly corrupted. Also, Trinity is a lie from Hell. Why was GOD Almighty charitable (χάριτι) and forgiving to Jesus in Luke 2:52:?

Where was the promised Holy Spirit in their conflicting scriptures?

Remember:

If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:

Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

The one unforgivable sin?!

Jesus further says: The only unforgivable sin is blaspheming the Holy Spirit (Luke 12:10). But your entire package that is called the NT and church is the greatest insult and blasphemy against GOD Almighty's Holy Spirit. It is like a prostitute preaching, and while continuing to prostitute, that the one unforgivable sin is fornication. How many times did you fornicate and continue to fornicate? How many times did you lie on the Holy Spirit and continued to lie on the Holy Spirit of GOD Almighty? Were you also a fat drunk in this one?

Was Jesus drunk?

High Concentrations and Intoxication:

Was Jesus also drunk when he decided to castrate and emasculate himself?

The alcohol-less Baptist is greater than Jesus:

John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol:

winebibber
wine·bib·ber
/ˈwīnˌbibər/

a habitual drinker of alcohol.

Matthew 11:19 (NIV)
19 The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, ‘Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.’ But wisdom is proved right by her deeds.”

Luke 7:34 (NIV)
34 The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.’

"But wisdom is proved right by her deeds"? What but wisdom is there when people see you drunk and stuffing your face and mouth with food like your life depended on it? And what Wisdom is there in drinking and being drunk when Yahweh Almighty Himself, your GOD, despises it? Hypocrisy and being false, and just wanting to be opposite, are now Wisdom?  What horrible health advice and butt-wisdom are you giving when you allow enjoying alcohol consumption?  People witnessed you regularly getting addicted and drunk.  Did not your toilet spirit teach you that alcohol seriously damages the human body?


                                              Of course it never did!   (See Holy Spirit of Islam, and alcohol is forbidden in Islam)

High Concentrations and Intoxication:

Was Jesus also drunk when he decided to castrate and emasculate himself? Yes, according to early Christians' writings, Jesus amputated his testicles and the head of his penis. Was the barfing christ drunk?? It is nearly impossible for addicts to remain sober, and to genuinely think and speak responsibly. All of that holy sh*t and sacred piss revealed from him had high concentrations of alcohol in them. This explains Jesus' ample confusing and oxymoronic riddles in the NT that turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful; polygamy became sinful and many other examples). He was not clear-headed (sober). He was high on ample pooping and peeing himself alcoholic wisdom. Jesus was also verbally abusive. Was he walking down the streets at 2:00 am shouting and screaming insults at everyone while being drunk? And again, was he pooping and peeing himself with some alcohol-heavy holy sh*t and sacred piss?

People also called him out on his lack of hygiene problems. Jesus had disregard for personal hygiene (Matthew 15:1-2, Mark 7:1-5). He emphasized that the outside filth is totally irrelevant. He probably showered a lot less, had a stench for body odor, and was lice infested in his beard and hair, and throughout his clothes and body. See what Islam says about personal hygiene. Being physically smelly and filthy is satanic according to the Glorious Quran. Jesus (the false Jesus of the NT, not the true Isa of Islam) and GOD are Heaven and Hell apart in this. The NT also says GOD considers John the Baptist great because he never drank alcohol.

Yahweh despised Jesus' wisdom:

Jesus: It is wisdom to drink, get drunk and barf for the sake of appeasing hypocrites and infidels. I am powerless and desperate and want to commit this sin. After all, satan also made me covet the sins of the world for 40 days and 40 nights. I was between him and GOD during this period. That was another wisdom.

Yahweh: You would not be a great person, nor pleasing to GOD if you drink alcohol. You drink alcohol you would not be pleasing to GOD, nor would you be considered a great person by GOD.

GOD despised Jesus' hypocritical wisdom that appeased evil and displeased GOD (Luke 1:15).

Luke 1:15
for he (John the Baptist) will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born.

So according to the New Testament itself, we have:

1- John the baptist.
2- Barf the baptist. And I am told to dump Islam and to take this castrated and emasculated brain-stoned addict as my Creator?? The Jesus of Islam is the true Messiah .

Is John the Baptist another member of the barfinity?

Satan was part of the trinity (Ezekiel 28:13-19), then got subtracted (-1):

GOD in the OT spoke a poem of regret [1] regarding Satan. GOD expresses how regretful He is that all of the Glory that He has created for and given to Satan will no longer be given to him. It was now given to a lesser second-hand, Jesus, whom otherwise would've received none of it. Jesus was GOD's plan B not A.

Jesus replaced Satan: (Ezekiel 28:13-19). Notice the language of how Satan was:

1. "You were perfect from the day you were created". Jesus was also created from the Word of GOD.
2. Glorious.
3. "the chosen one".
4. The "Anointed".
5. ruler over earth.
6. Ruler over the "Holy Mount" of GOD.

Question to every polytheist trinitarian pagan:

If Jesus replaced Satan, then:

1- How can Jesus be our Creator?

2- How can Satan be part of a trinity?

3- How can Jesus be given the glory that was created for and given to satan, not Jesus, and Jesus still be considered our Creator?

4- How come Satan was the primary and Jesus was secondary?

Of course, there is no Trinity, and Satan was not subtracted from any Trinity. The above exposes the lie of trinity; a word that does not even exist in any of the Jewish and Christian scriptures (Bibles and outside Bibles). Also, since we have

24 other thrones besides Jesus'

And Melchizedek was Jesus' Elder in Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20. Then, we also clearly have Satan as:

1- One of the elders and had his throne.

2- Satan too was Jesus' elder.

3- When compared to Melchizedek and Satan, Jesus was secondary.

Angels are scared of the mighty Satan:

Jude 1:9 Even Michael, the chief angel, did not dare to insult the devil.

Using the polytheist trinitarian pagans' illogic, satan was indeed a Mighty Member of the Barfinity, but then got subtracted. And since satan was subtracted, then Jesus could've also gotten himself subtracted when satan made Jesus covet the sins of the world for 40 days and 40 nights. Do you see now how blasphemous and stupid Christianity is?

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

2- Just who were the real authors of the Bible?

The sections of this article are:

1- Exposing the Bible's books' and gospels' corruptions.

     - Exposing the New Testament.
     -  Exposing Paul.
     -  Paul calls the Jewish law fables and lies (Titus 1:10-16).
     - Exposing the Old Testament.

- 600+ Commandments from GOD Almighty to Moses and the Israelites.

2- So who wrote the Bible then? Were they really the original Prophets and Disciples?
3- The New Testament was written in the 4th century by Constantine and his council by their own words.

4- The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered" [4].

5- Contradictions in historical claims and accounts.
6- Conclusion.

7- Further Sites to Research.
8- Book Information (Bibliography).

1- Exposing the Bible's books' and gospels' corruptions:

Below, we'll also see that the New Testamanet's gospels and books were written around between 80 to 300 years after the departure of Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

Unknown dates and authors?

Keep in mind also that shortly after Jesus, 10s of false messiahs and prophets emerged. Below, you'll see that the Bible's books and gospels were:

Do contain alterations, fables and man-made injections in them.
Written by mysterious men.
Written by an unknown number of men.
Written in unknown places.
Written in unknown dates.

Paul never even met Jesus Christ in person while the latter was on earth. It is falsely claimed that Jesus appeared to Paul while Paul was on his way to Damascus after the "crucifixion" (Acts 9:2-4. Note: Paul's name used to be Saul. Yet, Paul admittedly wasn't even sure whether the Holy Spirit was inspirning him or not).

None of the disciples, even in the false writings attributed to them, ever claimed that their writings were inspired or Divine. Not only that, but we even ironically see that:

Luke for instance, wrote his "gospel" for the sake of another person and not GOD Almighty. See below for details.

The disciples even fought with each others [1] [2].

We read about direct invitations to dinner and other occasions between the disciples in the "books" [1].

According to the commentaries below, all of the books of the bible were altered and corrupted.

The Bible's own theologians even admit that the bible contains "fictions", its original manuscripts "had been lost", and contains "fairy tails and fables".

Also keep in mind that the Bibles' words are marred with lies:

"How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us'? But, behold, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie. (From the RSV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"

Bible says that Jews from their essence were liars. From their "birth" they were liars writing lies the Old Testament declares them. The Bible is full of man-made corruption and fabrications especially in the Jews' ancient history and stories. Their writings were written with the "lying pens of the scribes".

See also Isaiah 1:9-17: Yahweh called Israel Sodom, because it spreads evil and is unjust

The Bibles also state:

Bibles and Talmud are marred with lies.

Rebecca's goat skin anointing Jacob lie.

David was anointed via deception 1 Samuel 16:1-5.

Also Visit:

What is the definition of Messiah in the Quran?

Deuteronomy 4:2 clearly declares that the Bible is corrupt! Also, which "Book" is the People of the Book?

The best way to convert a non-Muslim to Islam? Covers the Hijacked Bible in great details.

The Romans had to fake his crucifixion due to Passover issues:

Click to play video [1]. Matthew 12:40: "shall be buried deep in the heart of earth for 3 days and nights as Jonah was deep in the belly of the whale." Jesus never got crucified: [1] [2] [3] [4].

Never happened:

1- Jonah was alive on the shore, alive in the whale's belly, and alive when vomited out of the whale. Alive, alive, alive!

2- Jesus laid on the floor in a tomb (a cave-like room) as shown above, got healed, and got up and left. He was never inside any coffin nor ever got buried.

3- The Jewish Passover, where 1/2 million pilgrims were about to arrive, forced the Romans to abruptly end the crucifixion. Jesus only stayed for 3 hours. 100s of thousands of pilgrims were coming to Jerusalem for the Passover, the Romans had to rush his "crucifixion" and bring him down. The soldiers were even denied food due to lack of time.

4- Jesus never got crucified: [1] [2] [3] [4]. The OT and NT clearly spell it out. He was saved.

5- The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34).

The alcohol-less Baptist is greater than Jesus:

John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol:

winebibber
wineÂ·bibÂ·ber
/ˈwīnˌbibər/

a habitual drinker of alcohol.

Matthew 11:19 (NIV)
19 The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, â€˜Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.â€™ But wisdom is proved right by her deeds.â€

Luke 7:34 (NIV)
34 The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, â€˜Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.â€™

"But wisdom is proved right by her deeds"? What but wisdom is there when people see you drunk and stuffing your face and mouth with food like your life depended on it? And what Wisdom is there in drinking and being drunk when Yahweh Almighty Himself, your GOD, despises it? Hypocrisy and being false, and just wanting to be opposite, are now Wisdom?  What horrible health advice and butt-wisdom are you giving when you allow enjoying alcohol consumption?  People witnessed you regularly getting addicted and drunk.  Did not your toilet spirit teach you that alcohol seriously damages the human body?


                                              Of course it never did!   (See Holy Spirit of Islam, and alcohol is forbidden in Islam)

So according to the New Testament itself, we have:

6- Jesus' Hyperboles: Confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language falsely made sinful lawful and lawful sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples.

This statement "shall be buried deep in the heart of earth for 3 days" is a problematic, oxymoronic, self-contradicting, and exaggerated Jesus Hyperbole.

No miracle. A WWII soldier survived 63 hours on the cross by his captors. Jesus only stayed for 3 hours. Also, first 200 years there were no gospels or writings, and they admit that much forgeries were "fairly common".

Keep in mind:

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

Two Jesus:

Matthew 27:16-17: There were two Jesuses! Not one. Allah Almighty also said in the Glorious Quran:

‏[004:156] That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge;
[004:157] That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Apostle of God";-but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) know ledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:-
[004:158] Nay, God raised him up unto Himself; and God is Exalted in Power, Wise;-

Divine Setup for Conjecture:

Matthew 7:22-23:  GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit.

Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name.  Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

"... but so it was made to appear to them..." (Quran 4:157)

The two double-Jesus men & Pontus Pilate in Matthew 27:16-17:

According to the Gospel of Matthew, Pontus Pilate was standing between two double-Jesus men:

1- Jesus Barabbas.
2- Jesus Barabbas.

"...The Bibles' Christ was put on the cross for three hours. Any one of us would've survived this silly crucifixion. Your human body, when faced with death, can become 10+ times stronger, more resilient, more resistant and more stubborn than normal. This is what would enable you, for example, to lift an entire truck with your bare hands if your precious child was under it. Similarly, if you were put on the cross for three silly hours, your body would've survived it. A soldier was placed on the cross for 63 hours and still lived to tell the world about it." (Source)

A Divine Setup for Conjecture. And again, the "buried deep in the heart of earth" Prophecy never happened, Jesus laid on the floor, got healed, and got up and left. He was never inside any coffin nor ever got buried. Also, because 100s of thousands of pilgrims were coming to Jerusalem for the Passover, the Romans had to rush his "crucifixion" and bring him down. The soldiers were even denied food due to lack of time. Jonah was alive. Jonah was always alive in his ordeal. He was alive on the shore, alive in the whale's belly, and alive when vomited out of the whale. Alive, alive, alive! Jesus never got crucified: [1] [2] [3] [4]. The OT and NT clearly spell it out. He was saved.

Was Jesus Christ Crucified?


At hour 1:00:00 - 1:25:00, Dr. Zakir Naik really sealed
this debate and destroyed Christianity!

This is yet another wonderful 3-hour debate and video by
Dr. Zakir Naik where he thoroughly demonstrated from
the Bible's New Testament that Jesus Christ was never
crucified, nor did he ever rise from the dead. This 3-hour
debate was between Dr. Zakir Naik and Pastor Rukni.




Psalm 91 promises Jesus will never get hurt or die. Satan in the NT challenged Jesus on Psalm 91. Yashua (salvation) is the last word in Psalm 91, and it also happens to be one of Jesus' names in the New Testament.

Here is my shortened version video.  Dr. Naik also provided many more verses than the following ones. But the following verses and points were from my shortened version video. See also this text-debate [2] between me and a Christian brother on my blog. You're welcomed to join in.

Christianity's Salvation Lie:

Because Christianity's scriptures didn't get documented for 200+ years after Jesus, the Church and Christians had developed and invented the crucifixion lie and its requirement to save a person from Hell (by him believing in it), which had been thoroughly proven from both the Bible and the Glorious Quran, to be a fabricated lie [1]. Salvation verses like John 3:16 and others are all forgeries that were invented by liars 100s of years after the real Eesa , the real Messiah. Even in Latin, it is Iesu, and in Greek it is Iesus. Notice here Jesus' statements:

Matthew 9
12 Jesus heard them and answered, “Healthy people don’t need a doctor, but sick people do.
13 Go and learn what the Scriptures mean when they say, ‘Instead of offering sacrifices to me, I want you to be merciful to others (See also Isaiah 1:9-17: Yahweh called Israel Sodom, because it spreads evil and is unjust).’ I didn’t come to invite good people to be my followers. I only came to invite sinners.”

Matthew 5:7 Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.

Being Merciful to others makes you a good person. And Jesus didn't come for you if you are. Jesus didn't come to invite merciful and good people. They're already saved. They need no invitation. The Christian lie about one must accept that Jesus died on the cross for his/her sins is mandatory for their salvation, and that otherwise they'd be doomed to Hell is thoroughly destroyed in Matthew 9:12-13. In fact, both the OT and NT in many passages confirmed that GOD Almighty will save his Messiah from crucifixion and from death and harm.

Matthew 9:12-13 I have not come for you if you're a merciful Jew.

7. The New Testament further says that as Jesus grew up, he learned more and more about GOD: (Luke 2:52)

8. How is Jesus our Creator? Also visit:

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

Yes, the Jews did call Ezra a special Son of GOD with special Divine Connections.

Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.

The Gospel of John:

Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:

"Many scholars of the past two centuries have denied that John wrote this book, partly because of their belief that the author fabricated many details such as the miracles and the discourses of Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). (The Holman Illustrated Study Bible, ISBN: 978-1-58640-275-4, Gospel of John, Page1540)"

"Critical Analysis makes it difficult to accept the idea that the gospel as it now stands was written by one person. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"

"Within the gospel itself there are also some inconsistencies. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"

"To solve these problems, scholars have proposed various rearrangements that would produce a smoother order. However, most have come to the conclusion that the inconsistencies were probably produced by subsequent editing in which homogeneous materials were added to a shorter original. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"

"Other difficulties for any theory of eyewitness authorship of the gospel in its present form are presented by its highly developed theology and by certain elements of its literary style. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"

"The gospel contains many details about Jesus not found in the synoptic gospels. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"

"The final editing of the gospel and arrangement in its present form probably dates from between A.D. 90 and 100. Traditionally, Ephesus has been favored as the place of composition, though many support a location in Syria, perhaps the city of Antioch, while some have suggested other places, including Alexandria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"

1 John and Galatians forgeries:

From www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm:

3- Furthermore, we find even more alarming troubles with the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe that the writer of the gospel of John is the same one as the one who wrote 1 John, then it is important to point out the following absurdity in the authenticity of this gospel from its last and concluding chapter:

John 21:24-25
24 This is the disciple who testifies to these things and who wrote them down. We know that his testimony is true.
25 Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written.

"We know that his testimony is true"?!

Wasn't the disciple John the one who supposedly wrote the gospel of John? How can he say about himself that "we know that his (the author) testimony is true"?! Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book was written by an unknown person?

Below in this article, we see:

The Gospel of 1 John:

Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:

"....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)"

"The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"

1 John forgeries:

1 John forgeries by church fathers:

The lie of 1 John 5:7. This verse was later discovered to be a church forgery. The Roman Catholic Theologians don't believe in it, and it doesn't exist in their Bibles.

The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.

From www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=3480.msg16733#msg16733:

By Mustafa Ahmad

It's amazing how the two verses commonly used by Christians against Muslims fail!

But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed. (Galatians 1:8)

Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son. (1 John 2:22)

Here's the sucker punch!

1) Not to accept any other gospel even if an angel from heaven. This writing is not from the time of Paul. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 3rd century P46 . We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd century. there is no direct evidence that Paul wrote it.

2) Anyone who rejects Jesus as Christ and the son is the antichrist. This writing is not from the time of John. The earliest manuscript dates back to the 4th century GA 01, א - Codex Sinaiticus. We have nothing from the 1st, 2nd or 3rd century. there is no direct evidence that John wrote it.

How embarrassing both verses used against Muslims don’t even go back to the "alleged authors".

www.facebook.com/lyrical.mustafa/posts/10159959208932222

So again, no one knows regarding the "Gospel of John":

Who wrote it.
How many people wrote it.
When it was written.
Where it was written.

Also, when one reads this gospel, he would immediately notice that it was not written by John himself. Christians say that it was John the Apostle writting about John the Baptist. The evidence in the quotes above clearly proves that this is a desperate lie! I submit to you that neither John wrote anything! Let us look at the following verses from the gospel:

"And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:19)"

"John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:26)"

"For John was not yet cast into prison. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:24)"

etc...

Whoever wrote the gospel, was he appointed or inspired by GOD Almighty? If yes, then who is that man? It can't be John for it is quite obvious from the above verses and many more throughout the gospel that John wasn't the original author. One has to be ridiculously biased and blind in faith to deny that.

So now, what about these most popular verses:

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was ~~was God~~ was with authority (the same Greek word used for satan's rule [2] [3]). (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:1)"

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:16)"

These verses were obviously written by mysterious men and not by any of Jesus' original disciples. Therefore, it is blasphemy to consider such verses as Divine and to try to prove Jesus is the Creator of the Universe through them. The lie of trinity was born between the years of 150 to 300. It is quite possible and highly probable that some church wrote the so-called "Gospel of John" from excerpts that they found. Notice that there are 24,000 "letters" or papers found that were not included in today's New Testament, which means that the excerpts that were used for writing the "Gospel of John" and all of the other books and gospels of the NT are highly doubtful and contain no proof what so ever that they were written by any of Jesus' original disciples. The Gospel of John was written about John but not by the original "Saint John". Big difference and big corruption! You can't consider such rubbish as GOD Almighty's Divine Holy Words.

Again, please visit: The Gospel of John, Gospel or gossip? to see proof about early Christians rejecting the so-called Gospel of John. They believed it was all man-made.

Was Jesus crucified on a tree (according to Peter), cross (according to others), or never got crucified (according to Islam)?

None of Jesus' disciples witnessed the crucifixion. They "all fled" and "deserted" Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). This further confirms Islam's claims.

Hebrews 5:7-8 confirm Islam's claim about Jesus never got crucified and contradicts the Bible! According to the documentary film, "Banned from the Bible", which I watched on the History Channel, some of Saint Peter's apocalypse were banned from the current Bible, and these Epistles contain what Islam claims - that Jesus didn't get crucified on the cross and it only appeared that he was. This banned part also says that Jesus was standing next to the cross laughing. These are the parts of the Bible that only few people in the world know about.

According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.

Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing his face down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.

From https://www.answering-christianity.com/jesus_problematic_hyperboles.htm:

..........

Infestation:

Again, the New Testament's confusing, incoherent and oxymoronic statements had caused for sinful things to become lawful and for lawful things to become sinful. This in itself is a blasphemy against GOD Almighty. The New Testament gives warnings about the infestation of existing false prophets and messiahs [1] at the time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus). The analysis below clearly show that the false "Jesus" of the full-of-fabrications, the corrupt Bible, is not what Isa (eesa), the true Messiah and the son of our virgin mother Mary, is. Peace and blessings be upon Isa and his mother. We believe in the virgin birth of the Messiah, and we believe he will return to fight the armies of satan. Both the Bible and Islam agree that he will return as an Arab [2] from Damascus, Syria.

Baptist called Jesus a liar!

The infestation gets even more ridiculous when we read from the NT that John the Baptist, the supposed great Prophet, called Jesus a liar before he died:

www.answering-christianity.com/trinity_crucified.htm#calls_jesus_liar

www.answering-christianity.com/trinity_crucified.htm

www.answering-christianity.com/jesus_problematic_hyperboles.htm

Yes, John the Baptist died disbelieving in Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

The Gospel of Matthew:

"The unknown author, whom we shall continue to call Matthew for the sake of convenience, drew no only up the Gospel according to Mark but upon a large body of material (principally, sayings of Jesus) not found in Mk that corresponds, sometimes exactly, to material found also in the Gospel according to Luke. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1008)"

"As for the place where the gospel was composed, a plausible suggestion is that it was Antioch, the capital of the Roman province of Syria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1009)"

So we clearly see, both the author or authors and the place of composition of the "Gospel of Matthew" are unknown.

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

Jesus Castrated Himself:

Jesus amputated his own (satanic?) testicles and penis' head. He said it was to remain sanctified and holy (??) for the Kingdom of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). How is running away is actually defeating to satan's temptations? Jesus also kissed Mary Magdalene on the mouth. GOD Almighty was also "charitable" (Luke 2:52) with Jesus and forgave him.

Oxymoron: Paul said maimed flesh gets sent to satan. Jesus said maim your sinful body parts. Jesus maims his testicles and the head of his penis, but also never his (satanic?) eyes. See also Oxymoron Trinity (100+ verses). All Bibles call Jesus slave of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

Jesus' Hyperboles: Confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language falsely made sinful lawful and lawful sinful (ex: pork [1] became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples of blasphemies and quackery)

Quran: All Bibles are mostly of corrupt [1] (Quran 10:94 and 10s others discussed). See also the 39+ members of trinity. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:

Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.

Yet, Paul admits that he speaks through a lying spirit (Romans 3:7 But if through my lie God's truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?), while Jesus promised all of the disciples that the Holy Spirit will take over the disciples' mouths, and that it will not be them speaking, but the Holy Spirit. Yet, Paul says he was lying. 12th disciple was also chosen by holy gambling.

Only Islam completes GOD Almighty's Religion. See ample prophecies. Paul and his team of disciples were also calling Peter's team, - and vice versa, - anathema ἀνάθεμα (cursed by GOD), false, bewitched, dogs, and many other things. Jesus' original message got corrupt from the false christianity and the deification of flesh and blood creations like Jesus, Mary and others like they used to do in ancient Europe in Greece, Rome, Byzantine and throughout ancient ancient Europe of three-headed gods and trinities, such as the trinity of Zeus, Athena and Apollo; also Hell's three-headed guardian dog, or the trinity of Delian, Artemis and Apollo and many other ancient trinities:

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Paul also admits that he speaks through a lying spirit:

Romans 3:7
7 But if through my lie God's truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?

NASB © Greek Strong's

But if εἰ (ei) 1487: sometimes used with a command or as an indirect question, etc.)

through ἐν (en) 1722: in, on, at, by, with

my lie ψεύσματι
(pseusmati) 5582: a lie, falsehood

See full verse and table here [2]. Yet, Jesus promised them that it will NOT be them speaking but the Holy Spirit speaking through their mouths??!! How is this not an oxymoron? The twelfth (12th) disciple, Matthias, was also chosen by rolling the dice (casting lots); via a game of chance. Where again was the Holy Spirit in all of this?

Christianity permits lying while preaching. This clip shows a pastor lying while clearly knowing he was lying. Play clip here.

Robbing, hustling and stealing permitted:

Christianity permits stealing and robbing. Robbing includes physical assault on someone. To steal something you stealthily snatch it and run away. To rob someone, you either steal from them or forcefully take it from them via assault and force.

2 Corinthians 11:8 I robbed other assemblies (often translated as churches, but the Greek ἐκκλησίας (ekklēsias) means summoned people; a group of people; assemblies, which includes non-Christians) by aggressively taking λαβὼν ("to lay hold by aggressively"; hustling; STEALING by force; robbing) their wages/salaries/money to serve you.

https://biblehub.com/greek/2564.htm
https://biblehub.com/greek/1537.htm
https://biblehub.com/greek/2983.htm
https://biblehub.com/lexicon/2_corinthians/11-8.htm

Christians even have this saying:

"To rob Peter to pay Paul"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_rob_Peter_to_pay_Paul

The Glorious Quran's Scientific Miracle on Lying:

The Noble Quran on the Cerebrum: Lying is generated from the person's forehead.

What does the Glorious Quran say about lying and about taking credit and recognition for what you do not deserve?

The region in the brain that controls our movements - In Noble Quran and confirmed by Science.

www.answering-christianity.com/detailed_meanings_of_scientific_words_in_verses.htm#embryology

www.answering-christianity.com/ac20.htm#embryology

Quran Moral Code (100s of them)

Quran: All Bibles are mostly corrupt [1] قول (Quran 10:94 and 10s others discussed). See also the 39+ members of trinity. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

Paul also ordered killing and maiming of flesh.

Remember:

If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:

Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.

Paul and his team of disciples were also calling Peter's team, - and vice versa, - anathema ἀνάθεμα (cursed by GOD), false, bewitched, dogs, and many other things. Jesus' original message got corrupt from the false christianity and the deification of flesh and blood creations like Jesus, Mary and others like they used to do in ancient Europe in Greece, Rome, Byzantine and throughout ancient ancient Europe of three-headed gods and trinities, such as the trinity of Zeus, Athena and Apollo; also Hell's three-headed guardian dog, or the trinity of Delian, Artemis and Apollo and many other ancient trinities. Only Islam completes GOD Almighty's Religion. See ample prophecies. Bibles' manuscripts prove that Jesus was only sent for a limited Generation, as he himself stated, and his final return from the east (Matthew 24:25-27) is a new Covenant from Arabia and Islam; also false christs and prophets during and after Jesus [1] [2] at the time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus).

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Paul calls the Jewish law fables and lies (Titus 1:10-16).

The Gospel of Mark:

This gospel is the oldest and is supposedly the most original one in the New Testament.

"Although the book is anonymous, apart from the ancient heading "According to Mark" in manuscripts, it has traditionally been assigned to John Mark, in whose mother's house (at Jerusalem) Christians assembled. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"

"Although there is no direct internal evidence of authorship, it was the unanimous testimony of the early church that this Gospel was written by John Mark. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1488)"

We certainly do not know whether Mark was the author or not! The quote clearly states "no direct internal evidence of authorship". Also, the so-called unanimous testimony of the early church:

- Does not prove that the author was Mark.

- Nor does it prove that other people did not alter and modify the book, especially when the book was written at least 40-50 years after Christ. We don't even know if Mark even wrote the book.

"Traditionally, the gospel is said to have been written shortly before A.D. 70 in Rome, at a time of impending persecution and when destruction loomed over Jerusalem. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"

"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"

"This verse, which reads, "But if you do not forgive, neither will your heavenly Father forgive your transgressions," is omitted in the best manuscripts. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1081)"

"This passage, termed the Longer Ending to the Marcan gospel by comparison with a much briefer conclusion found in some less important manuscripts, has traditionally been accepted as a canonical part of the gospel and was defined as such by the Council of Trent. Early citations of it by the Fathers indicate that it was composed by the second century, although vocabulary and style indicate that it was written by someone other than Mark. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1088)"

So, in reality, we don't really know whether Mark was the sole author of this Gospel or not, nor do we know when and where the "gospel" was even written. And since The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus, then how are we to know for sure that the current "Gospel of Mark" wasn't written by some pro of Mark?

A new captured image of this book's corruption:

mark16_corruption.jpg (54552 bytes)

(http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark 16:9-20;&version=31;)

The above text reads: "The most reliable early manuscript and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20."

Now my concern to this corruption and 'answer-the-problem-away' statement is that what are those so-called "reliable early manuscript(s)" and who are the "ancient witnesses"?

According to the early Christians' manuscripts, Jesus never got crucified, and trinity is a lie. The so-called "gospel of Mark", along with all of the "gospels" of the NT, were written by third-party narration, as clearly demonstrated and shown in the sections below. People wrote on the tongue of Jesus' Disciples those books. They are neither original nor are the Pure Word of GOD Almighty.

If the "gospel of Mark" was indeed Divine and from GOD Almighty, then we wouldn't have this corruption, that they're admitting above, in it.

I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!

Further regarding this Gospel, we read the following commentary about Mark 16:9-20:

"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"

This quote raises a very serious issue here. First of all, as we've seen above in the first quote, we have no evidence that proves that John Mark was the sole author of this so called "Gospel". Second of all, we see that this Gospel has some serious problems/suspicions in it. The issue of Mark 16:9-20 is a scary one, because many Christian cults today use poisonous snakes in their worship and end up dying.

Removing Mark 16:9-20 is quite appreciated by me personally (to be quite honest with you), because it prevents people from dying from snake bites. But however, the serious issue of man's corruption of the Bible remains.

We can be absolutely certain now that the above quotes prove without a doubt that the Bible is doubtful. The quote "or its original ending has been lost" proves that what we call today "Gospels" were not written by their original authors such as Mark, John, Matthew, etc... It proves that the Gospel had been tampered with by man. Let alone considering it as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.

If John Mark wasn't the one who wrote Mark 16:9-20, then who did? And how can you prove the ownership of the other person? Let alone proving that it was GOD Almighty's Revelation. And as we saw in the first quote above, we don't even know that John Mark was indeed the one who wrote the so called "Gospel of Mark".

To say the least in our case here, we now have enough evidence to discard the entire Gospel of Mark from the Bible, because you can't take bits and pieces of it and say some of it belongs to him and some of it doesn't! Let alone considering the entire corrupted Gospel as the True Living Word of GOD Almighty, which is a complete blasphemy.

Please visit A dangerous forgery was inserted at the end of the so-called "Gospel of Mark".

Here is an email that I received from a Christian regarding Mark 16:17-18. Emphasis below are mine:

From: R.Mercer
To: Osama Abdallah
Subject: I Totally Agree
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:41:57 -0700

"What credibility does Christianity have when it scriptures are littered
with such dangerous and obvious forgeries?"

You summed it up very well on your web page. That is my question
entirely. Just what are we to believe? If forgeries have been proven to
exist in the Bible, then how many more must there be? What about the
chapters and verses we all guide our whole life/styles by? Are they
forgeries, too?

This verse in Mark 16:17-18, has always bothered me. I have, and
still do believe the rest of that passage (laying on of hands, healing
the sick,...), so how can that part of the passage be true when the
serpent part is forged?

I know the part on drinking any poison says "IF", but the part on
taking up serpents says "SHALL", which has always been a problem for me
to believe. Imagine us all being forced to take up serpents in order to
serve God.

On the other hand, if this was forged, then that creates an even
bigger concern for me. Not knowing what text in our Bible is authentic
and what is not.

Thanks for letting me take up so much of your time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus). Like I said
before, this passage always bothered me, probably more so than any other.

Thanks, once again. Good Day.

Four false promises made by Jesus regarding the Holy Spirit:

Jesus' confusing hyperboles and riddles, incoherent and oxymoronic language that falsely turned sinful into lawful and lawful into sinful (ex: pork became lawful, polygamy became sinful and many other examples of blasphemies and quackery) definitely make him a 100% GOd-sent lying spirit in Matthew 7:22-23.

1- Your sperma (Greek for sperm) will not cause you to sin fornication or adultery or masturbation if you have enough Holy Spirit in you. So why then did you amputate your own testicles and head of penis Jesus? Why did you castrate and emasculate yourself? You had no need for this. Who on this planet could've had more Holy Spirit in him than you? Or were you also drunk when you uttered this lie? The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34).   Jesus was addicted to alcohol. Jesus commanded to amputate your sinful body parts (cut off hand, penis, pluck eyes, etc...). Paul said amputated flesh gets sent to satan. Were you someone's boyfriend Jesus? Or were you someone's girlfriend? Why did you amputate your Holy Divine Genitals (??) and send them to satan?

         And why did you then keep your eyes??

Also Jesus, why are your churches, even from the times of Paul, were and are still are notorious in sexual assaults and rapes?

Paul also commanded women to not expose sex predators in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11–13, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-4, 1 Corinthians 2:15 and other passages.

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

Furthermore, the NT's writers lied when they said Paul was bit by a poisonous snake and was not hurt when he was in Malta (Acts 28:7–10). There are many problems with this:

1- Paul is singular. Jesus' bold promise was in the plural. "You shall pick up....". Well, historically all who genuinely picked up died from poison.

2- It's been proven that many non-venomous snakes existed in Malta. Some even look like Vipers. So there is not proof that Paul's snake was a poisonous one:

3- You can lift mountains and throw them in the sea with only one command only if you had the Holy Spirit in you. Not even Jesus, with all of his glory and sperms, was able to do this miracle.

Where was the promised Holy Spirit in all of this, and all of the above??

Where is Jesus' promise??

Where was the promised Holy Spirit in their conflicting scriptures?

Remember:

If Paul is false, then Jesus is insufficient:

Sam Shamoun thoroughly demolishes trinity and the early bibles' writings. See also: 24 other thrones besides Jesus'. Virgin Mary is being group-incest-raped by some trinity members.

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

The one unforgivable sin?!

Was Jesus drunk?

High Concentrations and Intoxication:

Was Jesus also drunk when he decided to castrate and emasculate himself?

The alcohol-less Baptist is greater than Jesus:

John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, was greater than Jesus. The NT calls Jesus a fat drunk "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34). Jesus was addicted to alcohol:

winebibber
wine·bib·ber
/ˈwīnˌbibər/

So according to the New Testament itself, we have:

Satan was part of the trinity (Ezekiel 28:13-19), then got subtracted (-1):

Jesus replaced Satan: (Ezekiel 28:13-19). Notice the language of how Satan was:

Question to every polytheist trinitarian pagan:

If Jesus replaced Satan, then:

1- How can Jesus be our Creator?

2- How can Satan be part of a trinity?

3- How can Jesus be given the glory that was created for and given to satan, not Jesus, and Jesus still be considered our Creator?

4- How come Satan was the primary and Jesus was secondary?

24 other thrones besides Jesus'

And Melchizedek was Jesus' Elder in Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20. Then, we also clearly have Satan as:

1- One of the elders and had his throne.

2- Satan too was Jesus' elder.

3- When compared to Melchizedek and Satan, Jesus was secondary.

Angels are scared of the mighty Satan:

Jude 1:9 Even Michael, the chief angel, did not dare to insult the devil.

Matthew 7:22-23: GOD sent Jesus to be Christianity's lying spirit

Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Jesus called every believer a Muslim in Luke 6:40.

The Book of 1 and 2 Peter:

"Some modern scholars on the basis of a number of features that they consider incompatible with Petrine authenticity, regard the letter as the work of a later Christian writer. Such features include the cultivated Greek in which it is written, difficult to attribute to a Galilean fisherman, together with its use of the Greek Septuagint translation when citing the Old Testament; the similarity in both thought and expression to the Pauline literature; and the allusions to widespread persecution of Christians, which did not occur until at least the reign of Domitian (A.D. 81-96). In this view the letter would date from the end of the first century or even the beginning of the second, when there is evidence for persecution of Christians in Asia Minor. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1348)"

"Nevertheless, acceptance of 2 Peter into the New Testament canon met with great resistance in the early church. The oldest certain reference to it comes from Origen in the early third century. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1354)"

"Among modern scholars there is wide agreement that 2 Peter is a pseudonymous work, i.e., one written by a later author who attributed it to Peter. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1354)"

So like the rest of the books and gospels of the Bible, we don't even know regarding 1 Peter:

Who wrote it.
How many people wrote it.
When it was written.
Where it was written.

The Book of Acts:

"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1643)"

So based on some conclusion, you're willing to die for defending the idea that the Book of Acts was the True Word of GOD Almighty? If the book was inspired by GOD Almighty, then how come it wasn't mentioned in the book itself to help us filter it out from the many other "Satanic false books"? Are we sure that this book too is not a man-made Satanic book?

After all, its just a conclusion, isn't it?

Beside, what evidence are they talking about?! The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 80-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we would know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone considering it as the True Living Word of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

Please visit:

Was Jesus crucified on a tree (according to Peter), cross (according to others), or never got crucified (according to Islam)?

Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing his face down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.

The Gospel of Luke:

"The identification of Luke as the author is primarily based on the "we" passages in Acts (beginning in Acts 16:10), which indicate that Luke was associated with Paul in his ministry and wrote down the account of his activities. (The Amplified Bible, Page 1153)"

The only proof that they have about Luke being the sole author of this gospel is a weak speculation on "we". This is absurd at best! This speculation shows:

The gospel was likely to have been altered or written by others beside Luke.
It's place of documentation is unknown.
It's date of documentation is also unknown.

It is also worth mentioning that the author of the book of Acts is also unknown as shown above:

"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1643)"

So their whole speculation is absurd at best!

There is a serious forgery about Jesus' "resurrection on the third day" claiming that it was foretold in the OT when it wasn't! Let us look at Luke 24:44-48 from the NIV Bible:

Luke 24

44 He said to them, "This is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms."
45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.
46 He told them, "This is what is written: The Christ will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day,
47 and repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
48 You are witnesses of these things.

Luke 24:44-48 says that it is written in the Law of Moses (i.e., the Torah) that Jesus will die and resurrect on the third day. Where in the entire Old Testament (not just in the 5 books of Moses that make up the Law of Moses or the Torah) do you have that?! Show me one Old Testament verse that prophesized about Jesus' third day resurrection?

Please visit: A serious forgery in Luke 24:44-48 about Jesus' "resurrection on the third day" claiming that it was foretold in the OT when it wasn't!

In fact, in my article Answering Isaiah 53, I clearly proved that the Old Testament actually confirms the Noble Quran's claims about Jesus never got crucified! Let alone dying and resurrecting on the third day!

Anyway, Let us see what the NIV Bible's theologians said about this book:

"The author's name does not appear in the book, but much unmistakable evidence points to Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1529)"

Again, we don't know for sure whether it was Luke or not who wrote the "Gospel of Luke" since his name doesn't appear in the Book. The Gospel itself seems to be a compromising one to the Word of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Let us look at the following:

"Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, (Luke 1:3)"

Few problems with this Gospel from the quote above:

1- The author was not inspired, and knew for sure that he was not inspired by GOD Almighty to write the Book since he didn't mention about any divine inspiration, and he said "...since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning..." Where do we see GOD's inspiration in this?

2- The author wrote it for the purpose of "his most excellent Theophilus." Since when we compromise GOD Almighty and document His Holy Words for the purpose of other higher (in rank) human beings?

I say it again, I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!

Also, beside, what evidence are they talking about?! The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we would know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone considering as the True Living Word of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

Further from brother Vipor Poison; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him:

Luke 1:3

Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus,

The following is from the Catholic Encyclopedia:

http://newadvent.org/cathen/14625b.htm

http://newadvent.org/cathen/14625a.htm

If Theophilus existed in either the 2nd or the 4th centuries then how could the writer of this gospel be the same Luke who is supposed to be with Jesus in the 1st century.

Maybe he lived to about 200 years.. :)

From brother Amir AbdulRahim; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him:

The subject of Mankind's Corruption of the Bible has interested me greatly, and I have taken a closer look at this subject. Its seems it's not only your site that brings this subject up, but a couple of Christian sites too.

For example, an article in the Catholic Encyclopaedia that you mentioned in regard to the 'Theophilus' mentioned in Luke's Gospel (from your Just Who Are The Real Authors Of The Bible? article) testifies to this fact (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14530a.htm):

"IV. TRANSMISSION OF THE TEXT

No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author-- all have been in some way altered. The material conditions under which a book was spread before the invention of printing (1440), the little care of the copyists, correctors, and glossators for the text, so different from the desire of accuracy exhibited to-day, explain sufficiently the divergences we find between various manuscripts of the same work. To these causes may be added, in regard to the Scriptures, exegetical difficulties and dogmatical controversies. To exempt the sacred writings from ordinary conditions a very special providence would have been necessary, and it has not been the will of God to exercise this providence."

Lets just go through that again - "No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author--all have been in some way altered." All have been in some way altered! In view of this blatant admission, how can anyone expect me, or any muslim, to follow an impure book?

When you compare this to the great lengths taken to preserve the original Qur'an, there's no contest!

The Book of Hebrews:

"The writer of this letter does not identify himself, but he was obviously well known to the original recipients. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1856)"

So because the guy was supposedly "well known (which we don't really know that for sure anyway)", then would that give us the right to consider his words as the Words of GOD Almighty?! I am sorry, but I don't really see the logic behind this! The Book of Hebrews is one of the highly used Books among Christians. I hear references from it a lot when listening to Christians preaching. Yet, no one really knows who wrote it!. This is quite ironic, because Christians use such highly doubtful books in their teachings as if they were the True Living Words of GOD Almighty. I don't care what you call this, but I call it blasphemy, because it is the most ridiculous insult to GOD Almighty and His Holy Words that I have ever seen.

I just hope you see the real cheap quality in the religion of Christianity, with all my respect due to every Christian reader.

Please visit:

Was Jesus crucified on a tree (according to Peter), cross (according to others), or never got crucified (according to Islam)?

Jesus is a hypocrite for bowing his face down to GOD only during his desperate times. See another proof in the Bible that Jesus can not be the Creator of the Universe.

The Gospel of 1 John:

Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:

"....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)"

"The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"

1 John and Galatians forgeries:

From www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm:

"We know that his testimony is true"?!

Below in this article, we see:

The Gospel of 1 John:

Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:

"....Unlike most NT letters, 1 John does not tell us who its author is. The earliest identification of him comes from the church fathers...(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1904)"

"The letter is difficult to date with precision....(From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1905)"

1 John forgeries:

1 John forgeries by church fathers:

The lie of 1 John 5:7. This verse was later discovered to be a church forgery. The Roman Catholic Theologians don't believe in it, and it doesn't exist in their Bibles.

The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.

From www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php?topic=3480.msg16733#msg16733:

By Mustafa Ahmad

It's amazing how the two verses commonly used by Christians against Muslims fail!

But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed. (Galatians 1:8)

Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son. (1 John 2:22)

Here's the sucker punch!

How embarrassing both verses used against Muslims don’t even go back to the "alleged authors".

www.facebook.com/lyrical.mustafa/posts/10159959208932222

1 John forgeries:

1 John forgeries by church fathers:

The lie of 1 John 5:7. This verse was later discovered to be a church forgery. The Roman Catholic Theologians don't believe in it, and it doesn't exist in their Bibles.

The same case where no author is really known exists in the Gospels of 2 and 3 John.

From www.answering-christianity.com/walid_shoebat_islam_satan_rebuttal.htm:

New Addition:

From https://www.answering-christianity.com/blog/index.php/topic,1346.msg5127.html#msg5127:

Quote from: mclinkin94 on Today at 12:44:30 pm

Quote from: Isa27James on Today at 05:45:49 am

ASSALAM ALYKAM

when ever i am in a debate christians always quote me this

1 John 2:18-27
English Standard Version (ESV)
Warning Concerning Antichrists

18 Children, it is the last hour, and as you have heard that antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come. Therefore we know that it is the last hour. 19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us. 20 But you have been anointed by the Holy One, and you all have knowledge.[a] 21 I write to you, not because you do not know the truth, but because you know it, and because no lie is of the truth. 22 Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son. 23 No one who denies the Son has the Father. Whoever confesses the Son has the Father also. 24 Let what you heard from the beginning abide in you. If what you heard from the beginning abides in you, then you too will abide in the Son and in the Father. 25 And this is the promise that he made to us

Does Muhammad (pbuh) deny Jesus being the messiah?

Does the prophet Muhammad deny the existence of God and God's servant Jesus?

As'salamu Alaikum dear brothers,

Notice here how Messiah was defined by the author of the 1 John book to be "Father and Son". Islam does not deny that Jesus is the Christ, nor does the Holy Quran deny that the Jews and Christians were called sons of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). The problem is that, like every exaggerated religion out there, the "Son of GOD" title became ridiculous over-blown. This is one of the many things that Islam came to straighten out from the corruption of the Jews and Christians.

Son of GOD in the Bible means Servant of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). This is a fact that no Jew or Christian could deny. And the Servant is not just any servant. He is a servant "raised to Honor" as the Holy Quran puts it. That's what son of GOD means. Taking it beyond this is bordering polytheism and blasphemy. Please visit:

https://www.answering-christianity.com/1john2_22.htm

Similarly, in Judaism, Idolatry is considered Spiritual Adultery against GOD Almighty. Now I want you to think about this for a second. Are we married to Allah Almighty? Absolutely not. Yet, it is considered spiritual adultery? Similarly, if you take this beyond metaphor, and start speaking nonsense about you are married with GOD Almighty, then you would be bordering blasphemy.

The liar in the 1 John verses, and I am not saying that they are divine or original or authentic in anyway, is one who denies Jesus is the Messiah. We do not deny that Jesus is the Messiah. Therefore, this title would not apply to us. But the title is messed up anyway. How could you be a liar even if you don't believe Jesus was the Messiah?? Again, another metaphor that doesn't mean anything actual. What is it that you're lying about?? It's like one saying if you're not hindu, then you're a thief! What kind of a stupid statement is that??

Again, Islam came to fix this stupidity and put an end to it. The blasphemies and stupidity stop with Islam! That's the bottom line, my beloveds.

And last and not least, please visit: https://www.answering-christianity.com/authors_gospels.htm. In this article, you'll see that the books of John:

1- Were written by unknown people.
2- Do contain alterations and man-made injections in them.
3- Were written by an unknown number of men.
4- Were written in unknown places.
5- Were written in unknown dates.

Here is an example:

We find even more alarming troubles with the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe that the writer of the gospel of John is the same one as the one who wrote 1 John, then it is important to point out the following absurdity in the authenticity of this gospel from its last and concluding chapter:

John 21:24-25
24 This is the disciple (WHICH DISCIPLE?? WHAT IS HIS NAME??) who testifies to these things and who wrote them down. We know that his testimony is true (HOW DO YOU KNOW?? DID YOU EVEN MEET HIM IN PERSON??)
25 Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written.

Many have doubted that John even wrote the entire book:

"Many scholars of the past two centuries have denied that John wrote this book, partly because of their belief that the author fabricated many details such as the miracles and the discourses of Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). (The Holman Illustrated Study Bible, ISBN: 978-1-58640-275-4, Gospel of John, Page1540)"

For ample more quotes from several other Bible commentaries, again, please visit: https://www.answering-christianity.com/authors_gospels.htm.

Now here is some analysis:

"We know that his testimony is true"?!

Wasn't the disciple John the one who supposedly wrote the gospel of John? How can he say about himself that "we know that his (the author) testimony is true"?! Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book was written by an unknown person?

I hope this helps, insha'Allah.


Osama Abdallah's Post:

And by the way, I know that what I just wrote was actually all written by mclinkin94, because somebody had just told me so! I know it. Don't question it! I was just told that the post wasn't written by me! Even if it has my name on it, and was written using my account. It doesn't matter. mclinkin94 wrote it. I was just told that.  I don't remember if whether I actually wrote it or not. But I know whoever wrote it, his testimony is true. Somebody told me so.

Now of course, brother mclinkin94 didn't write my post. But the point I am making here is that with this statement uttered by Osama Abdallah, do you see just how stupid and incompetent, and even a liar (if not mentally retarded), Osama Abdallah is?? This is all hypothetical of course :).

This kind of lies and retardedness and stupidity exist by the bulk in the Bible!

Everyone is supposedly inspired by GOD Almighty in the Bible, and all of their words are Divine Revelations. Yet, we find fights among the disciples, where Peter and other disciples were called "clearly in the wrong", and Paul was called a "false apostle" by several of the disciples and believers (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). I've went through this in my debate at: http://www.answering-christianity.com/is_the_bible_the_true_word_of_god_june_16_2013.mp4.

Take care,
Osama Abdallah

Walid Shoebat said that Muslims deny the Father and Son, and the Bible in 1 John 2:22 states clearly that who ever denies that Jesus is the Christ is the liar:

1 John 2:18-27
18 Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour.
19 They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us.
20 But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and all of you know the truth.[e]
21 I do not write to you because you do not know the truth, but because you do know it and because no lie comes from the truth.
22 Who is the liar? It is whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a person is the antichrist—denying the Father and the Son.
23 No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also.
24 As for you, see that what you have heard from the beginning remains in you. If it does, you also will remain in the Son and in the Father.
25 And this is what he promised us—eternal life.
26 I am writing these things to you about those who are trying to lead you astray.
27 As for you, the anointing you received from him remains in you, and you do not need anyone to teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about all things and as that anointing is real, not counterfeit—just as it has taught you, remain in him.
......

2- The author himself (of 1 John) makes it clear that he's writing from his own head without Divine inspirations. Notice his wrong prediction about his followers living in the "last hour" and that the reason it is the last hour was because they've had an epidemic of anti-Christs coming and going during their time (see also Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus).

"This is how we know it is the last hour. (1 John 2:18)" This statement clearly proves that the writer of 1 John was stating a conclusion, and not a Divine inspiration from GOD Almighty. Anyone can come up with wishful thinkings and conclusions. This doesn't mean that they are directed and inspired from GOD Almighty.

The Book of Revelation:

"The author of the book calls himself John, who because of his Christian faith has been exiled to the rocky island of Patmos, a Roman penal colony. Although he never claims to be John the apostle, he was so identified by several of the early church Fathers, including Justin, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Terullian, Cyprian, and Hippolytus. This identification, however, was denied by other Fathers, including Denis of Alexandria, Eusebius of Caesarea, Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory Nazianzen, and John Chrysostom. Indeed, vocabulary, grammar, and style make it doubtful that the book could have been put into its present form by the same persons responsible for the fourth gospel. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1373)"

"Four times the author identifies himself as John (1:1,4,9; 22:8).....In the third century, however, an African bishop named Dionysius compared the language, style and thought of the Apocalypse (Revelation) with that of the other writings of John and decided that the book could not been written by the apostle of John. He suggested that the author was a certain John the Presbyter, whose name appears elsewhere in ancient writings. Although many today follow Dionysius in his view of authorship, the external evidence seems overwhelmingly supportive of the traditional view. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1922)"

Again, we don't know who wrote the Book of Revelation. It is certainly highly doubtful that it was written by Apostle John. The Theologians and Historians of the NIV Bible seem to agree with the invalidity of this book from the above quote. So are you now going to consider the other John's words as the Words and Inspirations of GOD Almighty?

As we see, the style of writing in the book of Revelation is different from the books that are believed to be from John which are the Gospel of John, 1 John, 2 John and 3 John. The book of Revelation's style seems to be closer to John the Presbyter's writings. This man is known in ancient writings. There are also many Christian theologians today that hold the same view about the falsety of the book of Revelation.

Isn't this sufficient enough to prove that the book is doubtful?

Notice that in the sections of "Gospel of John" and "Gospels of 1, 2 & 3 John" above, the author did not identify himself and it was ASSUMED without actual proofs that it was Saint John who wrote them. Notice how they said that if he were to identify himself, then it would be hard for them to explain it.

Now, notice the author in the Book of Revelation does identify himself as John, but he has a complete different language and style of writing from the other books, which created much uncertainty about its validity in the Church.

My questions here are: Who wrote the Books? And is or is not Saint John supposed to identify himself in his books? And where are his books that have his name on them?

Again, keep in mind that the NT was not even documented on paper until 150 to 300 years after Jesus (depending on what Christian you talk to). So the dating is way too long for us to be assuming books to belong to certain people. Let alone considering their nonsense (contents) as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.

Please visit: Jesus the "Alpha and Omega". Not only this quote doesn't prove Jesus as GOD, but it was also written in a book that is unreliable in later bibles. In the original Bibles, the quote doesn't even exist!!

False and failed Prophecies about the Hour put in the mouth of Jesus in the books of Mark, Luke and Revelation in the New Testament.

Arche of the Creation of God as Alpha and Omega. The "Alpha and Omega" doesn't even exist in the original Bibles! It's a lie that was later inserted by trinitarians. See the historical proofs in the article. If their site is down, then you can read the article at this link ON MY SITE.

According to the documentary film, the apocalypse was very popular among Christians during the 2nd century. They believed "it was spiritually inspired" by GOD Almighty to Saint Peter. They actually had doubts about "John's apocalypse", which is known today as "the Book of Revelation". Interestingly also, this apocalypse says that after GOD Almighty fills both Heaven and Hell with inhabitants from Mankind, and the people of Hell get tortured for a long period of time, the People of Heaven will ask and Pray to GOD Almighty to Forgive the people of Hell. GOD Almighty will then eventually listen to their Prayers, and will order the "Gates and the Steel Bars of Hell" to be opened and allow the people of Hell to enter Heaven for Good. This apocalypse of Peter seems to also perfectly fit Noble Verse 7:40 in the Noble Quran where Allah Almighty Promised that He will eventually open the Gates of Heaven to all disbelievers and empty Hell. Please visit: Hell will eventually be empty according to Islam.

The Book of Revelation is a very important, probably the most important Book in the Bible today, because it has prophecies in it of what Christians believe is for our future today, even though it has nothing to do with our current world. It talks about Jesus soon (1800 to 2000 years ago) will return (Revelation 22:7). I don't know how soon is 2000 years to the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). All the people that this book was told to had died.

It also talks about the great battle of Gog and Magog fighting the righteous; "and will go out to deceive the nations in the four corners of the earth [The earth DOES NOT have four corners and no the earth is not a square or rectangle. It is round almost like an egg!!]--Gog and Magog--to gather them for battle. In number they are like the sand on the seashore. (From the NIV Bible, Revelation 20:8)"

The thing that we need to notice here beside the grave error about the shape of the earth in this false book (sorry to say that), is that the Gog and Magog existed before. Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal (Ezekiel 39:1), is the name of the leader and Magog is the name of his nation (Ezekiel 38 and 39). The Gog and Magog army had already been defeated and the Noble Quran confirms their story. There had been historical discoveries that perfectly match the Noble Quran's claims regarding the Gog and Magog, such as the discovery of the "Iron Gates", and other literature that mentions the Gog and Magog army and location. There is even historical documentation about them which matches the Noble Quran in London, England.

Please visit The story of Gog and Magog and the Iron Gates in the Noble Quran and the Bible to see the references and proofs of these historical discoveries and several more.

The Bible says: The earth is flat! See all the verses in the Bible that claim the earth is flat.

It is a common Christian answer to say "We support Israel because it is God's promised land to the Jews, and He will prevail them against the army of Gog and Magog who seems to be mainly an Islamic army today." They mostly rely on the Book of Revelation from the Bible to support this claim.

The story of the Gog and Magog army attacking the Jews exists in both the Book of Ezekiel and the Book of Revelation in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). The Book of Ezekiel which came literally thousands of years before the Book of Revelation predicted the attack and defeat of the army of Gog and Magog.

The Noble Quran (The Muslims' Holy Scripture) talks about the army of Gog and Magog in details and explains the events that ALREADY took place. As I mentioned above, there had been historical discoveries that perfectly match the Noble Quran's claims regarding the Gog and Magog, such as the discovery of the "Iron Gates", and other literature that mentions the Gog and Magog army and location.

Please visit The army of Gog and Magog and the Iron Gates in the Noble Quran and the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

The lie (sorry to say that) of the Book of Revelation, however, also predicts the coming of the army of Gog and Magog. But as I said, the army of Gog and Magog were ALREADY predicted in the Bible thousands of years before the Book of Revelation.

So, the prediction in the Book of Revelation proves that the writer of the book, lacked a great deal of knowledge about history, because as I said, the event of the Gog and Magog battle (i.e., the battle of Armageddon) already happened!

The point is that the Book of Revelation, however, like most of the Bible today seems to be nothing but a big hoax (sorry to say that). It is very doubtful, but yet ironically, very important to the Christians of today.

Would you honestly deep inside yourself call nonsense of this kind the True Living Words of GOD Almighty, especially after knowing that very important early Christian resources thought "the book could not been written by the apostle of John"?

Please visit What parts of the Bible do Muslims believe in?

Oxymoron Trinity [1]:

Jesus is the resurrection (John 11:25), but yet does not know when the Hour of the resurrection will come (Matthew 24:36) [1], and he had to cry, weep and beg GOD to resurrect Lazarus back to life. And this proves he is our Creator? And how is he exactly The Resurrection? Could Jesus and the disciples honestly even resurrect or create a fly on their own? This is one of the Glorious Quran's challenges to the polytheists from mankind who insist on deifying flesh and blood, dust and water, and idols. All are helpless. All are worthless when compared to Allah Almighty.

In the OT, Elisha and many others also raised the dead:

2 Kings 4
32 Elisha arrived at the woman’s house and went straight to his room, where he saw the boy’s body on his bed.
33 He walked in, shut the door, and prayed to the Lord.
34 Then he got on the bed and stretched out over the dead body, with his mouth on the boy’s mouth, his eyes on his eyes, and his hand on his hands. As he lay there, the boy’s body became warm.
35 Elisha got up and walked back and forth in the room, then he went back and leaned over the boy’s body. The boy sneezed seven times and opened his eyes.
36 Elisha called out to Gehazi, “Have the boy’s mother come here.” Gehazi did, and when she was at the door, Elisha said, “You can take your son.”
37 She came in and bowed down at Elisha’s feet. Then she picked up her son and left.

Is Elisha and others like him now our Creator?

John 5:30 "I cannot do anything on my own."

And Jesus could not determine who gets to sit on his right and on his left in Heaven. Only GOD alone decides this, Jesus said. Visit also:

Bible's problematic hyperboles. Jesus has, for example, caused Christians to eat pork, and they're now even the world's biggest pork consumers. But a closer look at the text reveals that he never allowed it and could never even DARE to violate GOD Almighty by allowing it.

The last two chapters of the book of Isaiah make an End of Time Prophecy about the evil and immoral ones who will be pork (pig's meat) eaters.

The Bible has ample problems with its hyperbole and excessive confusing metaphoric language, to a point where we don't know what Jesus actually means, and it has made lawful things sinful and sinful things lawful. Interestingly, people in the NT called Jesus a fat drunk, because they observed him drinking too much wine (alcohol) and eating too much. He was a "gluttonous, and a winebibber" (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34) [1] [2]. This could've played a major role in the nonsensical language that he was uttering left and right. Only Allah Almighty Knows best.

Ample more examples are given in the link above.

Muslims honor the Virgin Birth:

We Muslims believe in the virgin birth of Isa Al-Maseeh, from our mother Mariam, peace be upon them both. We also believe Isa performed many Miracles. In fact, it was the Christians who doubted the virgin birth. Islam came to cement it. But Isa (eesa) was nonetheless a creation of GOD Almighty, and a slave of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Even the Old Testament calls Jesus "Slave of GOD":

Islam cemented the virgin birth of Jesus! Christians doubted it. Christian scholars admit this.

Isa (Jesus), the Islamic Messiah and creation of Allah Almighty, is NOT our Creator:

Jesus, in the Bible, said he does not know when the Hour will come, only GOD alone Knows, Jesus said.

Jesus said if he bears witness of himself he would be a liar.

Jesus prostrated on his face and prayed and begged GOD all night long to save him from crucifixion.

Is Jesus greater than Adam? NT says no.

Jesus was called slave of GOD in Old Testament.

If Jesus was GOD questions.

None of Jesus' Miracles were unique in the Bible (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

Trinity Crucified! 100s of verses thoroughly destroy the trinity lie.

The Fly's Digestive Miracle - Mentioned in the Holy Quran and Confirmed by Science!

Is Jesus greater than Adam?  NT says no.

Sun Chips Blasphemies:

Jesus said Prophets are Servants, Jesus is the Son.  But the Old Testament thoroughly calls Jesus the slave of GOD [1] and who also fears GOD.  Yes indeed, the Islamic Isa (eesa) is the Messiah. This is his special sonship. He is also the Lord of his Mansion, which has twelve thrones or fruits [2]. He is more than a mere Jewish Rasul (Prophet) in this regard. That's the limit of his sonship. Otherwise, it is sun chips! There is nothing GODly about him. He is not our Creator. With all of his glory and might, he still remains a mere abd (slave) of GOD [1] as all sons of GOD were also called slaves of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).  See also:

Sons of GOD in the Glorious Quran. They are "....no more than servants raised to honor. (The Noble Quran, 21:26)".

Oxymoron Trinity.

Again, could "Jesus" and the disciples honestly even resurrect or create a fly on their own? This is one of the Glorious Quran's challenges to the polytheists from mankind who insist on deifying flesh and blood, dust and water, and idols. All are helpless. All are worthless when compared to Allah Almighty.

Sun Chips oxymoron: The polytheist trinitarian pagans' oxymoron here is that they're making a sun chips out of Islam's Prophet-Isa's sacred Messiahship and special sonship ("no more than servants raised to honour") with their blasphemies of inflating him with hot air and making him the Creator of the Universe.

What is Islam?

What is Islam?

How and Why do I convert to Islam?

How do I convert a non-Muslim to Islam?

Other:

www.answering-christianity.com/arabs_no_longer_jews_dogs.htm (according to Jesus)

https://www.answering-christianity.com/east.htm (Matthew 24:25-27: Jesus will return as an Arab from Syria)